Germaine Greer is a Cunt

Steve Irwin “The Crocodile Hunter” died on Monday. It’s an incredible loss for the world and the MenAreBetterThanWomen.com card will be black in mourning this week.

The MABTW.com card will also be black in mourning for the loss of the last shred of dignity held by the feminist movement — bowel movement. We’ve all had a good laugh at women and their silly agendas, stupid, childish groups, and the milestones they’ve managed to cobble together out of the political table scrapings tossed to them by men. This time they’ve gone too far.

Now they’re going after a tragedy just to prove a point that no one cares about and no one can even figure out. I guess that’s to be expected. Tragedy is the only thing a feminist knows.

Germaine Greer is a woman, allegedly a doctor (though I could not find of what. I would guess proctology, but that usually entails extracting things from the butt, not lodging your own head firmly up it), and has been a virulent feminist most of her life. During my research I found the reason Dr. Greer originally entered the field of feminism is because her clitoris is shaped like a male penis and the trauma of being teased for it since she was sexually active at the age of 12 drove her into the insanity. Interesting to say the least.

On a completely different note, “Dr.” Greer wrote her millionth article in a row this week on the topic of “things I shouldn’t even be fucking talking about” for The Guardian. She called it, “That sort of self-delusion is what it takes to be a real Aussie larrikin”. The surprise is that it isn’t an autobiography. Nor is it a treatise on Australian women in general who are largely regarded as bitches and unimportant the world over. It’s about Steve Irwin and his untimely passing. I don’t give half a fuck what larrikin means. Self-delusion is quite enough.

The points Greer wishes to address in her article are irrelevant — just like everything women say unless it starts with a, “Do you think I should,” or a, “I’m so sorry. I fucked up and did something you said you didn’t think I should do.” And obviously proceeded by a blowjob. It’s enough simply to quote the following from “Dr.” Greer.

It’s really quite unusual for divers to be stung unless they are grappling with the animal and, knowing Steve Irwin, perhaps that may have been the case…Not much sympathy there then.

Classy.

As she is a woman, I find it humourous that “Dr.” Greer — who I would simply just refer to as The Cunt for the remainder of this article, but my man-prudence prohibits me from doing so — even relies on the word ’sympathy’ as a part of her female feminist vocabulary. It is not. These female feminists are the same creatures who fabricate most rape allegations in the hopes of making a stab at some mythical patriarchy.

Does that sound like sympathy to you?

There’s no such thing as a patriarchy, Dr. Greer, you stupid cunt. It’s called the Real World, where seven billion strangers are picked to live in a loft and find out what happens when saber tooth tigers start taking bites out of their asses while they’re trying to sleep. It turns out in this Real World, men get to do everything. They do everything and make all the decisions. Call it whatever you want, but what it’s actually called is the truth. Men are better than women.

Here’s another gem:

The only time Irwin ever seemed less than entirely lovable to his fans (as distinct from zoologists) was when he went into the Australia Zoo crocodile enclosure with his month-old baby son in one hand and a dead chicken in the other. For a second you didn’t know which one he meant to feed to the crocodile.

First of all, that is inappropriate. Secondly, I was never confused, but then again, I’m not retarded.

When Germaine Greer dies, largely unnoticed by friends and family, and which I bet will be soon judging by the God fucking awful picture I found of the old hag on the internet — she looks like a fucking beige batting glove left in the sun with a wad of stringy doll’s hair stapled to the palm — you bet your ass I will be the first one shooting her little clitoral-penis problem out of the old Man-Mouthcannon. That’s called what goes around comes around. That was invented by men too.

Thirdly, let me say that if you have any problem whatsoever with Steve Irwin holding his infant son in his arms whilst feeding crocodiles raw chickens, you are not only wrong, but you are also not a man.

That has nothing to do with risk.

Let me give you a simple man test you can use on any anonymous parties to see if they are a man, woman or some kind of broken computing machine. Actually, strike that last one. If an unknown party gives a response that could only be arrived at through a cluster fuck of malformed logic, just assume it was a woman. Not even men could build a Touring machine that ran on crazy.

First of all, let’s say there’s something called risk. Now say that socially, we all accept a certain amount of risk and that stepping over that line incurs criticism from said society. The question then becomes, “How do we establish the risk of blank?” If you have a vagina, no matter how empowered it is, the answer is, “Well how do I feel about blank?” That is fucked and stupid. The correct and man-answer is, “Let’s ask an expert.”

I’d say someone who built a multi-billion fucking dollar business on the dealings and doings of blank would be a bonafide fucking expert. I would also say that this expert dangling his own fucking son over blanks while doing blank is a bonafide fucking testament that blank is not as risky as you think if you know what the fuck you’re blanking.

That’s just it. Women don’t ever know what they’re blanking so they have to rely on their shitty instincts at all times. That’s why feminism is backwards. It’s puts a small amount of power in the hands of people who have no fucking idea what they’re doing ever — that’s women.

After reading Germaine “Boy’s Name” Greer’s article on the untimely passing of one of the mannest man men to ever walk the Earth, I was saddened by her callous remarks in light of the family Irwin has left behind. Then it hit me: all feminists are insensitive cunts who have no family for that exact reason. They embarrass and shame their parents until they’re ostracized. They embarrass their friends until wallowing into the self-loathing circles of hags who will accompany them through menopause. They have no children because no man in his right mind would fuck a feminist and even if one was drugged into it, Jesus would step in and perform the world’s first immaculate abortion.

Feminists have no right to families. They are horrid and miserable abortions of women and they will rot in hell. Not the biblical one. I’m talking about the one women enter when they hit 35 and don’t have children.

Every creature he brandished at the camera was in distress. Every snake badgered by Irwin was at a huge disadvantage, with only a single possible reaction to its terrifying situation, which was to strike. Easy enough to avoid, if you know what’s coming. Even my cat knew that much.

A cat, huh? What a fucking surprise. Fuck feminists.

“Dr,” Greer Weighs in Heavily
A Female Eunich? What the Fuck?
A Proper Send Off. Written by a Man Instead of a Cunt.


Related Articles:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

1,181 Comments in 1107 threads.»

Pages: « 5646 45 44 43 42 [41] 40 39 38 37 361 » Show All

Comment by Catherine
2007-08-13 13:32:08 - IP Man-Hash: a8fc8ce9fb283

Catherine said:

mike said:

Al-Qaeda is nothing but a conveniently “Islamic” front which enables the C.I.A. to commit crimes in the name of Muslims. It is well known that the Mujahadeen terrorists of Afghanistan were organized, trained and funded by the C.I.A. using the Pakistani ISI as a “cut-out” in order to lure the Soviet Army into Afghanistan at the end of 1979. The Mujahedeen can be seen as C.I.A. terrorism with an islamic name and “islamic” perpetrators.

“Al-Qaida, (literally “the database”), was originally the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians.”

- Robin Cook

Are you quoting Robin Cook? Like the Dean-Koontz-wanna-be Robin Cook?

Geez - why stop there! Quote Dan Brown too, while you’re at it. Talk about getting the real experts to weigh in!

Not to knock Robin as an author. Acceptable Risk was a damn good book.

Sorry Mike, my bad:

“former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook”

 
Comment by Catherine
2007-08-13 13:31:16 - IP Man-Hash: a8fc8ce9fb283

Catherine said:

mike said:

Al-Qaeda is nothing but a conveniently “Islamic” front which enables the C.I.A. to commit crimes in the name of Muslims. It is well known that the Mujahadeen terrorists of Afghanistan were organized, trained and funded by the C.I.A. using the Pakistani ISI as a “cut-out” in order to lure the Soviet Army into Afghanistan at the end of 1979. The Mujahedeen can be seen as C.I.A. terrorism with an islamic name and “islamic” perpetrators.

“Al-Qaida, (literally “the database”), was originally the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians.”

- Robin Cook

Are you quoting Robin Cook? Like the Dean-Koontz-wanna-be Robin Cook?

Geez - why stop there! Quote Dan Brown too, while you’re at it. Talk about getting the real experts to weigh in!

Not to knock Robin as an author. Acceptable Risk was a damn good book.

Sorry Mike, my bad

“former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook”

 
Comment by Ralohcs Denrael
2007-08-13 11:59:01 - IP Man-Hash: ae179e9967da1

Catherine said:
war child : Way off

Catherine, you’re telling me your daddy wasn’t military?? My man nose is sensing a weeny wittle fib :P

Catherine said:

Used up whore/10-40 guys : Way off. Must be your ex-girlfriend you’re thinking of

So what’s the damage? Be honest!

Molestations/beatings : Now why would you think that? Are you projecting?

Good evasion technique. Somebunny here seems to know quite a bit about “projecting”. Too bad you’re transparent. But we don’t have to unearth your suppressed memories on this site. Go ahead and keep embarrassing yourself with your posts. We know you’re here to get back at Daddy. But ya know, it’s not your fault

I’m an attention whore : You noticed. Thanks for feeding my addiction by taking so much time to psychoanalyze me! And now I have a nice list to post on my myspace page - right next to a picture of me in lingerie - size youth medium. :)

What’s your myspace link?

[Aside to Alex: I'm very flattered that he compared me to you. But I don't think he's 100% right. You do seem a bit more balanced than I am. Probably because you've had fewer jerks like Ralohcs in your life. :)]

You go, gyrl!

I said gonna be which implies not yet.
Anyways, I am sure Alex is dating a ralohcs right now! We’re irresistible!!

On the other hand, all you do is date losers who abuse you like daddy.

btw, Catherine… “Wuz up, Chic?”

KellyMac said:

Alex, I don’t denigrate women. I denigrate feminists.

KellyMac, you don’t denigrate feminists. Feminists denigrate themselves.

Catherine said:

Are you quoting Robin Cook? Like the Dean-Koontz-wanna-be Robin Cook?

Geez - why stop there! Quote Dan Brown too, while you’re at it. Talk about getting the real experts to weigh in!

Not to knock Robin as an author. Acceptable Risk was a damn good book.

I love how we go from talking about KellyMac’s final insecurity, to Alex’s dreaded hour-glass, to Catherine’s crumbling ego, to the CIA’s plot to turn the world into a one world government fascist state.

I don’t know who any of the people mentioned in the quote above are, but Mike is completely correct about the New World Order.

son of the suns said:

What’s sad is Catherine is more attatched to reality than you, Mike.

A man just died somewhere :(

 
Comment by son of the suns
2007-08-13 10:10:09 - IP Man-Hash: f2d8ef4a913e4

What’s sad is Catherine is more attatched to reality than you, Mike.

 
Comment by Catherine
2007-08-13 09:54:28 - IP Man-Hash: a8fc8ce9fb283

mike said:

Al-Qaeda is nothing but a conveniently “Islamic” front which enables the C.I.A. to commit crimes in the name of Muslims. It is well known that the Mujahadeen terrorists of Afghanistan were organized, trained and funded by the C.I.A. using the Pakistani ISI as a “cut-out” in order to lure the Soviet Army into Afghanistan at the end of 1979. The Mujahedeen can be seen as C.I.A. terrorism with an islamic name and “islamic” perpetrators.

“Al-Qaida, (literally “the database”), was originally the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians.”

- Robin Cook

Are you quoting Robin Cook? Like the Dean-Koontz-wanna-be Robin Cook?

Geez - why stop there! Quote Dan Brown too, while you’re at it. Talk about getting the real experts to weigh in!

Not to knock Robin as an author. Acceptable Risk was a damn good book.

 
Comment by Catherine
2007-08-13 09:48:53 - IP Man-Hash: a8fc8ce9fb283

MansVoice said:

Unhappy that this site is sexist? Go to a feminist site and bitch. We men dont give two fucks but for now, PEACE.

I’ll have to go back and reread to be sure, but I don’t think anyone said they were unhappy this site exists. We are just amazed that people like you exist.

And Alex was telling KellyMac not to support the site, which is something altogether different than trying to get rid of it.

Personally, I’m having a great time here. But, you’ll be happy to know I’ll tire of picking on you long before you wear out your need to need to strut about like a cocky rooster doomed to the pot (metaphorically speaking of course).

Meaning, I will eventually go find something better to do, while you will never realize your futile attempt to prove your manhood by posting here. Instead, like all the insane, you will continue to repeat the same action hoping for a different result.

And how in the world can you possibly be the nicest guy in the world? Does that mean you don’t have the balls to voice these opinions away from the anonymity and safety of the internet?

 
Comment by KellyMac
2007-08-13 07:27:16 - IP Man-Hash: fc79c683fa180

Ralohcs Denrael said:

Actually, KellyMac said something very woman-brained earlier. She said if her husband ever said she couldn’t leave the house, she would leave. So… if he says she can leave, she’ll stay, and if he says she must stay, she’ll leave.

So you see, KellyMac is still prone women’s logic every now and then. And she does have a job, for whatever silly reason…

I do occasionally say woman-brained things. That is to be expected :)

But your logic is faulty. That’s quite a leap, about what he says determining whether or not I will stay. I think it would make more sense if you replaced “can” in the first part with “must”. If he said I MUST leave or stay, I would probably do the opposite. I’m contrary that way.

 
Comment by KellyMac
2007-08-13 07:17:52 - IP Man-Hash: fc79c683fa180

Alex said:

I just meant that the men here will respect anyone (even women) who denigrate women. Hence why no one attacks KellyMac for things they would attack in other women, like having a career.

Alex, I don’t denigrate women. I denigrate feminists. If I were pursuing a career at the expense of my family, I would expect to be derided for that. I am a woman. I am the heart and hearth of the home. That doesn’t mean I dedicate my life to housework; I actually suck quite badly at housework. It’s more about making a peaceful place for my family. I am not suited or meant to go out and conquer the world. There are probably some women who are, but most women are not. I work because I have to. I probably would still work if I didn’t have to. I would go out of my mind with boredom if I didn’t. But my life would never be about my career.

That’s my point, though. Women worked outside of the home waaay before feminism. I’m not even talking about “Rosie the Riveter” during WWII, if they still teach about that war in school these days. Women have pretty much always been free to work. We haven’t had to in the past, because our men did whatever they had to do to take care of us. Do you really think that every man in history, or even the majority of men in history, were “pursuing a career”, following their passion? Not even close. They were doing whatever it took.

 
Comment by mike
2007-08-13 07:04:11 - IP Man-Hash: 356b2e2244d02

son of the suns said:

I told you all Coderch was wise.

A culturally confident West would swat radical Islam like a fly.

But Euroman is a in the majority a weakling who would rather use his wealth on the bread and circus of this digital morally corrupt age. Video games, HDTV, meaningless sex with harlots instead of smacking them into place en masse to be capable of birthing his sons and securing his future.

So while the infighting dimwitted Arabs take 10 years to orchestrate an attack that matches 9/11, and Western men cuckold for Israel abroad and harridans at home.. “men” like Mike and Ralohcs say the government did 9/11 out of some dumbfuck desire to extend an empire to the shittiest place on Earth where every ounce of oil wouldn’t match what has been spent on the war thus far.

The only people who have the ability to breed in a morally relativist shit hole nation are the weak wealthy and upper-middle classes who have the money to buy sluts shiney things and distract themselves from their cuckoldry by passive hobbies like Golf.

The white race is dead in the water without drastic change.

Al-Qaeda is nothing but a conveniently “Islamic” front which enables the C.I.A. to commit crimes in the name of Muslims. It is well known that the Mujahadeen terrorists of Afghanistan were organized, trained and funded by the C.I.A. using the Pakistani ISI as a “cut-out” in order to lure the Soviet Army into Afghanistan at the end of 1979. The Mujahedeen can be seen as C.I.A. terrorism with an islamic name and “islamic” perpetrators.

“Al-Qaida, (literally “the database”), was originally the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians.”

- Robin Cook

The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al Qaida. And any informed intelligence officer knows this. But there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an identified entity representing the ‘devil’ only in order to drive the ‘TV watcher’ to accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism.

This is not about oil, nor “expanding an empire” as you put it. It is about de-population and the anilhilation of all governments and religions, one step at a time, to pave way for the New World Order - a global fascist state.

This is no different from what Hitler was trying to acheive.

 
Comment by Catherine
2007-08-13 06:42:04 - IP Man-Hash: 1456b8991af65

Ralohcs Denrael said:
[alot of shit]

Not a bad ass-reaming, Learned! You might have done even better, had I been the one to choose my name instead of my parents. And you’re right - I DO read into the monikers people choose for themselves. Yours says you consider yourself an intellectual, but you don’t want to appear to be trying too hard. And your posts in general say that you’re afraid of other men, but you like to blame your insecurities on women.

Here’s your scorecard:

Your name is “Catherine” : Correct, but no points there
Irish : Way off
Catholic/church at a young age : Correct!
Redhead with freckles, or a war child : Way off
Mid-thirties : Just barely into my 30s
Used up whore/10-40 guys : Way off. Must be your ex-girlfriend you’re thinking of
Molestations/beatings : Now why would you think that? Are you projecting?
Abortion : No. Emphatically
Drinking : No one’s told me I have a problem? But I do like a good buzz…
Depression/prescription drugs : No, but I did consider Wellbutrin to quit smoking
College degree : Correct
Ashamed of your body : It ain’t perfect, but it’s close enough to look it when I put the time in
No female friends: Wrong - but not way off. I’m very selective.
Hang out with the “guys” : I like to hang out with my guy. You can come too if you really want to - makes no difference to me
You probably still hang out with the guys who used and trashed you : No, but you’re kinda mean, and I’m still here - so maybe?
I’m sure I didn’t hit a nerve : The only nerve you hit was talking about my dad. :( He WAS kind of a loser. Kind of like you, actually. Not quite a total asshole, just sort of incapable of dealing with life, you know? Yeah, YOU know.

And from another post -

I’m an attention whore : You noticed. Thanks for feeding my addiction by taking so much time to psychoanalyze me! And now I have a nice list to post on my myspace page - right next to a picture of me in lingerie - size youth medium. :)

[Aside to Alex: I'm very flattered that he compared me to you. But I don't think he's 100% right. You do seem a bit more balanced than I am. Probably because you've had fewer jerks like Ralohcs in your life. :)]

 
Comment by MansVoice
2007-08-13 03:55:15 - IP Man-Hash: 1ab60015f6eb6

Re correction: I die for my country and for the women in my country.

 
Comment by MansVoice
2007-08-13 03:54:28 - IP Man-Hash: ff4893678328d

Alex said:

From his own mouth, KellyMac. They take their chauvinistic ideas very seriously. Many other men on this site, if asked, would say the same. No, of course they don’t want all women to die horrible deaths (though some of the crazy ones have advocated it), but they are chauvinists. What short of a signed confession from Dick and every single poster will convince you of that? Yes, some of it is hyperbole for humor or effect, but that does not change the fact that the underlying tone and nature of the site is extremely sexist. Be anti-feminist all you want, but this site is extremely degrading towards -all- women. Hell, if you didn’t denigrate the majority of women the way you do (after all, there’s no faster way to make friends on this site than denigrating women), they would probably be attacking you as a bad mother for holding a full time job (and implying you slept with your boss to even get the job), calling you a slut if you’ve slept with anyone other than your husband within your lifetime, and tossing in a variety of nasty names (cunt, bitch, etc.). This is not a site any woman should support, anti-feminist or not.

Woman, listen here and listen good. I may be a chauvinist but I have my morals. I die die for my country and to protect. A vast majority of Asian women in my country are worth dying for. For you? Hell no. Please dont twist whatever the fuck I am saying. Its fucking retarded.

I am anti killing of women. Any man who abuses a woman isnt a real man. Any man who rapes isnt a real man. Check my posts. I have condemned rape, assaults on women etc. Date rape inclusive. Also, I have never forcifully asked/insisted or called a woman to leave this site unless she was being a complete idiot. I tell that to all men. Women should be protected and cherished which the male gender has been doing for the last 4000 years? But raised on a fucking pedestral through feminism? Fuck no.

Heres where you got to listen good. When men are doing the fighting, working and everything worth doing, they are the better gender. Women deserve to have rights but the way the world is sliding, they are abusing those rights. I see feminism as a doctrine which demeans men for everything they stand for - justice, integrity and honor. They are just words when you say/type them but to a man, those are his lifeblood. I cant stand when I see my compatriots demeaned, attacked or insulted so I am here to make a stand.

If you meet me in real life, I am probably one of the nicest guys you ever meet but I still hold true to my beliefs so woman or not, we are better because in spite of inequality, we have continued to thrive and come out on top every.singe.time. Unhappy that this site is sexist? Go to a feminist site and bitch. We men dont give two fucks but for now, PEACE.

 
Comment by Ralohcs Denrael
2007-08-12 23:41:32 - IP Man-Hash: ae179e9967da1

Alex said:

This is not a site any woman should support

That’s what we keep saying… but you keep coming back :(

Alex said:

I just meant that the men here will respect anyone (even women) who denigrate women. Hence why no one attacks KellyMac for things they would attack in other women, like having a career.

Actually, KellyMac said something very woman-brained earlier. She said if her husband ever said she couldn’t leave the house, she would leave. So… if he says she can leave, she’ll stay, and if he says she must stay, she’ll leave.

So you see, KellyMac is still prone women’s logic every now and then. And she does have a job, for whatever silly reason…

Catherine said:

Some of these men are seriously disturbed.

Catherine, those nuns really fucked you up as a little girl. Add this to your Christmas list.

Catherine said:

Ohhh. TALON, is it? Very fierce. Rip! Tear! How like a bird of prey you are!

Catherine, that’s the second time I’ve heard you try to analyze and deride a man for his name, so now, being a man, who protects my brothers in manhood, I’m going to have to tear you a third asshole. Let’s take a look at your name:
Your name is “Catherine”, which means you’re Irish Catholic, probably red head with freckles, or a war child. You rant like a mid-thirties used up whore, which means your parents had you involved in the church at a young age, and maybe even sent you to religious school, where the priests possibly molested you, and the nuns beat the shit out of you, making you afraid of everybody, both men and women (as can be seen by your attacks of both genders in here).

Since you’re catholic and a bitch, odds are, you probably had an abortion, because 1/2 of all abortions are Catholic (go figure). You never forgave yourself for murdering your baby, and your parents hate you for it (but they hated you before anyways), so every night you mentally beat yourself up for it and since you’re Irish you probably drink yourself to sleep every night in depression.

You’re so depressed, but you’re way too anal-retentive to be smoking pot, which means the drugs you’re taking to try to deal with your past (since you can’t let it go) are prescription drugs. Maybe you even have one of those plastic grandma pill cases for your drugs for each day of the week.

You like to show off your intelligence by figuring out and analyzing our user names and making judgments on us, so you probably have a college degree, which means either your parents are divorced (annulled) or since Catholics can’t divorce, your father is so sexually frustrated that he beats the shit out of your mother because the church won’t let him divorce her. (which is why you think all men are rapists).

You must also be very ashamed of your body because you’re so anti-female and afraid of men judging you all the time. This comes from your Catholic upbringing where you were constantly being told that you are a sinner and going to burn in Hell just for being a human being.

For all your ‘intelligence’, what you don’t realize is how you look to others. No, I’m not even taking about us on this forum. At work, you probably have no female friends, and you probably pine to hang out with the “guys” as often as possible, constantly chatting with them all day online to see “Wuz up?”. You’ve slept with over 10 guys already (probably a LOT more, perhaps 30 or 40) and they all dump you like used trash, or trick you into dumping them, or you dump them before they can abandon you once they find out you’re just a hallow shell of a human being.

You probably still hang out with the guys who used and trashed you and they put up with it because if they can get you drunk enough, you still give them privileges to your worthless body.

Oh… I’m sorry, did I catch all that from your name???? Well, hey, I’m sure I didn’t hit a nerve or anything. Don’t think about any of this. I’ll be easy to forget ;) Goodbye.

Alex said:

What? What did I say in any of that that had anything to do with accomplishments? And I haven’t done anything that impressive, or ever implied I did. I pretty much do what your average college student does. I don’t “suffer”, either.

Alex, in your 30s your posts will sound like Catherine’s. I thought there was hope for you, but there isn’t. Your parents really fucked up.

 
Comment by Ralohcs Denrael
2007-08-12 22:28:31 - IP Man-Hash: ae179e9967da1

KellyMac said:

@ MansVoice: I said it was satire. But only in the sense that I don’t believe most of the men who post here really want all women to die horribly.

Who said anything about wanting women to die horribly? Did all of you not spend hours responding to my post that it’s a man’s job to make sure his wife does not die horribly (i.e. hacked up by the plumber, etc… - which all you women misinterpreted, by the way)

 
Comment by KellyMac
2007-08-12 22:17:24 - IP Man-Hash: fc79c683fa180

Catherine said:

KellyMac, are you saying that we should be pleased that eventually men came around to letting all of us in this country (legally) vote? I’m harder to please than that. And yes, yes, I know all about the rule by the elite, not majority. I’m not even opposed to it necessarily. What I DO object to is being excluded from consideration for being a member of the elite simply because I’m a woman.

No. I’m not saying that at all. What I’m saying is your “granny” wasn’t oppressed in the first place. If she was a U.S. citizen and couldn’t vote, she was part of a very large club made up of the majority of U.S. citizens. If she was wealthy, she probably had a college education - in any subject she felt driven enough to pursue. I don’t know what you’re talking about when you say you would be excluded from consideration for being a member of the elite simply because you’re a woman. That doesn’t even make any sense.

And don’t even try to tell me you don’t even feel the same way. You’re trying to get these men to accept you as one of their “elite” by being all nicey nicey to them and kicking down anyone you perceive to be a pretender to your dubious throne. You’d be happy to be accepted by men, even at the expense of your identity as a woman.

I think it’s obvious I don’t feel the same way as you do about much of anything, Catherine. I’m already accepted by more men than you even know. I don’t need more feathers in my cap. I post the things I do, write my blog, cover false accusations for the Honor Network, and am an activist in real life because it’s the right thing to do. I’ve actually, finally, found my identity as a woman. Believe it or not, there is an unbelievable amount of strength in being feminine and at the same time fighting for what you believe in. There’s also a lot more credibility in weighing empirical evidence to reach your conclusions than just repeating the platitudes you’ve been spoon-fed all your life. Believe me, I know.

I agree, I should have been more clear. Things do get fucked up occasionally. But to say that things ARE fucked up seems to me that no person, male or female, has any chance at anything resembling a happy life.

When I say things are fucked up, I mean the laws in this country, and in the West in general, are completely biased to favor women. I’m sure the guys on this site could give you plenty of anecdotal evidence about that, and then you should feel free to google it. You are absolutely correct in your assumption of what this means to a person’s ability to have a happy life. How many happy people do you know? I mean actually happy, joyful, content people? And if you do know any, how many of those are lying to you? How many are lying to themselves?

Stupid people make stupid choices. There’s difference between choosing to marry a scumbag (again, male or female) and then getting screwed in the end (ha - no pun intended there), and being forced to marry a scumbag, and getting screwed in the end. Things are better now than 100 years ago. At least we all have a chance now.

What, are you talking about arranged marriages? As far as I know, that has only ever been a religious thing here in the West. And even if it had ever been commonplace, do you really think a father would marry his daughter off to a scumbag, or to someone who was going to take care of her? You watch too much Lifetime.

I have never attempted to fuck a man over by skewing a law to my benefit. Nor have I let a man do it to me. Actually, I’ve never spent much time at all with a man who wanted to try.

You’ve never had to. The law is already skewed to your benefit. You just don’t notice because women pretty much always come out on top.

I suggest being considerate and savvy in your dealings with both genders, and you’ll find that you won’t feel quite so fucked as you apparently do now.

I don’t feel fucked at all. I’m a member of the privileged gender.

Except for stupid people. Feel free to be as hard on stupid people as you wish. I hate freakin’ stupid people. Fuckers can go jump off bridge, as far as I’m concerned. Let’s get things started with a few of the guys on here.

I try not to pick on stupid people, Catherine. I usually let them be. They make too easy of a target.

 
Comment by Alex
2007-08-12 17:16:43 - IP Man-Hash: 3c8b05bf321cc

What? What did I say in any of that that had anything to do with accomplishments? And I haven’t done anything that impressive, or ever implied I did. I pretty much do what your average college student does. I don’t “suffer”, either.

 
Comment by son of the suns
2007-08-12 17:05:57 - IP Man-Hash: a41caf4a68abe

Alex you and Female share an unrivaled arrogance for your trivial accomplishments is why you both suffer.

 
Comment by Talon
2007-08-12 16:13:36 - IP Man-Hash: bf1c132f6631e

Alex said:
Sorry for the confusion. I was referring to MansVoice’s comment: “Yes, we take our chauvinistic ideas very seriously.”

My bad, then.

Alex said:
And no, I can’t read the commenter’s minds, but many have corrected female commenters who called this site satire or a parody, saying that the site is instead dead-serious. Some have called THEMSELVES male chauvinists. Most have made comments that are undeniably sexist/chauvinist.

But not all.

Alex said:
“Free speech and freedom of opinion is a “bitch”, is it not?”

People can believe and say whatever they please. I was merely pointing out that it’s ridiculous for KellyMac to support this site, considering that it condemns her own lifestyle, and in my opinion, the simple fact of her gender.

This is up to the individual.

 
Comment by Catherine
2007-08-12 16:10:19 - IP Man-Hash: 94b3b6aecd2aa

Female said:

Catherine, Talon is just an eaglet. He’s fifteen and proud of it…yeah.

Ahh. That explains some things. Still, even at fifteen I was never so callow a youth. :)

sonyad said:

Catherine, you need to post a nude pic of your butt with a mabtw logo stamped on it.

Unless, of course, your bare (bear?) ass is something we likely would not seek to see, should we know what it looks like.

It’s a very nice logo, Sonyad, but I’m going to pass on the offer, thanks anyway.

 
Comment by Alex
2007-08-12 16:04:20 - IP Man-Hash: 3c8b05bf321cc

Sorry for the confusion. I was referring to MansVoice’s comment: “Yes, we take our chauvinistic ideas very seriously.” And no, I can’t read the commenter’s minds, but many have corrected female commenters who called this site satire or a parody, saying that the site is instead dead-serious. Some have called THEMSELVES male chauvinists. Most have made comments that are undeniably sexist/chauvinist.

“Free speech and freedom of opinion is a “bitch”, is it not?”

People can believe and say whatever they please. I was merely pointing out that it’s ridiculous for KellyMac to support this site, considering that it condemns her own lifestyle, and in my opinion, the simple fact of her gender.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis