Children Are Not Pinatas
Click below to get Dick in your Ear and listen to the podcast of this article.
Child abuse is one of the most shepugnant acts of violence known to man. It’s wrong for the same reason it’s wrong to beat up crippled people. They can’t fight back. That’s also why it’s wrong for fat ladies to squeeze themselves into anything that couldn’t be packaged and resold as a tent. No one can fight that.
There should be no size 4, 6, or 8. If you can’t fit into a 2, cut a hole in the bottom of a trash bag and throw yourself away.
All women suffer from a form of female narcissistic personality disorder, FNPD for short. Here are a summary of the symptoms:
1. Being loud and obnoxious.
2. Speaking when they don’t know what the fuck they’re talking about.
3. Beating the shit out of children.
That sums up every woman in the world.
Also: can’t drive for shit.
In the wild animal kingdom, mothers eat their babies all the time. Hamsters do it. So do fe-weasels and woman-guinea pigs. One of my friends had some gerbils when we were younger and it happened right in front of our very own eyes.
Men are better than women.
In a recent study, it was discovered that the wives of American soldiers are twice as likely to beat their kids and four times as likely to neglect them while their husbands are overseas fighting for the freedoms that make that kind of atrocious behavior possible. The neglect I can understand. Women would forget to feed themselves if men weren’t around to take them out. But the abuse?
Just like putting them on a leash, having a man around keeps women in line.
Here are some government statistics that will send you running to the pet store.
Women are 36% more likely to abuse children than men.
41% of child abuse victims were maltreated by mothers acting alone, compared to a low and manly 19% for fathers.
In the age range of 20 to 29, women are twice as likely than men to abuse their children.
Anyone with a penis will tell you that the younger women are, the more abusive and dumber they are. If teenagers had kids more often, child abuse would be so prevalent there would be no more racism. Everyone would just be black and blue.
Here are the results of a study I financed and undertook personally.
100% of women’s bodies turn to shit after they give birth.
I have a friend who would have been a pro footballer except late in a pre-season game, he blew his knee out. It was never the same and he blamed this blown knee for his ruined football career.
Now, if he had had absolutely no other prospects in life, and if he could have given birth to that knee, he might have smacked it around. However, as women so frequently and arrogantly remind us, men can’t give birth.
Men are better than women.
If women were my friend, football was their bodies, and grinning idiot kids were the weak knee that ended an illustrious career as a third stringer, the reasons for women and their out of control child abuse become painfully obvious.
When women aren’t thinking about their ridiculous sexual fantasies, they spend their day either beating children or thinking about beating children. That violence is all they have left after giving birth to a football that ruins their vaginas and turns their C-cups into tube socks. That’s why women in their 20’s beat children at remarkably higher rates. At that age, they have the most to lose.
Just because women can have babies doesn’t mean they should, and it definitely doesn’t mean they should raise them. We don’t put cops in prison. We don’t give fat kids schoolbooks printed on donuts. We don’t dress up in Bid Bird costumes, beat the fuck out of some German shepherds and then drop them off at a kid’s party.
It’s reckless and insane.
Army Child Abuse
Women More Likely To Go To Hell
Women Acting Alone
Women In Their 20’s Are The Worst
Related Articles:
August 14th, 2007 at 7:46 pm - IP Man-Hash: 94b3b6aecd2aa
Ah heck, KellyMac, it’s the internet. Self-respect goes out the window.
So, zogmama, how about it? :)
August 14th, 2007 at 8:01 pm - IP Man-Hash: ae179e9967da1
Yeah, some are widows.
We expected as much.
The internet is just a tool.
August 14th, 2007 at 8:09 pm - IP Man-Hash: 04de1e4af36c0
“I handed Wolfe the laurel (sonyad was in the running), and here you were, all along, zogmama.”
I don’t post here often, because I am a woman and not welcome. I’ve been accused of being male? Hmmm. I wasn’t aware. As for an acolyte, no thanks. To be honest, I don’t care for the baiting tone you’ve taken with KellyMac. Granted, the tone of the site engenders (ha) that reaction, but it’s distasteful. I comment (and occasionally post) at wolfe’s site. I’d recommend you check it out before you alienate wolfe with what your comments here. The conversations there center on politics, history, music, and gender. The difference? Women are welcome, if they behave themselves.
