They Can Never Take Our Pimpdom

You know what I think is hilarious: that the only successful woman pimp ever — Heidi Fleiss — was so inept that she went to prison and nearly sullied the reputation of one of the greatest thespians of the 20th century. One Charlie “The Green Machine” Sheen.

By the way, when I say “successful”, I mean successful in the way that a woman can be successful, by sleeping her way to the top and dodging the karma tornado of ineptitude for as long as possible.

Ultimately, success for a woman is having the new high score for Most Years Without Fucking Up. I think the record is like two. Princess Di probably holds it too. I don’t really know. I don’t give a shit.

Women do not make good pimps. In fact, they don’t make pimps at all.

Pimping requires business sense, charisma, and compassion; which are all fucking stuff that no woman has. Usually not being qualified doesn’t stop them from doing anything though. Single mothers raise children every day. However, there’s no affirmative action for pimping.

Let’s look at the facts.

Pimps cannot take maternity leave.
Pimps cannot afford to dress way inappropriately for work.
Pimps cannot start crying while business is going on around them.

At the end of the day, pimping is the oldest profession in the world. It’s been around ever since the first woman saw the first man building a shelter, making dinner, and inventing vegetables and thought to herself, “I can’t do any of that shit. Guess I better learn how to fuck.”

And she never did.

Related Articles:

86 Responses to “They Can Never Take Our Pimpdom”

Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 »

  1. Christian J Says:

    Dick Masterson said:

    [blockquote removed]

    So men (like always) have to take the first step. What a hypocritical fucking bitch you are, Female. Completely full of shit and conviction just like always.

    -Dick

    Isn’t it mindblowing, the arrogant self-serving bitch blames males for everything and actually thinks that we are going to show wommin respect.

    Why ?

    All you have demonstrated right here and worldwide, what a total arsehole you women really are.

    Respect What ?

    You gimme everything attitude ?
    Your ” I am a victim” droning ?
    Your ” everyone else owes me a life” whining ?
    Your “you have to nice to me because I am a women” ?

    You really are in a dream world.
    Don’t you bloody well realise that this site is testament of what we think of women. You cannot defend your obnoxious sex here, it’s past that.

    Have you not learnt that yet ?

    Do you think we are joking when we say your gender sucks ?

  2. Female Says:

    Dick Masterson said:

    So men (like always) have to take the first step. What a hypocritical fucking bitch you are, Female. Completely full of shit and conviction just like always.

    -Dick

    I didn’t say men have to take the first step DICK, but now that you mention it, I can imagine that if they actually did approach and consistently treat women with respect, then they would have a 50/50 chance of receiving it back in kind (depends on the phase of the moon, of course).

    If men approach like a drunken yob or boring, narcissist wanker, I can guarantee you they will not earn any respect or man points, but whatever, we live in free and easy times and men no longer think they have to be respectful. Funny then that it is the men who complain (see: turn into fucking clown shoes) when women become aggressive towards them for treating them as nothing but a second class citizen. Women getting pissed off and demanding to be treated better than a whore, occurs quite naturally in response to a man’s disrespect. Principle of complementarity at work. Look it up. Sorry, forgot you can’t read good yet. I’ll try and summarise this for you in kiddie speak.

    You complain about having to approach a woman respectfully.
    You complain about women responding rudely to rude men.
    You complain about all women being ‘whores’ these days.
    You seem to want to return to the 1950’s.
    When men approached women respectfully.

  3. Christian J Says:

    Dick,

    there must have been something in your comment that allowed the mule to head off in it’s own direction again.

    Bugger, one day it will actually GET IT.

  4. Female Says:

    wolfe said:

    Female, there is much of merit in your post of 7:10pm, and even more in what Geeza quotes.
    [blockquote removed]
    is excellent advice. All should heed it, even its author. Especially, if I may say, its author.

    -wolfe

    Hmmm, considering this is my own advice, don’t you think I do and have implemented it? As the change in my posts made no difference to responses I received back, other than make them worse, this had lead me to believe that it really doesn’t matter on this website how a women behaves. The men here want a woman to rant at. They seem to have confused me for far too long with one of thesehttp://www.superdairyboy.com/Toys/Bop_Bags/Dog.html

  5. wolfe Says:

    Yes and no. Honestly Female, you do have “the chip”. That having been said, you’re totally right that many (including now and then me, though not now) have taken quite against you.

    Tell you what. I will — IF Dick permits me to (it’s his site) — give you a thread in the Politik forum.

    As long as you are rational, polite and respectful, you can say what you want in that thread and if anyone unreasonably trashes you I will stop them from doing so.

    I’ll give you an example: your typical post “men sux0rz wahhh they are bad” (sorry, honestly this is the way you do often appear here). vs. “Hey guys, here’s a cool study that shows male chimps “pay” to see pictures of female chimps in heat.” blah blah. The first is crap; the second (to refer to a post you made) is kinda cool. Oddball, but cool.

    You can’t claim “men are stupid” in your post, you have to pretend to be your sister getting the PhD. On the other hand, men can’t simply trash you as “female you evil slag, you sux”. I’ll stop both.

    That’s as fair as I can attempt to offer. (I think Dick will permit me to, but no guarantees. His site, his rules).

    But you do that in one thread in Politik and you try to engage sensible and honest discussion on gender issues in that thread.

    that’s my offer.
    -wolfe

  6. Geeza Says:

    Female said:

    I didn’t say men have to take the first step DICK, but now that you mention it

    You did not say it, but your words clearly implied it.

    Female said:

    If men treat women without respect, they cannot be expected to be respected in return. Women will simply perceive them as the lowest in the chain of life.

    So its OK for a woman to simply judge a man as the lowest in the chain of life (whatever the fuck that means) without bothering to earn the respect of the man, but the man has to earn the respect of the woman and has no right to judge her.

    Thank you again Female for giving us an example of typical female entitlement mentality.

  7. Female Says:

    Geezer, why don’t you reread my original post. You are too eager to have a rant at me, that is definately clear. If you care to reread my post, you will see that I said that women will perceive a man, basically as scum, IF he treats her with disrespect, not just because he’s a man - as you imply. If anyone around he has a “chip” I think it may be you.

  8. Dick Masterson Says:

    No. It’s you. You’re prejudiced and a typical entitlement bitch. Fuck off.

    -Dick

  9. Female Says:

    What a laugh. If I’m prejucided, what the hell are you, other than a gormless prick? If you want me to be gone, just ban me!!!!!

  10. Dick Masterson Says:

    Typical woman. Asking — nay, begging for a man to abuse her or restrict her rights. Then it’s straight to the Birkenstocks, right?

    Horseshit.

    -Dick

  11. Female Says:

    Have you got Tourette’s?

  12. Female Says:

    wolfe said:

    Yes and no. Honestly Female, you do have “the chip”. That having been said, you’re totally right that many (including now and then me, though not now) have taken quite against you.

    Okay, while I still don’t appreciate the “chip” slur, you’re entitled to your opinion and I appreciate your honesty in admitting the men’s and your past attitude towards me.

    As long as you are rational, polite and respectful, you can say what you want in that thread and if anyone unreasonably trashes you I will stop them from doing so.

    Very chivalrous of you, I have put my response to a similar comment of yours along these lines, in the forum thread.

    I’ll give you an example: your typical post “men sux0rz wahhh they are bad” (sorry, honestly this is the way you do often appear here).

    OMG LOLZ, I think this is a bit of an exaggeration.

    On the other hand, men can’t simply trash you as “female you evil slag, you sux”. I’ll stop both.

    Cool.

    But you do that in one thread in Politik and you try to engage sensible and honest discussion on gender issues in that thread.

    Okay, well I will try and stick to these groundrules but sometimes I may feel like playing…..pity most men here don’t have a sense of humour.

  13. wolfe Says:

    Female said:
    Okay, while I still don’t appreciate the “chip” slur

    It isn’t a slur. Seriously.

    OMG LOLZ, I think this is a bit of an exaggeration.

    OK, sure, I’ll grant you that with a wry grin. (But please take me seriously on the comment above that it is NOT a slur).

    Okay, well I will try and stick to these groundrules but sometimes I may feel like playing…..pity most men here don’t have a sense of humour.

    No one gets to play there. You don’t; they don’t. See the thread.
    -wolfe

  14. Geeza Says:

    Female said:

    Geezer, why don’t you reread my original post.

    Because there is no need. You pretty much write the same rubbish whenever you post. Watch this space.

    You are too eager to have a rant at me, that is definately clear.

    And who would know more about ranting than you. I think you rant here with more frequency and volume than anyone else. So if you get rants in return. Deal with it, dont cry about it.

    If you care to reread my post, you will see that I said that women will perceive a man, basically as scum, IF he treats her with disrespect, not just because he’s a man - as you imply.

    I dont need to reread your posts because you just said it again!

    If a woman is treated by a man with disrespect, she will percieve him as scum.

    Yet you also said:

    if you want to change the way someone is treating you, you might try changing the manner in which you are viewing that person. If men treat women without respect, they cannot be expected to be respected in return.

    So what you have said again is that men have to make the effort of earning the respect of the women, and women will simply judge a mans behavior and react. Women have no need to earn the respect of men, they should be respected for being women anyway.

    If anyone around he has a “chip” I think it may be you.

    Yes you believe that dear if it makes you feel better. I’d rather be percieved as having a chip on my shoulder than be perceived as being full of shit.

  15. Female Says:

    Geeza said:

    So what you have said again is that men have to make the effort of earning the respect of the women, and women will simply judge a mans behavior and react. Women have no need to earn the respect of men, they should be respected for being women anyway.

    I didn’t actually say that, but read into it whatever fits in line with your pre-conceptions. My thinking is along the lines that a man wouldn’t really approach a women unless she had already earned his respect. If his respect is for her legs or chest, then that’s what it is.

    I’d rather be percieved as having a chip on my shoulder

    Oh good, cause that’s how I perceive you.

    Been for a spin on a dolphin yet?

  16. wolfe Says:

    My thinking is along the lines that a man wouldn’t really approach a women unless she had already earned his respect. If his respect is for her legs or chest, then that’s what it is.

    That is either the most cunning thing you have said, or the most incredibly stupid.

    Currently, I am leaning to it being both. (NB- cunning intelligent). You can do much better, though it’s an interesting point of departure for an argument. Albiet a depressing one, which is why I guess I’m a bit down on you for it.

    The chip thing. Seriously, you’ve got it. He doesn’t. Maybe it’s your age (uniquely, of all men here, I don’t think it’s solely your gender that gives you the ‘chip’ though that’s a huge factor). Everything you post is a giant neon sign saying “Hello, Chip On Shoulder Here”.

    -wolfe

  17. wolfe Says:

    Bah, I will lose man points by posting after myself. So be it. For “(NB-cunning intelligent)” please read “(NB-cunning is not the same thing as intelligent). I used ‘greater than’ and ‘less than’ signs to state non equality; they worked fine in preview, but were eaten once I posted.
    -growly wolfe

  18. Female Says:

    wolfe said:

    [blockquote removed]

    That is either the most cunning thing you have said, or the most incredibly stupid.

    Why don’t you say why you think it’s cunning or stupid.

    The chip thing. Seriously, you’ve got it. He doesn’t. Maybe it’s your age (uniquely, of all men here, I don’t think it’s solely your gender that gives you the ‘chip’ though that’s a huge factor).

    You don’t know my age. Take a guess. I’ll be honest and let you know if right or wrong.

    Everything you post is a giant neon sign saying “Hello, Chip On Shoulder Here”.

    Not like it’s provoked or anything. Should I have thanked him for telling me I was full of shit, then?

  19. wolfe Says:

    I’d start with “My dear”, but you would not unreasonably interpret that as condescending. Believe it or not, it wouldn’t be. So please consider this communication started with a pleasantry that you like.

    On the cunning vs stupid thing, I think you’re missing the point. What you’ve said is very subtle on one level but also very stupid on another. I would like to think you intended at least the former effect, but your response makes me wonder.

    Why? OK. On the cunning part, yes, a man wouldn’t approach a woman he didn’t respect. Fine.

    On the cunning AND stupid part, you break down respect to a woman’s legs and chest. This of course devalues both men and women (doubly). Women are devalued because they respond to such an approach (and because they are presumed to be valued in that way). Men are devalued because of course we evaluate in that superficial manner.

    Look, Female, there is no doubt that some men value women only in that way. What’s worse is this (and this is the heart of the cunning bit): Some women like being valued in that way. (No, I’m serious, and I don’t think you intended this meaning, but it’s true nonetheless). I wouldn’t if I were female, and you probably don’t (I don’t know, but if you’re more attractive than you are intelligent, who knows).

    On your age? I dunno about 33 plus or minus two?

    Not that it’s provoked? No, you could just be nicer. Seriously.
    -wolfe

  20. Female Says:

    wolfe said:

    I’d start with “My dear”, but you would not unreasonably interpret that as condescending. Believe it or not, it wouldn’t be. So please consider this communication started with a pleasantry that you like.

    Thanks for the pleasantry, but I think your reading of Geeza’s use of it is wrong.

    Why? OK. On the cunning part, yes, a man wouldn’t approach a woman he didn’t respect. Fine.

    I’m surprised you agree with that, especially considering I argued only a day or two ago that admiration for (men’s) looks doesn’t equal respect (from a female). Are you saying this is wrong when applied to men and that for men admiration = respect towards qualities of physical attractiveness?

    Men are devalued because of course we evaluate in that superficial manner.

    Yes it’s surface superficial, but it’s human nature. Besides, apart from perceptions of Jake Gyllenhaal and Angelina Jolie, most people differ in who they find attractive.

    Look, Female, there is no doubt that some men value women only in that way. What’s worse is this (and this is the heart of the cunning bit): Some women like being valued in that way. (No, I’m serious, and I don’t think you intended this meaning, but it’s true nonetheless).

    I am fully aware of this.

    I wouldn’t if I were female, and you probably don’t (I don’t know, but if you’re more attractive than you are intelligent, who knows).

    Pot shot insult at my intellect. Yes it is.

    On your age? I dunno about 33 plus or minus two?

    Sorry, no.

    Not that it’s provoked? No, you could just be nicer. Seriously.

    Yes I could be.

Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 »

Leave a Reply


Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis