A woman president? More like, no fucking way.
I hate to be political as much as the next man — which means exactly that I love it more than I love breathing air or using my eyeballs for seeing.
Think about that for a second because you know that it’s true. We men love politics, it’s no secret. It’s as much a part of being man as getting animals drunk or being forever vigilant for the greatest and fastest shortcut of all time. Politics at its core is in fact the very core of man. It is a quest, but a quest for what? Bam. That’s what. How do you like that.
Before I continue let me stress that no woman under any circumstance should be venturing these very deepest waters of sophomoric thought as revelations of the type just witnessed (with many more to come) can be severely damaging.
Let us picture in our minds a mythical land that would embody only the manliest nature — and here of course I’m talking about Germany, you can see for yourself. Picnic benches of oak as thick as a cinder block as far as the eye can see, and beer in glass steins the weight of an airplane windshield being getting smashed together with abandon for the absolute fuck of it.
Do you think that in the metaphorical “topic hat” of such a place there exists perhaps a piece of paper that says, “How was your day?” or “Where my mother went wrong.”
Fuck no. No way. And in fact there exists no such topic hat in either reality or fantasy.
But why?
It because men in such a place of rampant manhood want to speak of only one thing: Politik. The politics of doing the job. The politics about doing the job. And the politics of getting the job done. You can no sooner squelch this desire than you can throw a dumpster into the middle of the street with your bare hands. It cannot be done.
I think that my point here is obvious: a woman will never ever in a million fucking years be president of the United States or of anywhere.
There are two simple reasons for this. There is no need for a third because the first two are so utterly conclusive. Observe as I blow the lid off the entire media hype and tornado of bullshit…
No woman will ever be president because:
1. No woman is a man.
2. See rule 1.
Done. The fact that men are better than women is merely a corollary at this point.
Let’s expand these principles to some degree of practice with the power of our mighty imaginations by temporarily suspending every single non-perversion of logic and placing a woman in the White House for just a moment. The stress on the mind from such an absurdity is taxing I know so this will be brief. It is some relief that the details of the scene are not important. It can be any scene — that’s the beauty of it; any scene in which Madam President is there with anyone else.
What she is thinking at any moment is precisely, ‘Am I doing a good job?’, ‘Does everyone think I’m a fraud?’, ‘Did I get everyone’s opinion?’
Utter bullshit.
As men we know inherently that this is absolutely no way to get the job done. This kind of lay-about, lolly-gagging thought isn’t even preparing to get the job done. It’s a lame fuck around, and a waste of time.
Women do not understand politics at its core as much as a dog or a screwdriver does not understand crossing a busy street. Sure, you can guide them safely across. You can carry a screw driver to the store and buy it a cookie, but in the end it has no goddamn idea what’s going on — and that’s really what we’re talking about here.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 24 … 23 22 21 20 19 [18] 17 16 15 14 13 … 1 » Show All
I dont get it… Since when have I “dropped to my knees”? Abit of an overreaction dont you think? He needed directions, I posted politely in kind. Its what all men will do. When a fellow brother is in need of help, you reply politely how best may you do it.
I am being shot down for being polite and courteous? What the fuck? Since when … in that post.. was there even a hinge of submissiveness?
If you think I am not a man, by all means … go erm… suck off that beta’s cock.
So you feel like a real man sucking up to another man, that is presumingly stronger and bigger than you, but saying that women and men are equal makes you somehow less of a man.
You’re the real beta male. God, you’ll happily tell someone who is weaker than you “you’re a bitch for [insert stupid your reason here]” but if a man does the same thing, you instantly drop to your knees and claim that there must have been a misunderstanding and wait for them to pat you on the head and give you their approval. Ha. Yeah, real manly.
NO woman allowed. So fuck off Claire.
Clair, if I wanted to suck up, I would have gladly told you that you were an “equal” to myself. If I wanted to suck up, I would have gladly bended my knees to feminism. But am I such a man? No, never.
He seeked for a clairification, I responded in kind. Yes, he is a man and I grant him a certain degree of respect for that the same way I grant women a certain degree of respect. But what happens? I would have told any woman on this site who needed clarification the same thing if she hasnt lost that respect . Apparently, many fembots like yourself have failed, acting all bitchy and condescending.
