Women Would Vote for Hitler
A woman voting on anything other than American Idol or her personal favorite type of chocolate is like watching a small child run full speed into a wall. Clearly the fundamentals are understood. The child runs, it’s going somewhere and there’s no doubt about that. The child can run. But very quickly one comes to the understanding that somewhere, somehow, the process has been perverted. Then comes the wall. Then comes the crying.
Women would vote for Hitler. Not because a woman could be talked into buying a catsup Popsicle while she was wearing white gloves, but because women are all fascists.
Don’t believe me? Let’s leave the constant threat of castration out of it for the moment. That makes it a slam dunk in my book, but that’s fine. Women are just “joking” whenever they play fascism card #1.
How about oppressive dictatorship by force or threat of violence?
Anyone who’s married will tell you a lot of things. The first of which will be, “Don’t get fucking married for any reason you dumb shit.” But a likely secondary is that marriage is not a democracy. What is it then?
Marriage is a fascist dictatorship of oppression — and so is any relationship with a woman. Work, professional, “professional”; they’re all the same. If you don’t like the flavor of the Kool-Aid and you want to add some mix, prepare to have a wailing siren of bullshit go off in your ear. That’s assault and that’s oppression. That’s enforcing your opinion through the threat of violence. If you press the issue, prepare to receive the threat of withheld friendship — or even sex whether it’s applicable or not! There was another man who pulled the same kind of shit. Yep, Hitler.
The biggest women/fascism link is a woman’s reliance on violence. Women will be the first to hit during any kind of dispute. It’s not even a percentage. It’s as much of a guarantee as it is that the sun will rise tomorrow. And as men we can all understand that the sun rises because it’s actually a star that our planet rotates around, therefore it is guaranteed to rise. We are able to remove ourselves from our personal point of view and understand that the sun isn’t rising at all. It’s actually us who are spinning around the sun. Women don’t even fucking know that.
Every morning when a woman wakes up at the crack of 10:30 she’s thrilled to shit to see that the sun’s in the sky again and her fake orange tan will look just as radiant as it did yesterday. That’s one of the biggest reasons why women shouldn’t vote. They don’t know fucking anything about anything. They know nothing.
But that’s not why women would vote for Hitler if given the chance. Say what you want about the merits of an individual ethos of governments as you will. You’re all men and therefore deserve the right to express opinion unmitigated by slander or censure. What I’m saying is that by an intrinsic party affiliation — fascist — all women would check the box marked ‘Kill Or Savagely Beat Anyone Who Doesn’t Agree With Me’. That fact has always held women back more than any mythical glass ceiling.
Related Articles:
Pages: [106] 105 104 103 102 101 100 99 98 97 96 … 1 » Show All
Dear Dick,
I would like to reply to your youtube videos that I have come across. I would post a reply there, but I have way too much to say to fit their character limit. So here I am. My name is Rachel and I am 17 years old. I am not sending this in order for you to reply to it with snide remarks and witty comments. This is just a thought. In my years of high school I have learned about many women inventors. For example: Marie Curie,Ada Lovelace, Grace Hopper,Tabitha Babbitt, Anna Connelly, Maria Beaseley, Ida Forbes, Mary Walton, Sarah Mather, Margaret Knight, Mary Anderson, Ann Moore: all of these women created things that all people including men use today
Also if one of your arguments is that Jesus was a man therefore men are superior, all throughout the Bible it says that men were created in the image of God and yes men are referred to as the head of the household. They are to lead the family in all it’s decisions. Their wives should trust their judgment. Now I am assuming that (and have heard many sermons about) the man having the knowledge and integrity to do the right thing in every situation. God trusted men with the responsibility to lead and to ask for counsel. Women had nothing but an opinion in that day and age. But God created the woman for a reason. Women are the comforters and the child bearers. Women create a completely different point of view for men to learn about.
1 Peter 3:7
“Husbands, in the same way be considerate as you live with your wives, and treat them with respect as the weaker partner and as heirs with you of the gracious gift of life, so that nothing will hinder your prayers.”
Women are weak. Women are meant to be weak. Men are the soldiers and women are the comforters. That’s the way it was meant to be. Without women, there would be no life. Women CREATE men. They RAISE their sons to be men.
If your argument is about whose fault it was in the Garden of Eden, then I agree that it was the woman’s fault, but I disagree if you say that the man had no fault. The man, being the head of the household and the decision maker in the relationship, should have had the guts to say no to Eve and to correct her in her wrongs and help her to understand. Adam did not do this. Adam joined in.
The problem is not who should be considered a greater sex, the problem is that neither of the sexes truly respect the other as they were meant to be respected. How can you say that men do not get the respect from women that they deserve when you insult them and treat them like animals. I cannot make you change your views and I am not expecting you to take this with sincerity but before you go and make outragous claims about how women are all the same, how women are all whores and only care about money, please do your research. If you want to make the impact you say you want to make, it would help if you knew what you were talking about. This is not an insult to you in any way. This is a mere argument. Think what you want of it.
-Rachel
Now only if more women were smart enough to type this much.
http://www.antimisandry.com
You’ll better off going there instead or lurking the forum here. In the comments section you’ll just be covered up by a lot of girls who make your gender look bad. And Just think of Dick as another Maddox, he usually has a point, he just says it as bluntly as possible.
Also, wasn’t Curie a Nazi?
The phrase “generous woman” is an oxymoron. Because women are naturally selfish, there is no such thing as a woman who is generous. Generosity and the state of being a woman do not mix.
In my country, our newspaper voted for the nazi party… and it was run by MEN.
In all respect I am of the male gender, but when the crazy Emo Bastard formerly known as Dick Masterston complains about women, it makes me think…
That he is him self, the enity of Hitler
I think you may be onto something. Emo… that’s witty. To be called Emo is bad enough, Bastard is superfluous imho. “The American Emo”, maybe? That would be a great title for a song.
http://www.luv-emo.com/emo-jokes.html
These days I am always content and satisfied with women instead of disappointed .
Women are cum dumps.
Nothing else.
Yeah Chris, it sounds like viewing women that way, and presumably treating women as such, is making you really happy. That really explains why you’re on this site bitching about women every five minutes.
Your attitude is the lowest of the low. Enjoy that, I’m sure it’ll work out well for you when you are an old, lonely, bitter man, having sex with your pet dog.
It might not make him happy but it probably hurts women, which is crucial.
It’d only hurt them temporarily as I doubt many would go back for seconds. Meanwhile, he’s permanently angry and has to be constantly hunting for his next score. By the amount of his anger, I don’t think is batting average can be all that great. He doesn’t want to spend any money on sex, so that rules out prostitutes, and dating, which leads to the conclusion that he only bags skanks…and then wonders why they aren’t quality women bwahahaha.
But there aren’t any quality women in the Anglosphere. That is his whole point.
No, I think the real issue is that there aren’t any quality for him, because he himself isn’t quality, yet he doesn’t want to change himself. He has the entitlement mentality. He expects to get himself a quality woman when he has a repulsive attitude towards women. In short, he’s a fool.
Actually, It may surprise you to know that I attended the finest private schools and am an EXPERT in treating women perfectly.
But I am not interested in “treating women PERFECTLY” in my personal relationships with them . . . .I am only interested in treating women PROPERLY.
THERE ARE ONLY TWO WAYS TO TREAT WOMEN.
1. PERFECTLY –>> The way SHE wants all the time.
and . . .
2. PROPERLY –>> According to HER OWN BEHAVIOR.
Women don’t DESERVE to be treated the way they want all the time. They don’t even deserve to be treated the way they want SOME of the time.
ALL WOMEN SHOULD BE TREATED ACCORDING TO THEIR OWN BEHAVIOR, ALL THE TIME.
Many women (especially attractive women) will usually HATE that statement. Why? Are they trying to get away with shitty behavior?
That’s not an asshole thing to say.
That’s a perfectly REASONABLE thing to say.
