Ask Dick: What’s The Deal With Transexuals?
The following question was sent to me by a reader, darzie:
I have an Ask Dick question.
What’s the deal with gals who try to turn themselves into guys? Female to Male transsexuals is the term. Do they count as men?
Well, darzie, you certainly do have an Ask Dick question. Lucky for you, I have a Dick Answer.
Men are better than women at being transsexuals and also at being gay. It’s the same thing anyway.
Here’s an interesting set of scientific Man Facts proving my point. Proving points with science is manly. And gloating about it afterward? That’s so many Man Points you’ll need a Man Bag to carry them all to the Man Bank.
A recent study at the University of East London determined gay men use their brains like women, but also like men. Sex with women may not be a gay’s cup of tea, but apparently using their brains for more than a pillow weight is! Gay women, however (or as I like to call them, fake-biens), are unable to jump start their pudding-brains into any kind of man mode at all. Color me unsurprised.
“Gay men adopt male and female strategies. Therefore their brains are a sexual mosaic,” says a doctor who is probably a man. “As we expected, straight men used more compass directions than gay men or women, and used distances as well…but gay men recalled more landmarks than straight men, as well as using typically male orientation strategies.”
The study goes on to say that women, even when gay, are out of brain-gas before the garage of life is even open.
Men are better than women at directions and are therefore better than women at life. What’s more important in life than knowing where the fuck you are? You can probably think of something, but that’s only because you’re a man and men can do anything.
Women use landmarks when giving and following directions. Landmarks like, “Turn left where my husband yelled at me last week,” and, “Remember that coffee commercial in the 80’s with those whores reminiscing about ski trips and shit? I wish Starbucks sold Sex-achinos!”
Sex-achinos. That’s real fucking useful on the road. It’s also not a landmark and yet another account of charitable men bending the fuck over backwards to convince women they’re not completely useless.
A friend of mine has a favorite saying that’s appropriate here. “You can’t polish a turd.” I don’t know where he learned it, probably from another man. That’s how wisdom is passed down through the ages. One man tells a younger man who tells a younger man and so on. That’s how we have rocket ships and penicillin and not donkey carts and Syphilis — because of men. Women keep any wisdom they manage to scrape together locked up in their rusty minds like it’s their pin number. I guess grandmothers just love watching young women fuck up too much to every once in a while say, “Hey, sweetheart, shut the fuck up while men are talking. You’ll learn this in twenty years if you’re lucky, but you don’t actually know a goddamn thing. That’s for men to do.”
Female to Male transsexuals are not men. They’re just the same old bullshit with a new coat of paint. If you think that makes you a man, I’ve got a brand new Ferrari to sell you. I painted it on the side of a sack of shit.
Since When Do Brains Mean Anything?
Related Articles:
Pages: [2] 1 » Show All
I am a transsexual.When I was 25 years old(20 years ago) I had a sex change operation and became a woman.I did it because I felt women were treated better and had better clothes .Society was extremely cruel towards me and I lost everything I had because of it.women are cruel and vain and look at men as atm machines. I like women so I guess that makes me a lesbian.I am not dressing like a woman because of societys abuse towards me.legally I am a woman.It says so on my drivers license .
A friend of mine gave me a t-shirt that says I have the pussy so i make the rules.I am famous so everyone knows who and what I am so I am discriminated against alot.I am an EMT and I am having trouble trying to join a volunteer first aid squad because they dont want people like me .I felt like a girl all my life.
you make me laugh you faggot first off a sex change cannnot change who you really are A MAN second off your not a queer because you a boy who like woman
Im not a faggot you moron.I am a beautiful woman
You don’t decide if you are “beautiful” to men or not.
MEN DO.
Cute try though sweety.
Claud. What does it say is your gender on your birth cerificate? You’re a male to female trans gender and you like women. Kind of proves my vieww on this subject. Plastic surgeons who do this op’ are ghouls who would likely have done business with Burke and Hare. This should have stayed with your psychiatrist where it belonged.
Claud you think you’re the only one who been thru some shit growing up?!!!?! OMG why did you even come on here with this bullshit?! Nothing in life should push a man to change who he is or was made to be! Only a weak person would do that. MEN, I repeat, MEN are in control of their own environment. Anyone else who reads this(especially men) would agree. When having problems in your environment you can either change it(even if it means kicking some ass) or evade it. You’ve got sanity issues thinking it’s better to be a woman.
{{women are cruel and vain and look at men as atm machines}}
And that’s what you wanted to be? God made you a man for a reason. Changing your gender is your way of saying He(God) didn’t know what he was doing! How dare you!! Actually,Truthfully I feel sad for you, because the pride that once hung from your crotch area is gone forever. What a waste.
I love this website! I don’t care if this website is Real or “Borat-Real”. Either way it is funny, hilarious, and true! Mr. Dick Masterson, you are a God among Men!
This article is great, and so are all the others!
DICK MASTERSON IS A QUEER. DC FAG!!!!
Dick your probably a tranny. That or you just don’t have a penis. COCK MUNCHING FAGGOT!!!
http://singleabroad.com
Textbook example of your ungrateful, dull western girly-girl. I assure you she is above knowledge of any field, just look at her postings. She’s too stupid to even begin to comprehend what humor is – she’s almost subhuman. I suppose relying on your body as a substitute for your character does that to you. She’ll never know what it feels like to be respected like Teddy Roosevelt, to actually contribute something worth meaning as opposed to being a social parasite.
Shame.
stupid fags
You make no sense
So, according to Dick, men are much better at sucking cock than women?
This site is um, interesting. I had no idea there were so many of you Manly Gay Men out there who are so obsessed with women that you would dedicate an entire site to it!
Maybe this was true way back but affirmative action has ruined that for many. Kuntz rule.
To be clear, level of intellect has only a loose correlation with level of education. It is not feasible to be a moron and have a PhD from a reputable university; it is certainly feasible to be of mediocre intellect and have a PhD, or a brilliant genius and have no degree.
The statement that I think confused matters was:
I agree; it’s poorly written. My only defense is that I quoted it; a poor defense. What that statement means to me is… “a level said to correspond with people generally capable of getting first class degrees.” And that’s all I intended.
I’m actually skeptical of that book. After all, a coloring book, with paint by numbers shows (with numbers!) how to paint pictures. That doesn’t make it an authority. Much of what’s been written on the subject of IQ (on either side) is rubbish.
Suffice to say, though, that I agree with the premise that someone who works hard at a job is more likely to succeed than a somewhat more intelligent (or better connected) person who doesn’t.
-wolfe
Actually, I think you’re misreading something I quoted, though I agree it’s not terribly clear. To be clear, level of intellect has only a loose correlation with level of education. It is not feasible to be a moron and have a PhD; it is certainly feasible to be of mediocre intellect and have a PhD, or a brilliant genius and have no degree.
The statement that I think confused matters was:
It is amusing that you should mention this – my neighbour is currently reading a management/psychology book that shows (with numbers) that how good someone is at their job, and how far they’ve gone is completely unrelated to IQ (past a certain barrier level of say 120 for scientists). On the other hand, it’s very much related to how much time a person puts into work.
Common sense really!
I agree with abaddon. Too many women are ignorant airheads who think a college degree makes you honest. Quite the opposite.
@wolfe:
The only problem that I have with your argument, is that you equate the level of stupidity with the level of education.
-Strength and Honor-
(And presumably far more highly stupid men at the bottom end than there are highly stupid women). I disgree.
- There have been many intelligent men who didn’t graduate high school who achieved great things. Ever heard of a woman doing that without education?
IQ has much to do with schooled knowledge and there are many with book knowledge that have no walking around sense.
Women doing the same work as man is a fallacious fantasy of the feminist and other women who hate truth.
@Alex: you’re conflating and confusing a distribution of intelligence with average intelligence differences. You are also, I believe, mistaken on one assumption, as follows.
No, most men and women with the same occupation don’t generally work equally hard at outside-the-home jobs, in terms of continuous full-time employment. Statisticians normalize for this, and the 33% difference drops to between 0 and 5% when you account number of years of full-time work.
(I make no comment as to which gender ‘works harder’ inside the home).
Women typically take time out for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is pregnancy and child rearing.
Beyond even that, just look at the sub-specialties that men and women go into even when they have nominally identical educations. Female med students disproportionately become GP’s, or, if the specialize, become (say) allergenists, dermatologists, rather than oncologists or cardiac surgeons.
Look at professionals who work unpaid overtime. Unless a woman is unmarried, she is unlikely to work anywhere near the overtime of her male colleagues.
[NB- Never-married women outearn never-married men. This is interesting, and suggests men who don't marry don't work as hard].
The former specialties offer much more predictable hours and far fewer emergencies.
—————-
As to intelligence, the average man is not that much smarter than the average woman; correct.
However, the standard deviation for men’s intellects appears to be substantially higher than that for women. To put it another way (I don’t know how familiar with statistics you are), there are far more highly intelligent men than there are highly intelligent women. (And presumably far more highly stupid men at the bottom end than there are highly stupid women).
Richard Lynn and Paul Irwing analyzed decades worth of standardized testing in British schools, and came up with this peer-reviewed conclusion:
[quote]There were twice as many men [as women] with IQ scores of 125, for example, a level said to correspond with people getting first-class degrees.
At scores of 155, associated with genius, there were 5.5 men for every woman. [/quote]
One obviously can argue about how generally applicable or accurate or culturally biased their study was. Fair enough. One can also argue about how relevant IQ’s are, though the US Armed Forces find them invaluable as a predictive tool, and most non-crazed Marxist studies have tended to conclude that there is validity, provided the test is sound. (Many, especially historically, weren’t).
Now. It is the nature of our society and capitalism to value and compensate high achievers much, much more highly than average or low achievers.
This may not be ‘fair’, especially in the sense that many start with ‘unfair’ genetic or social advantages, but it is nevertheless the case.
If there are twice as many men as women with the intellectual capacity to get first class degrees (and they are paid triple the average salary, say), then one can rapidly see that one would expect men, on average, to out earn women by considerably more than (say) 3-6%.
(Assuming of course income tracks to intellect — and it doesn’t, quite, but that’s not infinitely far off either).
What about the low end? Well, there are still dirty jobs that may not require much intellect but require strength; these tend to be reasonably compensated.
A stupid woman (outnumbered, likely, by stupid men) who is not physically strong, has fewer high earning employment options unless she is physically attractive and young.
Hopefully that gives you an outline of my thinking on the matter, and why I think a 33% disparity is not prima facie evidence of sexist unfairness. (It may be unfair in other societal ways, of course, and I’ve also generally outlined many of the possible logical counterarguments to my thinking on the matter above).
Best,
-wolfe
@ Wolfe- You yourself admit that men are not “much smarter”, the average IQ difference is only 3-6 points. Also, a man and a woman with the same occupation will usually work as hard (because the nature of their work is the same), so there should be no pay difference. For males to earn 33% more is quite a difference (although I’m assuming that statistic refers to the average salary of men and women, not the average salary of men and women within the same occupation).
Why not take that argument the illogical step further? What if they’re the real women?
- Los Paraguayos – Ave Maria
The greatest male privilege is the privilege of spelling correctly.
Leaving that remark aside, male privilege:
- to die years younger.
- to be much smarter, and harder working, but only earn 33% more.
- to be rooked on social security, getting $0.37 out for every dollar women get out.
- to be drafted
- to be the number one victims of violence
- the number 1 victims of gender violence
- yet endlessly falsely accused of rape and DV, especially in custody disputes
- to have the deck stacked totally against them in custody and family courts.
Yes… please tell me more of this male ‘privilege’.
-wolfe