August 14th, 2007 at 8:11 pm - IP Man-Hash: 04de1e4af36c0
“Yeah, some are widows.”
Touche. I laughed out loud. I’m neither slut nor widow, though I’ve had fleeting moments of wishing the latter.
August 14th, 2007 at 8:16 pm - IP Man-Hash: 94b3b6aecd2aa
I can change! I know about being appropriate. This site really is a toilet, and that’s why I haven’t been behaving.
I know Wolfe has a good site - that’s why I handed him the laurel. I promise I can act with appropriate decorum.
At least I have the good taste to admire you, eh?
Even though I’ve been spurned as an acolyte, I will hover in your shadow and learn from you anyway?
Sorry I baited you KellyMac.
August 14th, 2007 at 8:28 pm - IP Man-Hash: 94b3b6aecd2aa
This makes me wonder - KellyMac, did you feel baited? You can be cruel to women - I’ve read it. You seemed the type of woman who could take as well as give, so I gave.
I should really just flush now, and go over to your site for tea and conversation.
Crap, is that baiting?
Dang, this sarcasm is going to get me into trouble even when I’m trying to be nice. Maybe I’m not cut out to be a zogmama acolyte after all.
August 14th, 2007 at 8:43 pm - IP Man-Hash: ae179e9967da1
You can not insult KellyMac. Even I, the God of Wit, couldn’t harm KellyMac.
As I said earlier, you are transparent to everyone but yourself. KellyMac can shut off her computer and not think about you, Catherine. Whereas, when you shut of your computer, you can’t stop thinking about this site and what you will write (or post your picture) on it tomorrow, even though you vowed not to. It’s call “insecurity”. Just like you’ll have to respond to this post *sigh*
August 14th, 2007 at 8:46 pm - IP Man-Hash: ae179e9967da1
Any by the way, since I know you’ll be responding… the name’s Denrael. I don’t refer to you as Enirehtac (Hint: that’s your name backwards).
Messing up people’s names by accident is even considered insulting. And you do it on purpose.
August 14th, 2007 at 8:59 pm - IP Man-Hash: 94b3b6aecd2aa
Ok, Denrael.
I didn’t think you could hurt KellyMac. Nor most of the people on this site actually (though I felt bad when i realized how young some of the “men” here are).
Certainly not you. :) But I think I might have hit a nerve somewhere in my wild flailing about.
I DO think too much about what I’m going to say next here. Though to be fair this (what the hell is it we’re doing here?) really is a new thing to me and I think I’ll ease up soon. I actually do read other posts too - I don’t just blather on with complete disregard for what’s going on.
We may have completely opposing views on alot of things, but to tell the truth, I identify most with you of all the people on here. Wonder how similar our backgrounds are? Similar, slightly foul, heavy-handed attack style. Slightly clever and funny, but lacking in finesse.
Feel insulted if you must, but I really do have a fairly high opinion of myself, so I mean it as a compliment. :)
Wanna come over for some rose soup sometime?
August 14th, 2007 at 9:06 pm - IP Man-Hash: 94b3b6aecd2aa
I need to rephrase. I believe KellyMac can be hurt. I believe KellyMac HAS been hurt. Just not by the likes of us.
August 14th, 2007 at 9:28 pm - IP Man-Hash: 1d7991e476ee8
LOL I take my son swimming and look what I miss! Thank you for the kind words. Catherine, what is it like in your head?
August 14th, 2007 at 9:32 pm - IP Man-Hash: 94b3b6aecd2aa
Hmm. I’m a pretty happy person, and I’m actually very well adjusted, despite Denrael’s suspicions. But I have 5 very conservative brothers, whom I love dearly. I also love to give them shit. This site just appeared to be a similar, but larger sandbox.
August 15th, 2007 at 1:09 am - IP Man-Hash: a13ba81333017
I don’t want to say much. I thought Z had a very stupid response to my statement. After thinking about it and reading what she wrote above, no, it’s not stupid at all. It’s profoundly sad.
The particular spin I’ll put on my response is this.
There are evil men that will take advantage of women and children. Women shouldn’t open doors and build bridges to them, and Z doesn’t. Most Disney-aspiring princesses do.
There are situations where women become single mothers without the fathers dying. Those situations are generally because the women are whores. Yes. Whores. I believe that’s the first time I’ve used that word on this site.
In Z’s case, I am convinced beyond doubt — not just beyond reasonable doubt — beyond doubt — that she became a single mother because her husband was not a man as we would define one here.
No, it’s not because of what she’s said. That would be of little value since it would be biased.
And Catherine, “I handed Wolfe the laurel (sonyad was in the running), ” I’m not sure what the devil you mean by that but it comes off as very insulting.
You’re welcome to post on my site and I’ll treat you politely there, but you sure don’t seem to be treating me politely here.
Now. I’m going to repeat what I said because I think it bears repeating.
Women are six times more likely to bring in outside partners to abuse children than men are.
Regards,
-wolfe
August 15th, 2007 at 2:14 am - IP Man-Hash: c406e944e31e4
Here’s the lowdown for you so you can stop blowing hot air. KellyMac arrived on this site and proceeded to castigate me because she had read some of my comments and she did not agree with them. She didn’t attempt to engage me in conversation, and she posted to me first. So I think that pretty much gives me a free pass to say whatever I like to her. And I shall. If Dick doesn’t think I should, then he’d ban my IP, as he hasn’t, you can take from that what you will.
KellyMac is constantly stating that all men think she is pretty much better than any other women because she supports men. Well der! If the men had any brains, they’d ask her what her problem with other women is and then give her a wide berth for being incapable of being able to get along with her own sex. She’s an extremist and she associates with other extremists in a fundamentalist circle jerk and they all pat each other on the back and tell each other that only they know the truth and everyone else who doesn’t agree with them is an idiot. If that’s not coming off as morally righteous (although deluded), I don’t know what is.
August 15th, 2007 at 2:22 am - IP Man-Hash: c406e944e31e4
Got a reference for that? No of course you don’t. That’s your opinion and in my own opinion, your opinion is seriously flawed. In my own experience (yes experience, not opinion) most women become single mothers because men cheat.
August 15th, 2007 at 2:59 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Then that means married men must be better whores than married women.
Oh, wait… Sex is an end in itself and it’s only women who can’t/won’t see that.
Men are better than women.
Catherine, you’re the kind of self styled dem dame that gives dems a bad name.
- Brooklyn Bounce - The Silence Of Life
August 15th, 2007 at 3:02 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Thankfully, all will be forgiven should you come forth with boobie pics.
Not the kind wolfe posts, of course.
Wolfe, if you’ll excuse me:
http://wolfesmusings.com/?p=224
- Brooklin Bounce - Club Bizare 2002 (Viva Club mix)
August 15th, 2007 at 3:17 am - IP Man-Hash: c406e944e31e4
Married men are whores. They can’t help themselves. Their trapped with only one female body and they just can’t adapt to it. As far as I can tell, monogamy just isn’t something that men can do. They certainly can’t do it well and they all desire a harem, whether of course the wife knows about it or not.
August 15th, 2007 at 4:10 am - IP Man-Hash: acd0eedbf59f7
Jesus Christ! Has this place turned into a forum for women to bitch at each other? I just scrolled for several minutes to get through all that crap. I understand that women need to do this too each other, but why here?
Don’t get upset with biology, it can’t help itself. Women will fuck mindlessly until they get pregnant, and they will do this with the best genes available. If new and better genes become available, it is their imperative and purpose to procreate with those in mind. Similarly, men are capable of impregnating a large number of women, yet they can only provide for and protect a limited number of offspring. Thus their activity is instinctively limited, and once offspring are produced, they will slow down.
Note that children are born to tribes or packs, not to individuals - a man with many friends and means will instinctively attempt to reproduce more, as he is aware that as a whole the tribe can rear the children produced.
In most cases a state of “natural monogamy” occurs, where a man reaches the extent of his power with offspring produced from one mate. Any other restrictions on mating - law, religion, morality etc, are false, unnatural constructs likely invented by a medieval upper-class trying to control who could breed and who could not.
August 15th, 2007 at 4:19 am - IP Man-Hash: c406e944e31e4
I’m not upset with it at all, I was just stating it as a fact. And it’s a fact that I accept, you can’t argue with biology. Doesn’t mean I’m ever going to get suckered into marriage though.