YOUR (female) behavior is an abomination on this website. And you BLAME and ACCUSE men for “treating you badly” or talking down to you?
You must be joking.
You will get exactly what you ask for.
Fuck you dry in the ass without spitting for going where you don’t belong, were never invited, and are not welcome.
MEN ARE NOT REQUIRED TO TREAT YOU WELL.
THAT IS A PRIVILEGE YOU MUST —->> EARN.
That fact that you don’t think so,
is the reason women are miserable failures in their relationships and marriages FOR LIFE.
Menarebetterthanwomen.
Is your caps key stuck? If not, we’ll just assume that you were poorly educated at your private schools when you were taught that shouting is a key persuasive tool of successful people.
I do tend to get what I ask for, because I have no problem in communicating to normal men, how I expect to be treated if they wish to enjoy my company. If they cannot abide by normal, civil behavior, then I cut associating with them in quick time. Smart men, learn. Fools, don’t and then they rant.
Yes you go ahead and ASSUME all you like. I wasn’t shouting at you. I WAS TYPING IN CAPS, YOU STUPID CUNT.
Pull yourself together.
“Normal” men?
I am definitely not one of those. “Normal” is just the 1/2 way point between WHAT YOU WANT, and WHAT YOU CAN GET.
Aim higher, I say.
Why don’t you?
“Normal” isn’t in my vocabulary.
I am only interested in the exceptional.
But if “normal” is your goal in life,
then by all means feel free.
——” I have no problem in communicating to normal men, how I expect to be treated if they wish to enjoy my company. If they cannot abide by normal, civil behavior, then I cut associating with them in quick time. “—–
EXCELLENT. WHY DON’T YOU JUST FUCK OFF AND DIE YOU STUPID CUNT BECAUSE NOONE WANTS YOU HERE.
MEN ARE NOT REQUIRED TO DO OR SAY ANYTHING FOR YOUR APPROVAL. HOW HARD DOES THAT HAVE TO BE HAMMERED INTO YOUR CUNTING SKULLS.?
Snap out of it.
Menarebetterthanwomen.
Well if what she said about herself was true, she will never be back. Nicely done. If only every woman would “cut associating with men in quick time” when they get treated like shit.
But that’s the best way to get laid.
No wonder men don’t respect women.
Bravo, Chris.
Thanks man.
My favorite part was when she said:
“How (she) EXPECTS to get treated”.
EXPECTS to get treated.
EXPECTS to get treated.
How can any woman EXPECT to get treated with any common courtesy or every day politeness when she barges into where she is not welcome or invited and men aren’t in a fucking word she has to say?
Men don’t EXPECT a fucking thing.
Only women do.
They are actually offended when men don’t give a shit about their EXPECTATIONS.
When will they learn.
Menarebetterthanwomen.
If a woman came into a man’s home, website or establishment when he merely doesn’t want her there, the only thing she should “expect” - is to be thrown out on her ass and treated like garbage.
What a fucking miserable attention whore.
Chris, you fucking idiot, typing in caps is the e-version of shouting at people. You really should learn the idiom of the medium you are attempting to work in. You are an expert in whining, and nothing more.
STARCK, you keep calling this place your home. Sad. But not surprising.
The thing is, even if he was into dogs, he picked the dog over girls like you. Really, how does it feel to be so worthless that even beastiality sounds better than a relationship with you?
It is true i am a woman, however it is false that I am relationship challenged or sex-deprived, as all the men on this site are. But please, so keep talking your crap, the rest of us are getting a very good laugh out of you.
Don’t worry it’s mutual. Seeing you girls assume things and rant all day to cover your own issues is amazing entertainment. Nice cover up of his rejection of you by the way, calling him a dog-fucker. Real mature and classy, kiddo.
lolz, there was no rejection of me Arbalest, as my post about his future relationship with his canine, was my very first post on this site. However, had he rejected me, I would be more than happy about that, I wouldn’t settle for anything less.
To Arbalest: “his rejection of you” - why, that sounds very conceited! But you humor me, so keep it up.
I read this: “all women deserve to be murdered”, and more of this kind of idiotry.
Then, how should we reproduce ourselves? Don’t be stupid and answer “cloning”, because we are still far from able to clone organisms without them being oversensitive to diseases and deformings.
Women are actually necessary, love it or hate it. That they’re not entirely capable to do what men can do, does not mean they don’t have their function.
We individually don’t need women, but mankind does.
Well –>> I didn’t say it, but how is saying “ALL WOMEN DESERVE TO BE MURDERED” any different from saying “ALL WOMEN DESERVE TO BE RESPECTED, WORSHIPPED AND ADORED”
Both are clearly FALSE.
But only one will get you thunderous applause.
Except here is a VERY interesting point…..
If you tell a woman “ALL WOMEN DESERVE TO BE RESPECTED, WORSHIPPED AND ADORED”, many women will smile, tell you how sweet that is to say, and then they will go out with OTHER men who would never be caught saying that in a million years. (like ME).
Fascinating isn’t it . . . . .
Tell them something SICK, TWISTED and DISGUSTING
and they will keep cumming back to you for more and MORE attention.
Tell them something nice, and sweet and they will walk away from men like that.
THAT’S *EXACTLY* WHY WOMEN DON’T *DESERVE* A FUCKING THING… INCLUDING RESPECT.
Menarebetterthanwomen.
I don’t even need to find the bluehairs.
We’ve got a B-I-N-G-O right here.
“Frailty, thy name is woman,” declared Hamlet, the most existential of Shakespearean protagonists, upon his mother Gertrude’s swift remarriage to the new king, Claudius. And of course, he was more than simply being accurate here because women are both frail in mind and body.
It is obvious that the female is considerably less developed along physiological lines when compared with the male. She has lesser muscle mass and upper body strength than the male and is therefore not suited to repetitive, hard labour. Her lung capacity is significantly smaller than the male and she has a much greater physical sensitivity to pain.
The human female also manifests a greater susceptibility to diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, cardiovascular disease, various forms of cancer and numerous other ailments of a minor nature such as fibromyalgia and rheumatoid arthritis. The ease through which sexually transmitted diseases are readily passed on to the female has been readily noted because of the fact that the woman receives the ejaculate of the male within the cavity of her vagina and not vice versa. Some sexually transmitted diseases, such as Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) which leads to malignant tumor growth and cervical cancer, only infect females.
Actually, dimwit, women have more stamina, are more pain tolerant and studies (done by men) have linked testosterone to immune system suppression and found that males experience more bouts of disease and are responsible for more disease transmission than females. There is a specific Penn State study if you require a reference.
Cervical cancer will of course affect more women, because, you fucking idiot, men don’t have cervixes. Your contention is akin to my gloating that only men are affected by prostate cancer.
And how about heart disease? Is it a physiological flaw that causes so many more men to be afflicted with heart disease, or are you too fucking stupid to eat a salad once in a while?
How about reading and thinking about what you pick up and post piece-meal from the web instead of just assuming it’s correct because “it’s on the web”.
You deserve to have your jaw dislocated for deliberately twisting the truth, you HIV-infected cunt with a microencephalic skull. How can women be more tolerant of pain, when only men perform the most dangerous and strenuous of physical activities, such as mining, sanitation, and going to war? How can women have more stamina than men, when only men are the ones capable of performing feats of physical strength and gymnastic ability? As a matter of fact, the overwhelming majority of women are biologically inferior weaklings who cannot endure pain for more than a few minutes. Furthermore, no woman, in the entire history of human evolution, has ever been able to exceed any man in physical strength or flexibility. Only somebody as severely mentally deficient as yourself would not be able to grasp a fact as rudimentary as that.
Vag, I could easily snap both of your arms like twigs and you would be screaming for hours on end, then I would have to snap your neck with my bare hands in order to shut you up. Don’t you dare spread lies about women being able to endure pain, you frigid cunt, because most women burst into tears when exposed to the merest sensation, such as that of a pinprick.
