Motive Means Nothing; or The Church of Feelings
If I gave $20,000 to an orphanage because I wanted orphans to be happy, a bunch of orphans would be happy and everyone would agree that I’m a fucking great guy.
If I gave $20,000 to an orphanage because I burned one to the ground when I was twelve and I feel guilty as shit about it, a bunch of orphans would be happy and everyone would agree that I’m a fucking great guy.
Welcome to the real world.
Motives don’t mean shit to orphans. Motives don’t mean shit to anyone. In fact, motives only mean something to those of us who have the luxury of falling vagina-first into money and never having to use our brains for anything but a hobby.
Those of us are called women, and those of us need to fuck off my website.
The reason it’s called a “man’s world” and not a “woman’s world” — or a “getting pregnant is as important as nuclear power and calculus world” — is because men understand that silly things like “intentions” don’t get you anywhere in this world.
If it was a “woman’s world”, intentions would get you everywhere. You could drive to the store on a gallon of “really wanting some Popsicles.” A world of intent is the she-topia of the modern woman. Not a single reason or consequence for anything, and especially no genitals.
With no genitals, women could walk around in the tightest little sweaters they wanted while still “not intending” to attract the occasional harmless grope. Big fucking deal. Someone grabbed your boobs. It’s not like you’re using them for anything.
Puppies grow up, unprotected sex won’t keep your hair from falling out, and intentions don’t mean shit. The sooner women realize the world doesn’t work the way they think it does, the sooner we can all stop paying for frivolous workplace harassment lawsuits.
It’s frivolous for women to be working. Therefore, it’s frivolous for there to be workplace harassment lawsuits.
The Church of Feelings
No religion cares about women because women all have their own religion. It’s called the Church of Feelings, and services start the moment a woman wakes up.
However a woman feels about something, that’s the way she remembers it happening. Women’s realities work in reverse. If a woman feels bad about wrecking the bumper on her SUV, then she didn’t mean to do it and history fucked up by not getting the memo. If a woman “tried her best”, then whatever it took fucked up by being too hard. If you disagree, it’s your fault for not remembering it properly. And if any of that sounds bitchy, then that’s your fault too because the woman who said it didn’t mean to sound like a bitch.
The world doesn’t care how you meant to act or how much money you meant to make. The world doesn’t care if you didn’t mean to fail.
Men enjoy failure. We enjoy being tested and we enjoy improving because of it. Sports are proof of this. Sports, inventions, sex, business, rock ‘n’ roll, climbing Everest, and every other thing in the entire fucking world are proof of this.
Men enjoy failure. It’s just too bad we’re not built for it.
Related Articles:
January 25th, 2008 at 2:35 am - IP Man-Hash: 349c2dc95fedb
Who cares about a woman’s respect?
January 25th, 2008 at 3:50 am - IP Man-Hash: b6d42514d148c
Kelly running off with her tail between her legs. Oh, nevermind, thats a string.
January 27th, 2008 at 10:56 am - IP Man-Hash: d9438fe1c6108
Dick could make the site a series of pictures showing paint drying, and, as long as he still forbade women to look, there’d still be many women flocking to view it.
-wolfe
January 27th, 2008 at 4:19 pm - IP Man-Hash: 55548152be297
Menarebetterthanwomen.
- Sgt. Reyes
January 30th, 2008 at 2:04 am - IP Man-Hash: eb773a31bc306
What are you, some sort of faggot?
February 7th, 2008 at 10:07 am - IP Man-Hash: 1d8da8cb142ab
Actually, the pyramids were not built by slaves (that would be physically impossible, and you can find it out by calculating the weight and mass ratios, and what material would be needed to build the structures allowing for this kind of building, and how much it would be needed (actually much more than the actual building of the pyramids).. the egyptologists are wrong, materialistic and unimaginative in their theories, and they cannot fathom a civilization that was actually in higher level in many respects than our current one)..
And they are not, and never were any kind of tombs. They were initiation chambers, and the pyramid shape is actually functional in aiding in this kind of process. (I know most here won’t understand, but it has to do with cosmic energy and earth energy connection, how the energy ‘nurtures’ the body while the initiated is away from it, keeping it alive for extended periods of time so it is all possible)
Of course this kind of thing would be impossible for simple-minded, barbaric egyptologists to fathom.. how low we have descended from our higher civilized points in history.
The existence of feminism proves we are probably at the lowest point where the human kind has ever been at.
(btw, sorry for the bad english, I just woke up and english is my second language)
Anyways, great site, although a tad harsh at points - though I recognize the need for such counter-harshness to balance things out and at least get the message across. In current climate, just being ‘polite’ (which I hate, as it’s dishonest), and being very ‘considerate’ just doesn’t get you anywhere, because women use more powerful tactics, and would immediately just silence too ‘considerate’ commentations with their bashful, hate-filled roars and hits below the belt (many times literally).. So, while I kind of regret the current state of affairs, and wouldn’t want to encourage anyone to hurt others with words or deeds, I understand this kind of harshness is necessary as one part of trying to re-create a balance between the sexes that once was in existence even on this planet. (well, actually I think at least twice, or possibly even three times)
It is kind of an interesting dilemma, because on the other hand I feel it’s wrong to hit back if someone hits you (verbally or otherwise), but on the other hand this situation is just unbearable to all the souls residing in male bodies, and I am personally so filled with rage and hatred because of all the feminist stupidity and control, the power they already have, etc.. that I kind of feel it is justified to just let the opinions and feelings be heard as they are (as this is honest), no matter if some self-righteous princesses decide to be ‘insulted’ by it ..
Once in IRC some feminist slut said something how terrible it is to be raped and telling some story about some woman taking 3 officers to court for raping her in the 80s and how the men got ‘cleared’ .. I simply remarked how easy it is for a woman to claim rape these days, and how the woman’s anonymity is preserved, but the man’s isn’t, even if he is found innocent (well, weirdly it’s never ‘innocent’, it’s always ‘not guilty’).. so the man’s life and reputation is ruined, while the woman’s identity isn’t even revealed to anyone, and the woman is not punished even if the man is found innocent (eventually)..
I tried to say that someone being in prison for sexual offence doesn’t mean they actually did it, and continued how the justice system always favors the woman .. and how I think there is a huge percentage of innocent men in prisons for sexual assault..
The response was something like.. “That is a really one sided and uneducated opinion” .. (I wondered, how do you educate an ‘opinion’ anyway? How can an OPINION be educated? Haha..)
I was a bit baffled by this weird counter-intuitive non-logic .. I was actually naive enough to think that discussion could be a civil, rational and logical one.. but as in most cases when a woman is involved, it NEVER is..
Then the bitch quoted me saying how the justice system always favors the woman (which is true, and a neutral statement, wouldn’t you agree?) - and pointed out “that is pretty offensive”..
At this point my jaw was wide open out of amazement .. how the hell does she find that OFFENSIVE?
Well, I took it the only logical way I could, ah.. maybe she means it’s offensive to MEN that the justice system always favors a woman, so I said “I know, and it should be changed, as it is offensive against men”
Then she ‘clarified’ .. “No, I find your comment offensive” and continued “I find you as highly uneducated” ..
I tried to make a bit of humour to buy time to think about this, how the heck did she make all these really weird conclusions.. I said “There is an easy solutio - stop finding my comment offensive :)” .. and out of feeling a bit furious about all this oddity and weirdness of this slut, I told her “and I find you brainwashed.. what else is new” ..
At that point she kicked me out of the IRC-channel.. of course she had OPs (Operator Rights) there, because she has a vagina.. have you ever seen any woman-nick in IRC without ops on a channel? Women always get ops in IRC also .. among the billions of other things they get for free that men never get, or if they do, they have to work really hard to get it and sacrifice years to get it ..
Anyways, this story just illustrates the current atmosphere in which the ‘freedom of speech’ is manifested for us men in a very odd way .. also it illustrates the attitudes of the bitches who get everything for free, and who won’t tolerate a logical, civil discussion about men’s rights and the truth about what is going on in courts etc. but abuse power instead .. presumably because either they know they are wrong, or they don’t have any logical abilities to discuss things - they have used to just killing the argument in one way or another..
Which is why I am so glad they have absolutely NO power here, they cannot silence anyone, they cannot insult anyone here in such a manner that would force them to be silenced.. men’s voices can really finally be heard!
So, to cut a long story a bit shorter, but still quite long, thanks for creating this site, for upkeeping it, and for advertising it .. lots of great stuff here, which makes me feel lots of relief and laughter.. It helps a lot to know there are many others who have noticed the injusticies of the current slut-worshipping society and system, and who have started pouring out the TRUTH about how things are.
By the way, I currently live in Finland, and it’s very bad here too .. we even have a feminist-slut-lesbian president! (ugly as hell of course)
And there is this huge controversy and discussion going on right now about the members of the parliament supposedly staring at some women’s breasts in an elevator or something.. the main newspaper accused several members of parliament using their photos and real names, but the accusers names were not printed, and are still not known .. this is just feminist tactics, trying to make all men look bad - I mean if the parliament members are made look bad, what chance does a regular man have to look good?
You can probably expect similar anonymous ’sexual harrassment’ shit happening in other countries as well .. First the women dress very revealingly, showing cleavage and pushing their breasts to the men’s faces in an elevator, where there is not very many places where you can look, then they start DEMANDING, that men should “control where they look” .. I mean come on, a “look-police”? Not very far anymore to ‘thought-police’.. sheesh!
Of course it’s the patriarch’s fault for women deciding to dress like 5 dollar whores..
Anyways, sorry for rambling so long, I just seem to have too much to say about these things ..
Very good website anyways, although I am a true equalitarian, and I think women and men have equal worth, but they do have different areas in which they are good, and specialised in, etc .. they should both be respected and valued the same, but their different skills should be of course utilized and priced differently.
I mean, a society should have same laws (also in practice, not just in text) for both genders, and same obligations and rights for both sexes - that’s what I mean by equality .. how individual people feel, think and treat other individuals is of course something that cannot very easily be changed anyway. But if we change the attitudes in the society to favor equal treatment and respect for both men and women, maybe the individual attitudes will change too.
No one gender should have ANY kind of power, not sexual, or any kind of social power over the other one. Of course physical power is different, because it really can’t be helped .. but I meant power like.. “You shouldn’t hit women” .. because that gives women power to hit men, while the men are helpless, no matter how powerful physically, because they are not ‘allowed’ to hit back.. so the woman can drown the man in gasoline and throw a lighted match towards him, burning him badly .. without the man even complaining about it.. though dying after the paramedics arrive. Yes, this is a real life story, though I might remember some details inaccurately.
Ok, now I will stop writing :)
- Vortac
February 7th, 2008 at 1:42 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0a379370a5fd8
Give Vortac the “Man of the Pyramid” award, for certain.
Welcome aboard.
Harshness is a form of educational tool. No one forgets the lesson pain taught. Generally, the more painful, the more lasting the lesson.
Yes, some of us do understand. As pointed out in some research, pyramids WERE used not only for initiation rights, but that they also focused on planar elements, and etc. outside our solar system.
Vortac didn’t expand, but oddly enough, not many actual Pharoahs were found INSIDE the pyramids in question, instead being interred at off-site locations, such as the Valley of the Kings, etc. For a burial chamber, not many people made their final resting place there…….
And while they like to throw slaves up, the malfunction is, they did not and could not literally capture that many people, nor support them within their infrastructure. This also proven out by the wars that were being fought AT the time the pyramids were being built, which couldn’t have happened if ALL your people were out building a big-ass pyramid for the hell of it.
Most Pyramids on the Giza Plateau having been built in less than 100 years (and sometimes, less than 35, as they were started and finished during the Pharoah in question lifetime, as is proven out in heiroglyphs that mention the Pharoah, the Pyramid, and the Priest, along with basic information on birth and death, some were detailed, some were not).
And the fact that recent archeological digs have confirmed that they were not slaves, they were workers who had camps, sometimes upwards to 10 miles from the Pyramids themselves. They also had houses, were treated fairly good for the time as well…..
Though, being an engineer sucked, as you would probably buy the farm when it got done……
February 7th, 2008 at 2:33 pm - IP Man-Hash: 578550131d9f7
@ Vortac, well written.
In your second to last paragraph, you mention how society should have the same laws for both genders. I agree.
In Australia, we have a very unbalanced system when it comes to child support (of course there are many other areas that are just as bad).
An example of this, came to the forefront late last year via a current affairs program. A father had been made to pay child support to his ex for a number of years, only to discover recently, through dna testing, that the child had never been his all along and the mother had always known but kept it a secret.
He was still getting hounded for payments even when he had the proof that the child wasn’t his, and has received none of the money back.
This poor guy had been dealt a double whammy, not only had he done the right thing in supporting the child who he thought was his, but had spent time with ‘his’ son and formed a close bond, leaving them both hurt and confused by this situation.
Now men, and rightfully so, want compulsory dna testing before handing over their first child support cheque. Has the law changed to make this so? No. It continues to punish those men who do the right thing, and favour the women who do the wrong.
February 7th, 2008 at 3:00 pm - IP Man-Hash: 578550131d9f7
Here is a link, that sums up men and dna testing in Australia.
Notice, their dna tests are not recognized by a Court, unless the mother has agreed to the testing.
http://www.mensrights.com.au/index.php?article_id=236
February 7th, 2008 at 7:00 pm - IP Man-Hash: eeb32e3dc6874
If the dna test aren’t recognized unless the mother has agreed to testing, then I have a suggestion. All criminals in that country are afforded the same privilege. It was amusing to hear one persons take on the issue.
One ass said it should be a crime to take a dna sample from the child without the mothers permission. The suggestion this person came up with was to ask her permission. How the fuck do you think that’s going to go over? You may certainly be looking at a divorce or an ongoing rift in your marriage. DNA tests should be required after all deliveries before anyone signs any papers. Without her permission. Any man that finds out he’s been supporting a child that isn’t his should get every cent back.
February 7th, 2008 at 7:42 pm - IP Man-Hash: 578550131d9f7
Mike, agreed. This is what we a presently fighting for. See first sentence of link - http://www.mensrights.com.au/Daddy%20dearest%20-%20dna.htm
February 8th, 2008 at 6:39 am - IP Man-Hash: eeb32e3dc6874
Governments might not go for it. Dad finds out he’s not the father and doesn’t pay support. That means more women collecting welfare. No govenment goes for that. Many excuses on this issue.
You have the he’s bonded with the child excuse. Or even better the it takes more than dna to be a father. All reasons to make men who aren’t fathers of children pay for them.
February 8th, 2008 at 9:05 am - IP Man-Hash: 34a76056addc0
You, Mike, are spot on. You should NOT pay for a child if it is not yours….that is wrong. It is even more wrong to NOT know who the father of your child is!!!
Only LOONS and sluts dont know who their child’s father is. What is even more worse is when a LOONY TOON makes some poor guy believe they are the kids dad and then dumps him and to top it off demand money from him to pay for another mans baby…..WOW, that only hurts an innocent child and a decent guy.
Where in the world has decency and class gone, ladies????
February 8th, 2008 at 9:58 am - IP Man-Hash: 4b8494f25ae28
According to Joan, a girly-girl’s damning inability to stop fucking her hubby’s golfing buddies somehow equates to a lack of responsibility on all of the men’s faults - despite the fact that there is only one girly-girl, many men, and the fact that those men never signed wedding vows with their ‘friend’ or his wife. Of course, that same little girly-girl believes that the National Dean’s List is not a scam for the sheltered and naive, and that her age, sex, marital status, or *snicker* bikini size somehow enters in to the validity of her outlandish claims, especially if said information is forced forward with the subtlety and grace of an elephant-legged 16-year-old pasty, socially inept hooker doing that creative ’shake yo junk’ dance move as she unironically swears in ebonics to her BFF on her hot pink cell phone.
February 8th, 2008 at 10:30 am - IP Man-Hash: 34a76056addc0
@Doubt- you crack me up……so creative! I might not know exactly what all your post are saying, but I love reading them.
Oh yea, and for Joan and her size 6 bikini, sorry to break the news to you , but that is a size 12 in feminazi world…not so skinny after all.
It’s about time we show are men some respect….who’s with me?
February 8th, 2008 at 10:32 am - IP Man-Hash: 34a76056addc0
oops! I meant *our*
February 8th, 2008 at 1:59 pm - IP Man-Hash: a4015c44c9d3d
I would say, in a lot of cases, out the window.
A 20 year old woman was on tv recently, saying her goal in life was to raise 11 children (by a 11 different fathers) on her own, eventually without help from the Government. She has been advertising her need for sperm donors and promises these men, that they never have to see, financially support or have anything to do with their child.
Also in Australia, women are given $5,000 dollars whenever they have a child. As any parent will tell you (I am a mother of 2), it costs a lot more than $5,000 dollars to raise a child, and yet many young women deliberately fall pregnant to receive this money. They then go and spend it on themselves, thinking they’ve just won the lottery.
Our Government, came up with this idea, to help boost our falling birth rate. But since its introductory a few years ago, its mainly boosted the pregnancy rates among young teenagers. Babies raising babies does not make for a healthy and strong society.
February 8th, 2008 at 4:05 pm - IP Man-Hash: eeb32e3dc6874
That’s one of the damn dumbest things I’ve ever heard. Do they realize what the implications of that are? They get pregnant on purpose. $5000 runs out pretty quick. So then you have all these guys that got duped paying child support for kids they didn’t want. I’m going to think that just creates more antimosity towards women. (less marriages)
It seems like a good country but you have to wonder. Do the fathers get paid to? I was also led to believe this is the same country women can retire earlier than men. Or used to be able to. Can someone explain why men get fucked over so bad there?
February 8th, 2008 at 4:36 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0a379370a5fd8
At least you won’t have gays trying to collect THAT money.
But they will probably sue anyway…..”unfair”, because while they can and do collect the one part, they just can’t quite make it across the finish line for the Reward money.
Just another paycheck for the weak, while it fucks the children, and Dads.
That isn’t a suprise. Ever. Nice to know the FemiNazi’s are not completely slacking, I guess I can look forward to being forced bank a kidney just in case I get fucked THAT way too………
February 8th, 2008 at 6:05 pm - IP Man-Hash: a4015c44c9d3d
In answer to your last question, Germaine Greer’s probably had a fair bit to do with it. Although she’s based in Britain, she’s Australian born.