Pain in My Man Ass

Women only have one skill. The ability to have children. And it’s not so much a skill as much as it is a defense mechanism againt doing work. Like how an octopus shoots ink all over the place when a shark is trying to bite it or stab it with something. That’s how women use their natural defense of cranking out children whenever a job is about to bite ahold of them.

It’s also like how Yakov Smirnoff would say shit about Russia about everything, even when it didn’t apply at all. Women are exactly like Yakov Smirnoff except their broken crutch is their ovaries.

Take promiscuous sex for example. Women will explain away their debauchery with some kind of mythical “biological, reproductive clock” that apparently starts dinging up like a slot machine when they hit twenty-six and spits Spanish Fly into the air like a crop duster. Where I come from we have a term for that. Horseshit.

Women also use the act of bearing a child (even the poseurs who haven’t actually gone through with it yet) to prove that they can take more pain than men — and that women have a higher pain tolerance than we do. Where I come from we have a term for that too. Super horseshit. Here’s the horse to prove it.

Linda LeResche “Poppin Fresh” has just earned the coveted MenAreBetterThanWomen.com’s Honorary Man of the Month award for August (congratulations Reschey Resche) by releasing some foxy facts and findings that really don’t mean shit if you’re either a man or you’re a women who lets a man do all the thinking, talking, and driving for her. If you’re either one of those then the findings and the rest of life in general are obvious.

Men can take more pain that women, says LeResche. Way the fuck more.

I didn’t read the rest of the study because, what the fuck. It’s obvious. Men can take more pain then women? I figured that out the first time I was kicked in the bean machine and fell to the ground for several minutes. I had seen a woman do the same thing when she was struck in the head by a football. The two are not the same.

So have women have been faking that they can take more pain than men? No. They could never do that sort of thing because a woman would never pass up the opportunity to bray like a pauper while being treated like a princess for stubbing her fucking toe or some silly fucking thing like that. Can you imagine? A woman choosing to keep her mouth shut when she’s just had a gold mine of attention fall on her pinkie toe? No. None of us can. Even with our mighty iMANginations.

The real dickle of this pickle is that women only appear to never be in pain because they never fucking do anything. It’s like an equal rights amendment. Sure, it sounds great (not really), but as soon as women start having to live by it everything falls the fuck apart.

Women never do anything — until its time to have a kid. And when that happens they scream like holy hell and say that no man knows what real pain is.

What I say is if the pain of childbirth is on par with the rest of feminanity’s bullshit, I doubt it even hurts very much at all. Bam Bam and you’re done. What the big fucking deal. I’ll tell you for sure that it can’t be as painful as having to listen to the embarrassing, awkwardly-insulting, half-baked opinions of a woman for the rest of your life, which all men have to do.

I would like to think that Linda LeResche agrees with me. That’s why she’s Miss August.

Poppin Fresh

Related Articles:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

339 Comments in 325 threads.»

Pages: « 1715 14 13 12 11 [10] 9 8 7 6 51 » Show All

Comment by mike
2006-10-06 08:30:43

Dutch269 said:

Since you bring up religion and races, ya I fucking hate some of them too. So now your going to tell me not to fucking hate those Iranians or Iraqies because “There not all bad”, fucking bullshit. How many more people have
to die because of terrerism before you get angry??

Ask yourself this; Why do religions exist? Is it due to some cranky, insecure, neurotic Deity, who requires constant human worship and sacrifice in order to feel complete?

Next question; Why do so many religions exist? They are clearly full of loopholes and contradict each other. Can they really all be the word of God, or man made systems of control?

The real enemies are our governments who continually divide us into separate factions and belief systems, orchestrate wars, then play us off against each other in exchange for more power. it doesn’t take a genius to realise this has been happening world-wide for literally hundreds or even thousands of years.

US Presidential election campaigns are a complete farce. How many times did Florida re-count electronic votes to ensure the preferred candidate (Bush) was voted into office? How many hundreds of millions of dollars did major corporations spend to ensure the man that best served their agenda became president? It is no secret that every single US presidential campaign since George Washington (a 33rd degree freemason, I might add) has been won by the candidate with the strongest European, aristocratic genes.

In short, Presidents are not elected by ballot - they are selected by bloodline.

Look at Britain. No matter who is currently in power, nothing improves. Immigration control is a joke, as is unemployment rates increasing, NHS, education, crime, drug abuse, teenage pregnancies, public transport, Housing prices…The list goes on.

Tory and Labour parties squabble amongst themselves, give empty promises, then deliver the exact fucking opposite. The next elected party will do the same. I bet my ass it will, because I live in a one party state that is following a pre-meditated agenda - namely, to destroy the sovereignty of my country and help set up a global fascist state.

Head of states are merely pawns in a game they do not fully understand. They serve their small part in the agenda then are disposed of. Look at Milosevic, Hussein etc They have been made into scapegoats to direct the people’s anger away from the true perpetrators.

All throughout history its the same shit over and over - wars, fear, suffering, strife, people relinquishing their powers in exchange for a false sense of security. Fuck it, just watch Star Wars! - a child’s film shows us how easily it’s done.

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-10-05 22:26:54

Here’s the difference as I see it. Hatred is a lingering emotion. Anger can come and go, as the summer thundershower. Hatred is climactic in its effects.

Hate puts you at a strategic disadvantage. Your rational thinking is altered by it for some very great length of time. This is rarely a good thing, and is something that, I think, separates men from women.

Anger may be a tool or a crutch, or (horribly) a club. Hate tends only to be a crutch.

Strength and Honor indeed,
-wolfe

 
Comment by abaddon_fff
2006-10-05 22:20:20

wolfe said:

Gentlemen, I would beg to differ slightly.

Hatred of women is not “ok”. In Sandra’s case, even a blind squirrel can once in a while find a nut. Hatred of feminism, communism and fascism? All those intellectually bankrupt and morally perverse ideologies of the 20th century? You bet.

-Agreed, to hate a specific gender for the shortcomings of a few of its members is detestable.-

Hatred of a woman’s specific actions and misdeeds? OK, sure.

-Agreed-

I applaud your learning and reasoning abaddon, but I am unconvinced that it was hatred that motivated Luther. I would suggest, rather, anger.

-They’re similar emotions in my view. However, I was using it as a parable, not as actual historical fact. However, who can say what Luther felt when he posted his Theses. Either way I would say that I made my point.-

Anger much as in the righteous anger that lead Christ to toss the money-lenders from the Temple.

So be righteously angry at that which is wrong, that which is evil. But hatred? That’s something one should be much more careful of. There is a place for hate, but it’s a small one.

-wolfe

-I think that hatred is perfectly acceptable. One has to look torwards cause and effect. A simple process, why does hate exist in the first place? Denial of love or emotion to put it simply. As I have said before, how it is used is when it should be defined as good or evil.

-Strength and Honor-

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-10-05 21:17:43

Gentlemen, I would beg to differ slightly.

Hatred of women is not “ok”. In Sandra’s case, even a blind squirrel can once in a while find a nut. Hatred of feminism, communism and fascism? All those intellectually bankrupt and morally perverse ideologies of the 20th century? You bet.

Hatred of a woman’s specific actions and misdeeds? OK, sure.

I applaud your learning and reasoning abaddon, but I am unconvinced that it was hatred that motivated Luther. I would suggest, rather, anger.

Anger much as in the righteous anger that lead Christ to toss the money-lenders from the Temple.

So be righteously angry at that which is wrong, that which is evil. But hatred? That’s something one should be much more careful of. There is a place for hate, but it’s a small one.

-wolfe

 
Comment by abaddon_fff
2006-10-05 20:54:50

sandra said:

“yes it is ok to hate women for what they do.”

your experiences probably have a lot to do w/ that statement … but it’s not good to hate any group of people whether it’s b/c their gender, religion, race, etc. hate leads to horrible things…

-Hatred is neither inherently good nor bad Sandra, its a natural human emotion, the mirror opposite of love to be exact. It’s how it’s used in life that can be defined as bad or good. Hatred of reliegious persection and the doctrines of the catholic church led Martin Luther to post his 99 theses on the Popes door. Hatred of Jews led to the Holocaust. To deny that you even feel it is childish to say the least. But it also denies you the full human experience which is saddening.-

-Strength and Honor-

 
Comment by sandra
2006-10-05 17:37:14

im not trying to give advice; i was just saying that it’s not good to hate. is that some crazy abnormal theory? hm, guess to everyone else. what intro line?

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-10-05 17:30:22

Missis Faggots, the student prostitute. I wouldn’t be dispensing advice if I were you. Remember that little intro line of yours, you little hypocrite?

 
Comment by sandra
2006-10-05 17:19:06

i said “its not good to hate”. whether or not you agree or disagree is your thing. im not telling you to change.

 
Comment by Dutch269
2006-10-05 17:14:10

sandra said:

“yes it is ok to hate women for what they do.”

your experiences probably have a lot to do w/ that statement … but it’s not good to hate any group of people whether it’s b/c their gender, religion, race, etc. hate leads to horrible things…

Then you really dont have a clue about men, we thrive on anger and aggression. Its how we get shit done. Its how we change the world, we see something that isnt right, we get pissed off then we fix it. But, Im not talking only of my personal experiance, every man I know has went thur the exact same shit… every fucking one of them.

Your advice may work well for women, they cant handle anger so its no wonder they are afraid of it. Let me give you some advice, quit telling men to not be angry or hatefull… it only pisses us off!

Since you bring up religion and races, ya I fucking hate some of them too. So now your going to tell me not to fucking hate those Iranians or Iraqies because “There not all bad”, fucking bullshit. How many more people have to die because of terrerism before you get angry??

You would have me ingore the people who have suffered so much because of terrerism from the middle east or to ignore the crap that religion spews out while they fucking molest our children?

Fuck no! So get the fuck out of the way so we can fix this crap.

 
Comment by sandra
2006-10-05 16:57:55

“yes it is ok to hate women for what they do.”

your experiences probably have a lot to do w/ that statement … but it’s not good to hate any group of people whether it’s b/c their gender, religion, race, etc. hate leads to horrible things…

 
Comment by Dutch269
2006-10-05 16:42:46

sandra said:

but there are [might seem unbelievable...] a lot of women that do “take it seriously”, make the right decisions, and don’t “fuck it all up”. don’t overlook those women. and please don’t assume all women are like the ones who are making those idiotic decisions. look at it this way- there are a lot of men in prison for some pretty violent acts. do i think all men are violent? of course not. and i’m sorry to hear the decision your ex-wife chose to make. do you keep in touch with your son? and about the ADD thing- seriously, the majority of teens today are diagnosed with it. most of them don’t even have it, and it’s definitely not a thing to fret about.

“nor the responsibility. Yet they hold it up high like a fucking crown, so damn pathetic.”

it’s true. that a lot of women hold that up over men. what i find pathetic, but mostly tragic, is women who think they are better than men… and vise versa… everyone should respect everyone. it doesn’t mean you have to agree with them, admire them, or heck- even like them. men and women should work together to make this world a better place and worry about more important things than who is better than who.

I have custody of my son, have been since he was 7, now hes 15 and yes he is having problems at school. His attention span sucks, and he cant concentrate in class. His fucking mother tells him its ok, hes “special”. While I try to tell him theres nothing wrong with him and to go out and be a fucking man and take care of his responsiblities. Im slowing getting his mothers words out of his head, and he is improving.

Back to the topic, yes it is ok to hate women for what they do. Your talking about degrees here, sure there maybe females who arent as bad as others, but they are all the same when it comes down to it. And from what Ive seen, its all bad.

 
Comment by sandra
2006-10-05 16:28:51

but there are [might seem unbelievable...] a lot of women that do “take it seriously”, make the right decisions, and don’t “fuck it all up”. don’t overlook those women. and please don’t assume all women are like the ones who are making those idiotic decisions. look at it this way- there are a lot of men in prison for some pretty violent acts. do i think all men are violent? of course not. and i’m sorry to hear the decision your ex-wife chose to make. do you keep in touch with your son? and about the ADD thing- seriously, the majority of teens today are diagnosed with it. most of them don’t even have it, and it’s definitely not a thing to fret about.

“nor the responsibility. Yet they hold it up high like a fucking crown, so damn pathetic.”

it’s true. that a lot of women hold that up over men. what i find pathetic, but mostly tragic, is women who think they are better than men… and vise versa… everyone should respect everyone. it doesn’t mean you have to agree with them, admire them, or heck- even like them. men and women should work together to make this world a better place and worry about more important things than who is better than who.

 
Comment by Dutch269
2006-10-05 12:05:16

To me the point about women screwing up the one thing they have to themselves, is so very valid.

Thats because its the ONE thing women always fall back to in any kind of “Man vs Women” argument. It is the ONE thing women will always and forever hold over mens heads to someone validate their prowess over us men.

That would be fine and dandy for me to except, it really would…. except you fucking women dont even do it right!! Its almost like you dont take it seriously.

I know from personal experiance, when my ex-wife was pregnant with my son, she was a smoker… we both were. Well, at first I didnt say anything.. trying to give her a chance to “do the right thing”, but she didnt and I had to say something. When I did she got really upset and told me not to tell her what to do, so I told about what could happen to the child and she didnt give a dam about that. You what she did care about, was me quitting smoking too… that was the deal. She didnt give a fuck about the baby,she would only quit smoking if I did.

Now is the best part, and I swear Im not making this up. At first I said no, because I thought she was being a fucking bitch about the whole thing. A couple days later I gave in for the sake of the baby, and I told her I was going to quit.. and I did too.

Guess what, you probly guessed it, she didnt quit smoking thru the entire pregnancy. In fact to this day she is a smoker and Ive been of the nicotine for almost 10 years now. Now my son is a teenager and Im told he has ADD, thanks alot bitch!!

So you see Sandra, women cant take the pain of child birth, nor the responsibility. Yet they hold it up high like a fucking crown, so damn pathetic.

Dutch~

 
Comment by sandra
2006-10-04 17:09:38

i read it.

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-10-04 15:11:33

Sandra, here. Have a gander, please.

Oh, do enjoy.

 
Comment by sandra
2006-10-04 15:07:09

“I am not talking about teenage guys making mistakes, I am talking about pregnant women acting without a thought as to what her actions will do to her baby.”

yes and im not trying to justify it in any way if you think that. I brought the comparison between male and female teenagers b/c of the comment “Congratulations, girls. You were given one solitary responsibility in life … couldn’t even get that right without fucking up.”

 
Comment by Luka
2006-10-04 14:32:15

Sadly it wasn’t just teenage mothers-to-be that acted in this way sandra, women in their twenties and thirties were still drinking more than they should when they hit the bars, clubs and pubs.

I also find some the comments you have made about teenage guys doing ‘crazy shit’ is completely missing the point. I am not talking about teenage guys making mistakes, I am talking about pregnant women acting without a thought as to what her actions will do to her baby.

There is a difference between making a mistake and inflicting it upon yourself and inflicting it upon an unborn child. Is it not unreasonable to suggest that a pregnant woman has the responsibility over the health of the baby growing inside her and that if she drinks, takes drugs etc. she is acting irresponsibly and being very selfish?

It wasn’t so much the drinking that angered me (although I was shocked to learn that some women were doing this) it was the fact that they were so quick to blame someone else for their mistakes with the painfully thin guise of ignorance - THAT was disconcerting, never mind the issue of drinking whilst pregnant!

 
Comment by sandra
2006-10-04 14:15:26

-just a personal opinion.

 
Comment by sandra
2006-10-04 14:12:21

i dont think the words “fault” and “baby” should go together. even if the baby wasnt “planned”…

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-10-04 14:04:33

Responsability is in prevention which manifests through adequate planning and foresight of consequences of one’s actions. Which are totally alien concepts.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis