Germaine Greer is a Cunt
Steve Irwin “The Crocodile Hunter” died on Monday. It’s an incredible loss for the world and the MenAreBetterThanWomen.com card will be black in mourning this week.
The MABTW.com card will also be black in mourning for the loss of the last shred of dignity held by the feminist movement — bowel movement. We’ve all had a good laugh at women and their silly agendas, stupid, childish groups, and the milestones they’ve managed to cobble together out of the political table scrapings tossed to them by men. This time they’ve gone too far.
Now they’re going after a tragedy just to prove a point that no one cares about and no one can even figure out. I guess that’s to be expected. Tragedy is the only thing a feminist knows.
Germaine Greer is a woman, allegedly a doctor (though I could not find of what. I would guess proctology, but that usually entails extracting things from the butt, not lodging your own head firmly up it), and has been a virulent feminist most of her life. During my research I found the reason Dr. Greer originally entered the field of feminism is because her clitoris is shaped like a male penis and the trauma of being teased for it since she was sexually active at the age of 12 drove her into the insanity. Interesting to say the least.
On a completely different note, “Dr.” Greer wrote her millionth article in a row this week on the topic of “things I shouldn’t even be fucking talking about” for The Guardian. She called it, “That sort of self-delusion is what it takes to be a real Aussie larrikin”. The surprise is that it isn’t an autobiography. Nor is it a treatise on Australian women in general who are largely regarded as bitches and unimportant the world over. It’s about Steve Irwin and his untimely passing. I don’t give half a fuck what larrikin means. Self-delusion is quite enough.
The points Greer wishes to address in her article are irrelevant — just like everything women say unless it starts with a, “Do you think I should,” or a, “I’m so sorry. I fucked up and did something you said you didn’t think I should do.” And obviously proceeded by a blowjob. It’s enough simply to quote the following from “Dr.” Greer.
It’s really quite unusual for divers to be stung unless they are grappling with the animal and, knowing Steve Irwin, perhaps that may have been the case…Not much sympathy there then.
Classy.
As she is a woman, I find it humourous that “Dr.” Greer — who I would simply just refer to as The Cunt for the remainder of this article, but my man-prudence prohibits me from doing so — even relies on the word ’sympathy’ as a part of her female feminist vocabulary. It is not. These female feminists are the same creatures who fabricate most rape allegations in the hopes of making a stab at some mythical patriarchy.
Does that sound like sympathy to you?
There’s no such thing as a patriarchy, Dr. Greer, you stupid cunt. It’s called the Real World, where seven billion strangers are picked to live in a loft and find out what happens when saber tooth tigers start taking bites out of their asses while they’re trying to sleep. It turns out in this Real World, men get to do everything. They do everything and make all the decisions. Call it whatever you want, but what it’s actually called is the truth. Men are better than women.
Here’s another gem:
The only time Irwin ever seemed less than entirely lovable to his fans (as distinct from zoologists) was when he went into the Australia Zoo crocodile enclosure with his month-old baby son in one hand and a dead chicken in the other. For a second you didn’t know which one he meant to feed to the crocodile.
First of all, that is inappropriate. Secondly, I was never confused, but then again, I’m not retarded.
When Germaine Greer dies, largely unnoticed by friends and family, and which I bet will be soon judging by the God fucking awful picture I found of the old hag on the internet — she looks like a fucking beige batting glove left in the sun with a wad of stringy doll’s hair stapled to the palm — you bet your ass I will be the first one shooting her little clitoral-penis problem out of the old Man-Mouthcannon. That’s called what goes around comes around. That was invented by men too.
Thirdly, let me say that if you have any problem whatsoever with Steve Irwin holding his infant son in his arms whilst feeding crocodiles raw chickens, you are not only wrong, but you are also not a man.
That has nothing to do with risk.
Let me give you a simple man test you can use on any anonymous parties to see if they are a man, woman or some kind of broken computing machine. Actually, strike that last one. If an unknown party gives a response that could only be arrived at through a cluster fuck of malformed logic, just assume it was a woman. Not even men could build a Touring machine that ran on crazy.
First of all, let’s say there’s something called risk. Now say that socially, we all accept a certain amount of risk and that stepping over that line incurs criticism from said society. The question then becomes, “How do we establish the risk of blank?” If you have a vagina, no matter how empowered it is, the answer is, “Well how do I feel about blank?” That is fucked and stupid. The correct and man-answer is, “Let’s ask an expert.”
I’d say someone who built a multi-billion fucking dollar business on the dealings and doings of blank would be a bonafide fucking expert. I would also say that this expert dangling his own fucking son over blanks while doing blank is a bonafide fucking testament that blank is not as risky as you think if you know what the fuck you’re blanking.
That’s just it. Women don’t ever know what they’re blanking so they have to rely on their shitty instincts at all times. That’s why feminism is backwards. It’s puts a small amount of power in the hands of people who have no fucking idea what they’re doing ever — that’s women.
After reading Germaine “Boy’s Name” Greer’s article on the untimely passing of one of the mannest man men to ever walk the Earth, I was saddened by her callous remarks in light of the family Irwin has left behind. Then it hit me: all feminists are insensitive cunts who have no family for that exact reason. They embarrass and shame their parents until they’re ostracized. They embarrass their friends until wallowing into the self-loathing circles of hags who will accompany them through menopause. They have no children because no man in his right mind would fuck a feminist and even if one was drugged into it, Jesus would step in and perform the world’s first immaculate abortion.
Feminists have no right to families. They are horrid and miserable abortions of women and they will rot in hell. Not the biblical one. I’m talking about the one women enter when they hit 35 and don’t have children.
Every creature he brandished at the camera was in distress. Every snake badgered by Irwin was at a huge disadvantage, with only a single possible reaction to its terrifying situation, which was to strike. Easy enough to avoid, if you know what’s coming. Even my cat knew that much.
A cat, huh? What a fucking surprise. Fuck feminists.
“Dr,” Greer Weighs in Heavily
A Female Eunich? What the Fuck?
A Proper Send Off. Written by a Man Instead of a Cunt.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 56 … 45 44 43 42 41 [40] 39 38 37 36 35 … 1 » Show All
Catherine, you need to post a nude pic of your butt with a mabtw logo stamped on it.
Unless, of course, your bare (bear?) ass is something we likely would not seek to see, should we know what it looks like.
Ah yes, finally someone took the deliberate ruse and went for the “age” card.
About time.
So, what exactly is your point? Where did I say I was proud of my age?
And am I an eaglet? :S
I do not concur.
I undersand fully, and I applaud you for having that opinion.
I believe in equality - no matter what gender or race in question, and I am, as I already stated, quite willing to go to great lengths to recieve this goal.
Of course, this is the last resort, and there is plenty of hope that such an atrocity will not be nessescary. Yet if the gender-apartheid I see coming will, in fact, be established, and no other solutions are possible, then that is what I will do.
Again, it is unlikely that it will be nessescary, but I will not live a life worth less than another because I am born male.
Correction:
“This is not a site any woman should BE ON, anti-feminist or not.”
Well, I prefer not using my real name.
I do not know what that specific paragraph was for, but I seriously doubt you would gain anything for making jokes of my username.
It was.
And I am just saying that I would do the same, exept with women, and killing instead of “kicking in the balls”. But of course, I have to deal with things like Alex’s post. Now how exactly is that fair?
I mean, when women do it, it is not chauvinistic, right?
Why should I?
Their incompetence might actually endanger someone else than themselves.
No, I do not mind women in the frontlines. I do mind it when they do not do their job properly, however.
As Dick said, let them smoke a full pack of cigarettes.
And now for Alex.
Quote the exact phrase. Or shove your words somewhere specific, Alex.
Or rather, let me elaborate, so you won’t have to bother.
I will assume that you are referring to male chauvenism, as in the belief that men are better than women. Problem is, I did not say: “And I do not advocate killing innocent women, but if that is what I will have to do because men are better than women, then so be it.” or any extention thereof, I said “And I do not advocate killing innocent women, but if that is what I will have to do to get equality, then so be it.”. Meaning, that if I had to kill someone to be considered equal to women (or anyone else, for that matter), then I would. This can be an extreme measure, but since it is not because of the belief that men are better than women, driven thereof, or based on it, it has no implications to male chauvenism.
