Space…the Male Frontier
If you’re anything like me, you have never asked yourself why a woman has never been to the moon because the answer is obvious.
Actually, the answer may surprise you.
The male instinct is a good one — it’s solid when the chips are down, and in this case it tells us men that women have never been to the moon because the moon is chalk full of science — like a robot, the natural enemy of womankind (both technology and robots). This is absolutely true, however, only true in the way that there are no unicorns underwater. Yes, unicorns cannot breathe water, but they also do not fucking exist. So what are we talking about here.
The real reason that women have never been to the moon has very little to do with their astounding ability to turn even the simplest of technologies into a catastrophic fucking unsolvable mystery on par with Stonehenge.
Remember the last time you were making some hot-hot jokes around a woman or womans, or the last time you were enjoying a cinematographic masterpiece like Die Hard 3, Payback, or The South Park Movie — or any other time that you were trying to mind your own fucking business?
Well what happened?
That’s right, said woman or womans ruined it with a torrent of shitty comments and/or nay saying. Perhaps something like, “Nicolas Cage thinks he’s so great” (in a sarcastic tone though. Nicholas Cage only thinks he’s so great because he’s fucking awesome), or maybe a “those are fake”, “you only think you’re funny”, or a “cigarettes cause cancer”.
Cigarettes cause cancer? No shit, I didn’t know that. Guess what talking any more during Face Off causes?
Can you imagine this manner of hijink aboard the USS Space Ship to the moon?
That’s why women will never go to the moon, because of their piss-poor, wet-blanket attitudes.
Related Articles:
January 2nd, 2008 at 4:44 pm - IP Man-Hash: e24370fe2bb3c
Very well then, that is your personal experience, I can’t contrdict you on that.
Also I understand that you point out the exceptions. The only thing that I find annoying (for lack of a better word) is stating that women automatically make bad drivers, whether it is meant generally or not, is making automatic judgements.
So now you have your response, so it’s 1 for 2
January 3rd, 2008 at 1:10 am - IP Man-Hash: 81973186d2cf2
No, it’s still 2 for 2. I count it as ã victory because I was able to get ã respone from you that was logical, rational, AND clearly expressed you views. I only seek to shut women down if there is no hope of reasoning with them.
I’d be mad too if I had people automatically judging me.
However, the point still stands that men are naturally more inclined to potentially be better drivers, simply based on their average starting levels of mechanical aptitude.
January 3rd, 2008 at 2:28 am - IP Man-Hash: 904f55006453f
Please address my post above which starts like this:
“Can you list schools which would not allow women to be educated? Can you list instances where women were discriminated against through their education?”
It’s about halfway up the page.
January 6th, 2008 at 7:41 pm - IP Man-Hash: 557cf002c6a29
so insecure they had to make a big conspiracy that men were superior to women to keep women down. How pathetic. From the beginning of time, a big lie. A big conspiracy invented by the insecure man.
January 6th, 2008 at 7:50 pm - IP Man-Hash: e24370fe2bb3c
Okay, here is your response.
I admit and apologize, I worded my post badly and did not make my point correctly. We were given a proper education, but were led to believe that we weren’t able to amount up to anything other than a housewife.
January 6th, 2008 at 7:52 pm - IP Man-Hash: 557cf002c6a29
don’t listen to them, they don’t know shit and are just trying to feel important. Isn’t a penis enough
January 6th, 2008 at 7:59 pm - IP Man-Hash: a1076a8d78fb1
Providing some foundation for her claims isn’t really her strong point. KL would do best to just make like a good meal - hot and quiet - seeing as how talking or doing anything other than shutting up and taking my meat isn’t her strong point. Christ, at least NORMAL women - the ones from less… suburban places like Brazil and China, know that I want something to fuck, not a diatribe on the evils of man. I know all about the laws of the jungle, and I know that people like KL would be skull-fucked in a second if it weren’t for the men keeping the safety net over her and all of the other ungrateful teenage sluts.
What do we get in return? False rape claims and bullshit about genetic inferiority. We went through that phase back during WWII, and it did not work out - you may want to break out those history books you talk about so often so you could realize that more often than not, female leaders did not fail to disappoint. I’ll be adding my responses to the forum post later on, so you don’t have to worry about them getting pushed off the board as you broadcast the nature of your period to your bored, disinterested, booing, jeering audience.
January 6th, 2008 at 8:07 pm - IP Man-Hash: 557cf002c6a29
Women are people too. We have just as much of a right to express our opinions as you do. You need to practice how to serve a woman.
January 6th, 2008 at 8:16 pm - IP Man-Hash: e24370fe2bb3c
Well, we are expressing our opinions that we are equal on a chauvinist website, so those are the ramifications.
January 6th, 2008 at 8:18 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5cfc4fdf87f79
Well said Hilary!
January 6th, 2008 at 8:34 pm - IP Man-Hash: 557cf002c6a29
Well Hillary.. I think they know deep down inside they are wrong. I assume they just want attention and to bond.
January 6th, 2008 at 11:00 pm - IP Man-Hash: 904f55006453f
Okay, here is your response.
I admit and apologize, I worded my post badly and did not make my point correctly. We were given a proper education, but were led to believe that we weren’t able to amount up to anything other than a housewife.
Wow. That’s incredibly respectful of you to admit you were wrong. I tip my hat to you. However, I must address the last piece of your post:
Are there any social trends you can describe which fostered that belief? Are there any media influences which could amount to that? Do you have any evidence to support the fact the women wanted to be anything more than a house wife?
I’m trying to have a frank discussion with Hilary. I’m listening to her. Why should she be exempt from listening to me? I’m not trying to offend her in anyway, I’m just trying to exchange information with her.
Of course you do. Everyone should have the right to free speech, no matter what they are saying, wouldn’t you agree?
That said, do you still have any problem with what WE are saying on this website?
Why should a man serve a woman? Why should a woman serve a man? In a loving relationship, the ideal function is for both parties to live for the benefit of the other, wouldn’t you agree? It is simply natures role that the males are dominant, protecting the herd and providing for it, as the females bear and raise young. What is so wrong with what nature intended? To raise children, both parents are needed, and they both need to play specific roles. If they both try to play the same role, or reverse them, they are defying the natural interaction between genders which is apparent in all higher lifeforms.
ramification: A development or consequence growing out of and sometimes complicating a problem
Can you explain how the word “ramifications” grammatically fits in your sentence? Ramifications would refer to the outcome or result of an action, but you listed none. You simply state that you expressing your opinion is a ramification. A ramification to what?
Well KL, I think deep down inside you want us to THINK we are wrong.
Tell you what, you pick out a point made by this website that you feel is wrong, and I will do my best to explain to you why we feel it is right.
And I promise not to swear at you or insult you.
January 7th, 2008 at 1:33 pm - IP Man-Hash: e24370fe2bb3c
ramification: A development or consequence growing out of and sometimes complicating a problem
Can you explain how the word “ramifications” grammatically fits in your sentence? Ramifications would refer to the outcome or result of an action, but you listed none. You simply state that you expressing your opinion is a ramification. A ramification to what?
.
The action that would cause ramifications was contraditing this website.
To correct my sentence: Contradicting this websites chauvinistic thoughts will cause ramifications.
If that is still incorrect then I apologize once again.
January 7th, 2008 at 1:35 pm - IP Man-Hash: e24370fe2bb3c
As for my earlier post, I made some mistakes in my posting.
The very last paragraph is mine, and in the post in the quotes, the large paragraph is my response.
January 7th, 2008 at 1:36 pm - IP Man-Hash: c4d026b819ad4
Thank God no one cares what you have to say. Otherwise, it would have been confusing.
-Dick
January 7th, 2008 at 2:13 pm - IP Man-Hash: e24370fe2bb3c
That was badly written.
Regarding my earlier post. In the section that is in quotes, the largest paragraph my response. In the section not in quotes, the very last paragraph is my repsonse.
January 7th, 2008 at 4:17 pm - IP Man-Hash: 904f55006453f
A contradiction is a fact which disproves another fact. Thus far from your statements I haven’t seen any facts which seek to disprove what we feel is truth. Only conjecture as to what you believe to be true.
Hilary, I can see what you are trying to say. However, I believe “contradiction” is not the proper term.
You should have said:
“Speaking out” against this websites chauvinistic thoughts will cause “backlash.”
Contradiction and ramification denote a certain finality of fact, neither which apply to what is going on in these forums. However, you are certainly “speaking out” and receiving “backlash”. Those terms directly apply. Contradiction and ramification do not.
Now, there are “ramifications”, denoting finality, for the “back lash.”
One is that you could loose any chance of being taken seriously here, and be completely ignored.
Another is that if you succumb to your anger, you could further serve to prove our points about women.
Our freedom of speech prevents any “ramification” of hindering this sites ability to function.
As it stands, for you to have any real impact on the way we think, you must seek to cause as little backlash with your statements as possible. Notice I say “as little” as opposed to “none”, as given the nature of this site, and you being a woman, you will not be able to post here without having some backlash against you. But by antagonizing us, you loose any foothold you had at influencing us. If you remain calm and collected at all times, provide reasonable arguments and ask unloaded questions, you will be taken more seriously. To an extent…
January 8th, 2008 at 5:42 am - IP Man-Hash: 99fedd0bfffc6
Who cares about your earlier posts. No one. That’s the point.
*D3C*
January 8th, 2008 at 11:56 am - IP Man-Hash: d3b80753594d9
“Clarissa says” -
I don’t understand this website, bit of a waste of time hey??? At the end of the day you can’t help it if your born a girl or a boy, and all of you sexist men had a 50% chance of being a girl anyway. Theres no argument here!
January 8th, 2008 at 2:08 pm - IP Man-Hash: 6d2bcc78aa95d
Ahh, and how much time did you waste chatting with your friends about men, today or yesterday? I’ll bet alot. I would bet you spend several hours each and everyday talking to your friends about men, and how bad we are. You probably whinned to your mom about how you can’t find the right guy, cuz they are all jerks. How many hours have you sat reading a mag, telling you all about the evils of men, or how to land the right man and get married?
Bit of a waste of time eh’?