Keep The Camping To Purse Sales
Men are much better than women at camping. In fact, women are so bad at it, that there’s almost nothing as unpleasant as camping with a woman.
Except maybe one thing.
Camping with two women.
Women are full of shit. They shirk the equality curtain when it fits like a snake shedding its skin, and in the case of why women can’t do things like camping, construction working, or cigarette smoking worth a damn, they run the princess game faster than Logan. It’s a bunch of shit though. See, you can tell immediately because a woman is saying it.
The dirt and the infrequent showers have nothing to do with why women hate camping. Imagine this if you will.
You’ve accidentally locked yourself inside a shitty motel room in some hick town because you dropped a suitcase on the door knob and broke it off — accidentally. The only thing in the room for entertainment is a television set. Then it turns out that, oh great, some prick broke the television set.
Does that sound like fun? No fucking way. If you weren’t a man that kind of thing would reduce you to a babbling, neurotic mess within an hour. That’s why women behave like shrill disasters when they are taken camping; because nature is a woman’s Podunk, locked-in motel room and her mind is a broken television set.
How many women philosophers have there been? There has never been one, because not only do philosophers have to buy their own bullshit (and no woman ever has ever believed a word she said), but they also have to be alone with their thoughts for longer than the four seconds it takes a woman to say, ‘Not tonight I’m tired,’ and then pass out on the bigger half of the bed.
To all the young men out there — and I see this all the time, if you’re holding out for a woman who can go camping with you or some other klepto-crazy shit like play video games with you or what have you, I have one piece of advice. Why hold out for one? Why not just hold out for two…or a dozen?
Fuck, the sky’s the limit in fantasy land where a woman can go camping without embarrassing herself and everyone she’s with.
Related Articles:
September 27th, 2005 at 6:24 am - IP Man-Hash: 681f2e2cfc31a
Where are the five answers, Jack? Come on, you know that incorrect does not an answer be.
September 27th, 2005 at 9:11 am - IP Man-Hash: 56806c0431943
I was at school when these comments were posted. So unless someone broke into my house posing as a guy named Jack pretending to be me then Dick is lying. That or he has no ability to check IP and is insulting any man with a brain.
September 27th, 2005 at 10:20 am - IP Man-Hash: e2bdae6dd4ca9
Nicole, do you have an alibi? Didn’t you once pretend to be your own father on this site?
September 27th, 2005 at 11:30 am - IP Man-Hash: 56806c0431943
An alibi?
I was at school all day.
As already explained. Unlike some of the losers on this site I do not sit at home all day on a computer.
I’ve noticed Dick has put the IP number next to all coments. Not surprisingly mine is different to “Jacks”
You proved your own acusations wrong Dick, lets see if you can admit your mistake.
September 27th, 2005 at 11:55 am - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
Fiction can be fun, Nicole. But I find the reference section much more enlightening.
For instance, if you were to look up MenAreBetterThanWomen.com’s all-time bone head posts:
http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/strangelove/#comment-164
http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/one-in-two-women-is-illiterate/#c omment-163
You would find that the IP Man-Hash’s of your prior posts match perfectly. Meaning that you posted from another computer once before and then used that same computer to post as “Jack” and “Jenny”. Don’t believe me? Click on the IP Man-Hashes for Jack and Jenny yourself and be prepared to be not surprised.
I have exorcized the demon.
-Dick
September 27th, 2005 at 5:48 pm - IP Man-Hash: 681f2e2cfc31a
Thank you, Dick. By the way, could you please acknowledge your opinion on the validity of the so-called answers I’ve asked for? Are they correct if they’re incorrect?
September 27th, 2005 at 5:58 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0e2f2db43d2f0
Ace Ventura, how very mantastic!
September 27th, 2005 at 6:18 pm - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
Correct and incorrect are such manly terms, jason. That’s one of the reasons that women are banned from this site.
Women deal in opinions and magic and fairy tale bullshit so that they can never be labeled or pinned down. It also means they can never have any responsibility or be accountable for absolutely fucking anything.
From a man’s point of view, obviously no none of the answers are valid because Nicole missed the point entirely. From a woman’s point of view however — to use the words of a good friend of mine — “apples are orange!”
-Dick
September 27th, 2005 at 7:21 pm - IP Man-Hash: 681f2e2cfc31a
thank you. I have been taught that, in order to complete a task, it must be completed properly. I’m sure there are women out there who have achieved enormous feats. Women, as a whole, though, have not contributed anything momumental to the furthering of technology, transportation, academics, philosophy, art, poetry, sanitation, medicine, astronomy, government, etc., etc, ad nauseum.
Now, ladies, don’t get me wrong–I know why, and it’s not that you are worthless 9even if I’ve said it jokingly before). You are important in nurturing a family (just as long as a man is present to balance out your hormonally-charged passion). Thanks for all the hard work.
September 27th, 2005 at 8:52 pm - IP Man-Hash: 3f6f1bc89c9c0
“I’ve noticed Dick has put the IP number next to all coments.”
Just to be clear, they are hashes of ips, not ips themselves. It’s an important distinction, but one would have to know what a hash and an ip was before one could make it.
September 28th, 2005 at 6:11 am - IP Man-Hash: 3dddc19b55aad
“Unlike some of the losers on this site I do not sit at home all day on a computer.”
*cough* bullshit *cough*
Nicole; according to these numbers; you’ve submitted more comments than anyone. You might not be sitting at home commenting all the time; but certainly others here have more of a life…
Guess it’s true what Dick says… “Quantity over quality”
September 28th, 2005 at 7:32 am - IP Man-Hash: 3dddc19b55aad
Jason,
I think the mistake was stating that single, isolated examples indicated equal ability overall. Nicole took this litterally; but it logically it shouldn’t be the case. There are always anomolies in any measurement. What’s important is
1) whether the measurements convey what you’re intending to measure
2) whether the anomolies carry any meaning
3) what the overall proportion and trends are.
Nicole seems to be implying that she believes 2) it true and that the presumed meaning is that women have been held back and largely haven’t been able to achieve to their true potential [based on other comments of hers]. (But this is an entire different issue)
September 29th, 2005 at 1:44 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7cafc309a7d82
Just to make one point here about invention, because I keep on hearing about how people - particularly women - have “invented” this and that. We have another example in Nicole’s posting that Sarah Mather received a patent for the “invention” of a submarine telescope and lamp.
Now receiving a patent does not make you an inventor. It just means you took out a patent. Anyone can do this just by putting their name to something that nobody else got their name to first. That “something” can be anything you want; it doesn’t make it an invention. Even if it is an invention, it might be somebody else’s that you just nicked by getting to the patent office first. There have been many examples in history.
Now look. I could sharpen the end of a spoon, use it to dig wax out of my ears, and patent it. There you have it: the patented Parmenter ear de-waxer. Provided nobody else got there first, of course (sorry I didn’t bother to check this). But it doesn’t make me an inventor. All I have done is to take somebody else’s idea and apply it in a different way that nobody else got to yet. If it’s clever and people want to buy it, then I can make money from it. If it’s really clever, everyone might marvel at it and use it to make the world a better place. But there are thousands of patented ideas that are just crummy and not worth the paper they are written on. Like my ear de-waxer.
So I have to take a pinch of salt when I hear about some of these so-called inventions, which are really nothing more than design modifications or different applications of what already exists. I read about a convention for “female inventors” some while back. They were all of this ilk - nothing really original. The ludicrous example that sticks in my mind was the woman who had “invented” a feather duster with an elongated handle for getting into the corner of ceilings. Inventor? Don’t make me laugh.
A real invention represents a leap forward. It is something that did not exist previously in any way shape or form, that nobody would recognise first off because they had not seen the like of it before, and that represents a step change in a particular field. Novelty ear de-waxers and extensions to feather dusters don’t count. Regardless of the patent.
Which brings us to the supposedly inventive Sarah and her submarine lamp and telescope. Let’s allow her to be the person who dreamed up the idea - we can’t be sure, it might have been her dad or her husband who just wanted to be nice to her and let her have the patent; that happens too - so I give her credit for a clever application of somebody’s else’s invention. But at most, that’s all it was. Now if she had been the first person to produce a lamp, or a telescope, then that would make her a real inventor. But finding a novel application for what somebody else had invented, just makes her a novel applicator.
So you have to do better than this, Nicole.
September 29th, 2005 at 7:42 pm - IP Man-Hash: 681f2e2cfc31a
Paul, exactly the point I’ve been trying to drive home–it’s just that women can’t hear what they don’t want to. I said I wanted correct answers–not bullshit answers like I received. Instead, I was told that I should ackowledge said answers as valid. None of her answers were correct, but I’m just supposed to overlook that, right?
September 30th, 2005 at 6:41 am - IP Man-Hash: e2bdae6dd4ca9
The reason that Paul can “drive the point home” so well is that, unlike you, he’s able to present valid argument in an intelligent and reasonable manner.
It makes a very nice change from your endless brown-nosing and Nicole’s increasingly entertaining stupidity.
October 3rd, 2005 at 1:15 pm - IP Man-Hash: e6e8a32757691
Nice reference to Ace Ventura, Dick; a thoroughly male film. That brings me to another point - how often are women quoted? Why the fuck would you ever want to start a book, essay, PHD thesis, or anything worth a shit by quoting a woman? The answer is simple, if your aim was to fail at whatever you set out to achieve. The only reason you would ever want to quote a woman is to illustrate her stupidity.
Done.
October 3rd, 2005 at 1:26 pm - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
Woody, I’ll tell you one quote springs immediately to mind.
“Let them eat cake.”
-Dick
October 4th, 2005 at 6:10 pm - IP Man-Hash: b6c12cbf7c5ae
wasn’t the person that found the cure for polio a woman?
October 4th, 2005 at 6:18 pm - IP Man-Hash: ac62c77584632
Yes it was Joanna Salk. Congratulations.
Your high school history teacher called and said you graduated early. They’re sending your diploma in the post so don’t bother coming in anymore.
-Dick
October 5th, 2005 at 7:56 am - IP Man-Hash: 6a9283bd40454
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aso/databank/entries/dm52sa.html