And here’s a thought: men acquire disease through building civilization and exploring the outer reaches of human consciousness. In other words, male susceptibility to disease is solely due to the fact that men are constantly being pushed to the limits of their physiology, whereas women acquire disease by remaining in a state of complete inertia, in the process of doing and accomplishing absolutely nothing. Yet why do women remain susceptible to disease even though they have contributed virtually nothing to the course of human civilization and culture for untold millenia? This is because women are both biologically and intellectually inferior to men or, in Shakespeare’s words, “frail”.
Aren’t women always complaining about dyspareunia and dysmenorrhea? Isn’t it only women who experience severe pain during intercourse? If women can tolerate pain so well, then why do so many of them cry to their gynaecologists about painful intercourse or a painful menustruation? Is it not a statistical fact that women run to the doctor with much greater frequency than men? There is no such thing as a woman who can tolerate as much pain as a man. Is it any wonder that so many of these frigid cunts hate sex and can’t stand their own bodies?
Men does those jobs because they’re not smart enough to get a proper job.
I’ve heard that some women feel pain during sex with some men, and I assume that it’s because some men just don’t know what they’re doing. Personally, I’ve never met any of these women. Apparently you have - I wonder why.
Women go to the doctor more frequently than men because [a] they have enough sense to take care of things before they go to far, thereby relieving the eventual much greater cost to the healthcare system, and [b] men are scared. Have you listened to a man with the flu? You would think they were dying. It’s really pathetic.
Oh, had to add, the only people I’ve ever met who complained about painful sex were two men, who whined about their backs. Why, I don’t know - they were both lazy and did nothing all day.
@Magnolia- Just because a man does a manual labor sort of job doesn’t mean he isn’t smart- just saying…
Gents - just ignore VAGNOLIA she’s a fucking retard who will say and post anything for attention. She can’t get men to pay attention - or listen - to her in the real world, so she cums here WHERE SHE IS NOT WELCOME OR INVITED because that’s as close as she can cum to men without us PUKING.
Who begins a sentence with “Men does …”.
Furthermore….
>>> “I’ve heard that some women feel pain during sex with some men, and I assume that it’s because some men just don’t know what they’re doing.” <<<
Only a WOMAN would think what she “HEARD” is true.
And furthermore, what kind of idiot cunt would say “men don’t know what they are doing” . . . .
DON’T WORRY, WE KNOW WHAT WE’RE DOING.
WE ARE POUNDING YOUR PUSSY AND ASSHOLE,
AND THROATING YOUR FACE.
What part of that suggests that “men don’t know what they are doing”?
If WOMEN knew what they were doing, they would be grateful that MEN paid them that COMPLIMENT.
But women think men are supposed to:
GIVE HER WHATEVER SHE WANTS IN BED TOO.
You selfish American Cunts are unbelievable.
You expect a man to PAY and take you out, and show you a good time, be nice to you, respect you, listen to you, talk to you, understand you, hold you, dance with you, ask if there is anything at all that he can do for you . . . .
. . . . and then he is supposed to CARE if he meets your fucking standards IN BED too????????????????
Fuck You.
Menarebetterthanwomen.
They also earn a lot. Deep-sea welders earn more than old Magnolia there, in her pink collar sinecure - a lot, lot more. They earn more in a month than most ‘professionals’ earn in a year.
@Sushi - actually, that is completely true and I agree 100%. Personally, I prefer a blue collar guy. I am just responding in kind to ol’ Cappy, there. For some reason that dim-witted lunatic just brings out the cantankerous in me.
On the women having more pain tolerance thing:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1048863/Women-DONT-higher-pa in-threshold-men.html
It is amusing to see Vag’s pseudo-scientific, failed middle class claims decisively crushed.
To Magnolia: “cantankerous” - I love that word.
To get a decent response from Commander Scott (or any other “man”, but Commander Scott is the Best so far, Chris being a close runner-up), I may also resort to something lowly and utterly idiotic, and that’s cool. I blend in here like a needle into a haystack, except that I represent the opposite persuasion, the superior one that is. I don’t expect any woman (or man) to take anything here seriously, including my posts. I’m not here to defend my own sex, just like most of the men here are not actually defending their own sex, even though they think they actually are - and boy, with such conceit and self-importance that they do, it’s so much Fun. And wringing that conceit and self-importance out of them seems almost like a worthy cause! Laughter makes you live longer. I too, have self-importance and conceit to go around, so please, give it your best shot.
