Germaine Greer is a Cunt
Steve Irwin “The Crocodile Hunter” died on Monday. It’s an incredible loss for the world and the MenAreBetterThanWomen.com card will be black in mourning this week.
The MABTW.com card will also be black in mourning for the loss of the last shred of dignity held by the feminist movement — bowel movement. We’ve all had a good laugh at women and their silly agendas, stupid, childish groups, and the milestones they’ve managed to cobble together out of the political table scrapings tossed to them by men. This time they’ve gone too far.
Now they’re going after a tragedy just to prove a point that no one cares about and no one can even figure out. I guess that’s to be expected. Tragedy is the only thing a feminist knows.
Germaine Greer is a woman, allegedly a doctor (though I could not find of what. I would guess proctology, but that usually entails extracting things from the butt, not lodging your own head firmly up it), and has been a virulent feminist most of her life. During my research I found the reason Dr. Greer originally entered the field of feminism is because her clitoris is shaped like a male penis and the trauma of being teased for it since she was sexually active at the age of 12 drove her into the insanity. Interesting to say the least.
On a completely different note, “Dr.” Greer wrote her millionth article in a row this week on the topic of “things I shouldn’t even be fucking talking about” for The Guardian. She called it, “That sort of self-delusion is what it takes to be a real Aussie larrikin”. The surprise is that it isn’t an autobiography. Nor is it a treatise on Australian women in general who are largely regarded as bitches and unimportant the world over. It’s about Steve Irwin and his untimely passing. I don’t give half a fuck what larrikin means. Self-delusion is quite enough.
The points Greer wishes to address in her article are irrelevant — just like everything women say unless it starts with a, “Do you think I should,” or a, “I’m so sorry. I fucked up and did something you said you didn’t think I should do.” And obviously proceeded by a blowjob. It’s enough simply to quote the following from “Dr.” Greer.
It’s really quite unusual for divers to be stung unless they are grappling with the animal and, knowing Steve Irwin, perhaps that may have been the case…Not much sympathy there then.
Classy.
As she is a woman, I find it humourous that “Dr.” Greer — who I would simply just refer to as The Cunt for the remainder of this article, but my man-prudence prohibits me from doing so — even relies on the word ’sympathy’ as a part of her female feminist vocabulary. It is not. These female feminists are the same creatures who fabricate most rape allegations in the hopes of making a stab at some mythical patriarchy.
Does that sound like sympathy to you?
There’s no such thing as a patriarchy, Dr. Greer, you stupid cunt. It’s called the Real World, where seven billion strangers are picked to live in a loft and find out what happens when saber tooth tigers start taking bites out of their asses while they’re trying to sleep. It turns out in this Real World, men get to do everything. They do everything and make all the decisions. Call it whatever you want, but what it’s actually called is the truth. Men are better than women.
Here’s another gem:
The only time Irwin ever seemed less than entirely lovable to his fans (as distinct from zoologists) was when he went into the Australia Zoo crocodile enclosure with his month-old baby son in one hand and a dead chicken in the other. For a second you didn’t know which one he meant to feed to the crocodile.
First of all, that is inappropriate. Secondly, I was never confused, but then again, I’m not retarded.
When Germaine Greer dies, largely unnoticed by friends and family, and which I bet will be soon judging by the God fucking awful picture I found of the old hag on the internet — she looks like a fucking beige batting glove left in the sun with a wad of stringy doll’s hair stapled to the palm — you bet your ass I will be the first one shooting her little clitoral-penis problem out of the old Man-Mouthcannon. That’s called what goes around comes around. That was invented by men too.
Thirdly, let me say that if you have any problem whatsoever with Steve Irwin holding his infant son in his arms whilst feeding crocodiles raw chickens, you are not only wrong, but you are also not a man.
That has nothing to do with risk.
Let me give you a simple man test you can use on any anonymous parties to see if they are a man, woman or some kind of broken computing machine. Actually, strike that last one. If an unknown party gives a response that could only be arrived at through a cluster fuck of malformed logic, just assume it was a woman. Not even men could build a Touring machine that ran on crazy.
First of all, let’s say there’s something called risk. Now say that socially, we all accept a certain amount of risk and that stepping over that line incurs criticism from said society. The question then becomes, “How do we establish the risk of blank?” If you have a vagina, no matter how empowered it is, the answer is, “Well how do I feel about blank?” That is fucked and stupid. The correct and man-answer is, “Let’s ask an expert.”
I’d say someone who built a multi-billion fucking dollar business on the dealings and doings of blank would be a bonafide fucking expert. I would also say that this expert dangling his own fucking son over blanks while doing blank is a bonafide fucking testament that blank is not as risky as you think if you know what the fuck you’re blanking.
That’s just it. Women don’t ever know what they’re blanking so they have to rely on their shitty instincts at all times. That’s why feminism is backwards. It’s puts a small amount of power in the hands of people who have no fucking idea what they’re doing ever — that’s women.
After reading Germaine “Boy’s Name” Greer’s article on the untimely passing of one of the mannest man men to ever walk the Earth, I was saddened by her callous remarks in light of the family Irwin has left behind. Then it hit me: all feminists are insensitive cunts who have no family for that exact reason. They embarrass and shame their parents until they’re ostracized. They embarrass their friends until wallowing into the self-loathing circles of hags who will accompany them through menopause. They have no children because no man in his right mind would fuck a feminist and even if one was drugged into it, Jesus would step in and perform the world’s first immaculate abortion.
Feminists have no right to families. They are horrid and miserable abortions of women and they will rot in hell. Not the biblical one. I’m talking about the one women enter when they hit 35 and don’t have children.
Every creature he brandished at the camera was in distress. Every snake badgered by Irwin was at a huge disadvantage, with only a single possible reaction to its terrifying situation, which was to strike. Easy enough to avoid, if you know what’s coming. Even my cat knew that much.
A cat, huh? What a fucking surprise. Fuck feminists.
“Dr,” Greer Weighs in Heavily
A Female Eunich? What the Fuck?
A Proper Send Off. Written by a Man Instead of a Cunt.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 56 … 17 16 15 14 13 [12] 11 10 9 8 7 … 1 » Show All
The day a computer thinks of you as spam you must really know you’re at the top of your game, no?
No. You get moderated because of your behaviour pertaining to a cunted idiot. Not because you actually are a cunted idiot.
The filter is entirely automatic and I’ve already summarily explained how it works. I don’t know the specific words the spam filter is looking for, or in what numbers, before it will allow your post to show as opposed to withholding it pending moderation.
A maximum of 1(?) uniform resource locators (URL, links, what the fuck ever) per comment.
There may be other triggers as well, that I may not know about. Such as an abnormally quick succession of comments, etc.
ha ha - I get moderated for trying to out child molesters!!! That is my whole friggin’ point about the men’s movement.
And you call us hypocrites…
Look I know I am not welcome, I was just here to defend Germaine and Steve. It has been interesting, and I hope you manage to root out all the pedophiles in your midst. (start with the ex-athlete, all women know they are dreadful perves who like to have sex in front of/with their mates)
Your posts are likely pending moderation, not deleted outright.
There is a top number limit of URLs inserted. Undoubtedly, there’s also some sort of word based spam filter as well.
Ok several times I have tried to post the info - is there a word limit on this?
Apologies to everyone who has been breathlessly waiting for this info.
Firstly, as you know Michael Flood’s work I will not rehash it but instead provide some other links as well. Also some more popular research and news pages and websites for survivors of abuse which talk about the damage the men’s rights movement has done to women’s and children’s rights.
http://www.omsys.com/mmcd/courtrev.htm
http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/res/csa-acc.html
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/10/02/1096527990335.html?from=s torylhs
http://www.childjustice.org/docs/carmody2005.pdf#search=%22custody%20w ith%20sexual%20abuse%20Queensland%22
http://www.stopchildabuse.com.au/support/kidsspeak.asp#voices (this last one is a page where victims speak out themselves - believe them if you won’t believe ‘women’.)
OK - now you have read some of that, please bear in mind that most men’s rights groups seem to me to make the opposite claims and link to sites that support the pedophile tactics and claims discussed in the (mostly independent, government) studies. You check for yourselves and decide.
Almost every men’s rights site will have some sort of article (usually several pages devoted to it) trying to promote these pedophile tactics. Why do men’s right’s groups misrepresent these statistics on sexual violence? Because the as you would know - members of such groups consist disproportionately of men accused of domestic violence, many of whom are accordingly denied child custody or access visits, and they resent having to pay child support to their ex-partners for the financial support of children they are not allowed to see. I accept that some of the men accused of abusive violence may be innocent, but that doesn’t mean that they can manipulate statistics to misrepresent women as being just as violent as men.
35,023 reports of suspected child abuse and neglect were made to authorities in Queensland in 2004-05.
After investigation, the Department of Child Safety confirmed that child abuse or neglect had taken place in 17,473 of these cases, involving over 12,000 individual children.
We are talking about 12,000 THAT HAVE BEEN SUSTANTIATED - and it is very difficult to prove these allegations so I think we can sensibly agree this is a conservative estimate.
Out of these substantiated allegations, 6% involved sexual abuse. That is at least 720 new, substantiated cases of sexual abuse in Queensland alone every year. Qld at 6% is lower than the national average of 10%. More than 95% of these substantiated cases involved the father or another male family member (either natural or adoptive) as the perpetrator. Of the cases in which it was determined by the judge that the mother made false allegations, she did not get custody.
Source: http://www.abusedchildtrust.com.au/facts.htm
So lets say around 720 cases per year. 13% were also perpetrators under the age of twelve, so that brings the number down to 626. http://www.communities.qld.gov.au/projectaxis/resources/documents/pdf/ incidence.pdf#search=%22number%20of%20person%20convicted%20of%20child% 20sexual%20abuse%20in%20qld%22
Only 40% of these substantiated cases (this is an Australia wide figure, I could not find Qld figures today - (source http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/links/doi/10.1046/j.1440-1614.2000.00 642.x/abs/ )
are ever taken to prosecution - and not all of these result in convictions. So… that means that around 370 NEW child molesters are known to be on the streets every year… JUST IN QLD who don’t have access to their children without supervision, and they are the very men forming and accessing the men’s rights groups. Hundreds and hundreds every year who should rightfully be in gaol.
Scary, isn’t it? Now Nick you can follow this up by finding out how many members have joined who have custody issues involving supervised visits. They are your child molesters.
For those interested, the men’s rights movement has also been linked to the pro-gun lobby:
“The Family Court and the Child Support Agency are particular targets, along with gun control. In the words of consultant Malcolm MacGregor: `if you scratch the surface of the gun lobby, there’s a lot of these blokes who have a huge fixation with the CSA. There’s a perception it’s run by a whole bunch of lesbian separatists who have access to their bank accounts’.(3) The Family Court is similarly seen to be in the grip of feminist ideology. Every time a non-custodial parent resorts to violence there are now letters to newspapers suggesting that this shows men’s powerlessness in the face of a system biased against them. Lawyers Miranda Kaye and Julia Tolmie have analysed this discursive shift whereby incidents of violence become evidence of the victimisation of men” .(4) Source: EMILY’s List and Angry White Men: Gender Wars in the Nineties
Journal article by Marian Sawer; Journal of Australian Studies, 1999
http://www.questia.com/PM.qst;jsessionid=FN2d3XQ1WgwnpJ5GpGQyJDJyGf11V 2nLWv4wvQwbWhR5Jd1h2qMD!-562589112?a=o&d=5001885623
Other identifiers of sexual predators that may help you identify these people within your group are:
The mean self-reported age when offenders first had sexual contact with a child was 32.2 years (median = 31 years; range = 102013;63 years). The mean age at first conviction for any offense was 30.5 years (median = 27 years; range = 122013;66 years), and the mean age at first conviction for a sexual offense was 37.3 years (median = 37 years; range = 152013;76 years). Sixty-nine percent (n = 143) of the combined sample had at least one previous conviction, and 80% of these (n = 114) had first been convicted for a nonsexual offense. ANCOVA revealed a systematic pattern of onset with first convictions for any offense preceding first sexual contact with a child. Taken together, results indicate that, in general, adult child molesters (a) begin sexual offending in their 30s, (b) have already become involved in nonsexual crime by the time they first have sexual contact with a child, (c) are criminally versatile, and (d) vary considerably in their persistence with respect to both sexual and nonsexual offending.
Source: Child Sexual Abuse in Queensland — June 2000
Dick, that’s not a quote. That’s my own rambling being made up on the spot which isn’t to say there’s never been someone else before me to have said that, though.
That’s the guy whose music I was listening to at the moment. Sorry for the ambiguity.
There’s a number of giant fucking URLs limit on this.
-Dick
Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. Don’t even try to understand that quote because a man genius hopped out of the manwomb and after a lifetime of contemplating the MANiverse, he laid down that man law.
The basic point is, the radicalism of this site is only the beginning. We’re tired of being labeled rapists, neanderthals, abusers when the opposite is true. All great revolutions are radical. It’s a neccessary step to do great things. Like when we came down from our man-trees and started walking up right, and the cunts told us not to. Like when we started going on manly hunts and eating dead carcusses for the neccessary protein to inhibit intelligence, and the cunt stayed behind scolding us and eating berries.
Now, the cunts think we’ve discovered every possible technological innovation and all they have to do is wipe us out, and live in their utopia of mediocrity.
Little do they know, the parasite dies without the host. But the host can always purge the parasite. We are moving onto new frontiers, and feminists aren’t welcome.
@Normal Human
As a matter of interest are you posting from your place of work?
I have been to your site numerous times in the past. In fact the combination of local feminists’ hostility over my history of sexual abuse and web sites such as your own and that of Hugo Schwyzer caused me to drift away from feminism. I come from deeply left wing and feminists roots. I try really hard to stay in the middle ground (much to the horror of my lefty parents) and I do see exaggeration and hyperbole on both sides.
No I’m sorry. The venue in which the claim was first made is the appropriate place for the supporting information to be presented. I have offered a reasonable alternative already.
Well thank you for that.
You could aid me and others by providing the information I requested. Surely if it’s as dire as you suggest the public and relevant authorities have a right to know. These are paedophile rings we’re talking about.
I imagine it would be quite risky. These are obviously dangerous people and I’d be the one in the firing line.
I have to prove my credentials before you will back up your already public claims?
I’ve seen similar threats on feminist blogs too. It takes all kinds I guess.
The sign on the gate does warn women to stay out. The “threats” and “violence” and “rape” you refer to are normally quite conspicuous in their absence when trolls are also absent. In fact many of those trolls post here pretending to be men(often under several names) and are themselves common sources of “threats” and “violence” and “rape”.
I seem to recall refering to “police or others”. Aren’t you contradicting yourself a little. On the one hand we need “protection from our protectors” and then they’re all “lovely men and women”. Do I smell weasel words?
Maybe you should also try addressing the entire argument instead of cherry picking the bit that’s easy to criticise in isolation.
I’m an anarchist in that I believe our civilisation should have as it’s goal a condition where armies, police, laws, judicial systems, prisons are simply not needed.
Unfortunately we don’t live in that world.
Shangri La is over that way====->>>>>
If I may use your own words it’s called HEAPS of LEGITIMATE research.
And if it is you can bet your life I’ll take it seriously. Others here would vouch for this - I do not like paedophiles. I am a fairly patient individual as my repeated attempts to engage yourself should indicate but if I’m ever to become explosive it’s child sexual abuse that will do it.
That is a brilliant quote.
-Dick
For there to be mountains of soaring peaks there first needs to be the plain mundaness of plains. Embrace mediocrity, ladies. For you are its definition and embodiment.
Jean Michel Jarre. The manly age of sinth.
Sure and if there was no such thing as chocolate pie, more women would have a man.
-Dick
“You have the privilege of sleeping safe at night because burly aggressive men protect our society and our civilisation. You may not like me saying this but you depend on the aggression of men and at the same time complain about it. You change it at your peril and mine.”
But its our protectors we need protection from… do you see my point? No burly aggressive men - no need for burly aggressive men to protect us.
You can’t lay the blame for police violence (which I hardly believe exists all the cops I know are lovely men and women) on women reporting crimes. You know that to hit a woman is illegal. You know you will (or should) go to gaol. Why then, would you do it?
OK off to get those links now… even though from the ‘research ‘ (chuckle chuckle) you cite here I have little hope you will take these legitimate studies seriously.
I will however hunt up some links and research to post here asap, stand by!
Allegiances?
Do you have a secret internet hand-shake?
-Dick
Nobody has to sift through my site - it is not up your alley anyway - just email me as I said and I will forward to you any information I am able. I’m afraid I am not quite stupid enough to form allegiances with persons met on this board, however you have certainly given me some ideas on how to approach this topic in future and I would be happy to aid you. If after time you seem genuine I would also be happy to join in the ‘risk taking’ as you put it. Just email me the details are on my contact page - you can go straight there from the home page so there is no need to surf my site.
Regarding all the legal threats from others here I wonder what the deal is with threatening women with so much violence and rape in these comments… sounds like inciting crime to me… REAL crime.
She’s a woman who would know to stay the fuck off my website.
-Dick