Cheating Army Wives Deserve the Death Penalty
Women have been cheating on men since the beginning of time. The first woman, Eve, cheated on her man with a snake. That snake’s name was “The Devil”.
A while ago, I was talking to a woman about my “radical” ideas. Men are responsible for every single advancement in human history; the wage gap proves men are better than women because if we were all equal, hiring a woman would be a cheaper alternative to a man and thus an obvious business decision; and it is only through our divine and manly grace that women are allowed to vote, own property, or wear bras. Her response was that I was wrong because the Devil is a man.
I’ll tell you who the real “Devil” is: a cheating marine’s wife.
The cheating wife of a soldier should be dragged into the street and shot.
To make them behave properly, women need more training than a killer whale and more discipline than a sack of lard. You have to whip a sack of lard pretty heavily to turn it into a meringue. If no one’s around to give a woman a condescending eyebrow raise or a disapproving inward breath, she won’t know when she’s fucking up. She’ll walk right off a goddamn cliff because there isn’t a sign on the rail of a cartoon man giving her the Stupid Eye.
During the holiday season several years ago, I overheard the end of a conversation among some women on what to do about a puppy that had been found who the owners were now looking for. One of the little darlings had become so attached to the puppy that she didn’t want to give it back. The consensus was that she didn’t have to. Puppies come with squatter’s rights. I wandered in, fetched a beverage, and give them all a stern look. The consensus was abandoned immediately.
That’s called Penis Power.
The army is a fighting machine and the personification of everything that is excellent and manly about a nation. If a pedophile is harassing your kid, you don’t take that problem to a woman, you take it to a man. Then, the problem disappears. Don’t ask questions if you don’t want to hear about someone getting their teeth stomped into a curb. And don’t watch it on the news, because the news exists to sell tampons.
I don’t get my facts from tampon salesmen.
The army has and always will be a necessity to ensure not just our way of life, but any way of life that doesn’t involve getting a golf club shoved up your ass because you have a plasma television and someone else wants it. The army protects your ass from that, and the only things a soldier should have on his mind while out in the field are: his gun, his ammo, and how best to keep my ass protected while I’m wearing a $10,000 fur coat.
Hoo-ah.
A soldier should not be wondering if his wife is fucking her new man-friend Kalan.
Cheating army wives hinder a thousand soldiers’ ability to get the job done. They are a plague of doubt in an otherwise healthy platoon. They are an act of treason that spreads at the speed of a hilarious internet video. They are a cancerous incarnation of greed and should be punished for it.
If one gets away with it, ten will.
For lack of a faithful wife, the mission was lost. For lack of a mission, the battle was lost. For lack of a battle, the war was lost. For lack of a war, the nation was lost. For lack of a nation, a golf club was shoved up my ass.
Unacceptable.
I’ve met plenty of army wives, and a dangerously high percentage of them were promiscuous little whores. Not promiscuous in action, but in mind. All women are whores. Anyone with a charge card or access to something shiny knows that. And there’s nothing wrong with a woman being a whore. It’s not something she can help.
But pouncing on anything with a cock is something she can help when her husband is thousands of miles away fighting for freedom.
If anyone says a cheating army wife doesn’t deserve the death penalty for the capital crime of treason, then “The Devil” needs to use his dick to turn up the thermostat. Last time I checked, having an affair was as easy to avoid as raping a child or robbing a bank with a parking ticket stapled to your cock.
Just don’t do it.
Cheating is the anti-Nike.
Women need a moral compass for they have not the penis to tell them which way is right. Big Brother needs to be the man while the actual man is overseas kicking ass.
The “right” way is “forward”.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 32 … 19 18 17 16 15 [14] 13 12 11 10 9 … 1 » Show All
Lady XX- I assume there’s a reason you dislike your own gender so much. I’m just wondering what it is.
Why the hell not?
Indeed, and there is no real difference between the two.
I like the fact that this is right on feministing.org’s front page…
“Especially not the faith of those fucking godbag cock-sucking Catholic christofacist cum-covered fuckheads.”
Anti-Catholicism… one of the last accepted forms of bigotry in the Western World.
Anti-Catholic… so fucking cliche. If you don’t like it, don’t be a part of it.
Most anti-catholics couldn’t name five things the church professes and believes in accurately… let alone why it does. It’s so easy just to hate something that they, particularly extreme feminists, do not have the mental capacity or the inclination to understand. We’ve been around for 2000 years, and we’ll be here for another 2000. ;) If we can piss off a bunch of hypocritical femi nazis in that time, that’s just icing on the cake.
Heh, that site’s not real, it’s a parody of the real site, Feministing.COM. It was made by anti-feminists to make fun of feminist blogs.
That is from “feminsting.org” - I am sure there are tons more out there but I cant be bothered to read through womanly drivel.
Oh really?
Look, it’s very simple: the kids popped-out of her pussy, they belong to her and she’s free to destroy her kids however she wants. She drowned her kids using her body and no fuckin’ patriarchy can tell a womyn what not to do with her body. The end.
And what about the husband in all this, huh? It’s his fault for leaving her alone with them! Why the fuck does he get off the hook? Fuckin’ men.
And check-out this vagina warrior: A mother accused of cutting off part of her son’s tongue with hot scissors avoided a 5-year prison sentence and was sentenced to 10 years probation. YES!
It’s about time that fuckin’ kid learned to watch what comes-out of his bandage-filled mouth. That bastard probably learned a well-deserved lesson. In fact, I’m 100% sure that the punishment would’ve been similar if the dad had cut-out his son’s tongue in the same way.
And if the father doesn’t pony-up enough cash to pay for speech-therapy, the mom ought to raise hell!
&
SUPPOSE men can vote for Edwards if they want to, but if I have any say it’ll be the last time those assholes ever get a chance.
If I have any say in the matter, the 2008 election would be the last hurrah of the Patriarchy. No matter how much it hurts.
Perhaps within three years, all men will be barefoot and chained to a stove by their dicks, forced to cook dinner and birth babies until they die? This is EXACTLY the kind of thing that happened to womyn for thousands of years.
Please tell me that isnt “hatespeech” Alex.
@ King Wang- Again, if you have another definition of “trying” in a relationship or “trying” to attract men, share it. We’re obviously working off of different definitions and I can’t respond until you simply state what you mean.
@Mansvoice- I’ve never read anything on Feministing that has promoted violence against men. I don’t even think I’ve even seen anyone post, “women are superior to men” on that site (though I’m sure if I read through every single article and comment I could find something like that). While foolish, it isn’t nearly as extreme, so there’s never been anything so shocking or disturbing to me that I felt compelled to comment.
Wang you complain to goddamn much.
My god you take up more space then most of the women posting here and it is just as pointless.
Seriously you are all getting WAY to bent out of shape over all this. First off if Dick had never intended for this sort of reaction he never would have announced the name of this site on Dr. Phil, a show that is watched mostly by women. He also would be banning the women here if he really wanted to end all of this bickering. He clearly is sitting back and enjoying the whole thing.
This points to him being hypocritical because he has now became the “attention whore” he hates so much in order to boost the views on his web site and make it seem that he is more popular than what he really is. Big fucking shock there.
You all are so damn wrapped up in yourselves that you can’t open your eyes and see the obvious.
BTW, I do agree that cheating army SPOUSES are the scum of the earth. So its not all bad.
There now go and misquote me cause I know it is inevetible.
Nice to have you here. Do sign up for the forums.
.
Lol. LOL. =)
I agree whole heartedly. Many men, women, and most people from my age demographic (18-25) shouldn’t be allowed to vote.
And that is Manly MAN being Man-Fuckin’-'Tastical.
’nuff said.
If you wish to stand on the moral high ground, feminist.org is THAT way -> http://www.feministing.org
Since when? Who?
One word: hypocrite.
Then you havent been to as many feminist sites as you like to think.
Since when? Who? Again, you said that they are “crazy”, arent there always “crazy” posters around.. even amongst feminist forums? No?
Many many women need to make themselves worthy of the right to vote and the same probably goes with many men as well.
Disagreed.
Agreed.
You are shocked because this site threatens you and your beliefs. Women must win, they MUST have that last word. Well, not on this site.
Your entire defense revolves only around your ability to stick in that trench with no defense at all………
Again, your inability to understand is the whole point, not bringing a fucking egg-salad sandwich to your hard dick. Give me a break.
You have to be nuts. Figuratively, because only literally do men have them.
You take anything I say, and work it out to fit your bill, namely, to fit your expostulations that you are indeed, great. You say it time and again, over and over, and then jump backwards in your own argument to say “I don’t get it”.
We understand, you don’t. And instead of FURTHERING the argument, you simply rehash the argument, even on points already taken care of.
