Germaine Greer is a Cunt
Steve Irwin “The Crocodile Hunter” died on Monday. It’s an incredible loss for the world and the MenAreBetterThanWomen.com card will be black in mourning this week.
The MABTW.com card will also be black in mourning for the loss of the last shred of dignity held by the feminist movement — bowel movement. We’ve all had a good laugh at women and their silly agendas, stupid, childish groups, and the milestones they’ve managed to cobble together out of the political table scrapings tossed to them by men. This time they’ve gone too far.
Now they’re going after a tragedy just to prove a point that no one cares about and no one can even figure out. I guess that’s to be expected. Tragedy is the only thing a feminist knows.
Germaine Greer is a woman, allegedly a doctor (though I could not find of what. I would guess proctology, but that usually entails extracting things from the butt, not lodging your own head firmly up it), and has been a virulent feminist most of her life. During my research I found the reason Dr. Greer originally entered the field of feminism is because her clitoris is shaped like a male penis and the trauma of being teased for it since she was sexually active at the age of 12 drove her into the insanity. Interesting to say the least.
On a completely different note, “Dr.” Greer wrote her millionth article in a row this week on the topic of “things I shouldn’t even be fucking talking about” for The Guardian. She called it, “That sort of self-delusion is what it takes to be a real Aussie larrikin”. The surprise is that it isn’t an autobiography. Nor is it a treatise on Australian women in general who are largely regarded as bitches and unimportant the world over. It’s about Steve Irwin and his untimely passing. I don’t give half a fuck what larrikin means. Self-delusion is quite enough.
The points Greer wishes to address in her article are irrelevant — just like everything women say unless it starts with a, “Do you think I should,” or a, “I’m so sorry. I fucked up and did something you said you didn’t think I should do.” And obviously proceeded by a blowjob. It’s enough simply to quote the following from “Dr.” Greer.
It’s really quite unusual for divers to be stung unless they are grappling with the animal and, knowing Steve Irwin, perhaps that may have been the case…Not much sympathy there then.
Classy.
As she is a woman, I find it humourous that “Dr.” Greer — who I would simply just refer to as The Cunt for the remainder of this article, but my man-prudence prohibits me from doing so — even relies on the word ’sympathy’ as a part of her female feminist vocabulary. It is not. These female feminists are the same creatures who fabricate most rape allegations in the hopes of making a stab at some mythical patriarchy.
Does that sound like sympathy to you?
There’s no such thing as a patriarchy, Dr. Greer, you stupid cunt. It’s called the Real World, where seven billion strangers are picked to live in a loft and find out what happens when saber tooth tigers start taking bites out of their asses while they’re trying to sleep. It turns out in this Real World, men get to do everything. They do everything and make all the decisions. Call it whatever you want, but what it’s actually called is the truth. Men are better than women.
Here’s another gem:
The only time Irwin ever seemed less than entirely lovable to his fans (as distinct from zoologists) was when he went into the Australia Zoo crocodile enclosure with his month-old baby son in one hand and a dead chicken in the other. For a second you didn’t know which one he meant to feed to the crocodile.
First of all, that is inappropriate. Secondly, I was never confused, but then again, I’m not retarded.
When Germaine Greer dies, largely unnoticed by friends and family, and which I bet will be soon judging by the God fucking awful picture I found of the old hag on the internet — she looks like a fucking beige batting glove left in the sun with a wad of stringy doll’s hair stapled to the palm — you bet your ass I will be the first one shooting her little clitoral-penis problem out of the old Man-Mouthcannon. That’s called what goes around comes around. That was invented by men too.
Thirdly, let me say that if you have any problem whatsoever with Steve Irwin holding his infant son in his arms whilst feeding crocodiles raw chickens, you are not only wrong, but you are also not a man.
That has nothing to do with risk.
Let me give you a simple man test you can use on any anonymous parties to see if they are a man, woman or some kind of broken computing machine. Actually, strike that last one. If an unknown party gives a response that could only be arrived at through a cluster fuck of malformed logic, just assume it was a woman. Not even men could build a Touring machine that ran on crazy.
First of all, let’s say there’s something called risk. Now say that socially, we all accept a certain amount of risk and that stepping over that line incurs criticism from said society. The question then becomes, “How do we establish the risk of blank?” If you have a vagina, no matter how empowered it is, the answer is, “Well how do I feel about blank?” That is fucked and stupid. The correct and man-answer is, “Let’s ask an expert.”
I’d say someone who built a multi-billion fucking dollar business on the dealings and doings of blank would be a bonafide fucking expert. I would also say that this expert dangling his own fucking son over blanks while doing blank is a bonafide fucking testament that blank is not as risky as you think if you know what the fuck you’re blanking.
That’s just it. Women don’t ever know what they’re blanking so they have to rely on their shitty instincts at all times. That’s why feminism is backwards. It’s puts a small amount of power in the hands of people who have no fucking idea what they’re doing ever — that’s women.
After reading Germaine “Boy’s Name” Greer’s article on the untimely passing of one of the mannest man men to ever walk the Earth, I was saddened by her callous remarks in light of the family Irwin has left behind. Then it hit me: all feminists are insensitive cunts who have no family for that exact reason. They embarrass and shame their parents until they’re ostracized. They embarrass their friends until wallowing into the self-loathing circles of hags who will accompany them through menopause. They have no children because no man in his right mind would fuck a feminist and even if one was drugged into it, Jesus would step in and perform the world’s first immaculate abortion.
Feminists have no right to families. They are horrid and miserable abortions of women and they will rot in hell. Not the biblical one. I’m talking about the one women enter when they hit 35 and don’t have children.
Every creature he brandished at the camera was in distress. Every snake badgered by Irwin was at a huge disadvantage, with only a single possible reaction to its terrifying situation, which was to strike. Easy enough to avoid, if you know what’s coming. Even my cat knew that much.
A cat, huh? What a fucking surprise. Fuck feminists.
“Dr,” Greer Weighs in Heavily
A Female Eunich? What the Fuck?
A Proper Send Off. Written by a Man Instead of a Cunt.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 56 … 22 21 20 19 18 [17] 16 15 14 13 12 … 1 » Show All
I don’t know if Labor will get in and I don’t bother with polls. I think it would be far preferable if Kim had of stepped aside for the benefit of the party before his hand was forced. Now it just looks like, yet again, that the Labor party is divided and subject to disaray. Guess this just proves that politicians are unable to put their personal interests aside for the majority, which begs the question, just what the hell are those sort of peole doing in politics?
I don’t want the Libs to win again as Howard no doubt will retire before the end of his term, giving the leadership to Costello and there aren’t many people I dislike more than Costello. That man really makes my skin crawl.
@wolfe
While the govt may have been targeting unions with their legislation it’s people and families who are being hurt.
I wont speak for other countries. Corruption in Australia has tended to occur more on the right than left. The AWB scandal as mentioned by Female and the PMs helping hand to his brother’s failed business are the most recent examples.
Historically the right has governed more federally but at state level it’s the opposite. The federal Liberal govt has been in place for ten years but was preceded by fourteen years of Labour rule. I’d hardly call that perpetual. I have a fair track record in predicting federal outcomes having been wrong only once(when Labour won in 92). Trust me when I say the libs are in trouble next time. My judgement may change in the next six months of course.
To be honest neither am I. I’m just brainstorming. We do certainly need to find another way. When you think about it I’m being a bit inconsistant by supporting compulsory voting while wanting to do away with it all together. All or nothing.
Check the latest polls. Seems many don’t feel that way. Let’s wait till the “honeymoon” is over. I still prefer Julia.
1111. Mmm… Fatidic. But of what?
Mere conjecture.
I too wonder. If a woman has hijacked the wolfe in addition to the inmates running his asylum. Plausible.
- Tribalisias - Je Sei Namorar
Correct gwallan, I do not like Rudd, he’s so weasily. Howard looks like he has reinforced iron as a backbone compared to Rudd. I feel so dirty for saying that. re: corruption. Australian Wheat Board scandal with kickbacks to Saddam, need I say more?
Which I continue to maintain is not necessarily a good thing.
Hopefully this legislation hits unions repeatedly over the head with a large hammer? (I can but hope).
Depends upon how crazy or corrupt Labour is. Judging by the fact that they aren’t a perpetual ruling party, I’d guess it’s relatively modest on the latter. (Seriously, this is a consideration in some countries like Canada where the left-wing parties tend to extremes of corruption).
Possibly true, but I’m not sure that scheme (random draws of those willing to serve) will yield the desired results.
I wonder if a woman has hijacked Sony’s computer. I can count 8 logical flaws in that single sentence.
Ah well,
-wolfe
Heinlein’s supposed idioms of wisdom are unsound both because of their absolutist or superlative formulation and despite it.
- Audioslave - Shadow On The Sun
In a sense it is still a vote of sorts. The important point is that 95% of our electors do actually vote.
Asked for that didn’t I?
We have a federal election next year - possibly May. The Howard Government will be in some strife. Their workplace relations legislation could be a real problem for them and Iraq is starting to gain an odour. The ALP have dumped Beasley as leader and replaced him with Kevin Rudd(Female may not be happy) and Julia Gillard as deputy(I AM happy although I’d have given her the leadership). This seems to have gone down fairly well in punter land.
The Libs may be in strife.
I wouldn’t go as far as that. Eagerness and willingness are not necessarily the same thing. A reluctant leader who is willing to accept the responsibility is, in my mind, the likeliest to perform well. An ambitious ruler will be more likely to make decisions based on personal interest.
I stand corrected. I loath the fellow. Though I find some of his work redeeming, somewhat.
- Grave Digger - Maidens of War
He happens to be an author a number of us — from disparate nations and political views — like. When he is relevant — as in the discussion of qualifications for voting — he is often mentioned.
You might do well to learn more, without need of bizarrely (mis)citing Eric Blair.
Like Nevil Shute, and others, he articulated some interesting views on the organization of society, ranging across the spectrum, from utopian one-world government, Upton Sinclair’s socialism, to being a Democrat (he ran as one, in the 30’s) to the right, and including libertarianism.
As for “rightfully claiming he’s a dope”, well, you’d need to present evidence to that effect. Claiming you don’t like the man or his writing is fine, but he served honorably, graduated (from a poor family) from Annapolis, and is generally held to have been one of the three greats of 20th Century SF.
Again Sony, you sadly come off as trolling. I don’t care whether or not you like the man, but citing him was relevant to the voting topic at hand — which you enthusiastically injected yourself into.
Learn a little.
-wolfe
Arghhhh!! No, I’m afraid the system is pretty terminal what with all the dubbos continually voting in Johnny.
Just last week, one day after your American Idol admitted the situation in Iraq “is bad” “is real bad” or whatever, our very own PM admits (for the first time) the same on morning radio. Honestly, I don’t even know why we bother having an Australian government at all.
Thanks for the tip gwallan, but once you get your name ticked off and are given the voting ballot paper the size of a queen sized doona, it kind of defeats the purpose not to write all over it, and add your own comments next to each party name. Does my adding of party descriptions mean my vote gets voided even if I correctly number all boxes below the line? Yea, you know I do that.
But seriously, I just go for the sausage sizzle and Lions Club raffles.
What’s with “Heinlein this”, “Heinlein that” all the time? What, is it a thought crime to rightfully claim he’s a dope?
- Alex - Yamasha
A good clarification. I’m still not sure I like it since then why not vote?
On the other hand, John Howard’s gotten repeatedly elected, so the system can’t be all bad .
(Of course gwallan’s response would be: “See? The right DOES benefit from the votes of the stupid and ignorant!”)
Hmmm… no, I don’t think I go along with that. Now if you selected reps randomly from the list of those NOT willing to serve… (As Heinlein said: surely absolute proof of disqualification to serve as a representative is one’s willingness to do so).
Cheers
-wolfe
how could Greer be Fucked. in order for that to happen someone would have to fall for her, and there isn’t a papperrbag thick enough for that to happen. the but ugly Bitch.
If you want men to like you Germain you are suposed to act inteligent not be stupid by pulling men down you havn’t even met.
I bet there is a picture of you on the dictionarry under UGLY to show what the word means.
Germain do us all a favour and drop dead.
i think Germain is the closit leSBIAN. IF I WAS HER I WOULD SUC ON AN EXHORST PIPE AND KILL MTSELF THE MAN HATER PERTHETIC Looser
YOU ARE UTERLY BORING gERMIN no one would sleep with you not even a dog if you had steak tied to coxit to be your friend.
Voting isn’t actually compulsory here. Turning up at the polling booth and getting your name crossed off the roll IS. In many cases, depending on the state, certain groups are exempt. Those over seventy can choose not to vote. Some states allow those between eighteen and twenty one to miss also.
Turning up at a polling booth once every couple of years should not be too much to ask of your citizens. Our turn-up tends to be about 95% and the informal vote about 5%. Our governments therefore can actually claim they have a mandate of sorts for their platform.
Personally I’d do away with elections altogether. I reckon our electoral roll should be replaced with a roll of those willing to participate in the process and that the reps should be chosen randomly. (This does not make me popular at party meetings.)
Perhaps you’re right. Let at least some of those truly unworthy to vote self exclude themselves from voting ineptly or unfoundedly/randomly.
- Aaliyah - Try Again
@Sony A good point. No, I wasn’t tormenting sheep, but I was brief, and hence unclear. Let me be clear. I’m all for self-selection on who doesn’t vote.
I definitely don’t propose in any serious or realistic fashion that we impose poll taxes or means tests or IQ tests or current events tests to determine who votes. The idea is intriguing, but I think unworkable.
In no small part because of the horrific legacy of institutionalized racism these brought in the past.
But if someone is too lazy to vote (or too stupid/ignorant by self-selection), then I don’t actually see that as a bad thing.
In short, I neither believe that a voting rate in the 30-60% range implies the imminent death of the Republic, nor that raising it is automatically a good thing.
I think those motivated to voluntarily vote are more likely to be of at least reasonable intellect and more likely to make prudent choices.
Incidentally, it’s hard to say who mandatory voting would most help in the US. Democrats seem to benefit most from the votes of the very stupid; Republicans seem to benefit most from the votes of the poorly educated.
-wolfe
Who decides who’s stupid or ignorant? How, on what premises, political views dissenting to their own?
I feel the Wolfe is out tormenting sheep on this one. At least in its current vacuously vague form.
I see mandatory voting as but an appropriate obligation of citizenry. Anything else is just a slinky excuse for sloths. The least you can do is to show up and either invalidate the vote (let the counters vote for you as they’d probably do so anyways) or vote with your feet if it’s a machine. Unless your feet stink, in which case you should use a stick to randomly bludgeon the pretty, sparkly buttons.
- BranVan3000 - Astounded