Germaine Greer is a Cunt
Steve Irwin “The Crocodile Hunter” died on Monday. It’s an incredible loss for the world and the MenAreBetterThanWomen.com card will be black in mourning this week.
The MABTW.com card will also be black in mourning for the loss of the last shred of dignity held by the feminist movement — bowel movement. We’ve all had a good laugh at women and their silly agendas, stupid, childish groups, and the milestones they’ve managed to cobble together out of the political table scrapings tossed to them by men. This time they’ve gone too far.
Now they’re going after a tragedy just to prove a point that no one cares about and no one can even figure out. I guess that’s to be expected. Tragedy is the only thing a feminist knows.
Germaine Greer is a woman, allegedly a doctor (though I could not find of what. I would guess proctology, but that usually entails extracting things from the butt, not lodging your own head firmly up it), and has been a virulent feminist most of her life. During my research I found the reason Dr. Greer originally entered the field of feminism is because her clitoris is shaped like a male penis and the trauma of being teased for it since she was sexually active at the age of 12 drove her into the insanity. Interesting to say the least.
On a completely different note, “Dr.” Greer wrote her millionth article in a row this week on the topic of “things I shouldn’t even be fucking talking about” for The Guardian. She called it, “That sort of self-delusion is what it takes to be a real Aussie larrikin”. The surprise is that it isn’t an autobiography. Nor is it a treatise on Australian women in general who are largely regarded as bitches and unimportant the world over. It’s about Steve Irwin and his untimely passing. I don’t give half a fuck what larrikin means. Self-delusion is quite enough.
The points Greer wishes to address in her article are irrelevant — just like everything women say unless it starts with a, “Do you think I should,” or a, “I’m so sorry. I fucked up and did something you said you didn’t think I should do.” And obviously proceeded by a blowjob. It’s enough simply to quote the following from “Dr.” Greer.
It’s really quite unusual for divers to be stung unless they are grappling with the animal and, knowing Steve Irwin, perhaps that may have been the case…Not much sympathy there then.
Classy.
As she is a woman, I find it humourous that “Dr.” Greer — who I would simply just refer to as The Cunt for the remainder of this article, but my man-prudence prohibits me from doing so — even relies on the word ’sympathy’ as a part of her female feminist vocabulary. It is not. These female feminists are the same creatures who fabricate most rape allegations in the hopes of making a stab at some mythical patriarchy.
Does that sound like sympathy to you?
There’s no such thing as a patriarchy, Dr. Greer, you stupid cunt. It’s called the Real World, where seven billion strangers are picked to live in a loft and find out what happens when saber tooth tigers start taking bites out of their asses while they’re trying to sleep. It turns out in this Real World, men get to do everything. They do everything and make all the decisions. Call it whatever you want, but what it’s actually called is the truth. Men are better than women.
Here’s another gem:
The only time Irwin ever seemed less than entirely lovable to his fans (as distinct from zoologists) was when he went into the Australia Zoo crocodile enclosure with his month-old baby son in one hand and a dead chicken in the other. For a second you didn’t know which one he meant to feed to the crocodile.
First of all, that is inappropriate. Secondly, I was never confused, but then again, I’m not retarded.
When Germaine Greer dies, largely unnoticed by friends and family, and which I bet will be soon judging by the God fucking awful picture I found of the old hag on the internet — she looks like a fucking beige batting glove left in the sun with a wad of stringy doll’s hair stapled to the palm — you bet your ass I will be the first one shooting her little clitoral-penis problem out of the old Man-Mouthcannon. That’s called what goes around comes around. That was invented by men too.
Thirdly, let me say that if you have any problem whatsoever with Steve Irwin holding his infant son in his arms whilst feeding crocodiles raw chickens, you are not only wrong, but you are also not a man.
That has nothing to do with risk.
Let me give you a simple man test you can use on any anonymous parties to see if they are a man, woman or some kind of broken computing machine. Actually, strike that last one. If an unknown party gives a response that could only be arrived at through a cluster fuck of malformed logic, just assume it was a woman. Not even men could build a Touring machine that ran on crazy.
First of all, let’s say there’s something called risk. Now say that socially, we all accept a certain amount of risk and that stepping over that line incurs criticism from said society. The question then becomes, “How do we establish the risk of blank?” If you have a vagina, no matter how empowered it is, the answer is, “Well how do I feel about blank?” That is fucked and stupid. The correct and man-answer is, “Let’s ask an expert.”
