Motive Means Nothing; or The Church of Feelings
If I gave $20,000 to an orphanage because I wanted orphans to be happy, a bunch of orphans would be happy and everyone would agree that I’m a fucking great guy.
If I gave $20,000 to an orphanage because I burned one to the ground when I was twelve and I feel guilty as shit about it, a bunch of orphans would be happy and everyone would agree that I’m a fucking great guy.
Welcome to the real world.
Motives don’t mean shit to orphans. Motives don’t mean shit to anyone. In fact, motives only mean something to those of us who have the luxury of falling vagina-first into money and never having to use our brains for anything but a hobby.
Those of us are called women, and those of us need to fuck off my website.
The reason it’s called a “man’s world” and not a “woman’s world” — or a “getting pregnant is as important as nuclear power and calculus world” — is because men understand that silly things like “intentions” don’t get you anywhere in this world.
If it was a “woman’s world”, intentions would get you everywhere. You could drive to the store on a gallon of “really wanting some Popsicles.” A world of intent is the she-topia of the modern woman. Not a single reason or consequence for anything, and especially no genitals.
With no genitals, women could walk around in the tightest little sweaters they wanted while still “not intending” to attract the occasional harmless grope. Big fucking deal. Someone grabbed your boobs. It’s not like you’re using them for anything.
Puppies grow up, unprotected sex won’t keep your hair from falling out, and intentions don’t mean shit. The sooner women realize the world doesn’t work the way they think it does, the sooner we can all stop paying for frivolous workplace harassment lawsuits.
It’s frivolous for women to be working. Therefore, it’s frivolous for there to be workplace harassment lawsuits.
The Church of Feelings
No religion cares about women because women all have their own religion. It’s called the Church of Feelings, and services start the moment a woman wakes up.
However a woman feels about something, that’s the way she remembers it happening. Women’s realities work in reverse. If a woman feels bad about wrecking the bumper on her SUV, then she didn’t mean to do it and history fucked up by not getting the memo. If a woman “tried her best”, then whatever it took fucked up by being too hard. If you disagree, it’s your fault for not remembering it properly. And if any of that sounds bitchy, then that’s your fault too because the woman who said it didn’t mean to sound like a bitch.
The world doesn’t care how you meant to act or how much money you meant to make. The world doesn’t care if you didn’t mean to fail.
Men enjoy failure. We enjoy being tested and we enjoy improving because of it. Sports are proof of this. Sports, inventions, sex, business, rock ‘n’ roll, climbing Everest, and every other thing in the entire fucking world are proof of this.
Men enjoy failure. It’s just too bad we’re not built for it.
Related Articles:
January 20th, 2008 at 3:45 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0a379370a5fd8
@Awoman
And only a fucking moron would say that I can’t make my money and keep it by force. Only a fucking man-soul sucking vampire could EVER equal fucking a man by divorce with not giving him a right to take care of the problem. Only a WOMAN says it is ok. You are LITERALLY saying it is ok to destroy a life AND all the money because YOU DON’T WANT IT TO BE EQUAL. Equal means me beating your ass and kicking you out, YOUR equal means taking it all and expecting no balancing of the scales.
My victim status is why men don’t fucking wholesale kill your stupidly speaking kind. Retardation in public is neither amusing nor useful, feel free to shut up.
Unless………..you discount all of history, retard. Of which, YOUR kind was indeed in a VERY minority existence.
Of course you run NOW. Common sense and someone saying, “You won’t rob ME bitch” generally leads to most females giving up because they can’t win.
I DO believe in what happens here, if a man comes home and his old lady is with another man, guess who gets the shit beat out of her? Duh…….
Rising to your greatness by filling up a hole somewhere is fine for YOUR kind. And killing someone who is literally try to fuck you into oblivioun bothers me not at all.
Like I said, you don’t CONTAIN intelligence enough understand what “divorce” actually means. So of COURSE it isn’t “that big a deal”.
As usual, you must train the stupid with pain and of course, force.
That story proves to me men are tired of being fucked over and over and over again. Sure, lock him, make sure to never ask why right?
AGAIN, I state that “Law” is never meant for the strong (men), it is and always WAS meant for the weak (females).
Law existed in history as whoever had the largest army, and the most will to kill all competitors. THAT is how the strong STAY strong. And that is why the weak did not flourish.
Until now.
I hate stupid people like Awoman. ALWAYS saying it is “never right” and all that. NEVER having to pay the price of their bullshit, but ALWAYS speaking like a fucking parrot.
ARgggggggggghHhH!
January 20th, 2008 at 8:58 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0facc02199a67
Nobody is saying my examples are the rule. Only an idiot or a woman would make such a jump. What I am saying is the current social environment sanctions these actions as lawful and justifiable, that they occur frequently enough to be a dire danger and you women fail to even acknowledge this huge loophole you can slip through, because you’re like that, sneaky.
Can’t make it any clearer than that.
January 21st, 2008 at 6:25 am - IP Man-Hash: fd5cd69179bd1
@Zardoz
Some points: 1. Any woman who kills her ex-husband simply because he divorced her and got the kids is wrong. 2. Child support is based on income, so taking 2 jobs can be counterproductive. 3. Once you get married, “your” property becomes “our” property. Your debts are now joint; your assets are as well. There’s no stealing involved. Beyond that, studies have shown that women are worse off after divorce financially. Men are better off.
4. I realize that being seperated from your children is hard, very hard, but at the same time, that’s what happens in divorce. It happens every day. People live with it every day. Most people don’t go and kill the other parent.