I don’t give a fuck about your relationships, I really don’t. It has absolutely NOTHING to do with my point, it is only the vehicle to get you there. Pick someone here and ASK them what they think and they will be very close to hitting you on your nail head. Yes, it is that easy, whether you like it or not changes not a whit whether truth is present. I have yet to ignore you, I don’t ignore potholes either…….then again, screaming at a rock doesn’t do much for me…….
As per Game Rule #55 of the Womens’ Argument Manual………you addressed exactly jack and shit on anything I said.
Granted, now you did what you intended to do, which is get EVERYONE so deep into your ass they can tell the last time you gargled with Gin.
I can truly say you are good at one thing: Pissing people off.
Btw, feministing.org promotes violence and sexism towards men. Why dont you preach your sermon to them? Why not? Because deep down like all feminist, you are a sexist at heart. Yeah.
Equality? You dont demand it, silly. You ask for it. If we feel like giving it to you, we will. If not, too bad. Afterall, its men who make the decisions. Or in your case, you desperately want us to accept equality which we dont and/or wont.
Alex, way to blow things out of proportion. I cant remember many(or any) men advocating rape or violence towards women. I seriously doubt it. Infact, Clair once advocated rape on myself. Did I take it sooooo seriously and emotionally? Of course not.
Sure, a ton of the things here are being said in a serious manner. This site is no joke, thats for sure… but that doesnt mean that it promotes misogynist behaviour. God…
@ Probs A Girl- You’re right in that Dick himself probably won’t have much of an effect on any laws (but he is a lawyer, so hey, who knows.) I do think he’ll have an effect on many of the men, particularly the younger ones, who read this site however. I don’t think any hateful influence is a good one. Whether or not any particular man will read this site and treat women poorly because of it, who knows, but as I said, hate is a harmful thing and I feel a need to comment when I hear it.
I comment on the site in spite of it bothering me because I find the issues discussed interesting (as I’ve said, I do agree with some of the things said here), so I pitch in my two cents about both what I think has truth to it and what I think is simply hateful.
@ King Wang- Jesus. I never said I was “great” or special or anything gelse. You claimed I put no effort into relationships. I simply responded by saying that I do. Plenty of people do, that doesn’t make me special or great. Do you need specifics of what I do in relationships? I’ve taken care of my boyfriends when they’re sick. My last boyfriend was extremely busy with classes and work one day, so I bought him lunch and brought it to his work because he didn’t have time to get it himself. I’m supportive of what they need and want to be happy. I consciously try to make them feel good about themselves. If you have some other definition of what “trying” is, feel free to share it, or ignore me if you want.
Lady XX- Again I have to ask why you are so hostile towards women.
As for everything else, I wasn’t trying to impress anyone and I certaintly wasn’t advertising myself. I am ONLY defending myself against insults and accusations, which I’ve explained before. King Wang said me and Jenn were the type of girls who don’t try to look attractive, but rather just insist they are. I said that wasn’t true in my case. I brought up other examples of things I do in relationships.
As for the last paragraph of my previous post, read what I just said to King Wang. I never said anything I did made me great. I was ONLY refuting the claim that I don’t try in relationships. The things that I listed, plenty of girls do. None of it makes me great, it merely means I put effort into relationships.
*AHEM* Allow me to reiterate a few points if I may:
Oh, I’m sorry… I seemed to have posted on a wrong site then. Because it seems to me that this site was ALREADY MADE AND DESIGNED TO DISPARAGE YOU BEASTS. Ugh, are you trying to create some women’s lib movement here? GTFO already.
Holy shit, what is this?! Some sort of classified ad? Why are you even TRYING to impress these guys if you claim to have such disdain towards them?
And lastly let’s go over your last paragraph shall we?:
ARE YOU KIDDING ME? Tell me you’re kidding. Oh please, just tell me you’re tripping on acid or making a joke of this right now. Because after you listed ALL OF THAT CRAP you have the AUDACITY to state the following sentence:
Gentlemen, I present to you all your typical, grade A, ‘typing before thinking’ hypocritical woman in all of her glory.
One word Miss Alex: Unbelievable.
Here we go, again. I bashed your ass twice already, I am fine with doing it again. Like a dog with worms, you just won’t let that fucking biscuit go, no matter how many times I say the same, exact, letter for letter shit, and you still won’t get it.
Let me hit you on the unintelligent part by doing the whole obvious, “Duh, women don’t belong here” and keep moving. Consider it a cursory slap on my part, compelled and obligatory…….et. al.
None of your post says jack or shit. I said you don’t “try”. Yep, I am right. After all, I can and WILL assume that you are a true reflection of your postings. Yep, because after all, you are…………
That leads me to believe that no, you don’t give a shit about anything BUT yourself. In that though, don’t feel bad, narcissistic behaviour is a universal trait………(your post incidentally tells me “I am great, because I do basic humanity shit like respect”, after all, that post is only here to make you look good, obviously, after my original point was made)
In your entire post you didn’t say jack about anyone but yourself, your views, your way, your ideas. Wow. Prove to me any of that was not selfish.
I can go on, and on, and on, and I probably will, but after a while, it is tiresome. Trolls = Headaches.
UNLESS you are being serious. In that case, which I doubt (since you have now changed tactics).
Let me explain life. Yep, it’s a game. You lose, you win, like sex and women. Like guns and bullets, sometimes, you get the shit end of it.
ALL relationships are a game. You do want something right? Your post eluded to it, you SAID it, YOU WANT SOMETHING. Ok, so, in a realtionship, YOU WANT SOMETHING. Cool, like all people, what are you going to pay for it with? You want something from someone else, and probably for free, so what do you do? Hmmmmmm……….let me think……something about sex…………..
The day I truly do believe you are caring towards a man in a relationship is right after you divorce his ass and take his money and kids. Let me put this EXTREMELY straight to you. You DO give a shit, enough to get the ball rolling, and when it doesn’t suit you, paycheck time is here and now.
I have YET to see a truly “caring” woman any more than I have seen that in a man. Why? If you can’t figure out the why for yourself……..fine, fuck it. It is because after all, YOU view the world from YOUR point of view, so literally, you are out to fuck the world for what YOU want in YOUR way.
That includes people, places and things for YOUR usage.
No, you care only until the price is too high, or the irritation is too much.
That, my dear, is humanity. And an easy thing it is.
It matters not at all whether you were insulted or not, but this I can guarantee with the certainty of Socrates beating off on Mount Olympus with his left hand: You showed up and YOU got that ball rolling……….
Amazing, NOW you are “trying” to get along with a man…………..interesting.
My final view/s on this is/are as follows. I say final, because this seems to be turning into an ‘online fight’, and I tend to not partake in those (something about likening them to winning in the Special Olympics, and how it’s not really winning at all).
If you dislike a site, why force yourself to view it, day in, day out, minute after minute, hour after hour? Why depreciate the value of your own life, when you could be doing OTHER things, that would obviously be a) less offensive to you, and b) actually constructive.
Why in the hell would anyone subject themselves to such (apparently) abhorrent, radical views, as are that which can be seen on this site, if it truly offends you??
I mean, do you go on pro-Al Qaeda web pages (and they exist, just so you know), and spam them, with your anti-Islamic-extremist dribble? I don’t condone extremists of any sort, if it endangers the lives of others (which Islamic extremism does), but I don’t unnecessarily walk into a lions den either.
The thing you haven’t yet answered once and I am still not quite grasping is…
Why persist in viewing this webpage, this damning webpage, that obviously makes you angry/mad about its contents??
Furthermore… so what if it’s serious? So what if they’re serious about every single thing they say- so what if Dick wants women that cheat, publicly hanged, so to speak, so what if he thinks they are second class citizens, and shouldn’t vote? SO WHAT? He’s allowed to think whatever the hell he wants to think. His thinking actually DOESN’T hinder your way of life, or mine, or anyone else’s for that matter. Well, I tell a lie- it does affect yours’, but only because you let it- only because you subject yourself to viewing his site, with HIS beliefs, and thus the following men, with likeminded beliefs.
Yet you don’t stop and think… what is Dick in the grand scheme of things? Is he a budding politician, lobbying his way to the presidential candidacy? Do you HONESLY believe that one day; he will obstruct your way of life?
Show me a travesty, acted out against women, one woman, any woman, as a DIRECT consequence of this website, and I am willing to take your self-righteous claims seriously.
-
Before anyone gets lost and side tracked, and all of a sudden all they see in this comment is ‘al qaeda’ and me basically deeming certain people heretics (which I am not, and have not), let me refocus you all with the two main points that reside in this comment.
1. Why subject yourself to viewing this site, as it so obviously offends you?
2. What real, true, PHYSICAL harm has this site elicited?