Q.E.D.
And this, you of course know. Becuase you know what “many” other men on this site is thinking.
Ah yes, but even a blind squirrel finds a nut, no?
After all, why bother proving someone wrong when you can just say they are chauvenists, right? Makes a lot of sense.
What makes even more sense is making a knee-jerk assumbption about someone being chauvenist because thay put the words kill, innocent and women in the same phrase. Right?
It works. That is all I can say.
Free speech and freedom of opinion is a “bitch”, is it not?
Would any other men care to help Alex make her point to KellyMac, as Talon and Son have done?
KM - Dick is really freakin funny - and yes, I get that he is simultaneously taking a dig at males while presumably griping about women (”lingerie” that only comes in a youth medium?). But only a rat bastard could really stand to applaud the kind of sick slime that has come oozing around this site. Some of these men are seriously disturbed.
Female, you are twat.
I just meant that the men here will respect anyone (even women) who denigrate women. Hence why no one attacks KellyMac for things they would attack in other women, like having a career.
Alex, I denigrate women to spread the truth, not to climb fucking social ladders.
I do not concur.
Catherine, Talon is just an eaglet. He’s fifteen and proud of it…yeah.
Alex, I couldn’t agree more, well said.
From his own mouth, KellyMac. They take their chauvinistic ideas very seriously. Many other men on this site, if asked, would say the same. No, of course they don’t want all women to die horrible deaths (though some of the crazy ones have advocated it), but they are chauvinists. What short of a signed confession from Dick and every single poster will convince you of that? Yes, some of it is hyperbole for humor or effect, but that does not change the fact that the underlying tone and nature of the site is extremely sexist. Be anti-feminist all you want, but this site is extremely degrading towards -all- women. Hell, if you didn’t denigrate the majority of women the way you do (after all, there’s no faster way to make friends on this site than denigrating women), they would probably be attacking you as a bad mother for holding a full time job (and implying you slept with your boss to even get the job), calling you a slut if you’ve slept with anyone other than your husband within your lifetime, and tossing in a variety of nasty names (cunt, bitch, etc.). This is not a site any woman should support, anti-feminist or not.
Ohhh. TALON, is it? Very fierce. Rip! Tear! How like a bird of prey you are!
Yes, I will kick a man who is holding me down in the balls. I will not kick a man who is not holding me down in the balls. I’m sorry, was that not clear enough for you?
So, do you want women on the front lines or not? If you don’t want the help, then quit your bitchin’, k?
Ah yes. Guilty by association, hmm?
You crack me up.
And I do not advocate killing innocent women, but if that is what I will have to do to get equality, then so be it.
And your point is?
And I am sure they are very useful in the frontlines, seeing as they are weaker, shorter and slower than men.
I just reversed your following “argument”:
…that I am going to ask that you back up with facts now.
Of course you can’t. But I can.
Well, from the horse’s mouth.
And what happens if women cannot get what they want? They kick a man in the balls. Thanks, gram.
Because raping are men’s base nature, right?
And you carry the underlining assumption that men not beating women are intelligent, yet you do not mind when a woman kicks a man in the balls - to your benefit.
I really want to feel insulted by that.
But I cannot.
Apparently, that’s no longer necessary. The bridge jumps off from under the people.
At least part of the money for infrastructure upkeep goes into Cheney’s and ilk’s pockets.
- FRAGMA - Toca me
KellyMac, are you saying that we should be pleased that eventually men came around to letting all of us in this country (legally) vote? I’m harder to please than that. And yes, yes, I know all about the rule by the elite, not majority. I’m not even opposed to it necessarily. What I DO object to is being excluded from consideration for being a member of the elite simply because I’m a woman.
And don’t even try to tell me you don’t even feel the same way. You’re trying to get these men to accept you as one of their “elite” by being all nicey nicey to them and kicking down anyone you perceive to be a pretender to your dubious throne. You’d be happy to be accepted by men, even at the expense of your identity as a woman.
I agree, I should have been more clear. Things do get fucked up occasionally. But to say that things ARE fucked up seems to me that no person, male or female, has any chance at anything resembling a happy life.
Stupid people make stupid choices. There’s difference between choosing to marry a scumbag (again, male or female) and then getting screwed in the end (ha - no pun intended there), and being forced to marry a scumbag, and getting screwed in the end. Things are better now than 100 years ago. At least we all have a chance now.
I have never attempted to fuck a man over by skewing a law to my benefit. Nor have I let a man do it to me. Actually, I’ve never spent much time at all with a man who wanted to try.
I suggest being considerate and savvy in your dealings with both genders, and you’ll find that you won’t feel quite so fucked as you apparently do now.
Except for stupid people. Feel free to be as hard on stupid people as you wish. I hate freakin’ stupid people. Fuckers can go jump off bridge, as far as I’m concerned. Let’s get things started with a few of the guys on here.
Yes, Catherine, yes it is. Just as one example, look at the divorce, custody, and child support laws, with an unbiased eye. By unbiased eye, I mean take out of your head for a moment that women make better parents because they are women, and that if a man wants to be a parent it means he’s a child molester.
Or look at the recent case of the female member of the air force who accused three male members of raping her, but then couldn’t keep her story straight, and refused to testify because it would be too “stressful”, but apparently doesn’t find it stressful to be in the middle of a media circus. What does the public automatically assume? That they raped her. Just ignore the facts, including the fact that she chose to get drunk and act out, and automatically assume she is telling the truth because they have penises and she is the “victim of thousands of years of patriarchal oppression”.
About the vote, research your history. And by history, I don’t mean anything they taught you in women’s studies. I mean look at actual historical documents.
At the time the suffragettes were fighting for the vote, there were already several states that allowed certain women to vote. Just as they allowed certain men to vote. Voting is not something ANYONE in the country has been able to do for very long. It was mostly the wealthy.
But I know it’s much more fun to imagine your granny being oppressed and fighting for your “rights”.
Holy jeebus. Everything is NOT fucked up. The men here who think it is are the bitter angry male equivalents of raging feminists.
And while I gotta say, I don’t advocate kicking a man in the balls simply because he’s got em - at the same time, if that’s what my grandmother had to do to get the right to vote, then thanks, gram!
@MansVoice There are women in the military, you know. Even dying for their country and keeping our asses happy and safe at home. Well, mine anyway. You don’t seem too happy.
I think the url for this site should be “menaremorethanwomen.com”. Stronger, taller, faster, more aggressive, more angry, more prone to violent crime, more likely to start wars and dictatorships.
I can’t say I think they’re more intelligent and creative, though, I really can’t.
It’s true that wrong and right aside, pretty much all our “rights” as women have to be granted by men, as they ARE stronger and more violent.
So, kudos to all the men who have managed to let their intellect overcome their baser nature, and who don’t go around raping, beating, and hiding women in a primal need to prove their “superiority”.
Believe me, I LOVE finding a man who actually IS better than me - and they are out there, though I seriously doubt there are more than one or two on this site.
I have news for you Alex, feminism does not believe in equality, although that’s what they trumpet.
I’ve seen it stated this way, and I think it covers it: Feminism isn’t about equal opportunity, it’s about equal outcomes.
@ MansVoice: I said it was satire. But only in the sense that I don’t believe most of the men who post here really want all women to die horribly. They just want women to see how fucked up everything is.
Like I said earlier, to demand equality of any sort, you must first be as capable and carrying out equal responsibilties. Women have done neither or accomplished anything worthy of that. Please, dont give me the half assed bullshit that women are getting into college etc. I dont buy that. Men on average are the better leaders, workers, inventors, painters, accomplishers etc. Women may study alot in their attempt to cover up stupidity and “rival” men but they are bound to fuck up in life more than men.
Who the fuck said this site was satire? Every man here believes that men are better than women. Yes, we take our chauvinistic ideas very seriously. I dont see whats wrong with that. Take a look at the feminist views. They wish to eradicate us. To fuck with that. IF they want/desire war, men are more than willing to fight…. And we all know if its a fight - verbal/political or physical between the genders, men will come out on top.