A woman president? More like, no fucking way.

I hate to be political as much as the next man — which means exactly that I love it more than I love breathing air or using my eyeballs for seeing.

Think about that for a second because you know that it’s true. We men love politics, it’s no secret. It’s as much a part of being man as getting animals drunk or being forever vigilant for the greatest and fastest shortcut of all time. Politics at its core is in fact the very core of man. It is a quest, but a quest for what? Bam. That’s what. How do you like that.

Before I continue let me stress that no woman under any circumstance should be venturing these very deepest waters of sophomoric thought as revelations of the type just witnessed (with many more to come) can be severely damaging.

Let us picture in our minds a mythical land that would embody only the manliest nature — and here of course I’m talking about Germany, you can see for yourself. Picnic benches of oak as thick as a cinder block as far as the eye can see, and beer in glass steins the weight of an airplane windshield being getting smashed together with abandon for the absolute fuck of it.

Do you think that in the metaphorical “topic hat” of such a place there exists perhaps a piece of paper that says, “How was your day?” or “Where my mother went wrong.”

Fuck no. No way. And in fact there exists no such topic hat in either reality or fantasy.

But why?

It because men in such a place of rampant manhood want to speak of only one thing: Politik. The politics of doing the job. The politics about doing the job. And the politics of getting the job done. You can no sooner squelch this desire than you can throw a dumpster into the middle of the street with your bare hands. It cannot be done.

I think that my point here is obvious: a woman will never ever in a million fucking years be president of the United States or of anywhere.

There are two simple reasons for this. There is no need for a third because the first two are so utterly conclusive. Observe as I blow the lid off the entire media hype and tornado of bullshit…

No woman will ever be president because:
1. No woman is a man.
2. See rule 1.

Done. The fact that men are better than women is merely a corollary at this point.

Let’s expand these principles to some degree of practice with the power of our mighty imaginations by temporarily suspending every single non-perversion of logic and placing a woman in the White House for just a moment. The stress on the mind from such an absurdity is taxing I know so this will be brief. It is some relief that the details of the scene are not important. It can be any scene — that’s the beauty of it; any scene in which Madam President is there with anyone else.

What she is thinking at any moment is precisely, ‘Am I doing a good job?’, ‘Does everyone think I’m a fraud?’, ‘Did I get everyone’s opinion?’

Utter bullshit.

As men we know inherently that this is absolutely no way to get the job done. This kind of lay-about, lolly-gagging thought isn’t even preparing to get the job done. It’s a lame fuck around, and a waste of time.

Women do not understand politics at its core as much as a dog or a screwdriver does not understand crossing a busy street. Sure, you can guide them safely across. You can carry a screw driver to the store and buy it a cookie, but in the end it has no goddamn idea what’s going on — and that’s really what we’re talking about here.

Related Articles:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

470 Comments in 463 threads.»

Pages: [24] 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 141 » Show All

Comment by Fears0m
2008-07-26 04:58:15

huh… btw new zealand has a female prime minister help on a come back to that for me?

Comment by David
2008-08-10 23:29:25

He said a PRESIDENT…

Canada has had a female prime minister as well, she was fucking shit.
He said president in place of prime minister because he meant somebody that actually mattered.

Comment by Shut the fuck up
2008-08-16 20:52:39

dont know if you’ve noticed, but america fucking sucks.

Comment by Mysanthrope
2008-08-28 00:20:55

Yeah thats why we fought and won 2 world wars Europe couldn’t fight on it’s own, beat Communist which Europe couldn’t do on it’s own, and maintain a world economy which Europe couldn’t do on its own, which is why they all had to combine their shit together (Euro) just to compete. But America sucks, right?

Am I a jingoist? Fuck no. Fuck Bush, John McCain and every ass-backwards Neo-Conservative like them, but let history speak for itself dickwad. America and Great Britain are the best countries in the fuckin world with Australia being our kick ass mutual best friend, but don’t fuck around and forget who brings the pain whenever the “civilized” world goes to shit and motherfuckers are backed into a corner. The Third Reich crumbled under OUR kick-assery, The Soviets feared OUR shit. America as a nation loves Europe, it’s these pencil necked, pampered and whiney cum rags that we somehow let into our offices and did the opposite of what we wanted as a country who pretend to speak to you on our behalf, but their time is up and we’re changing all that shit around.

Barack Obama ‘08, motherfuckers.

(Comments won't nest below this level)
Comment by SenileJohn
2008-08-31 18:28:14

I guess I was a conservative until McCain put pussy before country. So much for foreign policy credentials. Reckless Bastard!

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Question
2008-07-08 21:02:15

Dick, you are a dick.

Comment by Austin
2008-08-18 22:08:00

Question, you must be a woman so get the fuck away from this website FAST.

 
 
Comment by Question
2008-07-08 20:58:25

if you dont answer this i’ll asume you know i am right:

Woman give birth to men, so..
without women, your nothing. you would not exist buddy.

Comment by micho
2008-07-21 16:39:29

What a stupid question. Woman gives birth not life. We have enough eggs that can be cloned and can satisfy forever. Ask Kalil he knows more about this.

 
Comment by Fears0m
2008-07-26 05:00:25

um question u must be a woman or a retard who all they can do is type. as dick has stated already on numerous equation women are only good for cooking cleaning and carrying children they cant raise em though

 
 
Comment by KristinM
2008-06-11 14:43:58

*first woman to run :)

 
Comment by KristinM
2008-06-11 14:43:06

That is silly. The Middle East thinks it’s foolish that we have never had a female president. I love my America, but I also enjoy world politics. However, she is also not the first to run for president in our country either. Dogs bark really loud and can’t clean themselves, it’s always lovely to wake up with piles of crap all over your house, and your couch torn to pieces. Cat’s are everything a dog is but they are very quiet, clean, mannered and independent, another very loyal pet.
I love dogs myself as well.

Besides the most badass man agrees… you do not get cooler than him.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=VUCx8qKlvKM

 
Comment by Nathan
2008-05-23 02:42:48

Hate to point it out to you man but Germany’s run by a woman and the UK was run by one in the 80s. Although Thatcher’s no bull-shit attitude and ability to boss Reagan around makes me think she had balls bigger than planets hidden in that skirt and Merkel (the German dude) is pretty much the same…

 
Comment by Rem
2008-05-13 03:15:47

ghyttt said:

There is a woman president in Finland.

No wonder suicide rates are so high there.

 
Comment by ghyttt
2008-05-13 01:41:24

There is a woman president in Finland.

 
Comment by no manhole
2008-05-04 17:34:54

son of the suns said:

Join the sith, NMH.

Michael belongs in an early grave for his blend of arrogance and ignorance.

Funny! Thanks, but no thanks. I think there are a few decent ones left– I was with one today. Its just a pain to find them….

 
Comment by son of the suns
2008-05-04 14:48:06

Join the sith, NMH.

Michael belongs in an early grave for his blend of arrogance and ignorance.

 
Comment by no manhole
2008-05-04 14:00:47

Michael said:

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL you’re a bit wound up methinks.

If you don’t think your everyday doctor, is conducting research, hypothesizing and testing your answers when he or she asks you questions in order to determine the cause of illness, then you are, quite frankly, a buffoon. I think you should go and eat a banana, it’ll be good for your serotonin levels.

This is not at the level of creativity of basic research, which often times causes paradigm shifts in our thinking of the natural world. This would never happen in everyday medicine. You are an uneducated, naive dolt, who bobbles his head to any PC BS a girl will say just to get some action. Gratefully, you will only humiliate yourself with women with your mental weakness causing your wife to inevitably cuckold you such that your raising someone else’s child, and despite the obvious evidence for this, you will believe her lies. Sadly pathetic indeed.

 
Comment by Arbalest
2008-05-04 09:41:17

Actually I think the title is more of a psychological filter. The idiots see it, work themselves up into a rant, and leave, and it points out how people get all worked up over it but when someone says WABTM nobody says a thing. Besides, discussion is what the forum is for, right?

 
Comment by Harmeet Manseta
2008-05-04 09:17:03

I think a lot of angst that’s flying around on this site, and on the forums stems from the title of the website i.e. Men Are Better Than Women … I think, if the title were Men And Women Are Different, instead, that might help to cool things down a bit, and might actually lead to a more meaningful discussion … The fact is, Feminism is wrong - and has caused great harm to the World … But I guess, it’s how you put it, that helps to get your message, or opinion across …

 
Comment by Harmeet Manseta
2008-05-04 08:17:47

Michael said:

Learn some humility…how ironic that you say that.

