Just Because You Suck At Math, Doesn’t Mean You’re Good At Not-Math
Men are better than women at everything. Just look outside. See all that shit? That “shit” is men kicking the ass of women up and down the court of science. Women aren’t to blame for a single brick.
Unless when you look outside you see a bunch of fat hookers or some broad who just crashed her car into a fence post while talking on her cell phone. You can blame women for both of those.
Men consistently outperform women in math and science. You know it, I know it, the ex-president of Harvard knows it; but what about the math we do with our words? What about something we call “literature”? A lot of idiot jackasses will tell you that girls test higher than boys on the battlefield of books.
“Boys are obviously smarter than girls in math and science,” says the idiot, “but because of their rampaging emotions and compulsive chattering — which somehow magically translates into improvement, girls are better than boys at reading, writing, and communicating.”
This pile of ill-reasoned shit could not be further from the truth.
What woman ever wrote the dozens of immortal works of William Shakespeare? And while I don’t know who invented more words, Shakespeare or Snoop Dogg, I know fo shizzle that it wasn’t a woman.
Your girlfriend’s obnoxious need to combine two words into one and then call attention to it like a puppy for lack of an actual personality doesn’t count as inventing a word.
Men are better than women.
Girls appear to score higher than boys in the literary arts because the tests schools use to gauge a child’s reading comprehension are pointless and a waste of fucking time. It’s like seeing if a dog is faster than a turtle by putting them both in a bathtub and getting stoned off your ass. What the hell is that going to prove?
Feel free to skip the following text because it’s the dumbest story you’ll ever read.
One day, Johnny was upset because he wanted a red ball and the store was out of red balls. It was his birthday too. He asked his mom why the store was out of balls on his birthday, but his mother told him to be patient and that maybe the store would have some in stock next week. Johnny was sullen for the rest of the day, even during his birthday party, until he got a very special present from his mother. Inside a poorly wrapped box was a red ball.
“This is the happiest day of my life!” said Johnny.
“I know,” said his mother. “And it’s all thanks to me.”
Please answer the following questions to test your reading comprehension.
1. Johnny was sad because:
A) He had no balls.
B) His mother drove his father away with her messiah complex — which all women have.
C) Who fucking cares? That is a stupid waste of time, contains nothing of actual value nor did it ever pretend to, and I didn’t read any of it anyway because I had better things to think about.
If you answered anything but C, you are a woman. Fuck off my website.
Academic tests on reading comprehension are meant for the minds of children. A real test on reading and writing is getting a law degree or figuring out how to hook up a DVD player. The part on the back of the TV where it reads “Audio IN” is where the fucking audio goes in. What’s the reading comprehension score for that brain buster?
Academic tests on reading and writing are as simple-minded as harlequin romance novels and as worthless as Oprah magazine. If you really want to test a woman’s reading abilities, give her a map and get ready to laugh your ass off.
Women have a gimmism about them called Delusional Dogma. Delusional Dogma is when a woman picks what a man is good at, and then gives herself credit for being good at the complimentary tasks by default — as if declaring herself so is somehow a miracle cure for the crippling incompetence which nature has gifted to all women. Holding a fork in one hand doesn’t mean you have a knife in the other. You might be holding a bent Alan wrench or a dildo; only one of which a woman knows how to use.
If a wife thinks her husband is smart or strong willed, she immediately credits herself as being creative and nurturing. Then she will compulsively flush 10 grand down the toilet in a poorly conceived attempt at buying her way into the arts. Or she’ll leave her baby in the car while she goes shopping. Way to nurture that kid into triple digit brain damage, trophy mom.
Source
Related Articles:
Pages: [4] 3 2 1 » Show All
Dear, Crybaby Fuckwads
Satire.
As much as some of you dip shit self-proclaimed scholars like to flap off about how smart your aunt is (emotional crutch) and basking in your own mundane literacy, how quickly you’ve forgotten such a wonderful, thought-provoking, and hilarious genre of literature as SATIRE.
Wipe your eyes, wash your asses and laugh for Christ’s sake. You’re all the same people who forward emails to 10 friends in fear of being raped by a one-eyed ghost/never find your true love/whatever else keeps you flooding inboxes with spam and email viruses.
Die.
This article was fucking genius in every way. Even the title made me laugh.
You could even say that it was “da bomb da bomb,” fo sho.
Incoherence.
LMAO!!! Women don’t excel at ANYTHING - let alone “verbal skills”.
FACT:
Women speak an average/minimum of 5000 words a day.
Men speak 2000.
That’s right…. the world was built by shutting the fuck up.
Just because a woman TALKS more than necessary, doesn’t mean she “excels a verbal skills” - by a LONG shot. I payed attention to how many times women begin thoughts and sentences with the word –>> “IF”.
“IF”.
. . . . the most useless fucking word in the English Language. It accomplishes nothing. And WOMEN will contemplate - and yak about - “IF” and “IF ONLY” all fucking day!!
• “If I told you . . . .”
• “If the situation were different . . . .”
• “If you and me . . . ”
• “If you would only . . . ”
• “I wonder if . . .”
When I hear my woman use the word “IF” in a sentence,
I point it out to her that it is utterly POINTLESS to talk about “IF”,
and I recommend that she shut the fuck up. Or she can leave.
And guess what –>> it works.
Menarebetterthanwomen.
“..ever present negative portrayal of men in media (particularly advertising and comedy), blogspots or forums (not to mention feminist websites whose hatred cry out for the torturous eradication of the male gender altogether), and the wealth of imbalanced legislature and penalties for crimes which excessively favour the female gender.”
I’m glad you make that point. Boys have nearly no male role models to look up to in the mass media.
After reading several of your pieces, and the comments, I have come to a new perspective.
It is a fact that the differences between individual people are far wider than differences found between groups.
With that in mind, my new perspective makes no dent in my attitude.
Conclusion: Dick is right about women in many respects.
That is of no concern to me, because I know I work hard; I have met many people who lack the skills I have, men and women alike. I have lead fulfilling life, and found a good husband whom I care for emotionally, and finacially.
Any woman who becomes defensive on this site clearly feels threatened by Dick’s accusations, and I believe these women see in themselves something they do not like, and something they refuse to address. To you women, I suggest you investigate your eagerness to shoot Dick down. The comments made here, by infuriated women, are ridiculous. You further prove Dick’s point with out realizing it, and that is funny in the saddest way possible.
“Very little is needed to make a happy life; it is all within yourself, in your way of thinking”
Furthermore, as a former feminist, I know already that your reaction to this will be a feeling of betrayal. If so, then you fail. Use reason. For a moment, please, just use reason. Live.
Kain the only way your aunt got a masters in physics was clearly through sucking a lot of dick. It is pretty much the only explanation. Also, I find it hilarious when Lindsay almost gets it, and then veers into a big pile of stupid; “I thought it was a joke” actually made me laugh out loud.
How do you get fascism out of anything that was being discussed?? Please edify me on your reasoning.
Oh, I’ll take that a step further and say that men are, inherently, more industrious and less superficial. Hell, men inherently tend not to have to drag around Susan B. Anthony’s corpse everywhere they go to excuse their many shortcomings.
Man doesn’t get a job, as manhole says - nobody gives a shit. I forgot the ratio of male-to-female discrimination lawsuits, but I know that it just doesn’t make business sense to have a ’sexually integrated’ workplace if you’re just going to get shit from the girls. Not at all, you make more money and get more things done if you take that feminist business strategy and burn it in the furnace.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,953389,00.html
It is well known that teen-age boys tend to do better at math than girls, that male high school students are more likely than their female counterparts to tackle advanced math courses like calculus, that virtually all the great mathematicians have been men. But why? Are women born with less mathematical ability? Or does society’s sexism slow their progress?
In 1980 two Johns Hopkins University researchers tried to settle the eternal nature/ nurture debate. Julian Stanley — who is well respected for his work with precocious math students of both sexes — and Camilla Benbow had tested 10,000 talented seventh-and eighth-graders between 1972 and 1979. Using the Scholastic Aptitude Test, in which math questions are meant to measure ability rather than knowledge, they discovered distinct sex differences. While the verbal abilities of the males and females hardly differed, twice as many boys as girls scored over 500 (on a scale of 200 to 800) on mathematical ability; at the 700 level, the ratio was 14 to 1. The conclusion: males have inherently superior mathematical reasoning ability.
I suggest next time you resist your irrational, emotional impulse and look at the graph. Otherwise you are a fascist, and nobody likes a fascist these days.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:SAT_by_sex.png
Let’s see what the numbers say.
Men, statistically speaking, tend to care more about learning and studying more than women, who care - statistically speaking - about finding a man that deserves them and making good grades.
hmm….. now this one i couldnt resist commenting on. my aunt has a masters degree in physics, and is the second best mathamation that i know and many women i know are do well in math. im not saying women are better at math than men im saying it doesnt matter what sex you are. What matters is if you care or not. anyone can do good or math or reading comprehension if they care.
Oh, and Shut Up. You’re one of the reasons we get bad reps. Because you cannot shut your fucking mouth.
Fail, Lindsay….Epic Fail.
The Cult of Domesticity doesn’t change the fact that men thought women were idiots. They still believed education could damage a woman’s tender, little brain. Equality was lacking.
However, I agree that they were treated with plenty of kindness and respect. A friend once told me that she would give up the right to vote if men opened doors for her.
Tee hee. You said sex.
Seriously though, that’s because I’m a woman? I thought it was just because I’m a teenager.
Maybe he should charge membership fees. Who would pay money to read insulting things?
You are however, one of the few women whom actually do see the humour value in his articles. Albeit likely for reasons of condescension from your “superior” outlook on the world, rather than any belief in the validity of men having a forum such as this constituting a rare instance of equality in the face of the ever present negative portrayal of men in media (particularly advertising and comedy), blogspots or forums (not to mention feminist websites whose hatred cry out for the torturous eradication of the male gender altogether), and the wealth of imbalanced legislature and penalties for crimes which excessively favour the female gender.
You have me pegged! I am totally the future Supreme Dictator of the World.
The issues this site discusses didn’t exist in the 1800’s. People weren’t so precious about anything that might be remotely demeaning or insulting unless they were part of the grand old upper class. In which case it was a class issue, and affected both genders. But in the 1800’s the balance of laws was not weighted so heavily in favour of a single gender. Before you try tell me they were weighted in favour of men, I’ll point out the rule of thumb was a myth, women were expected to be respectable and treasured by their husbands, and motherhood was of such virtue as an occupation that pregnant women in England for example, were even permitted to urinate anywhere, with due decorum and respect - Even in a policeman’s hat!
Once again another woman proves Dick’s belief that women are juvenile and obsessed with sex, particularly the male anatomy.
This is why Dick has such a policy. No better way to get a modern and “empowered”[read entitled] woman to leave comments (inevitably proving the reality factors of the generalised sarcasm and wit of his humour), than to tell them they’re not permitted to or not welcome.
You are however, one of the few women whom actually do see the humour value in his articles. Albeit likely for reasons of condescension from your “superior” outlook on the world, rather than any belief in the validity of men having a forum such as this constituting a rare instance of equality in the face of the ever present negative portrayal of men in media (particularly advertising and comedy), blogspots or forums (not to mention feminist websites whose hatred cry out for the torturous eradication of the male gender altogether), and the wealth of imbalanced legislature and penalties for crimes which excessively favour the female gender.
I don’t type it often, but LOL. This website answers the question, “If people in the 1800s had internet access, what would they blog about?”
Come on. A male supremacy site headed by a guy named Dick? I thought it was a joke.
While I know there’s a “No Girls Allowed” policy here, I’m emailing a link to my friends. They’ll probably be upset, which will make the whole thing even funnier.
You know what, I don’t know what is going on in your guy’s minds when you agree with Dick-head. If you never want to get laid again, fine post as much shit about women as you want. Obviously women are sooo bad at sex, but wait a sec if they’re so bad then why do men want sex at all? It can’t be for the sake of keeping the human race going because that’s bullshit, they like it and if they didn’t like it, but wanted it anyways then how the hell does that make them smarter??? Men evolve faster, because they are just too simple. You guys must be compensating for something (like a small penis) but come on just because women won’t sleep with you doesn’t mean its because they’re the ones with the problem. Face it, hating women only leaves two other options, being attracted to no one (unlikely), or like Mr. Dick here, being attracted to men but thats fine. Hell maybe animals are your thing. All you over-compensation, UNintellegent pricks can have eachother, and us girls will find the pleasurable men that we seek (after having to endure your guys’ dull, and even painful, sex).
Look at Western culture pre and post feminism.
Ekwality is to civilization what ball cancer is to a pornstar.