Women Would Vote for Hitler
A woman voting on anything other than American Idol or her personal favorite type of chocolate is like watching a small child run full speed into a wall. Clearly the fundamentals are understood. The child runs, it’s going somewhere and there’s no doubt about that. The child can run. But very quickly one comes to the understanding that somewhere, somehow, the process has been perverted. Then comes the wall. Then comes the crying.
Women would vote for Hitler. Not because a woman could be talked into buying a catsup Popsicle while she was wearing white gloves, but because women are all fascists.
Don’t believe me? Let’s leave the constant threat of castration out of it for the moment. That makes it a slam dunk in my book, but that’s fine. Women are just “joking” whenever they play fascism card #1.
How about oppressive dictatorship by force or threat of violence?
Anyone who’s married will tell you a lot of things. The first of which will be, “Don’t get fucking married for any reason you dumb shit.” But a likely secondary is that marriage is not a democracy. What is it then?
Marriage is a fascist dictatorship of oppression — and so is any relationship with a woman. Work, professional, “professional”; they’re all the same. If you don’t like the flavor of the Kool-Aid and you want to add some mix, prepare to have a wailing siren of bullshit go off in your ear. That’s assault and that’s oppression. That’s enforcing your opinion through the threat of violence. If you press the issue, prepare to receive the threat of withheld friendship — or even sex whether it’s applicable or not! There was another man who pulled the same kind of shit. Yep, Hitler.
The biggest women/fascism link is a woman’s reliance on violence. Women will be the first to hit during any kind of dispute. It’s not even a percentage. It’s as much of a guarantee as it is that the sun will rise tomorrow. And as men we can all understand that the sun rises because it’s actually a star that our planet rotates around, therefore it is guaranteed to rise. We are able to remove ourselves from our personal point of view and understand that the sun isn’t rising at all. It’s actually us who are spinning around the sun. Women don’t even fucking know that.
Every morning when a woman wakes up at the crack of 10:30 she’s thrilled to shit to see that the sun’s in the sky again and her fake orange tan will look just as radiant as it did yesterday. That’s one of the biggest reasons why women shouldn’t vote. They don’t know fucking anything about anything. They know nothing.
But that’s not why women would vote for Hitler if given the chance. Say what you want about the merits of an individual ethos of governments as you will. You’re all men and therefore deserve the right to express opinion unmitigated by slander or censure. What I’m saying is that by an intrinsic party affiliation — fascist — all women would check the box marked ‘Kill Or Savagely Beat Anyone Who Doesn’t Agree With Me’. That fact has always held women back more than any mythical glass ceiling.
Related Articles:
December 10th, 2005 at 7:12 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5920bfbf4eac8
Translation: “He found someone better” YAWN…
December 10th, 2005 at 8:05 pm - IP Man-Hash: 8dd3dc862afae
You’re lucky men don’t live by the same principle’s, Female, or else all women would be muted at birth.
That’s morbid and disgusting and you’re awful for proposing it.
-Dick
December 10th, 2005 at 8:40 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7b3045c12f605
Check your inbox dick.
December 10th, 2005 at 8:55 pm - IP Man-Hash: d2e61781345f3
Dick, did you ever wonder why these feminasties want to stifle free speech ? Did you ever question the motivation behind “people” like female ?
I mean look at yourself for instance, you are running an awesome website that promotes debate and lets the flames fly, instead of being a girly man moderator like female is proposing you should do to folks.
So what is it that they fear so much ? Truth, honesty, valor, ethics ? I feel they are deeply afraid of their little leech and parasite show coming to an early end, because they promote no real values to society, and they are anti-life females that are a danger to our whole way of living.
Jane Fonda, Shirley Maclaine, Oprah Winfrey, Katie Couric, do you think any of these popular female figures would have a no BS discussion with you ? I don’t think so, because you cannot fight reality with illogical untruths.
Just look at female grasping at straws ! I have seen some pathetic neurotic females in my day, but female is making me think maybe Janet Reno had a daughter that no one knew about.
She’s next on the list to send people to places like Waco because maybe they think they are Jesus, or think differently than Big Sister feminasties want you to think.
Like the Bible said, “It is easier for a camel to jump through the eye of a needle, than for a woman to enter the kingdom of God”.
And that I do earnestly believe Dick, at least based on my own personal experiences with this assholish demented generation of post 60’s “modern” females. I want my refund now :) LOL !!!
Really though the way these crazy whores are acting is not funny at all, but an abomination that needs to be met head on. Maybe we could do like the sand apes, and beat any busybody feminists in the public squares with rubber police hoses, then force them to be branded and wear burkhas as a punishment :)
That’ll roast those bitches goats for sure !
December 10th, 2005 at 9:03 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7b3045c12f605
Haven’t you fucked off yet? Sheesh. Stop stalking me asshole.
December 10th, 2005 at 9:15 pm - IP Man-Hash: d2e61781345f3
OK Margaret Ray, whatever you say. Now you can go and eat your meal of scat and vegetables :)
December 11th, 2005 at 10:05 am - IP Man-Hash: 8dd3dc862afae
It’s certainly true that the only people to suggest censorship on this site are women. Nicole and Female constantly, and around half of the women who make passing comments. It’s alarming. If women had it their way, you’d be locked in prison or castrated for simply having a different opinion.
-Dick
December 11th, 2005 at 11:02 am - IP Man-Hash: aa524eb129acd
I never suggested that those who can’t comply with the criteria I determine should be culled.
December 12th, 2005 at 3:16 am - IP Man-Hash: dc6df4d5c25ad
That’s probably because you lack imagination and conviction. In the interests of the majority, quality of life and for the sake of the planet, and therefore all life, some sacrifices do have to be made. You’d best fast-track your emotional growth.
December 12th, 2005 at 11:44 am - IP Man-Hash: 957564b4aff6d
That is the most frightening thing I’ve ever seen you write, Female. Perhaps you need to spend more time reading about Hitler, Stalin, Lenin and others that thought “some sacrifices” had to be made.
December 13th, 2005 at 3:17 am - IP Man-Hash: 9efaeb2a8447e
You misinterpret my logic Arielle. My regime of culling will benefit all rational people everywhere as it removes those who are a malignant tumour on society. That is, people of apparently sound mind who are emotionally stunted and prejudiced against others based on completely irrational reasons. They do not help to keep society cohesive and therefore must go.
If you think wiping out this type of person is analogous to wiping out peasant farmers, the mentally ill, disabled, homosexuals, blacks and Jews, then you are the one who shows her prejudices, not me. I don’t care what your colour, religion, language or culture is, if you are a fuckwit, then you are a fuckwit pure and simple.
December 13th, 2005 at 4:13 am - IP Man-Hash: 30e38eb4b9c6e
Crazy cunt has spoken, YAWN…
December 13th, 2005 at 8:08 am - IP Man-Hash: d754ab99d7c00
Female said:
Creepy.
Really creepy.
Let’s take the case of a brilliant Jewish scientist, born in 1940, who survived the death camps, is emotionally scarred and stunted from his childhood experiences, irrationally hates Germans. You’ll have him put to death? Nice one, Female, nice one.
A 20 year old mentally retarded, emotionally stunted man who was beaten by his mother, and so irrationally fears and hates women. You’ll have him “culled”? Nice one, Female, nice one.
A rapidly aging 30-something woman who lacks the capacity to form true attachment bonds with other human beings, and is reduced to clinging to pseudo-science and astrology to redeem herself. You’ll have her “culled”? Why not?
You either see it or you don’t. Proposing mass extermination of “inferior” human beings is a road mankind has gone down before and it’s an ugly one.
What’s interesting is that feminists have repeatedly gone down this road before; they supported fascism in Germany, communism in Eurasia, and socialist eugenics in the US. (see Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood).
You come off as one of the most prejudiced and bigoted people on these boards. Even UP, who isn’t exactly a poster child for tolerance, simply wants to deport people he doesn’t like. You want to slaughter them.
Nice one, Female.
-wolfe.
December 13th, 2005 at 1:29 pm - IP Man-Hash: 60b660aafc3e4
She is just seeking everyone’s attention. She believes you deserve it because you dare to voice an opinion she doesn’t like. She - like many women of her ilk - just wants to control your opinions because it makes *her* feel secure. She has said as much in the forums and here. If she can’t convince you that you are wrong, she will just punish you by trollbaiting.
I don’t doubt she has strong feelings about these issues, but that is all the argument that she has.
Isn’t that right, female?
“That is, people of apparently sound mind who are emotionally stunted and prejudiced against others based on completely irrational reasons. They do not help to keep society cohesive and therefore must go.”
How typically controlling. Drunk on power, she’d exterminate everyone she hates. In her worldview, the individual serves the collective and the collective is ‘god’!
What hypocrisy that she speaks of people who are ‘emotionally stunted’! Female’s comment is dripping with insecurity! She needs a man that will make her feel safe. Unfortunately, she doesn’t like those kinds of men - so she will seek after ‘men’ who are nothing more than vaginas with legs.
December 13th, 2005 at 2:21 pm - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
Scathing! And well put.
-Dick
December 14th, 2005 at 1:19 am - IP Man-Hash: dc6df4d5c25ad
Grump, I think you need a man shag, soonish.
Many of you might be surprised to hear that my plans for world annielation and domination has a suggestion box. Imagine my delight when today I found a helpful comment, which I am now more than happy to share with you all in a slightly modified form.
After everyone takes the online emotional intelligence tests, the results and IP Hashes or whatevers get sent to a central databank. An automated second test then appears on each testees screen. This is the infamous prejudice test which will be so structured that liars will be caught out, so it isn’t ‘cheatable’. As soon as that test is finished, the central databank will start to work out which hash users are prejudiced and those who are not.
Nothing will happen at that time.
Thinking they are safe and it was just another government census, peeps will carry on their merry ways. But, sometime in the next week or so, once it becomes known who is fucked in the head and who isn’t, a strategic covert co-op mission will be launched. During the night, an army of panda bears will parachute from planes all over the earth. These pandas, being specifically trained at Westpoint Military Academy, under the direction of whothefuckeverisinchargethere are not your average pandas. Non docile, large, and hungry for bamboo, which they have not had since leaving China, they will show you no mercy. Cute death! I can’t wait.
December 14th, 2005 at 5:38 am - IP Man-Hash: 3f6f1bc89c9c0
If you want it done correctly it will be a man.
You are a good example of the average woman, not being able to think more than 2 steps ahead when planning anything.
January 8th, 2006 at 10:28 am - IP Man-Hash: f219c5c32bba2
You’re a really funny guy. Emotional intelligence…that’s a good one.
January 10th, 2006 at 10:09 pm - IP Man-Hash: 2afdb477a0884
Female said:
You misinterpret my logic Arielle. My regime of culling will benefit all rational people everywhere as it removes those who are a malignant tumour on society. That is, people of apparently sound mind who are emotionally stunted and prejudiced against others based on completely irrational reasons. They do not help to keep society cohesive and therefore must go.
If you think wiping out this type of person is analogous to wiping out peasant farmers, the mentally ill, disabled, homosexuals, blacks and Jews, then you are the one who shows her prejudices, not me. I don’t care what your colour, religion, language or culture is, if you are a fuckwit, then you are a fuckwit pure and simple.
-God save me from people that think like you, of course
January 10th, 2006 at 10:38 pm - IP Man-Hash: 2afdb477a0884
Female said:
You misinterpret my logic Arielle. My regime of culling will benefit all rational people everywhere as it removes those who are a malignant tumour on society. That is, people of apparently sound mind who are emotionally stunted and prejudiced against others based on completely irrational reasons. They do not help to keep society cohesive and therefore must go.
If you think wiping out this type of person is analogous to wiping out peasant farmers, the mentally ill, disabled, homosexuals, blacks and Jews, then you are the one who shows her prejudices, not me. I don’t care what your colour, religion, language or culture is, if you are a fuckwit, then you are a fuckwit pure and simple.
-God save me from people that think like you, of course you would be Judge,Jury, and Executioner? And you would never have to be subjected to trial or the summary execution would you? This is the problem with ideologies such as this, there are many people that could be considered “socially incohesive” depending on your definition, which is always up for grabs. Take the radical feminist view advocating the reduction of the male population of the planet to 10% of its current level. What they fail to mention is that that would mean the eradication of over 3-4 billion people. In fact I personally think that its the people that espouse this hateful bullshit that are the problem. They are quick to denounce others, in order to take the attention from their own inadequecies.