I’d say someone who built a multi-billion fucking dollar business on the dealings and doings of blank would be a bonafide fucking expert. I would also say that this expert dangling his own fucking son over blanks while doing blank is a bonafide fucking testament that blank is not as risky as you think if you know what the fuck you’re blanking.
That’s just it. Women don’t ever know what they’re blanking so they have to rely on their shitty instincts at all times. That’s why feminism is backwards. It’s puts a small amount of power in the hands of people who have no fucking idea what they’re doing ever — that’s women.
After reading Germaine “Boy’s Name” Greer’s article on the untimely passing of one of the mannest man men to ever walk the Earth, I was saddened by her callous remarks in light of the family Irwin has left behind. Then it hit me: all feminists are insensitive cunts who have no family for that exact reason. They embarrass and shame their parents until they’re ostracized. They embarrass their friends until wallowing into the self-loathing circles of hags who will accompany them through menopause. They have no children because no man in his right mind would fuck a feminist and even if one was drugged into it, Jesus would step in and perform the world’s first immaculate abortion.
Feminists have no right to families. They are horrid and miserable abortions of women and they will rot in hell. Not the biblical one. I’m talking about the one women enter when they hit 35 and don’t have children.
Every creature he brandished at the camera was in distress. Every snake badgered by Irwin was at a huge disadvantage, with only a single possible reaction to its terrifying situation, which was to strike. Easy enough to avoid, if you know what’s coming. Even my cat knew that much.
A cat, huh? What a fucking surprise. Fuck feminists.
“Dr,” Greer Weighs in Heavily
A Female Eunich? What the Fuck?
A Proper Send Off. Written by a Man Instead of a Cunt.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 56 … 18 17 16 15 14 [13] 12 11 10 9 8 … 1 » Show All
“Dear all,
I’m Michael Flood. I’ve just been alerted to the fact that some people on this list, and on a fathers’ rights list, believe that I have been posting on this forum, e.g. under a pseudonym.”
Really? Who alerted you?
Where are these “lists”?
Yes, women are like that. Good point.
Though somewhat interesting to see a woman admitting to women doing stuff like that. Guess it has a lot to do with being a mother of boys.
You may want to rethink that. I have a friend who married a Russian bride thinking the same thing, and he has been raked over the coals in family court after she filed for divorce. She got her nursing degree, her mother here, and had a child which protected her immigration status, then booted him out. Real classy.
Now that is one idea I can get behind. Let me know if you need help packing.
westernized woman really suck. All decent men should boycott the west and go and find good women in the east http://russianwoman.wordpress.com. The goods times are hahead for men people!
Normal Human said:
Apologies to everyone who has been breathlessly waiting for this info.
Firstly, as you know Michael Flood’s work I will not rehash it but instead provide some other links as well. Also some more popular research and news pages and websites for survivors of abuse which talk about the damage the men’s rights movement has done to women’s and children’s rights.
-Yes, yes, we must be concerned about the damage that Men have done to “women and children’s rights” once again. Why should Men even have rights? I guess that they just get in the way of “womens and childrens rights” once again. I would imagine that many of these pages are either ran by manginas or feminst heralds. Either way none of this has anything to do with Men addressing either their state, national, or even the UN as to their rights as a human being.-
OK - now you have read some of that, please bear in mind that most men’s rights groups seem to me to make the opposite claims and link to sites that support the pedophile tactics and claims discussed in the (mostly independent, government) studies. You check for yourselves and decide.
-I care not, Normal Human. You seem to follow the more extreme tactics of the feminist movement, by ascribing most of us as pedophiles and radicals for asking for the same basic human rights that are extended to women and children, but for some reason not to Men? Irregardless of your position, it is a fact that a majority of custodial disputes eventually end up in a womans favor if she so chooses. This must be because Men in general aren’t good parents nor are we capable of providing homes for our children, even though we make substantially much more money than women do, correct? It couldn’t be that most of the money that we do make is taken from us either through taxes (which provide a bulk of your hateful ideologies funding) or child support (I like to call it mommy support, or a matriarchal transfer of power through the state). So much so that many of us cannot even provide for the legal funding (that is causing this mess in the first place in my view) that is necessary to even start the custodial process.
Almost every men’s rights site will have some sort of article (usually several pages devoted to it) trying to promote these pedophile tactics. Why do men’s right’s groups misrepresent these statistics on sexual violence? Because the as you would know - members of such groups consist disproportionately of men accused of domestic violence, many of whom are accordingly denied child custody or access visits, and they resent having to pay child support to their ex-partners for the financial support of children they are not allowed to see. I accept that some of the men accused of abusive violence may be innocent, but that doesn’t mean that they can manipulate statistics to misrepresent women as being just as violent as men.
-Wow, you’re such a sheeple, much like your feminist sisters and much like most of humanity. You’ll believe anything you read as long as someone “reported” it. Would you resent having to pay for something that isn’t even considered yours in a court of law? Wouldn’t you resent Have you even been a part of the custodial process? Wouldn’t you resent the idea that you would have to fight for your unalienable right to be a parent while some sow can just charge you for hers? Sorry to break the news to you NH but women are just as human as everyone else and according to your feminist sisters, gender is simply a societal construct so why would it be that women AREN’T as violent if not more so than Men?–
35,023 reports of suspected child abuse and neglect were made to authorities in Queensland in 2004-05.
After investigation, the Department of Child Safety confirmed that child abuse or neglect had taken place in 17,473 of these cases, involving over 12,000 individual children.
We are talking about 12,000 THAT HAVE BEEN SUSTANTIATED - and it is very difficult to prove these allegations so I think we can sensibly agree this is a conservative estimate.
–Sure call it conservative. However, if I may ask what is the total population of AU? Somewhere around 20,000,000 people would be my guess. So what we are talking about must be an epidemic of course. I’ll even up your estimate to 100,000 and you are still far beyond what women are given for their social problems. As usual women and the government ignore Mens high rate of homelessness, drug abuse, unemployment, suicide and non-support from from any social budget that is provided mostly by Mens tax burdens. Typical hypocrite and Matriarch.-
Out of these substantiated allegations, 6% involved sexual abuse. That is at least 720 new, substantiated cases of sexual abuse in Queensland alone every year. Qld at 6% is lower than the national average of 10%. More than 95% of these substantiated cases involved the father or another male family member (either natural or adoptive) as the perpetrator. Of the cases in which it was determined by the judge that the mother made false allegations, she did not get custody.
–Lets not even go into how many Men are found innocent of either sexual or domestic abuse and still denied their children for the good of said children, by judges that are bought and paid for by the feminist agenda or the womens vote. Women have reaped what they have sowed bottom line. They wanted families without even knowing what a family was. What a sad way to look at life.–
Source: http://www.abusedchildtrust.com.au/facts.htm
-Bought and paid for by women for women-
So lets say around 720 cases per year. 13% were also perpetrators under the age of twelve, so that brings the number down to 626. http://www.communities.qld.gov.au/projectaxis/resources/documents/pdf/ incidence.pdf#search=%22number%20of%20person%20convicted%20of%20child% 20sexual%20abuse%20in%20qld%22
-720! In the Queensland area! Lets just jump that up a little bit lets just say a thousand? Under 12 indeed! What does this make it? Far from an epidemic. Have you bothered to try and extrapolate how many of the Men in this area are either homeless, undereducated, or poor as well? Of course not, that doesnt matter at all does it?–
Only 40% of these substantiated cases (this is an Australia wide figure, I could not find Qld figures today - (source http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/links/doi/10.1046/j.1440-1614.2000.00 642.x/abs/ )
are ever taken to prosecution - and not all of these result in convictions. So… that means that around 370 NEW child molesters are known to be on the streets every year… JUST IN QLD who don’t have access to their children without supervision, and they are the very men forming and accessing the men’s rights groups. Hundreds and hundreds every year who should rightfully be in gaol.
Scary, isn’t it? Now Nick you can follow this up by finding out how many members have joined who have custody issues involving supervised visits. They are your child molesters.
For those interested, the men’s rights movement has also been linked to the pro-gun lobby:
“The Family Court and the Child Support Agency are particular targets, along with gun control. In the words of consultant Malcolm MacGregor: `if you scratch the surface of the gun lobby, there’s a lot of these blokes who have a huge fixation with the CSA. There’s a perception it’s run by a whole bunch of lesbian separatists who have access to their bank accounts’.(3) The Family Court is similarly seen to be in the grip of feminist ideology. Every time a non-custodial parent resorts to violence there are now letters to newspapers suggesting that this shows men’s powerlessness in the face of a system biased against them. Lawyers Miranda Kaye and Julia Tolmie have analysed this discursive shift whereby incidents of violence become evidence of the victimisation of men” .(4) Source: EMILY’s List and Angry White Men: Gender Wars in the Nineties
Journal article by Marian Sawer; Journal of Australian Studies, 1999
http://www.questia.com/PM.qst;jsessionid=FN2d3XQ1WgwnpJ5GpGQyJDJyGf11V 2nLWv4wvQwbWhR5Jd1h2qMD!-562589112?a=o&d=5001885623
Other identifiers of sexual predators that may help you identify these people within your group are:
The mean self-reported age when offenders first had sexual contact with a child was 32.2 years (median = 31 years; range = 102013;63 years). The mean age at first conviction for any offense was 30.5 years (median = 27 years; range = 122013;66 years), and the mean age at first conviction for a sexual offense was 37.3 years (median = 37 years; range = 152013;76 years). Sixty-nine percent (n = 143) of the combined sample had at least one previous conviction, and 80% of these (n = 114) had first been convicted for a nonsexual offense. ANCOVA revealed a systematic pattern of onset with first convictions for any offense preceding first sexual contact with a child. Taken together, results indicate that, in general, adult child molesters (a) begin sexual offending in their 30s, (b) have already become involved in nonsexual crime by the time they first have sexual contact with a child, (c) are criminally versatile, and (d) vary considerably in their persistence with respect to both sexual and nonsexual offending.
Source: Child Sexual Abuse in Queensland — June 2000
-Get the fuck out of here, you are an ignorant person that claims too be able to use an abacus that is both old and ignorant. Sexist.
-Strength and Honor-
Must’ve been that link that did it. I was expecting a geezer in the pic. Perhaps at least a geezer at heart?
Dear all,
I’m Michael Flood. I’ve just been alerted to the fact that some people on this list, and on a fathers’ rights list, believe that I have been posting on this forum, e.g. under a pseudonym. I haven’t. This is my first post to this site. And, when I do participate in online debate, I do so under my own name.
Sincerely,
michael.
Dr Michael Flood
Postdoctoral Fellow
Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society (ARCSHS) La Trobe University
E-mail: michael.flood@latrobe.edu.au
PO Box 4026, Ainslie ACT, 2602 AUSTRALIA
Too bad that shit only works for download.
What, Sub-human’s this guy?
Am I proxying through Google or am I a crazed pedophile bent on sodomising pompous Doctor Flood till a merry, rosy death having just moved to Australia from a country with no extradition treaties standing for said goal?
The Biscuit Queen said:
One more thing (sorry, had to go study for an exam for a while). I do not support this sort of site normally on grounds that this is radicalism, and I do not support radicalism. Neither do most MRAs. This person is no MRA, he is just someone spewing bigotry. He has every right to do so, but do not lump him in with those who are politically seeking to support men’s rights.
-Call it one thing or call it another, however, it is what it is. Labels provide nothing more than a comfortable way to look at it. I might add that M. Masterson, has never claimed to be an MRA from what I have read.-
I came here to make a point that if you get out of the radicalism, which this is, and onto mainstream, real MRA sites, you will not find hatred or bigotry. Mainstream MRAs do not advocate the superiority of one gender or the other.
–Nor do mainstream Feminists? I differ from your opinion most wholeheartedly. Much of modern-day feminism, is in fact focused upon Mens “failure” to subscribe to their view of the world. Many wommin, wymin, ect ect, believe in such nonsense. What would you suggest as mainstream MRA sites BQ? MND? TNG? The eternal bachelor? Honestly, I respect your opinion, as I have seen you on other sites, however I find your view to be somewhat biased. You are similar to many people, you cannot support radicalism, even though “radicalism” has benefited you. Hypocritical, to say the least. –
I see this as similar to radical feminists who want to kill off all men and use sperm banks to engineer all girl children. I doubt most feminists find those women an example of their doctorine.
-I doubt that they do, however the question remains, what has been done with it (it being feminism)? It has never been said on this site that all women should be imprisoned, nor has it said that all women should have their genitals cut off. However the same cannot be said for Feminist sites. Many women have advocated the almost complete destruction of the Male gender, and if not that, hailed the idea that the Male chromesome is deteriorating as a sign of the end of the male species. Yet you come here and say that we are “radical”. How hypocritical.
-Strength and Honor-
“
One more thing (sorry, had to go study for an exam for a while). I do not support this sort of site normally on grounds that this is radicalism, and I do not support radicalism. Neither do most MRAs. This person is no MRA, he is just someone spewing bigotry. He has every right to do so, but do not lump him in with those who are politically seeking to support men’s rights.
I came here to make a point that if you get out of the radicalism, which this is, and onto mainstream, real MRA sites, you will not find hatred or bigotry. Mainstream MRAs do not advocate the superiority of one gender or the other.
I see this as similar to radical feminists who want to kill off all men and use sperm banks to engineer all girl children. I doubt most feminists find those women an example of their doctorine.
Normal Human Idiot, men’s rights groups are linked to the pro gun lobby? Preposterous!
Guns are what stops democracy corrupting parasites like you from taking your beta manginas to our door and sending us to Hillary Clinton created gulags where we are castrated and re-educated in the tenants of world socialism. A world where there can be peace, if only the great(big burly men) are beaten down into the mediocrity that your entire sick order represents…
I’ll pass cunt. I’m as proficient with an automatic rifle as I am with my big burly cock. Must be scary for a prudish little dyke like you.
Mr Flood.
I seem to recall you being made aware that I am a victim of childhood sexual abuse by a woman.
That I made it clear I don’t consider sex a spectator sport.
Does it make sense to you that as a result of my early experiences that I may be a little reticent where women were concerned?
Had it occured to you that it may have made me susceptible to sexually aggressive and often abusive women and that my sport may have increased that likelihood?
One thing you don’t know is that I was raised by a woman who got pregnant at seventeen to escape her rapist father. I was that child.
Does it make sense to you that much of my sensitivity to womens issues over the years might stem from those experiences and a possible empathy with womens’ own experiences as a consequence?
I also recall that I mentioned drifting away from feminism because of their insensitivity to these things.
Can you imagine the sense of betrayal, after having spent thirty years supporting feminism sometimes quite actively(including using my little bit of media profile, my fifteen minutes of fame, to highlight rape issues for them back in the seventies), at exactly the sort of insensitivity you demonstrate in this comment.
In this Mr Flood you truly demonstrate yourself to be a feminist.
“You know that to hit a woman is illegal. You know you will (or should) go to gaol. Why then, would you do it?”
Really? Where is it that there is a law that specificly cites “it is illegal to hit a woman”?
NH, not that you will read this, but here is my two cents. I am a very happily married woman with two sons (hence not here out of deperation.) It is for my sons that I support the men’s rights movement. I have yet to meet anyone who comes close to being what you claim MRAs are, and I have met quite a few in person and spent a lot of time on line with them, as my husband has as well.
While there are a few MRAs that do truly hate women (and there are feminists which truly hate men as well), the majority of MRAs are disgusted at gender relations today and want to fix them. At worst they wish to live and let live. I get far more respect from MRAs than I have gotten from feminists, even ones who disagree with me. I have never been treated badly by a men’s rights activist based on my gender. I have never seen a mainstream MRA even hint at taking away equality, such as repealing the vote or making child custody soley paternal. I have seen feminists make laws which took away mens rights. I used to be a feminist until I started really looking at the information out there, and looking at how my sons, who were supposed to be the oppressers, were actually having a much harder time than the girls they were supposedly oppressing.
The main thing that made me realize that feminism was just a pack of lies is that whenever there is a debate, the feminists tend to resort to name calling, bigotry, and lies when the MRAs still have hard data and logic. That has played out in this very thread. Calling someone white trash, child abusers, desperate, etc, says far more about you than anyone you are insulting.
Steve Irwin was a great man. Germaine Greer is bitter, nasty, and cruel. Why? Because of her actions. I don’t care that she is a woman, or older, or a feminist. I care that she said hateful, hurtful things about a person who did not deserve it, and how that likely affected his wife and kids, who certainly did not deserve it either.
Again, that says far, far more about her than it does the Erwins.
The breakfast of champions, Big Al?
You here “to defend Germaine and Steve”?
Did you read that sweet little obituary it made for him? It never ceases to amase me, how utterly full of crap women can be.
Words cannot express my disgust with you and your kin right now. The ground you walk on must feel desecrated. You deserve nothing but scorn and disdain for your preposterous, malevolent allegations.
It is true. Evil and stupidity go hand in hand.
It is a little known fact that seven out of ten members of the men’s rights movement eat corn flakes for breakfast.
Coincidence?
I think not.
-Big Al
The day a computer thinks of you as spam you must really know you’re at the top of your game, no?