Your post shows an utter lack of respect for women and nothing but respect for men.

that if the Men woke up a thousand years later, the Women would still be telling them the Earth was flat, and / or the Sun, Moon and Stars went around it ….

What’s the best it was a man that first advanced the notion that the world was flat?

The problem here is that before inventions become a daily affair, inventions by gender were cataloged. In the modern world, inventions and discoveries, esp in IT and medicine are so ubiquitous that they go by largely unnoticed. Many women are involved in these endeavors but you don’t see the media making a circus about the fact women are involved because it’s no longer 1901. It’s standard for women to achieve, most people know and accept this, with the exception of blind, narrow-minded chauvinists stuck in the early part of last century.

When you say that Women’s achievements go un-noticed as it is now considered normal, and the media doesn’t make a big deal of it … I have to really beg to differ with you … the fact is, that the mainstream media of the World is totally feminist - and we all know the power it wields is gargantuan … it’s in fact quite the opposite of what you say … the media is ever ready to not only trumpet to it’s best ability Women’s achievements, but in fact, are adept and clever at hyping up something a Woman might do, way beyond it’s actual significance - in other words, something that we may take for granted, had it been done by a Man, that would normally be not even mentioned, if the same thing was done by a Woman, you’d have the Mainstream Media all over it, magnifying it way beyond it’s actual importance and greatness - and should it actually be something significant, you can bet your life the Media would hardly wait to go to town with it. The reason for this is, that in the face of feminism’s obvious faliures, it needs the various branches of the media, to artificially hype and build up it’s (non)-achievements, it the media is only to willing to comply.

In any case, what I wrote had specifically to do with pioneering works, which change our World, the course of History and the way we perceive things …

If you are under the impression, for example, that there are Women who nowadays come up with something like the Theory of Relativity on a regular basis, but go un-noticed because the mainstream media don’t mention it, because it is considered too regular or run of the mill - then I think that is a fantasy.

 
Comment by MansVoice
2008-05-04 00:20:33

Harmeet Manseta said:
( I can’t imagine why, except, this site has got them so bothered, and irritated, that they simply can’t help themselves ) prattle and parade on as if Women created the universe and told the Sun and the Moon to shine … By that standard, considering that this World as we know it has been BUILT by Men over centuries, Men all over the world should be deified and temples built in the honour. Makes me wonder, that if Women had ACTUALLY had even 50% to do with anything … can you even begin to imagine the extent they would go on and on ( considering that inspite of the fact, that their contributions wouldn’t even reach 5%, they can still boast and fume and dictate the way they do ) ?? You can bet your life, they’re just waiting breathlessly for one Woman somewhere to come up with ONE good invention - that will give them enough boasting fodder, as if it were a HUNDRED inventions - that’s the thing with Feminism - although it has no intellectual basis, it will build up a sham as if it were God’s truth - Men can invent a million things, go the Moon etc. ( God alone knows WHAT they will accomplist this next millenium ), but ALL THAT IS COMPLETELY TAKEN FOR GRANTED - SO BIG DEAL MEN DID THAT - That’s the attitude. Meanwhile, let ONE Woman come up with ONE thing somewhere — that will be artificially bloated and magnified and hyped by the feminists, as if it were the second coming of Jesus Christ.

Feminism = Hypocrisy and Lies …That’s the bottom line.

That was fucking awesome. All men should read that. Go sign up at the forums and thats so fucking true. Welcome on board.

 
Comment by doubt
2008-05-03 21:35:18

manhole said:

[TL;DR]

She is a disgrace to America.

 
Comment by Michael
2008-05-03 20:47:22

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL you’re a bit wound up methinks.

If you don’t think your everyday doctor, is conducting research, hypothesizing and testing your answers when he or she asks you questions in order to determine the cause of illness, then you are, quite frankly, a buffoon. I think you should go and eat a banana, it’ll be good for your serotonin levels.

 
Comment by no manhole
2008-05-03 18:19:48

Michael said:

If you don’t believe that medicine and law require creative thinking then you’re an ignoramus.

Medicine is perhaps the most creative field of all due to the need to factor in some many variables and constant experimentation to find etiological reasons for disorder.

Law is nothing but creative interpretation.

You place creativity above these fields as if to downplay them, then turn around and use Nobel prizes as the standard measure for the highest intelligence — a prize that is usually awarded in the field of medicine.

Sort your reasoning out or don’t bother coming back. You’re making men look like idiots, like most of the others here.

Listen, dip-shit: YOU need to understand what your talking about. When you say “Medicine is perhaps the most creative field of all due to the need to factor in some many variables and constant experimentation to find etiological reasons for disorder.” Thats not medicine, thats BASIC RESEARCH, IDIOT!!!!. Medicine is healing; you get parameters of the person, and based on these parameters, you carry out a treatment. No creativity required, just following the age old rules defined by doctors in the past.

Yes, research DOES require tremendous creativity. And what you find is that in medical research, in the higher tiers of academia (faculty and above), its grealty dominated by men. That is an indisputable fact. In the lower tiers, women equal men. But, to a large degree, they get orders on the experiments to perform from the faculty, who come up with the ideas.

Yes, creatvity, when applied through research, is above the fields of medicine and law in terms of advacing society forward. It is a well known fact that the great discoveries of all time (a heliocentric solar system, the mathematical codification of mechanics, electrodynamics, and relativity, for example) broke paradigms of thinking and required tremendous creativity. So yea, dumb-fuck, its not unreasonable to hold these great discoveries above the RELATIVELY trivial pursuits of law and medicine, that are based on the past thinking of others.

My fucking god, you are so god-damn naive, and stupid. If your an American, YOU are a horrific embarssement to our country.

 
Comment by Michael
2008-05-03 18:02:55

If you don’t believe that medicine and law require creative thinking then you’re an ignoramus.

Medicine is perhaps the most creative field of all due to the need to factor in some many variables and constant experimentation to find etiological reasons for disorder.

Law is nothing but creative interpretation.

You place creativity above these fields as if to downplay them, then turn around and use Nobel prizes as the standard measure for the highest intelligence — a prize that is usually awarded in the field of medicine.

Sort your reasoning out or don’t bother coming back. You’re making men look like idiots, like most of the others here.

 
Comment by no manhole
2008-05-03 17:44:15

Michael said:

Learn some humility…how ironic that you say that.

Your post shows an utter lack of respect for women and nothing but respect for men.

that if the Men woke up a thousand years later, the Women would still be telling them the Earth was flat, and / or the Sun, Moon and Stars went around it ….

What’s the best it was a man that first advanced the notion that the world was flat?

The problem here is that before inventions become a daily affair, inventions by gender were cataloged. In the modern world, inventions and discoveries, esp in IT and medicine are so ubiquitous that they go by largely unnoticed. Many women are involved in these endeavors but you don’t see the media making a circus about the fact women are involved because it’s no longer 1901. It’s standard for women to achieve, most people know and accept this, with the exception of blind, narrow-minded chauvinists stuck in the early part of last century.

Without a doubt, women are entering the professional ranks in the US as much as men are, maybe in some fields (law, medicine) even more so. To me, this is strong evidence that women are, for the most part, just as intelligent, skilled (in many fields, maybe not all), and ambitious as men. But can we say the same thing for creativity? In other words, that women are now as professional as men, is that an indication that they are as creative as men in areas that require logical thinking, and not things like, say, dance? I dont think so. The reason I think this is that medicine in law fields require intelligence and specific skills to succeed but not creativity.

I think a good guide to creativity is to look at the number of Nobel Prizes awarded to women vs men, and clealy men have the great advantage, even in recent years when there has not been any discrimination, at least in the United States, for women to enter the ranks of academia. In the natural sciences, the only thing a university gives a shit about is you ability to get money from the government, not your gender.

So I am not convinced that women could make the great discoveries that men are doing. I would like to see that happen, but if hasn’t happened now (as evidenced by men getting the nobel prizes), it probably will never happen.

Of course, if I ever said this to a girl, I would be dumped immediately.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis