Germaine Greer is a Cunt
Steve Irwin “The Crocodile Hunter” died on Monday. It’s an incredible loss for the world and the MenAreBetterThanWomen.com card will be black in mourning this week.
The MABTW.com card will also be black in mourning for the loss of the last shred of dignity held by the feminist movement — bowel movement. We’ve all had a good laugh at women and their silly agendas, stupid, childish groups, and the milestones they’ve managed to cobble together out of the political table scrapings tossed to them by men. This time they’ve gone too far.
Now they’re going after a tragedy just to prove a point that no one cares about and no one can even figure out. I guess that’s to be expected. Tragedy is the only thing a feminist knows.
Germaine Greer is a woman, allegedly a doctor (though I could not find of what. I would guess proctology, but that usually entails extracting things from the butt, not lodging your own head firmly up it), and has been a virulent feminist most of her life. During my research I found the reason Dr. Greer originally entered the field of feminism is because her clitoris is shaped like a male penis and the trauma of being teased for it since she was sexually active at the age of 12 drove her into the insanity. Interesting to say the least.
On a completely different note, “Dr.” Greer wrote her millionth article in a row this week on the topic of “things I shouldn’t even be fucking talking about” for The Guardian. She called it, “That sort of self-delusion is what it takes to be a real Aussie larrikin”. The surprise is that it isn’t an autobiography. Nor is it a treatise on Australian women in general who are largely regarded as bitches and unimportant the world over. It’s about Steve Irwin and his untimely passing. I don’t give half a fuck what larrikin means. Self-delusion is quite enough.
The points Greer wishes to address in her article are irrelevant — just like everything women say unless it starts with a, “Do you think I should,” or a, “I’m so sorry. I fucked up and did something you said you didn’t think I should do.” And obviously proceeded by a blowjob. It’s enough simply to quote the following from “Dr.” Greer.
It’s really quite unusual for divers to be stung unless they are grappling with the animal and, knowing Steve Irwin, perhaps that may have been the case…Not much sympathy there then.
Classy.
As she is a woman, I find it humourous that “Dr.” Greer — who I would simply just refer to as The Cunt for the remainder of this article, but my man-prudence prohibits me from doing so — even relies on the word ’sympathy’ as a part of her female feminist vocabulary. It is not. These female feminists are the same creatures who fabricate most rape allegations in the hopes of making a stab at some mythical patriarchy.
Does that sound like sympathy to you?
There’s no such thing as a patriarchy, Dr. Greer, you stupid cunt. It’s called the Real World, where seven billion strangers are picked to live in a loft and find out what happens when saber tooth tigers start taking bites out of their asses while they’re trying to sleep. It turns out in this Real World, men get to do everything. They do everything and make all the decisions. Call it whatever you want, but what it’s actually called is the truth. Men are better than women.
Here’s another gem:
The only time Irwin ever seemed less than entirely lovable to his fans (as distinct from zoologists) was when he went into the Australia Zoo crocodile enclosure with his month-old baby son in one hand and a dead chicken in the other. For a second you didn’t know which one he meant to feed to the crocodile.
First of all, that is inappropriate. Secondly, I was never confused, but then again, I’m not retarded.
When Germaine Greer dies, largely unnoticed by friends and family, and which I bet will be soon judging by the God fucking awful picture I found of the old hag on the internet — she looks like a fucking beige batting glove left in the sun with a wad of stringy doll’s hair stapled to the palm — you bet your ass I will be the first one shooting her little clitoral-penis problem out of the old Man-Mouthcannon. That’s called what goes around comes around. That was invented by men too.
Thirdly, let me say that if you have any problem whatsoever with Steve Irwin holding his infant son in his arms whilst feeding crocodiles raw chickens, you are not only wrong, but you are also not a man.
That has nothing to do with risk.
Let me give you a simple man test you can use on any anonymous parties to see if they are a man, woman or some kind of broken computing machine. Actually, strike that last one. If an unknown party gives a response that could only be arrived at through a cluster fuck of malformed logic, just assume it was a woman. Not even men could build a Touring machine that ran on crazy.
First of all, let’s say there’s something called risk. Now say that socially, we all accept a certain amount of risk and that stepping over that line incurs criticism from said society. The question then becomes, “How do we establish the risk of blank?” If you have a vagina, no matter how empowered it is, the answer is, “Well how do I feel about blank?” That is fucked and stupid. The correct and man-answer is, “Let’s ask an expert.”
I’d say someone who built a multi-billion fucking dollar business on the dealings and doings of blank would be a bonafide fucking expert. I would also say that this expert dangling his own fucking son over blanks while doing blank is a bonafide fucking testament that blank is not as risky as you think if you know what the fuck you’re blanking.
That’s just it. Women don’t ever know what they’re blanking so they have to rely on their shitty instincts at all times. That’s why feminism is backwards. It’s puts a small amount of power in the hands of people who have no fucking idea what they’re doing ever — that’s women.
After reading Germaine “Boy’s Name” Greer’s article on the untimely passing of one of the mannest man men to ever walk the Earth, I was saddened by her callous remarks in light of the family Irwin has left behind. Then it hit me: all feminists are insensitive cunts who have no family for that exact reason. They embarrass and shame their parents until they’re ostracized. They embarrass their friends until wallowing into the self-loathing circles of hags who will accompany them through menopause. They have no children because no man in his right mind would fuck a feminist and even if one was drugged into it, Jesus would step in and perform the world’s first immaculate abortion.
Feminists have no right to families. They are horrid and miserable abortions of women and they will rot in hell. Not the biblical one. I’m talking about the one women enter when they hit 35 and don’t have children.
Every creature he brandished at the camera was in distress. Every snake badgered by Irwin was at a huge disadvantage, with only a single possible reaction to its terrifying situation, which was to strike. Easy enough to avoid, if you know what’s coming. Even my cat knew that much.
A cat, huh? What a fucking surprise. Fuck feminists.
“Dr,” Greer Weighs in Heavily
A Female Eunich? What the Fuck?
A Proper Send Off. Written by a Man Instead of a Cunt.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 56 … 44 43 42 41 40 [39] 38 37 36 35 34 … 1 » Show All
There is no need for the ad hominem. Despite being a chauvinist, I dare say I am highly capable in my own right. Yes, women do respect me for my intelligence.
My point was feminism inculcates into women the belief that everything they say and do makes as much sense as a man. Correction, more. They believe that both genders are “equal” which is bullshit as it sidelines into man-hate. My view is it neglects the contributions of men throughout the ages teaching women to be yes, ungrateful. Women think its their god given right to have their privelleges. No, lady, its not your right. We men gave them to you and we men can take them back.
When I see women making digs at men or the male gender, who, at one point of their life or another have to serve their country or defend their nation, I cant take that. Thats why I oppose feminism. We men are the ones … yes, the ones giving the blanket over the heads of all. Women and children. All. Feminism derides that. It believes in squeaky clean equality where men have to serve their country, take a low pay check and still be gentlemen. Fuck that shit. You want equality? Start by being as capable in all areas as a man. If not, cook my dinner and shut the fuck up. (Sorry for the verbal outburst but I am a man and entitled to verbal outbursts)
“No one gets raped in broad day light, in a crowded area, with tons of witnesses.”…
Actually, YES, it can happen. It happened to me at 9:00 a.m. in the morning in broad, clear daylight as I walked to my office building downtown. I was in a business suit, modestly dressed and there were definitely other people walking up and down sidewalks going to work. A very tall man had been hiding in an alley between buildings and lunged out and grabbed me from behind as I was walking briskly down that sidewalk. Because of his actions and his knife, he was serious, believe me.
It was a fast attack, and only because of martial training by my father and husband and self-study, and the fact that I am very athletic and strong even though I am a small woman, I reacted VERY quickly. So quickly, in fact, that I literally climbed UP his 6″4″ frame clawing, biting, kneeing him, poking his eyes, etc…doing anything to fight for my life. I was incredibly fortunate that just about the time (after somehow kneeing him and biting him badly enough he fell to his knees…) a police cruiser happened to come to the intersection near where this was happening and two big burly cops ran and helped me. They literally had to pull me off of him because by that time I was truly ready to kill him. Had I not had any training, had I not been strong and quick (even though a small female) and caught HIM by surprise, it could have been MUCH worse if he’d gotten control of me and dragged me into that alley behind a dumpster. He was arrested, tried and convicted and because of a LONG rape and assault rapsheet he went to prison for life (didn’t hurt I was a lawyer and worked for the biggest lawfirm in the state, either…he picked the WRONG female all around).
ANYWAY, I am NOT telling this tale to say that women shouldn’t go anyplace! Obviously, I have had a full life and career, travelled many places and lived in many countries over the world, so I am not a jailed woman in any way. BUT, to be naive enough to say that it is “safe” everywhere is not correct, either. Women should ALWAYS keep their eyes and ears open and a head on a swivel. Even though I knew that and was trained for that, it still happened to me. So, stay as safe as you can, ladies!
KellyMac, I absolutely agree with you! If one reads this site carefully, it’s not unlike the shock-jocks on radio…you have to listen/read carefully…there is a valid message happening here.
No, I don’t agree with alot of the more “extreme” postings and there are some posters who do believe what they say and to me are over the edge…which means that THEY don’t get it either, but overall, there’s a very important point being made here and it’s not a site meant for jumping to instant conclusions. Kellymac’s correct: don’t take it all so literally. If you read and discuss things on the Forum you can find that many of the men who post regularly are not wingnuts, but men who are just terribly frustrated with the changes wrought by extreme modern Feminism…many of them have women they care about in their lives, daughters, mothers, sisters and friends they respect and love…they just want to have a balance that is now missing in society restored.