I am shallow? Oh gee. Coming from you, that is probably a compliment. Thanks.
What kind of shallow person are you? You automatically give respect to this man that you DON”T KNOW, purely because when he was in his mother’s womb he was exposed to more male related hormones.
Tell him to (in the words of Chopper himself) harden the fuck up. Tell him to re-read the post, like you would any female person if she had done the same thing. Don’t suck up. Guy’s like that make me sick.
I dont have to suck up to him. I respect him for being a man so I wanted to make it clear to him that I would never do such a thing. Why would I want to suck up to an internet persona? I dont have “issues”.
I dont believe I have taken any shots at you or any other man. Never have, never will. Perhaps it was a misunderstanding or the response was not directed to you? Apologies and I hope to clear this up. :)
Why are you being such a suck up. Tell him to re-read the post. Be a man and stick up for yourself and don’t suck up. Even I got the post.
Apparently we live in a world today which lauds only the accomplishments and achievements of women. Aside from this site, men’s achievements are basically put down or not being highlighted sufficiently in place of women’s achievements? Why is that? Why can we only say “women are better” but never the other way around? For political correctness? This blog is payback time and it is paying the damned feminists back duly. Fuck this, men are the superior gender.
Fair enough. For every few men that came to power, I would agree definitely there were tyrants and incompetent men. But every woman which came to power … or 90% were bad. At their best, they were NOTHING in comparison to an average male leader. Cleopatra for all her “charm” was nothing in comparison to the greatest of men leaders. Put the best of men against the best of women. Who is going to win? Hands down, my last dollar is on the men.
I answered you as above ^. Like I said, I rather men be leading and governing this world than women and I am damn glad it is that way. What can I do? Ensure that it stays that way. I assure you, no matter how minor or little you may think I am, I will do what I can to make that difference. So there, Luka.
You referring to Betas?
No, I have never felt women were lying and cheating whores. Never. I call alot of women on this site whores and bitches because they acted like one. Fair enough. That is all. I *DO* appreciate and respect women, yes. I grant my girlfriend a certain degree of autonomy but who is calling the shots? Me. I am the man. End of story. Me.
Mmm, most of the men do so in a classy and savvy way. I read through several of the threads and burst out laughing alot at many of the men’s ingenius replies. Perhaps you may wish to read through. Haha.
Sorry man, what thread is this? I dont believe I have told you or any other man for the matter to “go elsewhere”. Seriously.
Basically told me to go elsewhere. You could have been confused. After all you have Clair to deal with. No problem.
I dont believe I have taken any shots at you or any other man. Never have, never will. Perhaps it was a misunderstanding or the response was not directed to you? Apologies and I hope to clear this up. :)
I am not missing the point. Staying single and getting your career established first makes things easier for you. So does not having children until later on.
The same logic applies to the past. But then men were pressured into marriage. It may come as a surprise but men have been capable of taking care of themselves for decades.
Then or today a single man running a household wouldn’t be impossible. In fact easy if he was only taking care of himself. If children are involved it’s the exact same situation many women are in these days.
You I think are talking of some bygone era. No washing machines means women made things much easier for men?
Yes, for the average Jane and Joe being in a relationship and having kids is a lot of work. A better option may be for some of these great men(and women) to be single, and it is certainly the case nowadays.
Yet, you are missing my point entirely. In the past women took care of the home, which is a very important aspect to living. Without a woman in the home to feed him, educate his children and so on, life would be more complicated having to run a household alone. In the past running a household was a lot more hard work than it is today. Then there were no washing machines and so on to work with. A man having to run a household as well as working outside the house would be next to impossible.
MansVoice, care to explain the shot you took at me on the previous page?
Luka it’s just common sense. A spouse and kids are just one more worry you have. Without them you can just concentrate fulltime on work, regardless of your gender. Many women take offense to this because they want to portray themselves as being the ones who “got him where he is.”
Lmao. The oppressed card, again? Lets go BACK ok? All the way back to the advent of time. Who were the first philosophers? The first mathematicians? The first inventers? All men. It says something about the natural abilities of men. What women have done is build up and expound on their work. Nothing impressive, nothing groundbreaking.
Mansvoice I’m not using any oppression card. I’m merely stating the truth as it is written in history. Although this may come off as a defense for women, is it not. If you look at it logically, you can’t expect women to invent or discover the amount of things done in centuries by men in about 200 years. You asked who were the first philosophers and such, of course they were men. Except for members of the high class society, women were not even allowed to learn to read or write so how do you expect them to discover or invent anything? That is the same statement certain groups used to try to prove that African Americans were inferior to their oppressors, while denying them their basic human rights.
I visited this mensuck.com and anvari.com and there top reasons why women are better than men made no sense and could not be backed by any proof either. It was all just a whole bunch of complaints as well.
As far as I can see, everyone is trying to prove their gender’s worth through their own life experiences and claiming it is logical. But a person’s life experiences is subjective and logic and facts are objective. So no matter how hard one wants one’s life experiences to be objective it cannot be because everyone is different, everyone’s experineces with the opposite sex varies. Don’t get me wrong, subjectivity does not mean that the way one feels and the arguments one makes about the opposite sex are not true. I’m simply saying that it’s true to that individual.
Many men will not share your views and argue against it due to there own life experiences with the opposite sex, so in the end the question is “who is right?”, both? none?
That is a question we may never be able to answer until concrete objective proof is given about each gender.
The way I see it, the worth of a man or a woman is relative to that invididual. If you feel women are lying cheating whores who should just be in the home and cook, clean, shut up and satisfy a man sexually, then that’s what a woman is worth to you. Unless by some miracle you find a woman worth more than that. I could not imagine who would be that for you at this point considering the choices in women you have nowadays.
And most of the comments posted in this site by women does not quite help them paint a better picture of the female gender either. Which is probably why most of my friends are men lol. However, many men have suprisingly responded quite the same way to insulting statements made by women in mensuck.com and avari.com, so that makes me wonder.
In the end, I’m complementary. Supplying mutual needs and/or offsetting mutual lacks. Though the gender roles have been blurred - which is probably why both side is so confused and angry - my role is to complete a man and have him complete me.
Who says? Why is it an either/or situation for you. Clearly having wives and children did not seem to stop the great men from becoming great - I argue that perhaps they helped make the great men become better. You will disagree, but it is - at the end of the day - a matter of viewpoint.
I would like to live in a world where men and women were rational enough not to view only their own gender in a positive light yet at the same time focus solely upon the weakness and failures in the opposite sex. I don’t think it is a tall order just to ask for men and women to be honest at least about themselves.
You say that women are equally capable of causing wars, that is true. Yet you miss my point. The point was, if you are so keen on taking credit for the wonderful deeds of your forefathers, at least have rationality to see that your forefathers have also committed atrocities too. I don’t personally see these great men and women as representatives of their gender, but you seem to, so at least be consistent. If you must take credit for the inventions and the greatness of men in the past and present, you need also admit that most of the world’s tyrants and cruel leaders are men, more so than women.
Yes, a few women have made it to the helm. So what was so awful about the choices and decisions of these women that make their time of leadership much worse than that of a man? Can you think of any examples of a female leader doing something that a male leader has never done? Do men never make terrible leaders? I can think of a great number of frankly incompetent men that should never be allowed to rule, and some are still in power today. Is all this really a realistic basis for a decision that you would rather live in a “man’s world”?
Except the author of that article is obviously joking…
http://www.anvari.org/fun/Gender/Why_Women_Are_Better_Than_Men.html
As is the author of that article, hence it’s under the category of “fun”, which you would see in the URL is you were paying any attention at all.
Barter me your dreams, Luka.
- DJ ANDI & AIDA - 4 The 1St Time (original mix)
Luka, I dont know about what kind of a world you hope to live in but I am satisfied with the world left behind by our forefathers. But then again, women are never satisfied. Maybe it would interest you to know that when women were at the helm or in positions of power, they often instigated wars and caused destruction. I much rather live in a Man’s World then. Thanks.