I wish that one day we could all meet and get drunk (or high) and be merry. That would be cool. But that may be the same as wishing for world peace.
All women deserve to be raped and murdered.
All sexist bastards deserve to be forcibly sodomized and be murdered in a form that is as painful as possible.
Both of you should be put in a padded room together.
That’s an interesting concept.
I do have a question, though: who’s in the straight jacket?
Answer: Arbalest.
All women, especially western women, are primitive, sub-human garbage that should be disposed of like human waste. All women are socio-economic parasites that breed disease and death.
Was your mother not female?
Remember these?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kang_and_Kodos
Two Anglo ‘tenth wave’ feminists?
If you never watched the episode(s), don’t bother, you’re just making yourself look silly. Next contestant.
Women should be rounded up en masse only to have their veins injected with a lethal mixture of potassium cyanide and arsenic. Then every single woman who has been injected with poison should be soaked in vats of sulfuric acid until they are completely dissolved. Humanity would be better off without the cold, frigid presence of the sub-human female.
How would we get laid? Sex robots?
Probably sex-droids, but I wouldn’t rule out the possibility of genetically engineered female slaves.
Oh yeah, you sick creature? Then how would humanity survive? Women are the only humans who can reproduce! There’s some power for you, you disgusting, pathetic, vile organism! You need to be investigated by the FBI, for there are surely hundreds of female bodies in your freezer and basement. I sincerely hope YOU are not procreating and spreading your infected venom to your doomed offspring. You are less than pond scum. Humanity can only hope that you and others of your ilk collapse from a hate-induced aneurysm as soon as possible.
Cloning is already possible.
Hopefully, you won’t be the one being cloned.
Hitler has a vagina?
I agree Hitler style was a typical female style. Hitler was at his best in speaking and acting. He was a good emotional manipulator. He would trough tantrums when he did not get his way. He never felt he was wrong. He was a prescription drug addict.
The voting for Hitler analogy is from an American centric view and in hindsight. German politics were quite different at the time. Hitler came to power at the very bottom of the Great depression. Germany had it much worse than we did here in America at nearly 100 percent unemployment. Germans we very desperate. We have not had such desperate times here since the Civil War. Few Germans knew what Hitlar was all about and the ones that did were eliminated, the first concentration camp victims.
Boo fuckin’ hoo, cry me a river, Germany.
Just like a woman, instead of learning from a bad mistake and the consequences there-of, you repeat said mistake and demand sympathy and understanding the second time around.
Germany had it made, fucked up and took on THE WHOLE FUCKING WORLD in 1914, got utterly fucked because, well, you took on the WHOLE FUCKING WORLD. THEN… You dig yourself out of the shitter somehow, blaming a completely innocent third party (Jews), lashed out at said innocent party and everyone else, again taking on THE WHOLE FUCKING WORLD, this time two big powers with HALF the world’s population, got torn in half for 50 years (what should have been eternity), and now you’re looking for sympathy and understanding… again.
Sounds like every ex I’ve ever had.
May I point out the hypocrisy that our friend “Mysanthrope” exhibits? He condescendingly points out Hitler’s discrimination against Jews, which Hitler used to pull Germany out of the “shitter,” yet he then digs at women. I see a correlation between “Mysanthrope” and Hitler. Hitler used Jews to make himself feel better; “Mysanthrope” uses women for the same purpose.
I’d also like to point out that you misspelled “misanthrope.”
Thanks,
Anonymous
Women are both sexually frigid and non-orgasmic inside, as well as they are outside, of relationships; and because of that, they are also raped inside, as well as outside, of relationships.
Only someone who is heavily indoctrinated in the central tenets of feminist ideology would maintain that rape is about controlling or degrading women. If rape is about power or control then women such as Hillary Clinton would be in the most danger of being raped. After all, would she not make an ideal rape target simply because of the fact that she possesses a considerable amount of power and control that could be had for the taking? But such is not the case because rape is about sexual gratification, and not control. In addition, rape requires sexual physiological arousal to begin with and this can only be achieved by the androgen-mediated erogenization of external stimuli of a sexualized nature by the brain; without such a process taking place in the brain, the rape itself would never occur at all. Thus, even on a psychophysiological level, the assertion that rape is about control is an impossible, ridiculous idea.
Rape is about sex and sexual enjoyment; it is not about control or degradation.
Only by establishing a state based on both patriarchal control and libertarian capitalism can we save ourselves from the plague of feminism and Marxist ideology. Only by creating a society that reinforces the values of the free market can we end discrimination against men, curb female entitlement to affirmative action/ employment equity, and finally terminate government subsidization of female “independence”.
Women are like children; they spend their entire lives in a permanent state of childhood, enveloped in both magic and superstition. It is because of this that all women need to be physically disciplined in public in order to behave properly. All of the great English jurists of the past, including Sir William Blackstone, one of the chief founders of modern Western jurisprudence, recognized this central characteristic of the female personality; it is the abandonment of a man’s right to administer corporal punishment to his wife that has enabled feminism and female emancipation to come into existence.
Women need to be physically disciplined when they misbehave because women, being lesser evolved hominids, do not fully understand the consequences of their own behaviour. After all, is not the ideology of feminism an acknowledgement of female rights and the corresponding denial of female responsibility for those very same rights? Women are not capable of being truly altruistic or ethical in the philosophical sense of the word; everything a woman does is motivated by both greed and selfishness because she considers her personal feelings to be an adequate substitute for the common good of humanity.
Thus, in all seriousness and with every bit of sang-froid, a woman should be physically disciplined every waking moment of the day until she finally comprehends that true feminine submission is recognition of male lordship
COMANDER SCOTT…..
“sang-froid” –>> Love it.
Women hate sex… Women hate sex with everyone and everything… Women really hate sex… Almost all women hate sex… The clitoris? Women despise the clitoris for the frigid organ that it is! Has anyone ever mentioned the clitoris to another woman? Why, they lose their tempers right away! Even most women know how truly frigid and sexless they really are! But shhhhhh… A woman’s sexual frigidity and strict monogamous inclination is a woman’s secret; anyone who knows that women hate sex has penetrated the veil of inner female darkness.
Knowing that women hate sex is an act of male liberation from female asexual tyranny. Women hate sex! All women are frigid bitches with a natural aversion to all forms of sexual activity.
Excellent post Ryan… The last part reminded me of several of my ex-girlfriends… they all had a habit of picking fights over nothing for no good reason.
“…A lot of women do seem to like a mental… beating”
So true.
American and Canadian women are frigid, ballbusting bitches who deserve to choke on their own shit, piss, and vomit. American and Canadian women deserve to have both their eyes gouged out and their tongues ripped out of their mouths.
If women truly loved sex, rape would not exist.
True statement CS.
Interesting that you feel the need to generalize all women without taking into account the wide range of behavior found in both sexes. Some women have a low sex drive, true, but the real reason rape exists is because: 1. some men just can’t get laid and 2. some men have control issues. I happen to be female with a high sex drive. If not for the fact that you are most likely an overweight, neurotic, unattractive individual, I would happily rape you with a strap on.
My dear, your post simply reinforces my point: women are brutally raped, and even killed, because women hate sex.
Piss off, cunt.
Date rape is a myth. In fact, the vast majority of rape allegations are largely unsubstantiated lies told by hysterical, mentally disturbed women. This demonstrates that the concept of rape is really an expression of female sexual power wherein, by means of telling rape “stories”, the woman effectively takes vengeance on weak and helpless males.
So you admit that men are weak and helpless, thats a great start, keep it up.
Women are stupid ,weak mentally and physically.
Because of the fucked up laws in US some men get abused ,but guess what, the boys that are raised by single mothers are going to rape as much women as they can.
I hope ones of them gets you Lee and he will rape you day and night ,and if you’re fat he will use a broomstick to rape you.
penis
To fuck a really fat woman you need a penis the size of a broomstick.
But I would never even get close to fat women, let alone fuck them, wowww disgusting.
And you are a silly little man. You might come out with some comments that are well thought out, but this just shows what a pathetic excuse for a human being you are. Fool.
Only women are fools. Did you know that the vast majority of women have smaller brains and lower IQs than men? Thus, the “human” female is in an intermediate stage of transitional evolutionary development; the woman occupies a special place between both man and ape (however, the woman is more ape than man).
Piss off the site, you frigid cunt.
Interesting theory, even if it is completely untrue. Nice try at an insult though.
It is a scientifically established fact that women are intellectually inferior to men. All credible academics accept the fact that women not only possess microencephalic skulls, but score lower on IQ tests than men. Read what Professors Rushton and Jackson have to say in this scientific paper:
http://www.charlesdarwinresearch.org/2006%20Intell%20Jackson%20&%20Rus hton.pdf
‘It could still be argued, however, that some
ambiguity remains in interpreting the results. Although
there is a clear sex difference in g among students taking
the test, it is perhaps less clear that this sex difference
captures faithfully the sex difference in the general
population. Better sampling of both sexes from the SAT
pool might answer this question more definitively, as
may additional parametric studies of sex differences
from other parts of the g distribution.
So yes, i have read it.
Lee, you really do have a minuscule brain well-hidden within the dark morass of your cranium.
Yes, there may be some (the key word being “some”) ambiguity in terms of results, but this point is meaningless because the logic of scientific investigation is based on relative probabilities, not absolute certitude. Rest assured that in no part of the paper do our esteemed authors ever deny that men are intellectually superior to women.
You know COMMANDER SCOTT…. for YEARS and YEARS I have always thought —>> “One day, I hope to meet a woman I consider equal . . . who has a genuine interest in dicussing keats or Milton instead of shoes , bags, purses and weddings all the time. . . . who enjoys working as much as I do . . . who is sane . . . simple . . . pleasant to be around . . . willing to please as mush as I am . . . . who is equal in interests, intellect, and also interesting . . .”
But there is no such thing.
I have accepted that MANY MANY MANY years ago.
And as a result , I STOPPED expecting women to have brains, or anything worth a man’s time. I am so much better off for it. I expect a woman to have NOTHING I could possibly be interested in other than pussy, ass and a hot mouth to catch my cum.
These days I am always content and satisfied with women instead of disappointed .
Women are cum dumps.
Nothing else.
And that is and AWESOME REALITY once you embrace it.
Men-are-way-better-than-women.
. . . . And women-went-out-of-their-way-to-prove-it.
Chris - I think it was Commander Scott who said “women are as pleasant to be around as foetid, maggot-infested garbage”
It’s true!
You’re totally right… it’s sad though, that men are so superior to women at an intellectual, artistic and spiritual level. It means that - apart from other men, there is no real company for the superior man (fine if one is gay, lonely if one is not).
Scotty, the point was that they were only making inferences about that specific group of people, and not the general popualtion. I agree with you, there are a lot of really, really stupid women out there, but you have not met every woman in the world.
Have you tried moving to another country? Im not keen on my own countrymen, i prefer Kiwis. Worth a shot, or you could just wait on the fembots.
Women of high intelligence, creativity, or genius IQ are as rare as a sighting of the Loch Ness monster.
That being said, the great eighteenth century economist Adam Smith was fond of saying that he reserved his chivalry for his books; referring to his awkward appearance, he also remarked that he was beau in nothing else but his precious volumes and manuscripts.
So what was our dear Adam Smith trying to tell us? Women of high intelligence and creativity being almost non-existent, the wise man seeks the company of old philosophers and scientists long since departed; he seeks to commune with their thoughts and ideas in the solitude of his genius.
If you expresse yourself like that more often, then maybe you will find a decent woman.