Germaine Greer is a Cunt

Steve Irwin “The Crocodile Hunter” died on Monday. It’s an incredible loss for the world and the MenAreBetterThanWomen.com card will be black in mourning this week.

The MABTW.com card will also be black in mourning for the loss of the last shred of dignity held by the feminist movement — bowel movement. We’ve all had a good laugh at women and their silly agendas, stupid, childish groups, and the milestones they’ve managed to cobble together out of the political table scrapings tossed to them by men. This time they’ve gone too far.

Now they’re going after a tragedy just to prove a point that no one cares about and no one can even figure out. I guess that’s to be expected. Tragedy is the only thing a feminist knows.

Germaine Greer is a woman, allegedly a doctor (though I could not find of what. I would guess proctology, but that usually entails extracting things from the butt, not lodging your own head firmly up it), and has been a virulent feminist most of her life. During my research I found the reason Dr. Greer originally entered the field of feminism is because her clitoris is shaped like a male penis and the trauma of being teased for it since she was sexually active at the age of 12 drove her into the insanity. Interesting to say the least.

On a completely different note, “Dr.” Greer wrote her millionth article in a row this week on the topic of “things I shouldn’t even be fucking talking about” for The Guardian. She called it, “That sort of self-delusion is what it takes to be a real Aussie larrikin”. The surprise is that it isn’t an autobiography. Nor is it a treatise on Australian women in general who are largely regarded as bitches and unimportant the world over. It’s about Steve Irwin and his untimely passing. I don’t give half a fuck what larrikin means. Self-delusion is quite enough.

The points Greer wishes to address in her article are irrelevant — just like everything women say unless it starts with a, “Do you think I should,” or a, “I’m so sorry. I fucked up and did something you said you didn’t think I should do.” And obviously proceeded by a blowjob. It’s enough simply to quote the following from “Dr.” Greer.

It’s really quite unusual for divers to be stung unless they are grappling with the animal and, knowing Steve Irwin, perhaps that may have been the case…Not much sympathy there then.

Classy.

As she is a woman, I find it humourous that “Dr.” Greer — who I would simply just refer to as The Cunt for the remainder of this article, but my man-prudence prohibits me from doing so — even relies on the word ’sympathy’ as a part of her female feminist vocabulary. It is not. These female feminists are the same creatures who fabricate most rape allegations in the hopes of making a stab at some mythical patriarchy.

Does that sound like sympathy to you?

There’s no such thing as a patriarchy, Dr. Greer, you stupid cunt. It’s called the Real World, where seven billion strangers are picked to live in a loft and find out what happens when saber tooth tigers start taking bites out of their asses while they’re trying to sleep. It turns out in this Real World, men get to do everything. They do everything and make all the decisions. Call it whatever you want, but what it’s actually called is the truth. Men are better than women.

Here’s another gem:

The only time Irwin ever seemed less than entirely lovable to his fans (as distinct from zoologists) was when he went into the Australia Zoo crocodile enclosure with his month-old baby son in one hand and a dead chicken in the other. For a second you didn’t know which one he meant to feed to the crocodile.

First of all, that is inappropriate. Secondly, I was never confused, but then again, I’m not retarded.

When Germaine Greer dies, largely unnoticed by friends and family, and which I bet will be soon judging by the God fucking awful picture I found of the old hag on the internet — she looks like a fucking beige batting glove left in the sun with a wad of stringy doll’s hair stapled to the palm — you bet your ass I will be the first one shooting her little clitoral-penis problem out of the old Man-Mouthcannon. That’s called what goes around comes around. That was invented by men too.

Thirdly, let me say that if you have any problem whatsoever with Steve Irwin holding his infant son in his arms whilst feeding crocodiles raw chickens, you are not only wrong, but you are also not a man.

That has nothing to do with risk.

Let me give you a simple man test you can use on any anonymous parties to see if they are a man, woman or some kind of broken computing machine. Actually, strike that last one. If an unknown party gives a response that could only be arrived at through a cluster fuck of malformed logic, just assume it was a woman. Not even men could build a Touring machine that ran on crazy.

First of all, let’s say there’s something called risk. Now say that socially, we all accept a certain amount of risk and that stepping over that line incurs criticism from said society. The question then becomes, “How do we establish the risk of blank?” If you have a vagina, no matter how empowered it is, the answer is, “Well how do I feel about blank?” That is fucked and stupid. The correct and man-answer is, “Let’s ask an expert.”

I’d say someone who built a multi-billion fucking dollar business on the dealings and doings of blank would be a bonafide fucking expert. I would also say that this expert dangling his own fucking son over blanks while doing blank is a bonafide fucking testament that blank is not as risky as you think if you know what the fuck you’re blanking.

That’s just it. Women don’t ever know what they’re blanking so they have to rely on their shitty instincts at all times. That’s why feminism is backwards. It’s puts a small amount of power in the hands of people who have no fucking idea what they’re doing ever — that’s women.

After reading Germaine “Boy’s Name” Greer’s article on the untimely passing of one of the mannest man men to ever walk the Earth, I was saddened by her callous remarks in light of the family Irwin has left behind. Then it hit me: all feminists are insensitive cunts who have no family for that exact reason. They embarrass and shame their parents until they’re ostracized. They embarrass their friends until wallowing into the self-loathing circles of hags who will accompany them through menopause. They have no children because no man in his right mind would fuck a feminist and even if one was drugged into it, Jesus would step in and perform the world’s first immaculate abortion.

Feminists have no right to families. They are horrid and miserable abortions of women and they will rot in hell. Not the biblical one. I’m talking about the one women enter when they hit 35 and don’t have children.

Every creature he brandished at the camera was in distress. Every snake badgered by Irwin was at a huge disadvantage, with only a single possible reaction to its terrifying situation, which was to strike. Easy enough to avoid, if you know what’s coming. Even my cat knew that much.

A cat, huh? What a fucking surprise. Fuck feminists.

“Dr,” Greer Weighs in Heavily
A Female Eunich? What the Fuck?
A Proper Send Off. Written by a Man Instead of a Cunt.


Related Articles:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

1,181 Comments in 1107 threads.»

Pages: « 5620 19 18 17 16 [15] 14 13 12 11 101 » Show All

Comment by abaddon_fff
2006-10-16 00:32:01 - IP Man-Hash: aaf4e181e1af9

Agreed

Strength and Honor-

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-10-15 23:57:51 - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181

Boys — and men — are abused by women. That definitely happens. The fact that the converse happens does not prevent me from accepting Gwallan’s statements without reservation.

Any person of reasonable IQ who read this site could grasp that yes, gwallan is different from Dick, etc.

To suggest otherwise is to behave as a Squid: to throw ink into the face of logic.
-wolfe

 
Comment by son of the suns
2006-10-15 07:18:08 - IP Man-Hash: 154d991721d14

You sound like me Gwallan. Darker, handsomer, and more manlier than most. An unnatural above average intelligence for someone who’s “athletic”.

Careerist sluts can’t resist that kind of thing, whether it’s my ex, or all the married milfs who stare me down(who i don’t fuck). They want to fuck us but never marry us unfortunately.

They get more from their corporate lords than they can from some lower class young male.

But as for your rape, I support you 100% and don’t doubt it happening. Every women I’ve ever fucked has came onto me first, and probably would have raped me if I said no. But I’m Italian, so I don’t say no often.

 
Comment by gwallan
2006-10-14 22:39:08 - IP Man-Hash: 9b96ad7ec8ccc

Normal Human said:
I can’t believe you all think there is such a thing as radical feminists that want to kill off men everywhere. What a load of bull. We just want to lock up the criminals, and stop the daft bitches reproducing with the idiot percentage of the male population thereby polluting the gene pool with your questionable DNA. Basically, men are useless in the modern world as big burly dickheads and women now are divorcing these ‘useless’ husbands at a great rate. I’m not, because my husband isn’t useless. He is a great man and father and what I most admire is that he is brave enough not to feel that his masculinity is threatened by defending a woman or women’s rights. Real men are not scared of feminists because they have no need to worry, in fact they recognise that the world will be better without the child molestors etc amongst us.

Gwallan/Sunofsons/Dick apart from posting under numerous identities here and confusing what sex I am

@Normal Human
Firstly I am guilty of mistaken identity and for that I apologise. I will also be apologising to Dr Flood in due time(which hopefully will have the added bonus of establishing a productive dialogue with him. I differ from his position primarily in terms of the solutions he suggests rather than the problems requiring them).

Finally some reasonable discourse from you. I will continue to ignore your more obnoxious contributions apart from making the following points.
I post under my own name, unlike many, and have done so for over ten years. I’m not concerned with anonymity as I have nothing to hide. I am not Dick nor am I son of the suns. If you truly had access to our IPs you would know this. And if you note the difference in posting styles and expression it should be patently obvious.

I do have difficulty in dealing with issues relating to sexual assault, particularly that involving children. I can overreact and at times become a bit irrational. Others here would echo that(particularly a women whom I recently, and regretably, attacked in a most unwholesome way. She and I are still on good terms I might add) . In our discourse you have not only labelled me a liar you have also directly accused me of being a paedophile and pervert. I ask you if a woman or girl admitted to you she she was a victim would you respond in this way?

There are certainly radical feminists just as there are radical mens rights activists. Indeed the subject of this thread, Germaine Greer, was considered a radical even by feminists in the seventies. JM made reference to Mary Daly. I would suggest you look into the activities of the suffragettes who were not beyond acts of terrorism. Look up Emily Pankhurst with regard to the White Feather and ask yourself if that wasn’t somewhat radical. Valerie Solanos, and her SCUM Manifesto, is highly regarded by many feminists even to this day. Very few folk consider Andrea Dworkin to be even close to rational. Do you agree with Catherine Mackinnon’s obsevation that all heterosexual sex is rape(and this is a woman with considerable clout in the US legal system)? Erin Pizzey, who started the first DV shelters in the UK, left the country after death threats from feminists who didn’t like her saying that men can be DV victims too. All political movements will number some radicals among their adherents. This has always been true and always will be. I suspect your denial of the existence of radical feminists is more a reflection of your own position. I’ve frequently been called a radical politically by right wingers and left wingers alike.

With regard to this site.
When you first entered here did you read either the FAQ or “about” pages? If you had you would be aware that women are not encouraged to enter.
You have a similar warning on your own site to whit

WARNING: The content in this web site is for mature female viewing only.
It may contain foul language, sexism and violence and is almost certain to
offend. Men should not view the following content even with adult supervision.

You do not, it seems, have an open forum where people may discuss the material on your site with others.
The first sentence of your very first post here was

My god what a useless bunch of loser white boys scared of girls you all are - and what a desperate bunch of girls to crawl this site in support of your sexist drivel.

Did you seriously expect to be offered a cup of tea and a bickie?
Those who enter this site politely are in turn treated politely, male and female alike. Indeed even after you made some particularly outrageous claims I continued, regardless of mistaken identities, to try to engage you in discussion.

Normal Human said:
…you keep referring to a woman who molested you. I have yet to meet any man who was molested by a woman - yet I know many who have been molested by men. What is your story? Share it with us. I can hardly believe you were raped as well - and just how can a burly ex athlete be raped by a woman? Did she penetrate you? Can there even be rape without penetration… an erection is obviously consent? Men raped yes - by other men - men raped by women…..????????? Is it even a crime?

I ask merely for clarification….

In the state of Victoria the laws were reworded in the mid nineties partly because they were finding it impossible to prosecute women who had sex with boys. It was also done on the basis of the insistence of feminists that consent was the primary issue. To be rape there must be penetration but the law now also includes the concept of envelopment. Simply put any sexual act forced on another and involving penetration is a rape.

I’m not sure of your age but the rape advocates of the early eighties talked about rape being about power and control rather than just sex. I agreed with that then and still do. Maybe you’ve forgotten that. It’s actually about the coercion by one individual of another to do something they do not wish to do. And there are many ways of coercing others to do your will. Not just physical force.

Rape is, and always has been, a very emotive issue. It conjures up in peoples’ minds images of brutal physical acts. But the issues that psychologists and counsellors deal with are not those of physical injury. In fact they tend to treat victims of physical and sexual assualts, as well as other forms of abuse, in much the same manner. The long term effects of abuse stem from issues surrounding coercion and loss of control.

The personal history I posted is true and is documented by my doctor and counsellors. The event in my mid twenties was defined as rape by counsellors, not by myself. I’m not interested in going into a blow by blow account of it except to say that it was in my place of work, I was coerced, was a passive agent through the whole thing and, indeed, verbally denied consent several times. Under current Victorian law I was raped. Perversely, under recently amended UK law, I would be considered the rapist purely because the woman was drunk.

Having an erection is a physiological response as others have tried to point out. It does not signify consent. Many men wake up with erections due to urine retention. Does this constitute consent or even interest in sex? Does lubrication on the part of a woman indicate consent? It is not unheard of for women, very rare though it may be, to have orgasms during rapes. Does the fact that they experience a putative indicator of sexual pleasure mean they have not been raped?

 
Comment by son of the suns
2006-10-14 15:09:29 - IP Man-Hash: e515291901c7b

I sense treachery.

Normal Human has such illogical anger and hate for “big burly men” that she must be addicted to fucking them raw.

But she has her little pussified male provider to defend her on websites and betray his gender, and raise her kids that she spawned in an affair with a “big burly man”. Rather than just tell her husband the truth that she finds his neutered essense as attractive as a blade of grass, and that his kids aren’t of his genes, she comes here to lash out at “big burly men” while simaltaneously fingering herself to death from the attention we give her.

Ignore it and it will die.

 
Comment by abaddon_fff
2006-10-14 15:03:30 - IP Man-Hash: f6d51f93da843

Normal Human Feminist said:

I can’t believe you all think there is such a thing as radical feminists that want to kill off men everywhere.

-Of course you don’t you’re a woman, and a prime example of why websites such as this occur on the internet. Try reading a little more into the more extreme types of feminism before you make such judgements.

What a load of bull.

-Much like the entirety of your post.-

We just want to lock up the criminals,

-As long as you can define what a criminal is right?-

and stop the daft bitches reproducing with the idiot percentage of the male population thereby polluting the gene pool with your questionable DNA.

-Here you strike me as a modern day Hitler, advocating geno/gendercide for having “questionable” DNA or bein a “daft bitch..-

Basically, men are useless in the modern world as big burly dickheads and women now are divorcing these ‘useless’ husbands at a great rate. I’m not, because my husband isn’t useless.

-Well then if women are divorcing these “useless” “big burly dickheads” at such an alarming rate, and if women are so intuitive, then why did they get married to them in the first place? Could money be it? Could it be that a majority of these women are nothing more than self-serving whores/parasites that disguise themselves as caring human beings?

He is a great man and father and what I most admire is that he is brave enough not to feel that his masculinity is threatened by defending a woman or women’s rights. Real men are not scared of feminists because they have no need to worry, in fact they recognise that the world will be better without the child molestors etc amongst us.

-Real Germans have nothing to fear from the national socialist workers party either, however they did in the end. Yes the world is SO much better now NH, Matriarchal Ghettoes, a 50-60 % divorce rate, a draconian child support system, enforced gender stereotypes, ect ect. Typical shaming language.—

I have yet to meet any man who was molested by a woman - yet I know many who have been molested by men.

-This goes back to allowing women such as yourself to define “crime” according to you women cannot commit “sexual crimes” simply by virtue of the fact that they’re women. If that isn’t sexist I don’t know what is.

Did she penetrate you? Can there even be rape without penetration..

-Well, there are a variety of objects that can be used I suppose, but only men would do that right? Never mind the fact that women commit sexual and physical abuse against children everyday, nor the fact that women are the primary physical abusers of both children and the elderly. How about we just don’t even look at the facts at all. Another typical feminist move.-

. an erection is obviously consent?

-An erection is a biological process, much like birth, or digestion idiot, not consent to a sexual act.-

Men raped yes - by other men - men raped by women…..????????? Is it even a crime?

-Not by your definition I gather-

-Strength and Honor-

 
Comment by The Man
2006-10-14 14:49:17 - IP Man-Hash: 4b451c16cc02f

I prefer Hitlery Cunton. Simple and to the point.

 
Comment by chunda
2006-10-14 09:16:00 - IP Man-Hash: 9f385e9678ff7

hiltery clitnon sounds better.

 
Comment by Female
2006-10-13 20:11:58 - IP Man-Hash: ecf72d58bf105

Back from a refreshing 2h drive.

Sounds quite vigorous.

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-10-13 15:29:16 - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181

lara silvertone said:
you sound a bit like the gun men that shot all those women down at Montreal University back in the 70’s .

Lara, if you’re going to make an odious, invalid and disgusting comparison, at least don’t be an ahistorical cretin.

It wasn’t Montreal University; it was École Polytechnique. It wasn’t the 70’s but very nearly the 90’s; December 6 1989. It wasn’t gun men, but a single gunman, Gamil Garbi, aka Marc Lepine.

And no, Dick doesn’t sound anything like Garbi. But then you didn’t even know the decade, place or what happened, other than “something bad”. So why you made the comparison is beyond me, unless you enjoy looking like a foolish idiot.

-wolfe

 
Comment by lara silvertone
2006-10-13 10:50:44 - IP Man-Hash: fec87a0a6b7fb

Yeah, it was a terrible tragedy Steve Irwin dying-it’s always terrible when people die in unexpected circumstances and leave families behind. Germain’s comment does seem a little unsympathetic but then I remember thinking the same thing when my boyfriend said more or less the same thing about the accident and I don’t care much for nature programmes or acts of bravery. I think you’ll find that Germain’s attitutudes are always extreme and often intolerable a bit like yours seem to be-her being ‘ a bit of a cunt’ in one article has no more to with women and feminism any more than your being a bit of cunt in this article has any thing to do with mankind. you sound a bit like the gun men that shot all those women down at Montreal University back in the 70’s .

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-10-13 04:06:57 - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7

Back from a refreshing 2h drive.

Tangentially Human Idiot. I never said that was your ip address. That is the resolved ip of the http server that’s got http://www.latrobe.edu.au mounted(want a manly word - in more ways than one - , nay?) on it.

Which brings me to a manly question I’ve got, not for you - don’t worry. Do http browsers also store the resolved ips of specific sites in their history list, or do they query again each time you type even if matched to an url from the list?
That would be unmanly inefficient, creating avoidable congestion through needless queries to the dns servers. They should only query if the http server can’t be reached or doesn’t respond at the stored ip.

THI, I find you and your scatological writing repugnant. Won’t you please relieve us of your virtual presence?

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-10-13 00:41:08 - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7

And free (runaway) stupidity. She exercises both those rights.

 
Comment by Aaron
2006-10-12 23:48:08 - IP Man-Hash: 7f0331adb6577

normal human, your not really normal if you want to gewt federal police involved with men talking about travelling to a another country for some real women. What happened to free speach?

 
Comment by JM
2006-10-12 19:50:55 - IP Man-Hash: 6214144bb2267

God this normal human person is absurd. First up if you want an example of women that want to kill off men, google Mary Daly. In fact, go to her website so you can see her picture with an Axe. What an ugly bitch she is.

Are you aware of the myriad of medications now available for erectile disfunction? Are you aware that these cause erections without consent? Is a woman touching an underage male child not ‘molestation’?

Just like a typical woman, you see divorce rates as ‘empowerment’. The destruction of families as something noble.

 
Comment by Normal Human
2006-10-12 18:22:18 - IP Man-Hash: 73761643fb90d

By the way, as you well know that is not my IP address.

And, I would just like to say you have a hide to ask me to PM the info, then do a backflip and tell me to post it (which I did anyway).

Far out, how much do you have to pick on a woman before you feel ‘manly’ anyway?

 
Comment by Normal Human
2006-10-12 18:20:05 - IP Man-Hash: 73761643fb90d

I can’t believe you all think there is such a thing as radical feminists that want to kill off men everywhere. What a load of bull. We just want to lock up the criminals, and stop the daft bitches reproducing with the idiot percentage of the male population thereby polluting the gene pool with your questionable DNA. Basically, men are useless in the modern world as big burly dickheads and women now are divorcing these ‘useless’ husbands at a great rate. I’m not, because my husband isn’t useless. He is a great man and father and what I most admire is that he is brave enough not to feel that his masculinity is threatened by defending a woman or women’s rights. Real men are not scared of feminists because they have no need to worry, in fact they recognise that the world will be better without the child molestors etc amongst us.

Gwallan/Sunofsons/Dick apart from posting under numerous identities here and confusing what sex I am, you keep referring to a woman who molested you. I have yet to meet any man who was molested by a woman - yet I know many who have been molested by men. What is your story? Share it with us. I can hardly believe you were raped as well - and just how can a burly ex athlete be raped by a woman? Did she penetrate you? Can there even be rape without penetration… an erection is obviously consent? Men raped yes - by other men - men raped by women…..????????? Is it even a crime?

I ask merely for clarification….

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-10-12 13:25:23 - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7

Feminism’s purpose is the rendering obsolete of obnoxious women and outsourcing to naturalised, untainted populations. Or at least being a gross incentive towards that. It is an evil, obscene purpose that should not be embraced by worthwhile women.

I would say unto feminists, don’t push your luck ladies. Lest you die as spinsters or germ, loathed and despised by all people in plenitude of their mental faculties.

 
Comment by son of the suns
2006-10-12 08:48:21 - IP Man-Hash: 1623dee4f0c72

Normal Human said:

Sun of Bums are you posting from gaol or something? You ought to be. You know women commit much milder violence than men - do you really believe a slap across the face gives a man the right to ‘kick their arse’? Or anyone’s? I bet you beat up men who look at you funny on the street, too. Sicko coward.

Assault is assault, and no one has the right to initiate violence against another human being. That being said, if someone smacks me, as I have done before… I will obliterate them.

Cunts like you like to have double standards because you have no decency or sense of honor, because you’re an estrogen soaked fuckwit suffering from chronic histrionics vaginitus. You are the cowards because you think you should be able to physically assault someone and recieve no reprocussions. How fascist of you.

My ex-fiance not only slapped me, but busted my lips and face with closed fists and wouldn’t stop it until I grabbed her throat and took her to the ground. Then she called the cops on me. Why did she strike me in the first place? Because I caught her in the act of trying to fuck my cousin and called her a fucking slut. Nothing enrages you harlots more than the truth of your unfaithful nature.

 
Comment by Female
2006-10-12 06:03:29 - IP Man-Hash: ecf72d58bf105

NH, care to reveal the sock puppets?

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis