http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-c0YIzYz1RE&feature=related

I see it like this.

wow its clear that the boys on this site know nothing about girls!!!!……so many assumptions

I think that Wolfe and Female should get married. Look how thye love each other and compliment each other ad nauseum. I don’t know if a marriage between two gay people from different genders qualify as a gay marriage, but it’s not a straight marriage either. It would be the first recorded case of a faggot and a dyke tying the knot. How lovely!

P Coderch

And it is now added. Thank you, Geeza.

(http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/forums/post-186.html#186)
-wolfe

Geeza, I think that’s partially covered by

3. A woman exists in the now. As such, to her, actions have no predictable consequences and words mean whatever she wishes them to mean at the moment.

Granted, she may be deliberately talking nonsense, which is something I hadn’t considered. If so, that perhaps would be a corollary of the fourth law,

4. The LL law: Women are easily offended by what they perceive as oral or written assaults on their femininity, intelligence, or other attributes, and respond entirely out of proportion, demonstrating near total ignorance, thereby reinforcing the notion that they are stupid beyond belief.

I therefore propose the Geeza corollary:

When a woman has lost an argument, she shall start talking complete nonsense.

-wolfe

Female said:

How do you know that? How many of your friends might one day choose to nudge a bomb, rather than glide straight past one? How will we ever know if it was accidental or deliberate? Aside from jet-ski’s and terrorists, dolphins can also turn themselves into sushi.

You’ve just added a new female law to debating with a male:

Stage 3.3) When you have lost an argument, start talking complete nonsense.

Geeza said:

Interesting article. You should actually read it sometime. The dolphins arent suicide bombers.

How do you know that? How many of your friends might one day choose to nudge a bomb, rather than glide straight past one? How will we ever know if it was accidental or deliberate? Aside from jet-ski’s and terrorists, dolphins can also turn themselves into sushi.

wolfe said:
On the plus side, she is actually somewhat smarter than most here think she is, so she may well come out with some worthwhile comments.
-wolfe

The way she goes on and on, probability alone dictates that she will eventually come up with something worthwhile……even if its just by accident.

Its just that your posts go round in circles

Amen, Brother.

Dolphins turn themselves into Jet Skis???

She deserves that, alas. Well done.

Old one said (see above):

One must assume then that one of these is a lie.

Yeah. I’m afraid I reluctantly believe Female is lying about her age. Kinda sad.

Her mismatched condescension also troubles me. Oh well, so be it. On the plus side, she is actually somewhat smarter than most here think she is, so she may well come out with some worthwhile comments. She’s also not evil.
-wolfe

Female said:

Geezer, you don’t interpret the meaning of my posts correctly.

Oh I do. Its just that your posts go round in circles without going anywhere. This normally happens when you are trying to prove a point which is pointless. Feminazis typically do this when they bark about equality and then apply different rules to men and women.

Female said:

Unfortunately for some men, they think that just because they have some talent, or looks, or money, that this is enought to earn a woman’s respect. This is false.

Female said:

“My thinking is along the lines that a man wouldn’t really approach a women unless she had already earned his respect. If his respect is for her legs or chest, then that’s what it is.”

Note the use of the word “if” which is used to imply a possibility, not a definitive.

Whether you use “if” as a posibility or a definitive is immaterial. You cannot even bear to think about the possibility of women actually having to earn respect.

A woman not wanting to take responsibilty. Now where have I heard that before.

Female said:

I haven’t seen one of those dolphin convertibles yet, but did you know they can also turn themselves into suicide bombers. I hope you don’t take your test-drive on one of those…

http://espn.go.com/outdoors/general/news/2003/0327/1530384.html

Interesting article. You should actually read it sometime. The dolphins arent suicide bombers. They aid the navy in detecting mines. But seriously….

Dolphins turn themselves into Jet Skis???

Geezer, you don’t interpret the meaning of my posts correctly. Either this is because you are distracted/biased/whatever, by your hateful feelings towards me or you are simply a poor reader. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and believe it’s the former, rather than the later.

If you are a poor reader, I apologise and would like to direct your attention to the following:

“My thinking is along the lines that a man wouldn’t really approach a women unless she had already earned his respect. If his respect is for her legs or chest, then that’s what it is.”

Note the use of the word “if” which is used to imply a possibility, not a definitive.

You also seemed to miss my discussion with wolfe about this point above. We both already decided admiration was distinct from respect, from the point of view of both sexes. In the words of oldone, “do try to keep up dear.”

PS: I haven’t seen one of those dolphin convertibles yet, but did you know they can also turn themselves into suicide bombers. I hope you don’t take your test-drive on one of those…

http://espn.go.com/outdoors/general/news/2003/0327/1530384.html

oldone, I understand if you are too nervous to dispute valid points with me. I also know you have a real interest in non-sequiturs, but just so you know, I would have confirmed my age had wolfe’s guess been correct. I was even generous to indicate a second time whether his second assumption was right or wrong. There the only guesses I’m going to allow or respond to. Like I said, the topic is now closed.

Oldone said:

Female said: “You don’t know my age. Take a guess. I’ll be honest and let you know if right or wrong.”

and again a short while later: “a woman does not reveal her age.”

One must assume then that one of these is a lie. Thus, as one cannot debate a liar, for all credibility of words is gone, to debate you is pointless since your words cannot be trusted. I believe that would be check mate, then men are victorious once more.

If you are saying it is redundant to debate her, then I guess the following is also irrelevant.

I believe that would be check mate, then men are victorious once more.

Oldone said:

One must assume then that one of these is a lie. Thus, as one cannot debate a liar, for all credibility of words is gone, to debate you is pointless since your words cannot be trusted. I believe that would be check mate, then men are victorious once more.

Sorry Oldone I missed your post.

You are of course right. Still, its fun to see Female post full of defiance while waving her little feminazi flag and then gradually see her disappear down the big hole that she has dug for herself.

Female said:

My thinking is along the lines that a man wouldn’t really approach a women unless she had already earned his respect. If his respect is for her legs or chest, then that’s what it is.

Ah yes, you should try thinking sometime. But all you are doing now is desperately trying to conjure up a get out clause as you have posted yourself into a corner as usual. Your babblespeak translated into English reads:

A woman feels that she has already earned the respect of a man who approaches her, simply by the fact that he finds her attractive.

So by that argument if a woman is approached by a guy who stares at her cleavage and thinks to herself ‘Gee, this guy really respects me’, what sort of respect does such a woman deserve?

The answer is that she deserves about as much respect as someone who is dumb enough to confuse physical attraction with respect.

Been for a spin on a dolphin yet?

Nope. I’ve never come across one that turned into a Jet-Ski.

Should I have thanked him for telling me I was full of shit, then?

No need to thank me for pointing out the obvious.

Female said: “You don’t know my age. Take a guess. I’ll be honest and let you know if right or wrong.”

and again a short while later: “a woman does not reveal her age.”

One must assume then that one of these is a lie. Thus, as one cannot debate a liar, for all credibility of words is gone, to debate you is pointless since your words cannot be trusted. I believe that would be check mate, then men are victorious once more.

Female said:

Not like it’s provoked or anything. Should I have thanked him for telling me I was full of shit, then?

Yes, and you are. The giant neon sign that says “Chip on her shoulder!” is spot on as well, wolfe. Nicely done.

-Dick

not as lame as

Woman said:
That is a [sic] totally lame!

A woman does not reveal her age? That is a totally lame!

You assume wrong. This topic is no longer open for discussion, a woman does not reveal her age.