Germaine Greer is a Cunt
Steve Irwin “The Crocodile Hunter” died on Monday. It’s an incredible loss for the world and the MenAreBetterThanWomen.com card will be black in mourning this week.
The MABTW.com card will also be black in mourning for the loss of the last shred of dignity held by the feminist movement — bowel movement. We’ve all had a good laugh at women and their silly agendas, stupid, childish groups, and the milestones they’ve managed to cobble together out of the political table scrapings tossed to them by men. This time they’ve gone too far.
Now they’re going after a tragedy just to prove a point that no one cares about and no one can even figure out. I guess that’s to be expected. Tragedy is the only thing a feminist knows.
Germaine Greer is a woman, allegedly a doctor (though I could not find of what. I would guess proctology, but that usually entails extracting things from the butt, not lodging your own head firmly up it), and has been a virulent feminist most of her life. During my research I found the reason Dr. Greer originally entered the field of feminism is because her clitoris is shaped like a male penis and the trauma of being teased for it since she was sexually active at the age of 12 drove her into the insanity. Interesting to say the least.
On a completely different note, “Dr.” Greer wrote her millionth article in a row this week on the topic of “things I shouldn’t even be fucking talking about” for The Guardian. She called it, “That sort of self-delusion is what it takes to be a real Aussie larrikin”. The surprise is that it isn’t an autobiography. Nor is it a treatise on Australian women in general who are largely regarded as bitches and unimportant the world over. It’s about Steve Irwin and his untimely passing. I don’t give half a fuck what larrikin means. Self-delusion is quite enough.
The points Greer wishes to address in her article are irrelevant — just like everything women say unless it starts with a, “Do you think I should,” or a, “I’m so sorry. I fucked up and did something you said you didn’t think I should do.” And obviously proceeded by a blowjob. It’s enough simply to quote the following from “Dr.” Greer.
It’s really quite unusual for divers to be stung unless they are grappling with the animal and, knowing Steve Irwin, perhaps that may have been the case…Not much sympathy there then.
Classy.
As she is a woman, I find it humourous that “Dr.” Greer — who I would simply just refer to as The Cunt for the remainder of this article, but my man-prudence prohibits me from doing so — even relies on the word ’sympathy’ as a part of her female feminist vocabulary. It is not. These female feminists are the same creatures who fabricate most rape allegations in the hopes of making a stab at some mythical patriarchy.
Does that sound like sympathy to you?
There’s no such thing as a patriarchy, Dr. Greer, you stupid cunt. It’s called the Real World, where seven billion strangers are picked to live in a loft and find out what happens when saber tooth tigers start taking bites out of their asses while they’re trying to sleep. It turns out in this Real World, men get to do everything. They do everything and make all the decisions. Call it whatever you want, but what it’s actually called is the truth. Men are better than women.
Here’s another gem:
The only time Irwin ever seemed less than entirely lovable to his fans (as distinct from zoologists) was when he went into the Australia Zoo crocodile enclosure with his month-old baby son in one hand and a dead chicken in the other. For a second you didn’t know which one he meant to feed to the crocodile.
First of all, that is inappropriate. Secondly, I was never confused, but then again, I’m not retarded.
When Germaine Greer dies, largely unnoticed by friends and family, and which I bet will be soon judging by the God fucking awful picture I found of the old hag on the internet — she looks like a fucking beige batting glove left in the sun with a wad of stringy doll’s hair stapled to the palm — you bet your ass I will be the first one shooting her little clitoral-penis problem out of the old Man-Mouthcannon. That’s called what goes around comes around. That was invented by men too.
Thirdly, let me say that if you have any problem whatsoever with Steve Irwin holding his infant son in his arms whilst feeding crocodiles raw chickens, you are not only wrong, but you are also not a man.
That has nothing to do with risk.
Let me give you a simple man test you can use on any anonymous parties to see if they are a man, woman or some kind of broken computing machine. Actually, strike that last one. If an unknown party gives a response that could only be arrived at through a cluster fuck of malformed logic, just assume it was a woman. Not even men could build a Touring machine that ran on crazy.
First of all, let’s say there’s something called risk. Now say that socially, we all accept a certain amount of risk and that stepping over that line incurs criticism from said society. The question then becomes, “How do we establish the risk of blank?” If you have a vagina, no matter how empowered it is, the answer is, “Well how do I feel about blank?” That is fucked and stupid. The correct and man-answer is, “Let’s ask an expert.”
I’d say someone who built a multi-billion fucking dollar business on the dealings and doings of blank would be a bonafide fucking expert. I would also say that this expert dangling his own fucking son over blanks while doing blank is a bonafide fucking testament that blank is not as risky as you think if you know what the fuck you’re blanking.
That’s just it. Women don’t ever know what they’re blanking so they have to rely on their shitty instincts at all times. That’s why feminism is backwards. It’s puts a small amount of power in the hands of people who have no fucking idea what they’re doing ever — that’s women.
After reading Germaine “Boy’s Name” Greer’s article on the untimely passing of one of the mannest man men to ever walk the Earth, I was saddened by her callous remarks in light of the family Irwin has left behind. Then it hit me: all feminists are insensitive cunts who have no family for that exact reason. They embarrass and shame their parents until they’re ostracized. They embarrass their friends until wallowing into the self-loathing circles of hags who will accompany them through menopause. They have no children because no man in his right mind would fuck a feminist and even if one was drugged into it, Jesus would step in and perform the world’s first immaculate abortion.
Feminists have no right to families. They are horrid and miserable abortions of women and they will rot in hell. Not the biblical one. I’m talking about the one women enter when they hit 35 and don’t have children.
Every creature he brandished at the camera was in distress. Every snake badgered by Irwin was at a huge disadvantage, with only a single possible reaction to its terrifying situation, which was to strike. Easy enough to avoid, if you know what’s coming. Even my cat knew that much.
A cat, huh? What a fucking surprise. Fuck feminists.
“Dr,” Greer Weighs in Heavily
A Female Eunich? What the Fuck?
A Proper Send Off. Written by a Man Instead of a Cunt.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 56 … 24 23 22 21 20 [19] 18 17 16 15 14 … 1 » Show All
@Necro True, bad though it was, it was infinitely preferable to a hot ‘World War 3′.
@SotS Could be… would he switch from a fighter to a sub-chaser though?
-wolfe
@Wolf
I’m more enlightened now thank you. When I said ‘Nobody got hurt’ I thought it was true, but now, we have to admit, compared to the losses in the first 2 wars, it was pretty harmless in the long run.
Grumman F9F Panther fighters?
Heh. I can partly turn that around, SotS.
This is as close as I can get to the pig with wings. Only props, no jet engines. Don Rumsfeld did fly it off carriers though, God bless him.
Now, can you get as close to showing us a chaste hippie chick?
More seriously, I mostly agree with you on Rumsfeld (”badass motherfucker”). I’ve some friends in Army aviation who can’t stand the guy, but hey, that’s no doubt army/navy stuff.
Do you know what else he flew, other than the tracker (which was the last aircraft he flew for the Navy)? I don’t.
-wolfe
Please don’t take this as desiring to argue, but rather simply some thoughts that occurred to me after reading your rather interesting response. Perhaps you’ll find them interesting as well.
The Cold War, most would agree, involved a great many proxy localized ‘Hot Wars’ — the ‘55 Coup in Iran, insurgency in Malaysia combated very effectively by the SAS, IndoChina, notably Korea, and that’s just 5 hotspots off the top of my head from the 50’s.
Lots of people died; lots of people got hurt.
Even leaving aside hot wars, in the armed forces, two weird statistics: in the ‘91 Gulf War, the death rate in US forces apparently went down, possibly because there were no drinking and driving accidents in the alcohol-free Saudi desert. In the present war, the US death rate is apparently only roughly double the Cold War “peacetime” rate.
None of this is to suggest that these deaths matter any less; quite the reverse, simply that serving even in “peacetime” is inherently dangerous.
The confrontations (Cuban Missile Crisis, Berlin Wall) probably resulted in a higher rate of operational and training accidental deaths given the ratcheted up tension levels.
Regards,
-wolfe
Do you love the cock?
Well said Kate *polite clap* Always been saying that.
The fact that you accept this site’s right to exist probably proves you’ve got character and have nothing to fear from the truths exposed here.
For all the others who swear and slander and go apeshit, they’re scared to death that a new place where the truths of their nature will be revealed exists. They’re time of socially acceptable treachery, cuckolding, backstabbing will soon be at an end.
OMG!
Kate, you are a credit to your gender. If it were up to me, I’d award you mabtw.com’s honorary man of the month right now.
Kate, no one cares, didn’t you get the memo?
To all the women who comment on this site and get all upset about it does just plain show that you are stupid. If you dont like the site, dont go on it. Women are always going on about freedom of speech and the right to an opinion. That’s what this site is about and I think you should respect it and not be so hypocritcal. I am a woman too, and as i have said before i dont necessarily agree with this website but i do respect it. If anything, this site has made me realise that maybe there is some truth to it, because of all the angry woman comments.
SotS, right again.
The problem with beta men is we always assume “our” women are on “our” side … that they are “scared” of the same enemy we are.
The truth is - only the fathers/sons/brothers of a society will REALLY lose if a war is lost. Just think, if the enemy conquers a territory, they will simply kill or enslave all of the men and become the new leaders. In fact, the invading conquerers will be seen as masculine, powerful by the conquered females. Sure, the invaders may rape a few women, but ultimately they will simply take them as wives, etc. This is how it has always happened.
Genetic research into the subject shows we are clearly descended from many fewer fathers than mothers… ie polygyny… ie alpha male “bad boy” kings, conquerers, etc with harems was the norm throughout much of history, with lower men going without sex and dying out.
Iow, men are naturally attempting to eliminate “low quality” (ugly, fat, old) women via our desire to choose beautiful, young women - and women are naturally attempting to eliminate “low quality” (powerless, short, ugly, anti-social) men via their sexual choices as well.
A sexually egalitarian species we are not. We are hyper competitive social darwinists in constant competition for survival - evolution never ended. This is why ethical, regulated, transparent competitive systems work so well - because they allow us to compete (which we will anyway) thus producing growth - while also moderating against unfair outcomes - thus encouraging us all to cooperate/work within the system - instead of destroying it.
This is why the naive ideologies of traditional conservatism and even modern liberalism fall apart on their faces - they assume we all naturally have similar enemies and friends -we do not.
Westernism’s founding fathers were fucking geniuses who “got” the basic logic of human nature and evolution .. they were way ahead of their time. As bad as things can seem some times - westernism is based upon self organizing, adaptive systems (democracy, capitalism, open cultures) - which will always eventually fix themselves - even if they take longer than they should most of the time.
abaddon:
Women’s problem is only with modern war as Western powers since Greece fought it.
Ever since the advent of republicanism, professional armies, and tech(even a phalanx qualifies) war has been a way to turn nature’s inherent chaos and conflict into something to benefit the many.
Women despise such humanitarian warfare. Women only like techless/orderless wars of godless slaughter so that the enemy tribes can be killed and her alphas can take all their property and share it with her, while ruling over the betas in the home tribe. And even if the enemy tribe wins, their alphas were stronger and more fit to breed her.
@ All
War in my view, is the use of force to end an argument whether on an individual or national scale. The end result of, if you will, failed diplomacy. It’s not like a bunch of Men get together and saying “LETS HAVE A WAR” like foolish women have Avon parties. It’s simply the end of the line and their must be “closure” as women put it.
War is the directed use of force to achieve an end result, which is a Masculine trait in and of itself. War has been refined through society and our environment to what it is today. It’s to my belief that without war, we wouldn’t have advanced as far as we have. Look at the PLANET we LIVE on! It’s a system BASED upon conflict. Only the strongest survive on this planet, in time the others fade away or are killed off.
To women who would blame Men for all wars. Thats like blaming the planet for creating us all. You don’t understand what you’re talking about.
-Strength and Honor-
hippie chicks are gross
okok! but…emm i meant it as an example of “I’ve been with less glamorous or feminine girls” and they are just as fuckable, lovable, enjoyable etc… but somehow unconsiously im attracted to those other types i mentionned… i think thats status…
hippie chicks are…theyre clean man! what u sayin, not that bad just alittel hairy… …
hah!
Donald Rumsfield is a badass motherfucker and I’ll castrate anyone who says otherwise. He looks like my grandfather. Acts like him too.
Hippie chicks are disgusting. If you even touch them it’s no surprise you’re a little bit confused about your sexual identity. A hippie chick is like fucking an unwashed towell that 40 dudes just shot ejaculate into. You like that? Show me a hippie chick who’s chaste I’ll show you a fucking pig that has wings and jet engines with Don Rumsfield flying it off a aircraft carrier.
everyone is attracted to power and status, or symbols of power and status, be it a man or a woman. i am personally attracted to certain types of women - well groomed, big breasts, but i am conscious that it is a symbol of a trophy or the “ideal” status-provoking shit…ya know? I’ve had just as good sex with hippie chix or less groomed women…but the norm is always the high class “desirable”.
as for women being attracted to people like donald rumsfeld or warrior type pricks… well, its what our nation aims for thats the IDEAL man, the warrior, protector, masculine, charming, yet coldblooded murderer….why WOULDNT he be sexy? - its how we measure social currencyand therefore FUCKABILITY.
fuck you all for accusing someone else for somethign you ALL have in you…..
why do people make such a big deal about “spelling” its not like it changes the value of the person or what she/he is saying? i just don’t care much about your reading pleasure, an di am sure you get the point bsides all the spelling detaisl which are typos anyway…
i wish i were …a woman that is.
I have studied womens studies though.
Not true :). Wars do solve alot of things, its just a bad way of doing it. Now the Cold war, that was a proper war. Nobody got hurt, but everybody was scared shitless. Which is better than dead.
I won’t touch the other stuff because… well, I didn’t understand any of it. Not surprising though. However, I agree that being ignorant isn’t a good thing, yet thats what you and all the other women are doing. Being ignorant. :D