Female: with all that I have said here, I do agree with you also that it IS disturbing to read some of the things said here…I admit that also. However, I’ve not been on any forum (regardless of the subject area) wherein there aren’t “extremists” or unbalanced people who post. I find many of your comments insightful and right on…and OBVIOUSLY, I don’t agree with the idea of locking women into their homes like total prisoners!!
People: moderation in ALL THINGS…balance, people, balance…along with using the strengths of EACH sex in a cooperative manner…NOBODY should be the oppressive dictator keeping the other sex as prisoners, whether literally or psychologically.
Although I obviously agree that respect is earned and not demanded, I cannot agree with your opinion that it is down to the individual and not feminism, when feminism has stated it’s hatred for men, blamed us for any & everything wrong in the world, pretends that women are practically incapable of abuses upon men & children, blames men if women are found guilty of anything, mocks (using junk science & fraudulent survey results) the Y chromosome and insults us daily with it’s belittling interpretation and portrayal of men through various media formats. (break for air).
Feminism has concentrated wholey on destroying the good traits of being male, painting them all as bad, etc. and this does trickle down into society at many degrees. I can specifically recall at least a couple of my first school teachers (90% female) being very anti-male and always trying to pin blame on the boy if anything happened between a boy & girl. You may think “Only two, out of how many employed in the whole school?” - in first school, you get one teacher per year, so we’re talking 2 out of 4 teachers that I had. 50% antimale bias - not bad!!!
I spent 2 yrs trying to do everything I could to please my wife. I saw her mother battering my step children, mentally & verbally assaulting them, overstepping our marital boundaries, using my immigration status & reltaionship to my daughter as leverage for her to get away with endless abuses. My wife supported her ‘mom’ in all that she did, including protecting her from legal repercussions. She would rather be in a hostile environment where child abuse, alcoholism & drug abuse are ‘normal’ than with the guy who stood by side every time and did everything in his power to protect both his own children and his step children.
There is no respect, even for her own children.
Trust me, ladies, the vast majority of men on here get that it’s satire. You’re taking everything literally.
Actually, the one who was talking about raping her mother was a woman - apparently she hadn’t quite grasped the concept of the IP hash.
But then I never expected you to go that far into something that could be used to degrade this site. It would be easier to just write off some of the idiotic drivel gurlz write to purposely defame the site… as things men wrote to defame this site.
Do you really think a man would talk about raping his mother? Right, you have a separate-but-equal female brain. Think about it.
And, also, if men and women are judged on the same standard instead of on a slant, the womyn would look bad. I have a feeling you aren’t talking about that kind of equality, but if you’ve accepted that one gender can, on average, be better or even different from the other, then I guess you’re somewhat for true equality.
Of course, that also includes the ever-present mystery of sex. If it takes a gurl no effort to get boned senseless by a man, and if gurlz admit they use not a single brain-cell when they’re getting fucked, then obviously they don’t like sex. Nor is it honorable for them to go sleeping around.
But hey, the gurlz here write about their ‘mind-blowing orgasms.’ If they can type it with their manicured nails, it must be true.
And I’m the king of Spain.
Feminism doesn’t expect women to be better men than men. Feminism expects men and women to be treated as equals (though, yes, modern feminism now supports women being given preferential treatment at the expense of men, which is why I don’t identify with modern feminism).
If this site is satire, the commenters sure as hell don’t believe that. The majority of even regular posters take this site as gospel (and that’s excluding the random crazies talking about raping their mothers, or god knows what else). Even some of the moderate posters here believe women shouldn’t vote. Most of the people reading and commenting on this site take its chauvinistic ideas VERY seriously, which is why it’s crazy for a woman to support it.
I have to agree with your commentary, KellyMac. But do the men here understand this? Can they?
Alex, when are you going to figure out that this site uses satire to make a point? The point being that we women are expected to be better men than men, and that is impossible because we AREN’T MEN! Sometimes it takes a shock treatment to make a person see something that was invisible to them before.
Dick doesn’t hate women. The majority of the men who post here don’t hate women. They just want women to realize how fucked up everything is.
Heh, I know what a job entails. I’m not talking about carefree, fun, party-like social interaction, just interaction with people one’s own age.
Also, I agree with Female when she says that much of the world is safe for women to venture alone. No one gets raped in broad day light, in a crowded area, with tons of witnesses. And as for times or places that may be dangerous, well, women know what those times/places are (late at night, bad areas, etc.), and will usually be with a group of friends or her husband/boyfriend if she knows it’s not safe to be alone. (And, of course some women make unfortunate decisions and don’t protect themselves in this way, but then, plenty of men wind up in bad areas and get mugged/murdered as well). In regards to cheating, should married men be kept far away from all women for the same reasons?
@ KellyMac- This is exactly why I said you shouldn’t support this site. Sure, not everyone here may have the same beliefs as Ralohcs, but the general tone of the site is overwhelmingly sexist and chauvinistic to ALL women. You were offended by the comment Ralohcs made about owning his wife, but Dick himself wrote in one of his articles that a woman’s body belongs to her husband rather than herself. He also believes women shouldn’t have the right to vote. The PREMISE of the site is that women are inferior to men, in every way conceivable. Hate feminism all you want, but no woman in her right mind should support this site, because it denigrates all women, condescends to them, and supports them being in a place of subjection to men.
As far as I can tell the men are operating under genderalised beliefs. I’m operating according to realistic thinking which takes into account that authoritarian ways of thinking/being simply have an effect that is the reverse of what the authoritarian wanted to have happen. Again, that is called being knowledgeable and realistic.
So, your friend Raholcs thinks he can control his wife by locking her inside the house like Rapunzel. This to me seems indicative of fairy tale thinking.
You have a similiar belief in that you think locking women inside houses, even burning houses, will wipe out juvenile pregnancy and wow, possibly even contain transmission of HIV, because clearly young people have never heard of condoms and only ever have sex with HIV carriers.
Recommended reading for men who don’t want to be considered like witches.
http://www.familymanagement.com/literacy/grimms/grimms09.html
Recommended reading for all other men.
http://www.gottman.com/research/
I’m just shedding a little light on the case.
See, you never can quite comprehend what the men are saying. That is why nobody wants you here.
Doubt, just a hint, nobody (women included) want to be subject to another person’s overly exaggerated and hostile rant which is primarily made up of prejudices. I suggest you work on lightening up because as mind boggling as this may sound, you wont actually get women to stop having sex or abortions by screaming in their face. Ask any adolescents’ parents just how much success they had by being authoritarian. Hell, just ask George Bush how much success he’s had being that way.
If she was babbling about pulling male fetuses out of her vagina and making up bible versus to suit her feminist agenda, she probably would be safer in a burning house than the outside world anyways. The world would be a better place for it, that’s for sure, being that those kinds of sluts keep muttering about how dangerous free speech is. And I’m not sure about how successful a slutty preteen could turn out, but it would undoubtedly be best if she stayed in there with her son-aborting mommy. A few less AIDs cases never hurt anyone, eh?
I wonder whether if the house was on fire, whether she’d still need permission to leave it? He’d probably say no anyway.
Read that back to yourself.
Still makes sense?
Yes?
That’s cause you’re a woman.
- Nina Simone - Sinnerman
I thought that a certain someone was leaving this site for good.
You strike me as having a very one dimensional view of women. Unless you live in a dangerous housing project, I can’t see why you would think it was dangerous for women to leave the house without being accompanied by a man or getting your permission (because you seem to believe that only you know when the danger periods for being able to go outside are).
As for workmen banging women en masse. Again, this is a fear conditioned stereotype and if you believe it, then again it simply proves that you have little experience of most women and quite obviously have a rather big problem with trust. The trust/mistrust issue you might be able to blame on your first initial caregiver (let’s assume that was your mother) but to blame it on feminism is simply scape-goating because for whatever reason that better suits your agenda.
Liberated women and men can be happy. While humans are by nature, social creatures, those who are not in monogamous relationships can still derive happiness from other social networks. In fact, most theories would support the view that people that are not in intimate relationships actually need greater social networks than those who are in monogamous relationships. Thus, liberation is essential to being able to obtain social support which itself is a key ingrediant necessary for good/happy mental health.
There is a big difference between need and respect. A woman can need a man’s support and still not respect him, and equally, women are able to respect men whose support they do not depend on. You cannot demand respect, and if you personally find that you cannot obtain it, then rather than blame it on feminism, perhaps you should look at your own actions and what you are doing in your interactions with women that does not engender respect in the women towards you.
Totally wrong. If it was in her subconscious, she wouldn’t be able to recognize it, let alone state it.
Just because a women has future thought about the differences between LBC (life before children) and LAC (after children) and what she may personally find limiting, this bears no relation whatsoever to being an employee or employer in her own right who can hold responsibility in a work environment without viewing it like a 5 day a week tea party.
If anything, it means the woman is insightful enough to have actually seriously considered motherhood and the life changes it would entail and how she would personally make adjustments, as opposed to someone who deliberately plans to get pregnant for the sole purpose of receiving a govt. baby payment or for maintaining a relationship that is on the rocks and that she erroneously believes may need a baby to hold it together.
Women that fall pregnant just to trap men are the lowest of the low.
I’m with you there, MansVoice. 100%.