Motive Means Nothing; or The Church of Feelings
If I gave $20,000 to an orphanage because I wanted orphans to be happy, a bunch of orphans would be happy and everyone would agree that I’m a fucking great guy.
If I gave $20,000 to an orphanage because I burned one to the ground when I was twelve and I feel guilty as shit about it, a bunch of orphans would be happy and everyone would agree that I’m a fucking great guy.
Welcome to the real world.
Motives don’t mean shit to orphans. Motives don’t mean shit to anyone. In fact, motives only mean something to those of us who have the luxury of falling vagina-first into money and never having to use our brains for anything but a hobby.
Those of us are called women, and those of us need to fuck off my website.
The reason it’s called a “man’s world” and not a “woman’s world” — or a “getting pregnant is as important as nuclear power and calculus world” — is because men understand that silly things like “intentions” don’t get you anywhere in this world.
If it was a “woman’s world”, intentions would get you everywhere. You could drive to the store on a gallon of “really wanting some Popsicles.” A world of intent is the she-topia of the modern woman. Not a single reason or consequence for anything, and especially no genitals.
With no genitals, women could walk around in the tightest little sweaters they wanted while still “not intending” to attract the occasional harmless grope. Big fucking deal. Someone grabbed your boobs. It’s not like you’re using them for anything.
Puppies grow up, unprotected sex won’t keep your hair from falling out, and intentions don’t mean shit. The sooner women realize the world doesn’t work the way they think it does, the sooner we can all stop paying for frivolous workplace harassment lawsuits.
It’s frivolous for women to be working. Therefore, it’s frivolous for there to be workplace harassment lawsuits.
The Church of Feelings
No religion cares about women because women all have their own religion. It’s called the Church of Feelings, and services start the moment a woman wakes up.
However a woman feels about something, that’s the way she remembers it happening. Women’s realities work in reverse. If a woman feels bad about wrecking the bumper on her SUV, then she didn’t mean to do it and history fucked up by not getting the memo. If a woman “tried her best”, then whatever it took fucked up by being too hard. If you disagree, it’s your fault for not remembering it properly. And if any of that sounds bitchy, then that’s your fault too because the woman who said it didn’t mean to sound like a bitch.
The world doesn’t care how you meant to act or how much money you meant to make. The world doesn’t care if you didn’t mean to fail.
Men enjoy failure. We enjoy being tested and we enjoy improving because of it. Sports are proof of this. Sports, inventions, sex, business, rock ‘n’ roll, climbing Everest, and every other thing in the entire fucking world are proof of this.
Men enjoy failure. It’s just too bad we’re not built for it.
Related Articles:
January 17th, 2008 at 6:25 am - IP Man-Hash: 829be8a41e45b
Woman’s key motive for anything? A man did it so I can do it too.
-Solomon
January 17th, 2008 at 7:35 am - IP Man-Hash: 134c8b1d4eada
rule 34 man… rule 34
January 17th, 2008 at 7:36 am - IP Man-Hash: eeb32e3dc6874
Motive=$$$$$$$$$
January 17th, 2008 at 8:04 am - IP Man-Hash: 829be8a41e45b
Thanks Mike I stand corrected.
-Solomon
January 17th, 2008 at 10:00 am - IP Man-Hash: f78d821cb12a8
“Harassment accusations should be a matter of public record. This would make it possible to maintain lists of women with a history of making such charges for the benefit of employers and, far more importantly, potential suitors. Women might eventually reacquaint themselves with the old-fashioned idea that they have a reputation to protect.”
—from Roger Devlin’s Sexual Utopia in Power
January 17th, 2008 at 4:35 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
There should be a federal public registrar for all gun owners as well. They should be obliged to register the weapons they have in possession and only entrust them to other people with valid permits.
Information like the CCW permit holders’ list used to belong to public record.
- DJ Tiesto - In The Dark
January 17th, 2008 at 8:02 pm - IP Man-Hash: fe637a8b73246
why? what purpose would that serve… a registry of all women that make complaints so you can see if they make excessive amounts of complaints seeing that 50% of rape cases are false, the majority of harrasement cases will also be false. The more complaints by one person, the more likely they are faking
registering gun owners does not have that effect. The effect you are looking for in respect to firearms would be to register all gun incidents, which would show who it a liability due to the number of incidents they have.
Persons with CCW would very very rarely be on that list since statistically they are the most unlikely people to have an incident.
I have no idea what your problem with firearms are since as a woman you need to protect yourself from “oppressive men” and since a rape can happen in 5 minutes and the average police response time is 15, a CCW and a snubbie could be the difference between you explaining a bullet hole in a rapist to a cop, or you lying naked abused in a puddle of his filth and your blood.
Your emotional looking at a gun and seeing an apperation of evil instead of a tool, and the idea that you should not protect yourself but let the police is detremental to yourself and society
Police are not required nor organized to prevent crime, they are there only to apprehend those that commit it for judgement and possible punishment if they don’t find a loophole.
Hence the term it is better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6 but you are too busy forcing your irrational fear of an inert hunk of metal to worry about the rights of your fellow man.*
*yes I know I said man and you are a woman, man used in this context means HUMAN therefore sticking human or people in here or in compound words such as mailman is redundant, bastardization of the english language, attention whorish, and sexist.
January 17th, 2008 at 9:44 pm - IP Man-Hash: bf1f8818f8ec7
My 2nd and 4th Amendments tend to disagree.
That was apples and oranges, anyway. A more reasonable parallel would be to suggest registering those who make repeated threats of violence with firearms (or any other weapon). In fact, I do believe that is public record.
Do you not agree with the original premise that there needs to be some deterrent to a woman’s slandering? And are you really a woman? If so, then please forget that I have even addressed you.
January 18th, 2008 at 8:50 am - IP Man-Hash: 3b87498627ba8
Gun ownership has nothing to do with Dick’s article. It’s a derailer. Like women themselves…
January 18th, 2008 at 10:58 am - IP Man-Hash: b065e2c6595b0
You know who also cares more about intentions? Democrats. No wonder they get more female voters.
January 18th, 2008 at 11:23 am - IP Man-Hash: 720a12647a390
As the old saying goes:
“The road to Hell is paved with good intentions.”
January 18th, 2008 at 12:31 pm - IP Man-Hash: 3b5e7b8bea94f
Go see Aliens vs Predator II. It has aliens exploding from chests, decapitaions, kick ass nuclear explosions and a full-fledged battle between soldiers and aliens and the former gets owned. It is the manliest film since The 300
P Coderch