5. I believe it is a fact that women usually get less of a penalty for the same crime. I don’t think that’s fair.
January 21st, 2008 at 6:30 am - IP Man-Hash: fd5cd69179bd1
@detached
Sorry. I guess when you said that “what happens in reality,” I assumed that you meant it was going to happen more than 50% of the time. As it is, you apparently believe they “occur frequently enough to be a dire (dire!) danger” and it’s a “huge loophole.”
So it’s not the rule, but you see it as a major, major problem.
Okay. I’m still not convinced the problems you cited occur enough to be a “huge loophole” even if you don’t think they occur enough to be the rule.
Still looking for some hard evidence on that.
January 21st, 2008 at 6:41 am - IP Man-Hash: 720a12647a390
@Awoman:
1. I agree
2. That depends on other factors also. Failure to meet a certain minimum level can and sometimes does result in 2 jobs needing to be worked, especially so if alimony is involved.
3. It’s theft. Unless we’re speaking of a business that was started from scratch by both members, 100% of whatever was owned by either party prior to the marriage, should always and forever remain the sole property of the respective spouse whom previously owned it. Period.
4. It does happen every day, is also the number one reason NOT to get married or have children. It happens to vastly more men than women, which is not only unfair, but hugely detrimental to the future viability of those children, and by extension one of the largest contributing factors to the decadent social decline we are now enjoying. Indeed most people do not, which shows great restraint on their behalf.
5. You’re correct, it is not fair at all.
January 21st, 2008 at 8:06 am - IP Man-Hash: 388d4a7a25ab0
It’s actually pretty rational. Dick puts up these bitter posts basically because he is bitter, like is there really a rational basis for anything on this site. Any guy on here who agrees with Dick is just bitter at life cause for whatever reason they had a bad experience with a guy and they are too much of a baby to move on.
January 21st, 2008 at 8:07 am - IP Man-Hash: 388d4a7a25ab0
January 21st, 2008 at 8:22 am - IP Man-Hash: c3f4479460146
Since when does reality mean majority? That is a painfully stupid association and one of the reasons women suck at any technical job.
If only 1% of men in the US are affected by this per year that is still 1 million men per year who are getting legally fucked over.
Kelly B: The only thing bitter about me is the taste of my sperm as it runs down your throat. Fuck off.
January 21st, 2008 at 8:25 am - IP Man-Hash: c3f4479460146
Oh, and Awoman, that also means that 1 million women are getting off free. You want to keep the status quo because you want to keep that loophole open in case you need it.
Just like in relationships, you want to keep that ace in the hole, as a future escape route.
January 21st, 2008 at 2:43 pm - IP Man-Hash: 720a12647a390
@Kelly B:
Well, if nothing else, we can at least see from your Freudian slip why it is you feel need to insult Dick. Had a bad experience with a guy did you? Lot of bitterness huh? Well, it was probably your own fault.
Anyhow, even if you were correct in your ridiculous unfounded assumption that Dick is bitter, his posts hardly focus on only one woman in society, but rather speak of the grotesqueness with which all mankind is surrounded on a daily basis. Passively accepting the iniquity and bullshit that feminism has wrought upon the world would make him a dick in the sense for which you accuse him. Anger is a perfectly reasonable and expectable reaction to gross injustice.
Thus, once again I fail to see that you have any point beyond letting the viper in your mouth extend its influence to your fingertips.
January 21st, 2008 at 3:11 pm - IP Man-Hash: c4d026b819ad4
Did I seem bitter on Dr. Phil?
-Dick
January 21st, 2008 at 3:16 pm - IP Man-Hash: cde4d6da17a7a
well, i know you’re not asking me but no- you seemed most affable and really quite nice.
January 21st, 2008 at 3:44 pm - IP Man-Hash: c3f4479460146
I would think I would enjoy having a beer with ya Dick. As a matter of fact, if you are ever in the Southeastern part of the US, send me a pm.
January 21st, 2008 at 4:58 pm - IP Man-Hash: 720a12647a390
I figure you don’t really want nor need an answer from me on this one mate. Nice use of rhetorical to my hypothetical. It just might get some women reflecting on what they saw on their beloved Dr Mangina program before the viper in their mouth impels their fingers to begin typing a bunch of pointless shit.
January 21st, 2008 at 5:00 pm - IP Man-Hash: 55548152be297
You could claim 10,000 Man points by simply having a beer with Dick.
- Sgt. Reyes
January 21st, 2008 at 5:03 pm - IP Man-Hash: 720a12647a390
I think if Dick were down here in Oz I’d be more interested in working toward organising a seminar for men’s rights with him as primary speaker. Beer can be imbibed after important man-work is done. Perhaps before also, heheh, there’s always time for beer.
January 21st, 2008 at 5:04 pm - IP Man-Hash: cde4d6da17a7a
@Zardoz- i just want to clarify that i am in no way i regular viewer of Dr Phil- not that you care, of course…just sayin’.
January 21st, 2008 at 5:26 pm - IP Man-Hash: c4d026b819ad4
I was thinking of launching the book at a bar; possibly going on a little tour with it.
-Dick
January 21st, 2008 at 5:30 pm - IP Man-Hash: 55548152be297
Tour dates please? I guarantee you free beer in L.A.!
- Sgt. Reyes
January 21st, 2008 at 5:34 pm - IP Man-Hash: 55548152be297
Additionally, I reccommend the bar ‘The Standard’ in downtown L.A. Especially if you enjoy Mantini’s
- Sgt. Reyes