The L Word
Love is a silly thing and also a major loss of Man Points to discuss. I, however, am going to have to shed those Man Points today as I drop the L-bomb.
Don’t worry about my Man Points though. I gained several thousand this week by drinking a beer into which some careless, anorexic, fatass shrew had discarded a cigarette.
Then I slipped her a free MenAreBetterThanWomen.com card and my Man Points lit up like a slot machine.
Christmas is getting closer, and that means expensive gifts are being purchased all across the land. That also means that a million women are about to fall in love; a love of jewelry and bath products and other lame bullshit upon which women base their lives and also credit for the foundations of a good relationship. Merry fucking Christmas.
Women are lousy at being at in love.
To a man, being in love is a lot like getting a promotion. Sure it’s exciting and it has the potential to improve your quality of life, but it requires at all times that we men behave with discretion and self respect. For example, you don’t see a man running out of his boss’ office and spiking a stapler or striping his shirt off, do you? No of course not. That would be completely classless. Perhaps buying a round of drinks or two for his friends. Now that would be a perfectly reasonable reaction.
Men look at love in exactly the same way. Something has happened which is good for the moment — in the present context, and now I will have to adopt my lifestyle in some way. Maybe it will work, maybe it won’t; we’ll have to wait and roll with the punches. Surprise, surprise, women are exactly the opposite.
To a woman, being in love is a license to behave like a fucking lunatic. Firstly, women do not love other people — men, women, children, it’s all the same. Women love only things and it’s obviously true because they obsess like fuck about their precious trinkets every chance they get. That’s what women call love. It’s a self-love that’s also called avarice and greed, and because they don’t actually feel anything like the love that men feel, women behave like crazy people to fill in the gaps.
Women in love are like the mad inventor who never had the time to start a family of his own. He was probably too busy inventing time machines and T-shirt cannons and helicopters that ran on sunflower seeds. To compensate the scientist naturally builds weird robot replicas of families or other such things. Like Edward Scissorhands, that’s a good example. The guy didn’t have hands, so what did he use instead? Scissors. That’s the manner of shit women perpetrate when they want to be in love or think they should be. They just pull a bunch of emotions out of their ass and mix it up in a big gumbo of delusion.
“My boyfriend’s sixty pounds overweight but boy does he have a perfect ass!”
Yea, that makes about sixty pounds of sense.
Talk to a woman about love and she’ll go on for hours with all kinds of similar nonsense sayings and bullshit aphorisms. Women are like fucking car salesmen with the shit — all selling themselves the same used junk. Take my word for it if you want to do the manly thing and not ruin your evening by listening to a bunch of whining. The point is that women spend most of their time thinking about being in love. They think about it so fucking much that by the time it comes around for the first or fiftieth time, they’ve trained themselves to react like cult members or kung fu masters. Every signal and reaction is automatic, and from the barroom to the bedroom they’re on autopilot; just soaking in the adulation and shelling out the storybook shill.
Women debase themselves regularly for love. The love of not being wrong and not having to admit the fantasy upon which they’ve built their self-worth just isn’t going to work because it’s impossible and stupid.
The first step to being in love is growing the fuck up.
Related Articles:
December 12th, 2005 at 3:06 am - IP Man-Hash: eadd56da2c7c9
Prejudiced people should be culled?
Female, you’re beyond parody.
December 12th, 2005 at 7:27 am - IP Man-Hash: 448b690b954fe
No, not angry. I was pragmatic, practical and cold blooded. I was disappointed that someone could not be selfless with their children. I was disappointed that I had to to spend $250,000 on legal fees to bury her. I was disappointed that she lacked the common sense to be somewhat reasonable but she acted typical of most women in a divorce when they are the party who either: 1) engages in PAS and then faces losing custody due to their own foolish actions, and 2) intentionally make things worse rather than resolve issues. Divorce is merely a business deal gone bad. I am not mad at “women”. I merely see them for what they are, a potential danger to my career. If I was mad at women I would not be in a relationship with one. You are a sad person whose blindness and absolutist position is indefensible.
December 12th, 2005 at 8:13 am - IP Man-Hash: 801d8edb201cf
George 99 percent of all women are NOT reasonable, just look at female !
Women don’t care about anything other than their own wants and needs, that’s why you have to invest in a nice rubber hose to beat them with daily if need be, because they certainly are beyond reasoning.
I think of a good pre-nup as the best armor a man can get to protect against the psycho feminasty whores who are only out after our money.
Having the bitches surveilled is also a good countermeasure, because you can bet when you’re not around, they are up to some shit, FACT…
December 12th, 2005 at 8:33 am - IP Man-Hash: e6684e7eed2e9
Excellent advice given to your sons George. I have 4 daughters to whom I have given similar advice. The New York State Family Courts have ordered me to pay $4,500 a month in “child support”… yeah, men and women are equal…
December 12th, 2005 at 4:48 pm - IP Man-Hash: e2d025f19e31f
Female, thought you might like a little proof that men are better than women.
Boys outnumber girls in remedial reading classes — by large ratios, in most studies — but they are even likelier to outnumber girls among the most gifted in math and science. In one Johns Hopkins University study of gifted pre-adolescent students, boys outperformed girls among the top scoring students on math by 13-to-1.
Comparative Study done on Olympic Athletes: Foot Races (all distances are in meters, averages done in seconds)
1 100M M=9.84 W=10.6 -8%
2 200M M=19.32 W=21.3 -10%
3 400M M=43.49 W=48.3 -11%
4 800M M=103 W=113 -10%
5 1,500M M=212 W=234 -10%
6 5,000M M=786 W=881 -12%
7 10,000M M=1625 W=1817 -12%
8 Marathon M=7740 W=8580 -11%
Women Compared To Men In Life:
Did do-it-yourself maintenance: oil, battery, antifreeze, spark plug
change
—————————
Men Women
18-24 26 12
25-34 33 16
35-44 29 12
45-54 25 11
55-64 23 9
65+ 13 4
Men consistently do car maintenance more than women by over 2 to 1
in all age ranges.
Items Purchased in 1996
———————-
Men women
Motor Oil 64 50
Antifreeze 44 36
Wiper Blade 28 20
Only 30% of women in the US Army said that they would
volunteer for combat jobs, compared to 60% of men
POINTS OF INTEREST FOR MEN:
EDUCATION OF MEN, BUT NOT WOMEN HELPS ECONOMIC GROWTH?
Robert Barros’ “Determinants of
Economic Growth” says that male secondary and higher levels of
education is highly correlated with economic growth. However, the
secondary education of women showed an insignificant or negative
effect on subsequent levels of economic growth. Of all the variables
he mentions in the book he gives a theoretical explanation, except
for this one. His data included over a 100 countries over a 35 to 40
year period.
RADICAL FEMINIST REFUSES TO TEACH MEN
Radical feminist Boston College professor told she must teach men
Eastside Journal Feb 26, 1999 p. A11 Mary Daly says “women defer to
men in their presence, so she won’t let men into her classes.”
women’s college
Fewer than 1 percent of Fortune’s 4,000 highest corporate
earners are female, although a third of that elite group are women’s-college graduates.
Only one Wellesley woman, from ‘79, has run a company with more than 1,000 employees; about a quarter have run businesses, mostly very small ones.
Just food for thought Female. :-)
December 13th, 2005 at 2:02 am - IP Man-Hash: 9efaeb2a8447e
Alright geezer, you’ve got my attention (hairline close though). Thanks so much for giving us these facts, not that I could care less. The whole debate of who is the better sex is rubbish. That’s like saying, which is better, a dog or a horse? A horse is better if you want to travel long distances quickly, but maybe not so good at bringing you your slippers and pipe at night (which I’m sure is relevant in your case). This is why I do not waste my time trawling the web to find facts on the many things in which women excel at, and which men, do not. The premise of this site is a joke, that you have bought into it is completely laughable. Good one geezer!
December 13th, 2005 at 4:17 am - IP Man-Hash: 30e38eb4b9c6e
Yeah, it looks like he gotcher sore spot female :)
December 13th, 2005 at 9:24 am - IP Man-Hash: 8dd3dc862afae
The comparison of the sexes has nothing to do with dogs and horses. It’s like asking which is better: a dog or a lame, disobedient dog?
-Dick
December 13th, 2005 at 1:37 pm - IP Man-Hash: 60b660aafc3e4
‘Alright geezer, you’ve got my attention (hairline close though). ‘
Oh, give it a rest, female. Everyone has your attention. You’re on a mission, and you know it.
December 14th, 2005 at 12:43 am - IP Man-Hash: dc6df4d5c25ad
Much like yourself no doubt. What’s your mission then honey? If it’s to get me off these boards, you’ve got too little, too late. I’m over it. Ciao.
December 14th, 2005 at 5:30 am - IP Man-Hash: 3f6f1bc89c9c0
Exactly.
December 14th, 2005 at 7:29 am - IP Man-Hash: 60b660aafc3e4
It’s to my personal benefit that you remain, female.
December 14th, 2005 at 5:51 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5475964f1d333
Now that sounds frightening. Lucky you Female, seems you now have 2 stalkers and the latest one seems a bit unhinged. Do you always manage to attract freaks?
December 15th, 2005 at 3:18 am - IP Man-Hash: 05876c7260a2f
Not as regularly as I used too, but things do look like they may be picking up.
December 15th, 2005 at 7:41 pm - IP Man-Hash: fa9f9872494c7
Unforytunately this board attracts female samples by 2.
December 17th, 2005 at 9:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: 1cc2bd319db66
Ah love. The captivating “Deus ex machina�-phenomena, which suddenly strikes from beyond, and you feel powerful and powerless at the same time and blah. blah . Even though the sentence before is enthusiastically written, I exaggerated on purpose, because love in my opinion is drastically overrated or perhaps confused with lust.
I might be pessimistic or realistic on the subject, as it depends on how you would look at it, but the definition “to fall in love� is in my optics alias attraction or a sexual drive, though love in my opinion isn’t an nonexistent quality, it can only be reachable in a relationship over the course of time, and thus strengthening the bonds between one another the more you learn about each other.
I don’t know why girls can act so hysterically when they are “in love�, and then after 2 days “fall in love� with another man. No wonder there are so many divorces in the western world, and thus I come to admire Muslim culture in some ways, where women do not walk around like crazed sex robots seeking attention.
(Oldone)Quote:� Only 30% of women in the US Army said that they would
volunteer for combat jobs, compared to 60% of men�.
I actually think this quote makes men look bad, because if you think that you in casu will find men with more courage I have to agree, but at the same time also with a lot of stupidity to risk ones life in that calibre, just to get a pay check. You won’t find vires et honestas in the army as there is nothing honourable about war.
Half Soul
December 18th, 2005 at 2:27 am - IP Man-Hash: 818387b8dec3d
They are only in love with the motion of being in love. Women do not really care whom it is as long as they can go through the emotions of it.
Regardless of sex or gender, women will do the rounds of being in love.
Unfortunately love to women is money, that is, wedding dress(shopping),wedding ring (money and shopping).
It has to be the right colour, shape and size otherwise you don’t really love them),
parties(money),
wedding reception(money),
what to eat (shopping),
what the bridesmaids should wear(shopping),
flower for the occassion (shopping),
Honeymoon (shopping).
It does not stop.
Get hitched to these professional shoppers and you will never achieve or do what you want.
Only suckers get married.
You will just be broke.
December 18th, 2005 at 6:51 am - IP Man-Hash: 1cc2bd319db66
Hi Christian j :)
Quote:�Only suckers get married.�
Well mate, besides getting an education and a career (perhaps as a teacher), there is nothing else I would rather be than a father, and you usually marry to be that.
Quote: “You will just be broke.�
I will just have to take that chance, but you can always use some prevention in order to not make her use her purse with catastrophic effect, by i.e. putting a mouse or a cockroach in it. She would never go near it again hehe.
Half Soul
December 18th, 2005 at 11:44 am - IP Man-Hash: d754ab99d7c00
I respect you, and your right to an opinion, but I do not respect that opinion. (You grasp the distinction, I hope).
Much like the force of gravity, violence and stupidity will sadly be with us for ages to come. Perhaps forever. We have not evolved beyond it and are nowhere near doing so. (Witness the recent wars and violence in “civilised” Europe.)
As long as this is the case, we either surrender to the violent, or we battle them to preserve a civil society. The police battle from within; the military from without. The men who volunteer to fight for us do so honorably, at least in most Western militaries. (The US military rejects the stupid on both moral and practical grounds; perhaps you were unaware of this.)
They do not do so for a “pay check”.
As for the suggestion that you will find neither moral force (I assume this is what you mean by vires; the usage is unusal, even for me) nor honesty in the Army, I think you are very very mistaken.
Almost uniformly (no pun intended), the military men I’ve worked with through the years were more honorable and reliable than their civilian counterparts. Most had a highly developed moral sense; something I’ve only more rarely seen in civilians.
As for the idea that there is nothing honorable about war? I don’t know. I know there is no glory.
But the war against Fascism, the War against Slavery and even the Cold War — ask most Czechs, Hungarians and Poles — were, I think, all honorable wars.
You, as do I, owe your right to write as you please in no small part to a dying group of Americans, British, Canadians, Australians and New Zealanders and others of many nationalities.
-wolfe
December 19th, 2005 at 2:20 pm - IP Man-Hash: 60b660aafc3e4
hahahaha
female and femalemark2,
Get the bleep over yourselves.
Thank you for making me laugh (again). It’s always fun to read your posts. Such great amusement.