Just Because You Suck At Math, Doesn’t Mean You’re Good At Not-Math

Men are better than women at everything. Just look outside. See all that shit? That “shit” is men kicking the ass of women up and down the court of science. Women aren’t to blame for a single brick.

Unless when you look outside you see a bunch of fat hookers or some broad who just crashed her car into a fence post while talking on her cell phone. You can blame women for both of those.

Men consistently outperform women in math and science. You know it, I know it, the ex-president of Harvard knows it; but what about the math we do with our words? What about something we call “literature”? A lot of idiot jackasses will tell you that girls test higher than boys on the battlefield of books.

“Boys are obviously smarter than girls in math and science,” says the idiot, “but because of their rampaging emotions and compulsive chattering — which somehow magically translates into improvement, girls are better than boys at reading, writing, and communicating.”

This pile of ill-reasoned shit could not be further from the truth.

What woman ever wrote the dozens of immortal works of William Shakespeare? And while I don’t know who invented more words, Shakespeare or Snoop Dogg, I know fo shizzle that it wasn’t a woman.

Your girlfriend’s obnoxious need to combine two words into one and then call attention to it like a puppy for lack of an actual personality doesn’t count as inventing a word.

Men are better than women.

Girls appear to score higher than boys in the literary arts because the tests schools use to gauge a child’s reading comprehension are pointless and a waste of fucking time. It’s like seeing if a dog is faster than a turtle by putting them both in a bathtub and getting stoned off your ass. What the hell is that going to prove?

Feel free to skip the following text because it’s the dumbest story you’ll ever read.

One day, Johnny was upset because he wanted a red ball and the store was out of red balls. It was his birthday too. He asked his mom why the store was out of balls on his birthday, but his mother told him to be patient and that maybe the store would have some in stock next week. Johnny was sullen for the rest of the day, even during his birthday party, until he got a very special present from his mother. Inside a poorly wrapped box was a red ball.

“This is the happiest day of my life!” said Johnny.

“I know,” said his mother. “And it’s all thanks to me.”

Please answer the following questions to test your reading comprehension.

1. Johnny was sad because:

A) He had no balls.
B) His mother drove his father away with her messiah complex — which all women have.
C) Who fucking cares? That is a stupid waste of time, contains nothing of actual value nor did it ever pretend to, and I didn’t read any of it anyway because I had better things to think about.

If you answered anything but C, you are a woman. Fuck off my website.

Academic tests on reading comprehension are meant for the minds of children. A real test on reading and writing is getting a law degree or figuring out how to hook up a DVD player. The part on the back of the TV where it reads “Audio IN” is where the fucking audio goes in. What’s the reading comprehension score for that brain buster?

Academic tests on reading and writing are as simple-minded as harlequin romance novels and as worthless as Oprah magazine. If you really want to test a woman’s reading abilities, give her a map and get ready to laugh your ass off.

Women have a gimmism about them called Delusional Dogma. Delusional Dogma is when a woman picks what a man is good at, and then gives herself credit for being good at the complimentary tasks by default — as if declaring herself so is somehow a miracle cure for the crippling incompetence which nature has gifted to all women. Holding a fork in one hand doesn’t mean you have a knife in the other. You might be holding a bent Alan wrench or a dildo; only one of which a woman knows how to use.

If a wife thinks her husband is smart or strong willed, she immediately credits herself as being creative and nurturing. Then she will compulsively flush 10 grand down the toilet in a poorly conceived attempt at buying her way into the arts. Or she’ll leave her baby in the car while she goes shopping. Way to nurture that kid into triple digit brain damage, trophy mom.

sat scores by gender
Source

Related Articles:

61 Responses to “Just Because You Suck At Math, Doesn’t Mean You’re Good At Not-Math”

Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 » Show All

  1. DaveB Says:

    Men are better than women at reading and writing. It doesn’t take a genius to figure that one out. Hell, the only women writers there are is J.K. Rowling [whose last book's ending sucked horribly, to say the least] and whoever does harlequin [female porn] literature.

    Magazines are not literature. They’re pictures meant to distract dim minds, much like a Jedi Mind Trick.

  2. Alex Says:

    If you think there aren’t any talented female writers, you probably aren’t very knowledgeable about literature. I’ll agree there haven’t been any female Shakespeare’s though.

    Girls score higher on reading comprehension tests all throughout elementary school, junior high school, high school, etc. They score higher in reading, on average, on the SATs, which most would agree is a fairly accurate indication of ability. Boys suffer from learning/reading disorders at a higher rate than girls. No matter how you measure it, statistics always seem to indicate that boys are stronger in math and science on average and girls are stronger in reading comprehension/writing on average.

  3. e v i l e d d y Says:

    Women remember lots of words and talk a lot… but do very little actual application of the data they obtain.

  4. Dick Masterson Says:

    Alex said:

    Girls score higher on reading comprehension tests all throughout elementary school, junior high school, high school, etc. They score higher in reading, on average, on the SATs, which most would agree is a fairly accurate indication of ability. Boys suffer from learning/reading disorders at a higher rate than girls.

    Twice as many girls than boys are illiterate.

    See if you can read this, Alex: fuck off my website.

    -Dick

  5. Alex Says:

    @ Dick- Worldwide? If so, it’s because certain areas of the world deny girls education.

  6. Dick Masterson Says:

    Alex said:

    @ Dick- Worldwide? If so, it’s because certain areas of the world deny girls education.

    Just like a woman. Arguing without even knowing the facts.

    Worldwide?

    -Dick

  7. soundwave Says:

    Alex said:
    Girls score higher on reading comprehension tests all throughout elementary school, junior high school, high school, etc. They score higher in reading, on average, on the SATs, which most would agree is a fairly accurate indication of ability.

    Not true. See this: http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/3/34/SAT_by_sex.png

    …and this: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article558743.ece

    Boys suffer from learning/reading disorders at a higher rate than girls.

    So what? Leonardo da Vinci and Albert Einstein both had a learning disorder. So did Beethoven, Thomas Edison, Mozart, Van Gogh, Abraham Lincoln, Alexander Graham Bell(inventor), The Wright Brothers(inventors), Benjamin Franklin, Henry Ford, Picasso, and many others.

    http://www.twicegifted.net/ld.htm
    http://loveadderall.wordpress.com/2007/08/03/famous-people-with-learni ng-disabilities/

  8. Dick Masterson Says:

    soundwave, you’ve done it again.

    -Dick

  9. Uli Says:

    I’ve had learning disorder. In fact it was just because the other half of the class was so fucking retarded that teaching became so uninteresting and i didn’t have to learn anything anymore and just live on my knowledge to still get good grades. Then someday it gets you back and you are diagnosed with a learning disorder because you’ve (i’ve) just spent my time drawing time machines while cunts where actually still learning how to spell “pussy cat”. But after a few hours of catching things back up, you’re back on track and you are ready to get bored again…

  10. kristina Says:

    DaveB said:

    Men are better than women at reading and writing. It doesn’t take a genius to figure that one out. Hell, the only women writers there are is J.K. Rowling [whose last book's ending sucked horribly, to say the least] and whoever does harlequin [female porn] literature.

    Magazines are not literature. They’re pictures meant to distract dim minds, much like a Jedi Mind Trick.

    You are an idiot. Emily Dickinson, and Victoria Holt. Not to mention several others, who do not write on romance…

    soundwave said:

    Alex said:
    Girls score higher on reading comprehension tests all throughout elementary school, junior high school, high school, etc. They score higher in reading, on average, on the SATs, which most would agree is a fairly accurate indication of ability.

    Not true. See this: http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/3/34/SAT_by_sex.png

    …and this: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article558743.ece

    Boys suffer from learning/reading disorders at a higher rate than girls.

    So what? Leonardo da Vinci and Albert Einstein both had a learning disorder. So did Beethoven, Thomas Edison, Mozart, Van Gogh, Abraham Lincoln, Alexander Graham Bell(inventor), The Wright Brothers(inventors), Benjamin Franklin, Henry Ford, Picasso, and many others.

    http://www.twicegifted.net/ld.htm
    http://loveadderall.wordpress.com/2007/08/03/famous-people-with-learni ng-disabilities/

    Correction, soundwave, some of those men didn’t have learning disabilities, they just didn’t get to go to school like more privileged men.

    Uli said:

    I’ve had learning disorder. In fact it was just because the other half of the class was so fucking retarded that teaching became so uninteresting and i didn’t have to learn anything anymore and just live on my knowledge to still get good grades. Then someday it gets you back and you are diagnosed with a learning disorder because you’ve (i’ve) just spent my time drawing time machines while cunts where actually still learning how to spell “pussy cat”. But after a few hours of catching things back up, you’re back on track and you are ready to get bored again…

    Were, not where, you idiot. If you had been paying attention while they were teaching you how to spell, like those “cunts”, then maybe you wouldn’t have misspelt that.

    There is a difference between learning disability, not having the same privilege as others to go to school, and just not paying enough attention in school. Get it right.

    You don’t have a learning disability, you are just an idiot.

  11. Necroswordsman Says:

    kristina said:

    Were, not where, you idiot. If you had been paying attention while they were teaching you how to spell, like those “cunts”, then maybe you wouldn’t have misspelt that.

    You can’t talk bitch. You make some of the worst spelling mistakes Ever!

    You don’t have a learning disability, you are just an idiot.

    So you should get along well with him.

  12. kristina Says:

    :) Necro, you are missing my point. Yes I have made some bad typos, most of the time cuz i type too fast for my sticky keyboard(yes I know, most of you don’t believe me, ah well). And I never said I was the most perfect speller in the world. According to Dick, however, men are perfect beings who spell perfectly.

    I was just pointing out that obviously if you can spell were where, then Dick must be wrong. Which, didn’t Dick also say somewhere that men are never wrong? And if they are, they admit it?

    Please, Necro, just because I am smarter than you doesn’t mean you need to be jealous and call me an idiot.

  13. Necroswordsman Says:

    kristina said:

    Please, Necro, just because I am smarter than you doesn’t mean you need to be jealous and call me an idiot.

    I know girls like you. Haha.

    Sent one crying to her mommy after causing severe mental damage.

    By smart, do you mean exams? Tests?

    I call that FUCKING SHITE!!!

    Anybody can pass the exams and tests. Just read up stuff and you’ll speed through. Evenvif you have no idea what you’re writing about. That’s not proper testing. Yeah the system is fucked but meh.

    And how do you know I’m smarter than you? Do you really think I’ll exert my brain power to talk to some odd person on the internet? Hahahaha

    I use it for real life. I’m actually a social chameleon and everybody ends up liking me. Adults, businessmen/businesswoman, teachers.

  14. soundwave Says:

    kristina said:
    Correction, soundwave, some of those men didn’t have learning disabilities, they just didn’t get to go to school like more privileged men.

    No, that is false. They did have learning disabilities and some of them DID go to school. Einstein was a slow learner in elementary school and didn’t start talking until he was around 3 or 4 (and neither did the mathematical genius Ramanujan) and Edison and da Vinci both had dyslexia. Einstein, Newton, Bell and Picasso all went to college. The ones who didn’t go to college didn’t go because they DIDN’T WANT TO, not because they couldn’t.

    http://www.dyslexiaonline.com/famous/famous.htm

  15. Alex Says:

    As Kristina said, there’s a difference between not paying attention because the class is moving too slow, and having a learning disorder. Boys who are too far ahead of the class often get wrongly diagnosed with ADHD, which sounds like what you’re referring to. Boys have a higher rate of dyslexia (reading disorder), however, and that can’t be blamed on boys being bored and being wrongly diagnosed.

    As for the SAT scores, that surprised me (although there was only a 7 pt. difference), but in state testing in elementary school, junior high school, and high school, girls consistently score higher on verbal tests (information obtained from my psychology class, unless my professor taught us incorrectly. And no, he isn’t biased, he points out gender differences in men’s favor when statistics support it).

  16. Dick Masterson Says:

    Alex said:

    As for the SAT scores, that surprised me (although there was only a 7 pt. difference), but in state testing in elementary school, junior high school, and high school, girls consistently score higher on verbal tests (information obtained from my psychology class, unless my professor taught us incorrectly. And no, he isn’t biased, he points out gender differences in men’s favor when statistics support it).

    You were wrong.

    -Dick

  17. ddn Says:

    Can I just point out that his mother was trying to draw attention away from the joy of his birthday onto herself for having given him a gift?

  18. Necroswordsman Says:

    soundwave said:

    No, that is false. They did have learning disabilities and some of them DID go to school. Einstein was a slow learner in elementary school and didn’t start talking until he was around 3 or 4 (and neither did the mathematical genius Ramanujan) and Edison and da Vinci both had dyslexia. Einstein, Newton, Bell and Picasso all went to college. The ones who didn’t go to college didn’t go because they DIDN’T WANT TO, not because they couldn’t.

    http://www.dyslexiaonline.com/famous/famous.htm

    Also apparantly, Einstein used to daydream in class, and forget where he lived.

  19. soundwave Says:

    Necroswordsman said:

    Also apparantly, Einstein used to daydream in class, and forget where he lived.

    Einstein himself said that his slow development helped him in creating his theories:

    “The normal adult never thinks about space and time. These are thoughts that he has thought about when he was a child. But since my intellectual development was retarded, as a result of which I began to wonder about space and time only when I had already grown up. Naturally, I could go deeper into the problem than a child with normal abilities.”
    -Albert Einstein

  20. gwallan Says:

    kristina said:
    Correction, soundwave, some of those men didn’t have learning disabilities, they just didn’t get to go to school like more privileged men.

    Which “privleged men” were these?

    Another piece of feminist dishonesty for gullible fools. Girls/women were never refused an education that was being granted to boys/men. Through most of western history the only folk able to gain an education were the children of the landed gentry and those in religious institutions. In fact among the wealthy the girls often got a more extensive education while the boys were stuck in the military.

Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 » Show All

Leave a Reply


Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis