But It Happened to Me! Who Fucking Cares?
Women like to argue. They love it because it’s one of the few things in life where fucking up at it gets you more.
Take pies for example. If you go into a restaurant and try to serve the waitresses a pie with your face they’re probably not going to serve you another one.
Arguing is different. The less listening (women refer to this as “not talking”) you do, the more you get to do it. For women it’s like a pint that’s got a treasure map to a free pint on the bottom. Holy shit, I wonder if that’s patented.
Of the many ways women argue too stupidly to fathom, this is my least favorite:
But it happened to me! And this is how I feel about it!
What am I supposed to do with that? It sounds and looks like a useless piece of shit, but the look on her face says it’s something wonderfully impressive. Like some kind of artwork. Women are the opposite of magicians. They do nothing and look fucking astounded whereas a magician will make your face disappear and look like the smuggest prick in the universe.
That’s why women make shitty magicians. That and they hate little kids.
If you want to see the Me, Me, Me Defense in action, try engaging a group of women in an abortion argument. If you’re in the right part of town — any part of town that’s out after 10PM — you can bet your ass half of them will have “had it happen to them.”
Somehow letting a man pay for an abortion makes a woman an expert on the subject. That reminds me of the time I opened a dental practice after I let my parents pay for a cavity filling when I was eight years old. Or it least it would if I was a woman and tooth decay was a fetus.
Having it happen to you doesn’t give you any extra say. All men know that. That’s why a man calls another man when he ends up in prison for some reason. That’s why men call lawyers instead of their mothers or their dumb as fuck best friend when another man has kicked the crap out of them.
Women don’t. It’s the dumbest, most manipulative, and egotistical debate tactic that could ever be imagined. I hesitate to even call it a tactic because it’s so retarded, but it does qualify in the same way women barely qualify for everything else.
So it is a tactic, and that means you can use it. Keep it in your man bag. Every woman jumps on the Me, Me, Me Defense like it’s a bar tender.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 2 [1] Show All
That’s close to the case for me, Wolfe. It was a combination of things that turned me off from feminism, and indeed convinced me of the inherent superiority of the male sex. Personal experience, while a major component, was by no means the only component.
In terms of personal experience, I’m capable of looking at it fairly objectively: it’s possible that my experience with women is atypical, for a variety of reasons. That’s why I run a reality check against the experiences of other men and (because I have family members in the field) with psychologists in general.
Without fail, every man my age has had similar experiences. Not all of them have had a failed marriage (though a fair percentage have), but all of them have experience with psychotic behavior on the part of the women they’ve known.
Furthermore, psychologists (the good ones, mind you, not the psychobabblers) will readily admit that there are two standards for “normal” behavior: one that applies to men and one that applies to women. If one applied the male standard to women, a huge number of women would be diagnosed with personality disorders that presently are not. It even shows up in standardized psychological tests such as the MMPI: scores that would be interpreted as a personality disorder in men are interpreted as within norm for women.
This is actually a reasonable point. It’s completely wrong, but it’s the most logical thing you’ve said today.
You ignore the fact that men in general — and the men here in particular — tend to analyze things that happen to them personally and fit them into a larger rational framework.
We do not take umbrage against a class of people the way women do. It takes much more time for a man to conclude that an entire group (that presents itself positively) is malign.
Were women accurate in their anger, and judgments, this would be a huge advantage for women, and a huge weakness of men. Since the accuracy of women is roughly that of a weathervane pointing the way to the nearest McDonalds, this is not the case.
Many of us started out as pro-feminist. It took, not negative personal experiences, but several years of observation and thought, coupled with a lot of reading to bring us round to our present view. Negative personal experiences didn’t hurt that process of course, but they didn’t drive it (at least not for me).
Regards,
-wolfe
Female, we already know you don’t know anything. That’s what we’ve been saying since you first set your club foot on this site.
Now fuck off.
-Dick
Most of you justify being here because you yourself have experienced negativitiy from feminism firsthand. So if that isn’t the pot calling the kettle black, I don’t know what the hell is.
Good point indeed, both Dick and RAP.
Yep. No need to be in the “right part of town”, just look around menarebetterthanwomen.com. I don’t think we’ve a single female poster who hasn’t used this, often repeatedly. Sometimes they disguise it, but often it’s just the blatant “I feel”.
-wolfe
Good fucking point Dick, we all see that happen here time after time. This should be a woman law.