I am shutting this site down.

When you see some cunt crying there’s one solution. Tell them to SHUT THE FUCK UP or get the fuck out. I tell girls to suck it up and take it like a man. There is no better time to antagonize a woman than when she is crying like a little girl.

They should sell the jaw trap from the movie SAW at target so every man can buy one. Jigsaw is an icon.

Or to be more precise, remove any existing laws criminalizes prostitutes. Seriously, you’re playing right into the Matriarchal/feminist/UN agenda when you engage yourself with the prostitution industry. All feminism is based on sexual anarchism. There is scarcely a Matriarchal society in the planet that isn’t saturated with pornography, slut culture and prostitution. Cut out the sexual anarchism and you’ll find feminism/Matriarchy seizing up.

Becoming a user of prostitution is an anti-male feminist thing to do. Prostitution (or as women like to say “the sex industry”) is a female-operated business and one of the first things the UN does when it wants to feminize a country is to make prosecution of prostitutes illegal.

I don’t think western women will like the laws of the sharia, women are digging their own grave and there will be no man left with enough sympathy for them to protect them against the results of their own liberation.

Really? What about the feminist War in Iraq? Plenty of men willing to go die to defend and extend feminist rule there.

And I am not going to tolerate any one of you dribbling clap cock assholes saying the above was a ‘homophopic rant’…. It wasn’t.

PHOBOS = FEAR

THERE. IS. A. BIG. DIFFERENCE. BETWEEN. FEAR. AND. DISGUST.

Homosexuals are the ultimate product of womens’ fuck ups as mothers.

I’m glad you see that I am 100 percent right about IQ. I am going to adopt a child as a single man and train him to be a fucking hollywood director from the age of 2. I can shape the boy, i’ll give you the man. No fucking nursing home for me!!!

I only use legal brothels by the way. There is no violence but my violence there…. so I am fully safe so don’t worry about me.

SMash said:

Muzalon said:

Commander Scott said:

devilsadvocate said:

Our civilization is now rotten in the core and the final strike will be given to the west by the islam. I don’t think western women will like the laws of the sharia, women are digging their own grave and there will be no man left with enough sympathy for them to protect them against the results of their own liberation. Maybe the laws of the sharia aren’t such a bad deal for men compared with contemporary female behaviour and family court. I don’t have sufficient knowledge about islamic culture to judge if the sharia will profit men, but i can imagine what will happen when a significant portion of western men convert to islam.

Yes, now that you mention those points I see that as well. can you give some examples of other civilizations that have treated women as equals that have been destroyed? (and not just the name of the civilization, what happened)

thanks

In no civilization have men and women ever been treated as equals; as a matter of fact, in all civilizations, women have been granted preferential treatment and special privileges, whereas men, especially those of the middle and lower classes, have always been discriminated against harshly and treated with great brutality. Thus, contrary to popular opinion, women were granted more privileges and a much higher status than the vast majority of men in such societies as Pharaonic Egypt, Ancient Rome, Han China, Japan under the shoguns, and the feudal kingdoms of the Middle Ages. In these cultures, the vast majority of men were bought and sold as slaves, coerced at the end of a sword to till the soil like serfs bound to the land forever. In what historical period have women ever been treated with such barbarism? After all, is woman not redeemed solely through the presence of her vagina?

It is under the aegis of contemporary Western society, that women are more privileged now than they have ever been throughout the history of the world. The notion of female oppression by males is an ideological fantasy concocted by Marxist historical revisionists; women have always been placed on pedestals and those men with the audacity to curtail female entitlement have always been subject to violent retaliation. Even in the polygamous culture of Islam, where most available young women are confined to lavish harems of concubines and beautiful odalisques, women have always been granted a higher status than men, given the fact that none ever have to work, pay taxes or fight wars. However, in Islam, female entitlement never reaches the same bizarre extreme as it does in the West.

The only difference between the contemporary West and previous civilizations is that the West has granted women so many privileges as to subvert the current patriarchal basis of civilization. Because all civilizations are founded and held together on the basis of male strength and intelligence, the elevation of the human female to such dizzying heights of power and wealth can only undermine the very fabric of Western society and ensure a civilizational collapse of the modern West more spectacular than that of the Roman Empire during late classical antiquity.

One very direct cause of cultural decline is the natural female preference for low IQ thugs and morons as sexual partners. Not only is this costly to society, putting unhelpful demands on the economy when the titular fathers abscond; it also has a dysgenic effect, causing the average IQ to fall in formerly healthy populations.

Under patriarchy, female choice counts for nothing, and the finest males tend to spread their genes, keeping the population at a respectable level in terms of IQ, social acumen and mental stability. When patriarchy crumbles, female choice (always in favour of the workshy,stupid and sociopathic) becomes a central factor in determining the genetic decline of the population. This is why and how matriarchy kills civilizations.

Muzalon or whatever the fuck your name is…. read a book called ‘the mismeasure of man’…. I think you are a eugenicist fuckhead… the wide baseless assertions you attribute to simply ‘genes’ are misguided in the utmost.

What creates low IQ is letting a fucking dvd player raise your children. Any child who is homeschooled by a father who has retired early or is self employed and has the time and vigor to dedicate hours a day to the child, will ace any IQ test.

You eugenic fucks are the ones that need to be wiped off the map and rolled into the fucking sea, simply because you cheapen every newborn baby with your baseless assumptions.

Learn motherfucker.

Oh, man, did you pull my string! I can’t say I agree with you 100% but I can say I certainly mostly agree with you. In fact, I could write a book on that topic.

You don’t have to spend hours a day with a kid to boost their i.q. More is better, but after work/school, normal interacting with your kids in a rational way is adequate to the task.

First example: My second wife was a type I unwed mother. (Type I was stupid; type II involves serial immorality.) I do not advise anyone marry an unwed mother. I was apparently blessed by God. My stepdaughter is simply put the best thing that ever happened to me in my life. Not my wife.

I have heard other men have had the same experience, but I have never personally met one. DON’T DO IT!!!!! Every other man I knew, and I counseled more than 1,600 divorced man, who took a step-child would have been better off to aim a double barreled shotgun at both knees and pull the triggers.

She told me as a young adult if I hadn’t become her dad, she probably would have run away from home — and probably ended up being one of X’s hookers to beat up?

Anyway, when her mom and I married, she was 7, and the teacher was recommending her for special ed classes. If I hadn’t come along, you can be sure her future as a Hispanic minority in special ed was bleak.

After I was there, she went up two years every year on Skill testing. She now has a Master’s Degree in Science Ed. and is working on another Master’s.

Am I a conceited jackass who thinks he is responsible for the difference? Absolutely! Eugenics f*****s would have labeled her as low i.q.and talked about dragging down the i.q. of society. With the proper dad (let me repeat, dad) she has done relatively well with herself.

My eldest son is a math research professor; the second is at least temporarily in med school, starting his last year. They are both Hispanic minorities. My ancestors were all manual laborers or dirt farmers.

My latest example is the half-grandson of my best friend. He is 8 months old, and within a few hours he jumps at me when he sees me.

Has anyone seen a woman trying to calm a fussy baby? The woman usually rocks him up and down. This kid was doing that and his mom was trying to rock him to calm him. I took him, and started exploring, I call it, just as I did with my own kids. I took him to the window and started talking to him in English, about the trees blowing in the wind, and the truck driving by. For some reason he wasn’t fussy!

If a kid isn’t sick or teething, in most cases when a kid is fussy, he is bored sick. Give him to a man who understands kids, and not only will he (or she) quiet down but his i.q. starts climbing. Heh, heh.

When my son was a kid, they did a study that showed the less time a small kid spent with his mother, the better he did intellectually. Hee, hee. Men Are Better Than Women.

devilsadvocate said:

SMash said:

HOW TO SURVIVE A HEART ATTACK WHEN ALONE

Dude, how do you go from talking about cuttin up women ala American Psycho, to some Anti-Semitic Stuff to 9/11 conspiracy theory stuff to Anti Homophobic stuff to an article about helping people survive a heart attack

got a lot on your mind …lol

Sounds much like the high i.q. folks I met in Mensa when I was an officer. Heh, heh.

Hans said:

SMash said:

I must say it is at least refreshing to see for the first time months and months, a mabtw comment thread has graduated beyond the stock standard ‘you’re gay…. you’re a cunt’ kind of shit.

Yeah, and on top of it I found out I can buy the M>W book easily in Germany too!
End of next week it´s here.

Dude you need to lay off on this Women hating shit. It´s like hating a dog for being a dog, just plain stupid.
Plus you always end up giving away your power to the thing you hate.
If you got issues then go beat up a sandbag or something.

Give up our power to that which we hate? I gotta’ think about that, at great length. I know the same folks who support all sorts of strange things say that (not to say you are in that category, just pointing out what I have seen.)

But, what I see as a former divorce counselor is men giving away their power to the thing they love.

So, I am not really sure I can buy that viewpoint. Maybe it’s one of those things that gets repeated enough that we start to believe it?

I suppose it’s possible that when someone lets their hatred dominate their life, it can screw them up. The guy who says he likes to beat up on hookers will sooner or later find himself with a knife in his back, or bullet in his forehead, or in lock-up.

But, I think modest amounts of hatred serve to keep us out of trouble.

Like I said, I gotta’ think about this at length.

SMash said:

HOW TO SURVIVE A HEART ATTACK WHEN ALONE

Dude, how do you go from talking about cuttin up women ala American Psycho, to some Anti-Semitic Stuff to 9/11 conspiracy theory stuff to Anti Homophobic stuff to an article about helping people survive a heart attack

got a lot on your mind …lol

HOW TO SURVIVE A HEART ATTACK WHEN ALONE

Read This – It could save your life!

Let’s say it’s 6:15 p.m. and you’re driving home (alone of course), after a hard day on the job. You’re really tired, upset and frustrated. Suddenly you start experiencing severe pain in your chest that starts to radiate out into your arm and up into your jaw. You are only about five miles from the hospital nearest your home. Unfortunately you don’t know if you’ll be able to make it that far. What can you do? You’ve been trained in CPR but the guy that taught the course, didn’t tell you what to do if a heart attack happens to you.

Since many people are alone when they suffer a heart attack, this article seemed to be in order.

Without help, the person whose heart is beating properly and who begins to feel faint has only about 10 seconds left before losing consciousness.

However, these victims can help themselves by coughing repeatedly and very vigorously.

A deep breath should be taken before each cough, and the cough must be deep and prolonged, as when producing sputum from deep inside the chest.

A breath and a cough must be repeated about every two seconds without let up until help arrives, or until the heart is felt to be beating normally again.

Deep breaths get oxygen into the lungs and coughing movements squeeze the heart and keep the blood circulating.

The squeezing pressure on the heart also helps it regain normal rhythm. In this way, heart attack victims can get to a hospital.

Tell as many other people as possible about this, it could save their lives!

There are few spectacles quite as rivetting and pitiable as a revved-up public pursuing a false idea in the name of equality. One gets the sense that the snake has charmed the charmer. One of the Canadian Public’s pet snakes is the idea of homosexual rights, and “All shall be the same in this society,” is the tune that charms.
I would argue, rather, that unless we maintain our historical distinction between individual rights, and social rights, there will be no society left. Every citizen of Canada, including all homosexuals, already has the same, exactly equal, individual rights (freedom of speech, right to trial, and so on). But not everyone has, nor ought to have, the same social rights. Simply being a citizen is sufficient to get all individual rights. But in a normal society, a citizen must qualify for specified social rights and benefits, and society has the prerogative of stipulating exactly how, rigorously excluding – that is, discriminating against – unqualified individuals.
For example, you cannot have a Canada Pension until you reach a certain age (unless you are an M.P. – then age doesn’t matter!). Nor can you have Social Assistance unless you demonstrate difficult circumstances. Nor can you qualify for veteran payments unless you have fought for Canada in a war. Nor are you a legal adult until a specified age. AND, most importantly – you can’t have the legal or tax benefits of a spouse unless you marry someone of the opposite sex.
But increasingly, people are believing the egalitarian idea that qualification for social rights is unnecessary. Increasingly, we have been subjected to a damnable new Charter argument designed to get social rights for homosexuals.
Most people have insisted the Charter should only protect against discrimination based on immutable characteristics such as colour, ethnicity, and gender, but never behaviour. But the new argument says: How about religion? Religion is protected, and that’s not immutable! Unfair!
But there is an unbridgeable gap between these two.
For starters, religion underpins Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Preamble of which specifically states: “Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God.” Homosexuality is not mentioned as a principle upon which Canada is founded (yet). A Charter would be Orwellian if it did not protect from discrimination those who believe in its own founding principle.
Religion is universal. It infuses all societies, and directly or indirectly shapes their collective identity. But homosexuality is the opposite. It is a widely spurned behaviour, even a counter-identity, practiced by only 1.5 to 2 per cent of the population in most nations.
Religion, though fallible like all things human, at least promotes moral behaviour through the worship of God, the highest Good. Homosexuality is the opposite. If not outlawed by most countries, it is deemed morally wrong, or sinful, by overwhelming majorities of normal people – even by those who defend the legal right to practice it privately. Charters and human rights codes should not be used to protect behaviours universally deemed bad.
Religion promotes procreation, is supportive of society, traditional family, and the continuation of both. Homosexuality is the opposite. Two homosexuals cannot procreate with each other. A fully homosexual society would self-destruct. Charters should protect procreation and pass over in silence other choices made by free individuals.
Religion is healthy, too. Societies that stress sincere religious beliefs tend to be the lowest in sociopathology, alcohol abuse, and crime. Homosexuality is the opposite. It is unhealthy, even dangerous behaviour. Homosexuals die younger, and have vastly more social, psychological, sexual, alcohol/drug problems than any other group. About 85% of all AIDS deaths in Canada and the U.S.A. are male homosexuals.
Religion is culturally inherited. The vast majority of the world’s children are inducted into their religion before adulthood, and never change. In this sense, religion is in theory mutable, but in practice is only quasi-mutable.
Homosexuality is the opposite. No one, no parent, no community leader, no one except another (usually older) homosexual, would ever voluntarily induct a child into homosexuality. About half of all homosexuals themselves even say they would “become upset” if a child of theirs became homosexual (Bell and Weinberg). And in no sense is homosexual behaviour immutable, as is skin colour, or ethnicity. Respected sexologists Masters and Johnson have repeatedly shown recovery rates of 70 per cent for homosexuals.
Religion is necessarily based on spiritual belief, but not necessarily on behaviour. Homosexuality is the opposite. No beliefs are required. What is required to identify and define homosexuality, is an act. Without homosexual behaviour, there is no homosexuality to worry about, and this fact alone is sufficient grounds to deny protection.
Charters should not protect or promote the mere appetites or behaviours of any individual or group.

I think it is time for the obligatory ZOG planned 9/11 and mind controlled bush with antidepressants and made him mesmerized reading a children’s book on the morning of 9/11… and metal doesn’t melt in the history of man…. and listen to alex jones he is so right…. and watch loose change…. and visit meatholes.com

SMash said:
Ich bin der fuhrer von Deutschland! Sig Heil! Jude NEIN!!!!!!!

I personally prefer the words of the megalomaniacal Aguirre, as portrayed by Klaus Kinski, in the movie of the same name:

“Ich bin der Zorn Gottes!”

Much darker and more sinister, don’t you think? Anyway, the Jews, provided that they are all of the male gender, are a friendly and intelligent people who have contributed enormously to both the scientific and material progress of civilization; what these men have suffered throughout history was a tragedy of immense proportions.

However, I do agree that the Protocols of the Elders of Zion was probably penned by a Jewess and that the world would be a much better place if all of our Jüdische Frauen were stuffed into the ovens of Auschwitz and roasted alive.

Beating up a whore is just like beating sandbag. No one knows about it. I leave the place and I’m fucking out of there. It’s fine. Don’t worry about me. Bitch patches her cunt up… goes to the ER…. its like American Psycho…. with the coathanger.

I’m impressed to see Dicko’s bx is 4 sale in the reich… that’s impressive… has it been translated to spreche deutsche?

Ich bin der fuhrer von Deutschland! Sig Heil! Jude NEIN!!!!!!!

SMash said:

I must say it is at least refreshing to see for the first time months and months, a mabtw comment thread has graduated beyond the stock standard ‘you’re gay…. you’re a cunt’ kind of shit.

Yeah, and on top of it I found out I can buy the M>W book easily in Germany too!
End of next week it´s here.

Dude you need to lay off on this Women hating shit. It´s like hating a dog for being a dog, just plain stupid.
Plus you always end up giving away your power to the thing you hate.
If you got issues then go beat up a sandbag or something.

I must say it is at least refreshing to see for the first time months and months, a mabtw comment thread has graduated beyond the stock standard ‘you’re gay…. you’re a cunt’ kind of shit.

I enjoy frequenting prostitutes…. I really fucking do. I very much love to economically rape and pillage these cunts’ bodies and minds. It is payback for what their ’sisters’ have done to my society. I spit in bitches’ faces.

Muzalon said:

Commander Scott said:

devilsadvocate said:

Our civilization is now rotten in the core and the final strike will be given to the west by the islam. I don’t think western women will like the laws of the sharia, women are digging their own grave and there will be no man left with enough sympathy for them to protect them against the results of their own liberation. Maybe the laws of the sharia aren’t such a bad deal for men compared with contemporary female behaviour and family court. I don’t have sufficient knowledge about islamic culture to judge if the sharia will profit men, but i can imagine what will happen when a significant portion of western men convert to islam.

Yes, now that you mention those points I see that as well. can you give some examples of other civilizations that have treated women as equals that have been destroyed? (and not just the name of the civilization, what happened)

thanks

In no civilization have men and women ever been treated as equals; as a matter of fact, in all civilizations, women have been granted preferential treatment and special privileges, whereas men, especially those of the middle and lower classes, have always been discriminated against harshly and treated with great brutality. Thus, contrary to popular opinion, women were granted more privileges and a much higher status than the vast majority of men in such societies as Pharaonic Egypt, Ancient Rome, Han China, Japan under the shoguns, and the feudal kingdoms of the Middle Ages. In these cultures, the vast majority of men were bought and sold as slaves, coerced at the end of a sword to till the soil like serfs bound to the land forever. In what historical period have women ever been treated with such barbarism? After all, is woman not redeemed solely through the presence of her vagina?

It is under the aegis of contemporary Western society, that women are more privileged now than they have ever been throughout the history of the world. The notion of female oppression by males is an ideological fantasy concocted by Marxist historical revisionists; women have always been placed on pedestals and those men with the audacity to curtail female entitlement have always been subject to violent retaliation. Even in the polygamous culture of Islam, where most available young women are confined to lavish harems of concubines and beautiful odalisques, women have always been granted a higher status than men, given the fact that none ever have to work, pay taxes or fight wars. However, in Islam, female entitlement never reaches the same bizarre extreme as it does in the West.

The only difference between the contemporary West and previous civilizations is that the West has granted women so many privileges as to subvert the current patriarchal basis of civilization. Because all civilizations are founded and held together on the basis of male strength and intelligence, the elevation of the human female to such dizzying heights of power and wealth can only undermine the very fabric of Western society and ensure a civilizational collapse of the modern West more spectacular than that of the Roman Empire during late classical antiquity.

One very direct cause of cultural decline is the natural female preference for low IQ thugs and morons as sexual partners. Not only is this costly to society, putting unhelpful demands on the economy when the titular fathers abscond; it also has a dysgenic effect, causing the average IQ to fall in formerly healthy populations.

Under patriarchy, female choice counts for nothing, and the finest males tend to spread their genes, keeping the population at a respectable level in terms of IQ, social acumen and mental stability. When patriarchy crumbles, female choice (always in favour of the workshy,stupid and sociopathic) becomes a central factor in determining the genetic decline of the population. This is why and how matriarchy kills civilizations.

Muzalon or whatever the fuck your name is…. read a book called ‘the mismeasure of man’…. I think you are a eugenicist fuckhead… the wide baseless assertions you attribute to simply ‘genes’ are misguided in the utmost.

What creates low IQ is letting a fucking dvd player raise your children. Any child who is homeschooled by a father who has retired early or is self employed and has the time and vigor to dedicate hours a day to the child, will ace any IQ test.

You eugenic fucks are the ones that need to be wiped off the map and rolled into the fucking sea, simply because you cheapen every newborn baby with your baseless assumptions.

Learn motherfucker.

montreal said:

irlandes said:

It is alleged there is a book SEX AND CULTURE, by Unwin, 1934, which covers the subject of civilizations which rise and fall as female sexuality is controlled or not. And Unwin says in every civlization, of over 80 he studied, the first generation of women who had complete sexual freedom saw the end of their civilization.

The only copy I have found was listed for around $800 in UK.

wow just wow. On amazon there are 2 reviews of this books and I quote : “Of course I rate this book 5 stars. It is the most important book written since The Origin of Species. But since the facts it contains are not politically correct, it is doomed to obscurity.”

Yes, civilizations, in my limited study, just before the end believe they are stronger and better than ever. I am looking forward to getting time to read this book.