The L Word
Love is a silly thing and also a major loss of Man Points to discuss. I, however, am going to have to shed those Man Points today as I drop the L-bomb.
Don’t worry about my Man Points though. I gained several thousand this week by drinking a beer into which some careless, anorexic, fatass shrew had discarded a cigarette.
Then I slipped her a free MenAreBetterThanWomen.com card and my Man Points lit up like a slot machine.
Christmas is getting closer, and that means expensive gifts are being purchased all across the land. That also means that a million women are about to fall in love; a love of jewelry and bath products and other lame bullshit upon which women base their lives and also credit for the foundations of a good relationship. Merry fucking Christmas.
Women are lousy at being at in love.
To a man, being in love is a lot like getting a promotion. Sure it’s exciting and it has the potential to improve your quality of life, but it requires at all times that we men behave with discretion and self respect. For example, you don’t see a man running out of his boss’ office and spiking a stapler or striping his shirt off, do you? No of course not. That would be completely classless. Perhaps buying a round of drinks or two for his friends. Now that would be a perfectly reasonable reaction.
Men look at love in exactly the same way. Something has happened which is good for the moment — in the present context, and now I will have to adopt my lifestyle in some way. Maybe it will work, maybe it won’t; we’ll have to wait and roll with the punches. Surprise, surprise, women are exactly the opposite.
To a woman, being in love is a license to behave like a fucking lunatic. Firstly, women do not love other people — men, women, children, it’s all the same. Women love only things and it’s obviously true because they obsess like fuck about their precious trinkets every chance they get. That’s what women call love. It’s a self-love that’s also called avarice and greed, and because they don’t actually feel anything like the love that men feel, women behave like crazy people to fill in the gaps.
Women in love are like the mad inventor who never had the time to start a family of his own. He was probably too busy inventing time machines and T-shirt cannons and helicopters that ran on sunflower seeds. To compensate the scientist naturally builds weird robot replicas of families or other such things. Like Edward Scissorhands, that’s a good example. The guy didn’t have hands, so what did he use instead? Scissors. That’s the manner of shit women perpetrate when they want to be in love or think they should be. They just pull a bunch of emotions out of their ass and mix it up in a big gumbo of delusion.
“My boyfriend’s sixty pounds overweight but boy does he have a perfect ass!”
Yea, that makes about sixty pounds of sense.
Talk to a woman about love and she’ll go on for hours with all kinds of similar nonsense sayings and bullshit aphorisms. Women are like fucking car salesmen with the shit — all selling themselves the same used junk. Take my word for it if you want to do the manly thing and not ruin your evening by listening to a bunch of whining. The point is that women spend most of their time thinking about being in love. They think about it so fucking much that by the time it comes around for the first or fiftieth time, they’ve trained themselves to react like cult members or kung fu masters. Every signal and reaction is automatic, and from the barroom to the bedroom they’re on autopilot; just soaking in the adulation and shelling out the storybook shill.
Women debase themselves regularly for love. The love of not being wrong and not having to admit the fantasy upon which they’ve built their self-worth just isn’t going to work because it’s impossible and stupid.
The first step to being in love is growing the fuck up.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 4 3 2 [1] Show All
George, I’m glad I was able to provoke you into a decent response. It seems that most men who are attracted to this site are bitter with women due to having experienced a difficult divorce. Fair enough you are angry. Just don’t forget LOVE 101 or you’ll end up throwing away someone better, when next she comes around.
No, I think I’ve grasped it. I’m not hanging around to let trolls like UGP annoy me. Just came by to say that if anyone has seen footage of the race riots between people of anglo saxon appearance and people of middle eastern appearance that took place at Cronulla beach yesterday, most Australians are sickened by it and ashamed. I think this proves my point that mandatory culling of all prejudiced people is necessary, regardless of their cultural background.
Putting my x in jail would not have served any purpose, unless she continued harassing me and doing things that would be considered irrational and/or illegal. I wanted the advantage to incarcerate her for non-payment as a means to insure her unwilling total compliance and subordinance since working through diplomatic means had failed miserably due to her inability to be reasonable or meeting anyone half-way to do what was best for the children. Once she dug herself a hole I merely shoveled the dirt back on her to keep her in a box and to leave me alone. Now, if she steps out of line you can be assured I will fuck her up beyond all reason since she also committed bankruptcy fraud and I am sure the US Attorney would love to address that matter criminally as well. I am like any other predator. Leave me alone and all is fine. Harass me at your own peril.
by the way female just because god gave you a vagina and no self respect does not mean you have the right to be angry at the power wielding sex
Good post, George. “enlightened self interest” is the key phrase that you use twice. A great many women sadly do not remotely grasp that concept.
-wolfe.
i agree whole heartedly with everything george just said and good job for sticking it to your ex, i would have put her in jail though
To Femail: PS, I have 2 sons whom I have sole physical and legal custody of. Spent the requisite funds on legal fees to remove their meddlesome mother from their life. I don’t deny her access but she is typical of women in divorce as she tried to deny me access to my sons and harassed me. Once I was done with her I put her into bankruptcy and she owes we 6 years of child support which I can use to have her thrown in jail if she gives me any grief again. I have told my sons to be very careful in their selection of girlfriends, that if they feel compelled to marry to only do it if they intend to have children and to wait until after they are 35 to do it and to get a prenuptial agreement. I have told them to always use condoms and to assume that the other party isn’t on birth control, even if they say they are. I never bad mouth their mother or say rude things about her (How many women do you know that don’t as most do badmouth and harass their childrens fathers.) Had I to do it over again, I would never have married. I make too much money and have too much to lose. The laws favor women and contribute to an environment encouraging them to make false claims of abuse, to use children as a chattel/property to bargain with their x-husband, and to do other things which taken in the whole are unethical, immoral and to the detriment of children and their own situation. You want equality, get your wallet out. Money is the great equalizer and creates a level playing field. Act consistent with your position or shut the fuck up.
No, I merely told the truth. The following are facts:
1. There is no such thing as equality.
2. One party or the other always contributes more to a relationship. This may change sides from time to time, but typically does not.
3. All relationships have economic disparity. This leads to such things as alimony (funny, when man may be awarded alimony the women are up in arms-see Nick Lachey. But they feel a sisterhood, an entitlement when it comes to one of their own gender, which is typical bullshit!). Since I am the only financial contributor in my relationship and (men are the primary financial conributor in most relationships) have the responsibilities, liabilities and requisite accountability that it entails then I am entitled to speical privelages and consideration, if I am adult enough to require it. Anything which does not support my career goals and objectives I remove, this includes meddlesome and interferring women. If a woman does not have the simple intelligence to understand enlightened self interest (and most don’t or have cuchholded their men to the point where they have no confidence in their career or lead lives of quiet desperation) and aid in the common good of making herself more secure by assisting her mate/partner/husband/boyfriend etc, then she has become a liability to be removed. If a woman is not making my life and career better, yet she benefits from my efforts, then why is she there? No reason. Therefore, she would be gone. You see the symptoms of their stupidity in divorce, which serves only to enrich attorneys and to harm the woman financially, when they attack the men’s careers by harassing them at their workplace, interferring with their work, and doing other malicious acts designed to harm him financially all the while failing to realize that it will harm themselves as well. This is all to common.
4. Men don’t need or want women as friends. We have plenty of friends in other men. Some women want to be one of the guys, but they never can be. There is always that subtle undercurrent which underscores and emphasizes the vast differences. Only gay men have women as friends, since they don’t want to fuck them. That is fine.
Thus, if a woman isn’t helping me there is no reason to have her in a relationship. I don’t need a pet. I don’t need a rattlesnake. I really don’t need a woman, but if one is going to be around then be of some service and support or get lost. Relationships are about enlightened self interest, not about selflessness (that is when you have children, selflessness) or altruism. They don’t exist in relationships between men and women, and shouldn’t. Don’t act like they do. If you benefit from my work and income you will be of assistance or you will be gone. Simple. Why is that so hard to understand. Also, a man should never marry without prenuptial agreement protecting his income, assets and career earnings.
I think Ozgur gotcher sore spot female :)
Explain this to me genius, what post would you have contributed in replace of the one you just had, had I never come across this site? There was nothing else in your post, besides your opinion of me. No opinion on dick’s story, no ideas you might have about why you think men are better than women, no interesting stories about your own personal experiences with the other sex, no news item relevant to the premise of this site, not even a comment on whether you enjoyed Dick’s story. How boring. Not to mention the fact that the aforementioned absences totally contradict your request. If I’m boring, you’re already in a coma.
This female bitch is getting nastier and nastier day by day and I really think she should be banned from this site. She has already done more than enough in proving how nasty, illogical and hate-driven women can be and there is nothing else she can do to contribute to this site, as she obviously lacks the ability to make even one single argument based on evidence and logic. All she does to prove that her ideas are based on reason is to claim they are, but she understands no better about reason than a parrot does. Besides, she has started to make the site terribly boring.
There is no way on this earth that I would EVER be offering love to the misogynist who runs this site. I was referring to a post I made in response to some asshole called George, a day or two ago. George thought he was a manly man because he could tell his girlfriend that if she didn’t moddycoddle him 24/7, then he’d be kicking her sorry ass out. I tried to straighten things out for George by giving him a lesson in Love 101. Naturally, the beast didn’t understand, but who cares, that’s his problem. I hope he can’t have children.
WTF is this Female person offering you love. You don’t need none of that sheyt, because you can write brilliant sheyt as the following.
Damn, every time I come here and read, I forget to surround the chair with pillows, as I always fall off it laughing uncontrolably.
The Geezer
http://www.hatemalepost.blogspot.com
http://www.thespinmeister.blogspot.com
No one cares who you tend to agree with, Female. You’re a woman.
-Dick
Did you have a bad date, dick?
Shall I give you my understanding of love? Oh, wait, I already did that yesterday. You’ll probably think my definition is completely immature, much like George did.
Considering that it was all about selflessness and men know nothing than pure ego selfishness, I don’t expect you to interpret it as “mature.” But then, your also the one who advocates masturbating in the work place, so you must be right. Not that I think all men are like you, that would be an overwhelming generalization.
Love is a tricky beast. Very difficult not to confuse it with lust. I tend to agree with Freud’s interpretation that the “in love” state is an overblown idealization, comparable to being in a psychotic state. It’s so unfortunate that when you idealize someone’s average traits, you also tend to do the reverse and deidealize their other average traits that for whatever reason, just don’t sit well with you.
This is a very timely topic you have written on and I am glad to see it. I know you couldn’t care less to know this but I have just fallen out of being “in love.” I feel a lot better for it. Yay!!!