Germain Greer is a Cunt (And a Whore) Part II

After writing my original article entitled Germaine Greer is a Cunt, I did some research on the dear lady doctor. After all, I did come at “Dr.” Greer like a venomous Ferrari (I’m sure I’m not the first — if you know what I sexually mean), and I didn’t want to sound half-cocked. I’m a man. If I’m going to sound anything it’s going to be all-cocked and I want to know about it first.

Not only did I discover that I was completely right in saying Germaine Greer is a cunt and also everything else I say about women not being as good as men, but I also found that Germaine Greer is even cuntier than I implied.

And she’s a whore.

Before I get into that, let me just say for the record that Germaine Greer has a nose like the cartoon version of Laurel from Laurel and Hardy. On a man it looks humourous, whimsical, and occasionally mischievous; on a woman, however — especially one as old and turkey chinned as “Dr.” Greer — it looks trashy and whorish, which she obviously is.

No woman has ever gotten to be a feminist without whoring the fuck out of herself for a good six or seven years prior. That’s why they turn into feminists. Five guys in one night, five guys at a time; your average feminist has fucked every combination she can count too and Greer is no exception. That’s why feminists (and specifically Greer) say they’re so comfortable in a world built by men for men. It’s because they’ve most likely fucked the sexual tension out of any situation.

Sounds like a pretty wild allegation doesn’t it? Well I have man proof. That’s the best kind of proof.

During her college years in like 65 BC, “Dr.” Greer joined a student acting troupe. I don’t know about you, but where I come from the only reason women join acting groups is because they want to sit on the casting couch. Whoring and attention whoring are pretty much the same thing anyway. I’ve man-proven elsewhere women can’t act anyway, so let’s just agree to agree and call that Exhibit A.

As Exhibit B, I present this anecdotal remark on a younger student Greer from one of her lady professors:

Germaine was explaining that there could be no liberation for women, no matter how highly educated, as long as we were required to cram our breasts into bras constructed like mini-Vesuviuses, two stitched white cantilevered cones which bore no resemblance to the female anatomy.

I’ve heard a lot of come-ons in my day. I’m a man after all and I wear a tie. That means women are coming on to me all the time. Try it for yourself. Fuck, wear a tie to the beach — just Speedos and a tie. You’ll need a lifeguard just to keep you from drowning in women. Actually, women are most likely coming on to you all the time anyway. As a man you just don’t notice because you’re too busy thinking of shit that matters, like getting a job or keeping a job by not fucking up. Women don’t have that option; thinking or not fucking up.

Do women look at your eyes or specifically avoid your gaze? Those are both classic female come-ons. Another classic female come-on is constantly ranting and raving about their breasts. Are they too big, are they too small? Do you not care for them, could they use a lift or a stuffing? Do you love them? Can they be aptly or cutely described by a volcano metaphor a fucking ten year old might concoct on a bad day?

There’s no better way for a woman to get attention from men than by talking about her tits. Just ask the America’s Women’s World Cup team — or Germaine Greer the student.

That’s strike one and strike two. In the whore game, that’s all you get. That’s a good thing too because Exhibit C is Greer’s own quote from a 1971 interview in the New York Times confessing that she was once a traveling unpaid sex toy for any and all bands; a period she calls her supergroupie phase. As a man, I am naturally more skilled than “Dr.” Greer at not inventing words where perfectly applicable ones already exist. That’s a waste of fucking time. In this case wanton, promiscuous slut seems appropriate.

Naturally, exhibits D through F are Greer’s advice to young women in Sex and Destiny to give up celibacy, monogamy, and finally to drink their own fucking menstrual blood — I assume that’s her homeopathic method of checking for STD’s.

And you thought the clitoris/penis thing was bad.

Germaine Greer is the real-life nightmare of every filthy, drugged up, and well abused whore who’s ever been typecast. She has no business speaking.


Related Articles:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

174 Comments in 173 threads.»

Pages: [9] 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All

Comment by Kyle
2008-06-21 08:18:33

Oh yeah, almost forgot to mention. This could count as point 6, although its linked to 4 and 5, being a man, who is accountable and responsible, you have to also accept the fact that one day, if you fuck up, or say, or do the wrong thing, you’re gonna have to cop a hit, and no, I don’t mean that little slap on the arse your boyfriend gives you when you tell him to treat you dirty, I mean a full blown punch to the face. Potentially from a man, who believes as a true champion of equality, that its his duty to punch you in the face because you’re a responsible member of society who wants to be treated like a man.
Congratulations, you’re on of the boys now.

 
Comment by Kyle
2008-06-21 08:10:08

Which brings me to another point, and this is obviously more for the guys. I mean, I’d ask women to think about this, but if they did then it’d just be a menstrual storm of poorly thought out abuse.
When are people going to get it into their heads that feminism isn’t really about “equality,” but rather about some deluded concept of superiority.
If women want to be treated equally, that would mean being treated as A MAN, and as a man, you are subject to the following (and much more):
1) Pay your own way, no handouts.
2) Lift heavy baggage.
3) Not expect chivalry, or any other kind of special treatment for that matter, you’re just another face in the crowd, nobody cares, and neither do you.
4) Be responsible.
5) Be able to be held accountable for what you do in or with your life.

Women want the benefits of having a man do points 1-3 to them, while not having to accept 4-5. That is not equality, that is superiority.

Comment by Dustin
2008-08-08 19:03:47

Actually, there’s nothing superior about that attitude. It’s putting degeneracy on a pedestal, which is a form of degeneracy itself.

 
 
Comment by Kyle
2008-06-21 07:18:45

Liam said:

How depressing this website is - a bunch of bitter, abusive loners who reinforce each others’ unbalanced views on women by pretending it’s humorous.

Sad

Humour has nothing to do with it.
People have a hard time with Dick because he’s not just some boorish idiot who goes, “Durrrr, women suck!”
He presents himself in a cool, calm, rational manner, as well as speaking and acting with integrity. He doesn’t fit the stereotypical mold for someone whos considered “prejudiced.” He says his piece and gives his reasons that deep down a LOT of people agree with, and it drives a lot of bulldyke feminists and pussy whipped men like you up the wall.

 
Comment by Big Al
2008-05-14 05:11:50

gwallan said:

Alex said:

Gwallan- I agree with most of what you said. I’d identify much more with women’s lib, then… equality of opportunity, not outcome. Women, as you said, were not being treated as adults and weren’t given a fair shot and the majority of it was corrected fairly quickly. With affirmative action… it’s a difficult subject. When women’s lib began, certain businesses probably wouldn’t hire a woman over a man even if she was more qualified, and affirmative action meant to ensure that women would be given a chance. Without affirmative action, would businesses still hire men over women regardless of talent/qualifications? The same question arises with regards to minorities. It’s hard to tell when affirmative action has outlived its usefulness, but once it does, it does become damaging to the previously advantaged party. It’s just hard to tell when that point is. I think that the original goals of feminism were noble, but the philsophy was merely taken too far.

Businesses are not charities. It is NOT in their best interests to employ lesser qualified people regardless of gender or anything else in order to “give them a chance”. It reduces their competitiveness and efficiency and in large systems adds to a shortcoming of bureaucracies known as the “Peter Principle”(which I will leave you to research on your own time).
Affirmative action ASSUMES discrimination where for the most part it did not exist. And if it did exist equal opportunity laws were already in place to deal with it. AA has already become damaging to it’s targeted beneficiaries because many already assume women and minorities are token appointments(or, as I’ve heard many times, “token titties”).
Basically AA came into existence because of feminist insistance that their grievances be fixed yesterday.

I do not employ women nor will i ever, business is great.

 
Comment by Amy
2007-12-17 15:20:05

Stick a cock up your ass.

 
Comment by diamatik
2007-06-12 11:48:33

Beinrich_Bimmler? That is an amusing change of moniker.

 
Comment by son of the suns
2007-06-12 07:53:48

glandular problem said:

Hmmm, my ‘lot’ being who, exactly?

As for your obvious allegiance to der Fuhrer, wouldn’t that count as your lot proving me right?

Now, go join gwallen and sons of the sun in their bunker and await these fabulous dark ages you pine for. You can rant and rave about each other’s man-boobies between rousing bouts of hide the bratwurst.

Damn, now I have to apologize to the good Germans.

Amusing how this cunt implies Gwallan the athlete and I the veteran are fat fucks awaiting doomsday because we can’t get laid.

Little fucking whores like you eye fuck me every time I buy liquor, go to a party, or even the grocery store. The truth is you couldn’t make it into the bottom of my “who I’d fuck when blind drunk with a bad case of blueballs” list.

 
Comment by Beinrich_Bimmler
2007-06-12 00:33:46

NursDoc said:

What is wrong with you? If you tell me, I will cure it.

Would you now? I doubt that. (In fact, what’s wrong with me is i really need a good shagging. It wouldnt change anything in my life but it would improve my ‘tude a lot, and thats a start.) What do you think of that, nursedoc?

 
Comment by NursDoc
2007-06-11 22:48:53

What is wrong with you? If you tell me, I will cure it.

 
Comment by Billy
2007-02-25 12:54:59

And the stupidity of women never ends.

 
Comment by Necroswordsman
2007-02-25 08:51:54

glandular problem said:

Hmmm, my ‘lot’ being who, exactly?

As for your obvious allegiance to der Fuhrer, wouldn’t that count as your lot proving me right?

Your lot being crazy feminists. And you’re wrong, HEIL HITLER means saluting the fuhrer, SIEG HEIL is just ‘Hail (to) Victory’.

 
Comment by sonyad
2007-02-25 02:51:49

berth*

 
Comment by glandular problem
2007-02-25 00:45:39

Hmmm, my ‘lot’ being who, exactly?

As for your obvious allegiance to der Fuhrer, wouldn’t that count as your lot proving me right?

Now, go join gwallen and sons of the sun in their bunker and await these fabulous dark ages you pine for. You can rant and rave about each other’s man-boobies between rousing bouts of hide the bratwurst.

Damn, now I have to apologize to the good Germans.

 
Comment by Necroswordsman
2007-02-24 23:36:41

glandular problem said:

p.s. Apologies if you don’t take this as a joke. Seriously, it’s nothing personal, but you’re really asking for it.

Oh no need to apologise. It’s so fun when your lot prove us right. And Nazis over feminism? SIEG HEIL!!

 
Comment by glandular problem
2007-02-24 23:04:14

gwallan said:

It is essential that men do prevail else our civilisation is lost.
A return to a dark ages culture is quite possible and it could happen very quickly.

I see.

With regards to you pending Dark Age, might I suggest that you avoid jamming your head up your arse in the first place? You know, as a preventative measure and all.

son of the suns said:

Ironically enough in the Dark Ages that women will create, there will be no central fascist power to gaurantee their “rights” in exchange for their votes.

So men win either way.

Correct me if I’m wrong and all, but fascism was never very pro-women (you know, that whole chasing women out of public schools, leaving domestic work or prostitution as the only means for survival thing).

In fact, neither was nazism (you know, that whole Kinder, Küche, Kirche thing). And yet, the term feminazi persists (damn you Larry Flint, you and your pathetic chicken raping ways!).

When, oh when will you boys learn? Reading comprehension is a virtue!
Anyhow, thanks for the laughs and all.

p.s. Apologies if you don’t take this as a joke. Seriously, it’s nothing personal, but you’re really asking for it.

p.p.s. Also, apologies for not commenting on the whole Dakota thing, but I don’t know you people, and am therefore not informed/interested enough to weigh in.

 
Comment by glandular problem
2007-02-24 22:36:10

Another classic female come-on is constantly ranting and raving about your breasts.

Oh. Your breasts. Now I get it, all this vitriolic hatred. Despair no more young onions, if Subway Jarred can turn his life around so can you.
Unless that is, you are turned on by women ranting and raving about your man-breasts (although, were this the case it would not explain your frustrated hatred of women).

Anyhow, whimper on.

 
Comment by diamatik
2006-10-21 05:06:22

wolfe said:

If what you say is true, LW, why are you posting here?
-wolfe

because women and integrity mix as well as oil and water.

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-10-20 03:09:30

If what you say is true, LW, why are you posting here?
-wolfe

 
Comment by Lying_Whore
2006-10-19 14:29:05

Where did you get the idea I am pregnant? I am not. Just because Dakota speculated as much in the midst of a bizarre situation does not make it so. Bite your tongue. And, Dakota would never get back together with me. Ever. Just so we have our facts straight. Mmmkay? I am glad you already apologized to Dakota. Must have been in a PM or something because I do not see it here. Nevertheless, good day to you and I am leaving, if only to demonstrate to you what that means as an actual occurrence rather than an empty threat.

Since you cannot seem to make good on your threat/promise, I would suggest you try engaging in more rational discourse with the men here.

Yours Truly,

LW

Female said:

LW, I have already apologised to Dakota. I am not going to revisit our conversation. I also do not wish to get into an argument with a pregnant woman. I’m not sure why you are now appearing on this board, maybe you and Dakota are back together, but if not, then perhaps your desire is to make peace with him. I do not think that posting to this board is the ideal way to do that. I would suggest doing it directly.

 
Comment by Female
2006-10-19 13:48:26

LW, I have already apologised to Dakota. I am not going to revisit our conversation. I also do not wish to get into an argument with a pregnant woman. I’m not sure why you are now appearing on this board, maybe you and Dakota are back together, but if not, then perhaps your desire is to make peace with him. I do not think that posting to this board is the ideal way to do that. I would suggest doing it directly.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis