Cleanliness is Onto Manliness
When you think of a woman, you think of a shrill harpy whirring around the house with a duster and a vacuum cleaner under the watchful eye of some imaginary deity of clutter. One errant bill or remote control earns her an eternity of stacking in the Trash Yard of Damnation. That’s how I see it anyway. A tornado of nerves frantically stacking the debris of everyday life into neat little piles and shoving them into drawers like a five year old with learning disability on a reverse scavenger hunt.
That’s what women call cleaning. Women can’t clean for shit.
Men know that the cleaning of things (cars, houses, clothing) is not a one step process. Doing anything in one step is a sure way to fuck it up — especially quitting drinking. It’s called being thorough, and it means that the cleaning of anything can sometimes take several days.
Not that women don’t understand that process. Women can take several days to do things too, like get over a headache or break the rules of a new diet by downing two pieces of German chocolate cake.
That’s right, ladies. In your face. 3000 calories in your face to be precise.
It’s an old stereotype, but just like every stereotype with women, it’s completely true. Women don’t clean they just hide shit. Here’s the proof.
The remote.
The remote can never be cleaned up. It can’t be put away, it can’t be clutter inherently because it is in a constant state of use. When was the last time that a day went by and someone didn’t have an urgent need for a remote control? Putting the remote in some kind of little basket or lock box under the coffee table is the equivalent of putting a piano in front of the bathroom door. Sure, it may look best there, but there’s a fucking piano in front of the bathroom. I sure hope one of those keys is flush!
The bills.
Since women don’t pay any bills they don’t know how the fuck they work. For example, if a bill gets put into some random drawer near the kitchen sink and doesn’t get paid because bill paying time is not supposed to include treasure maps and interrogations. That’s something that women don’t understand. It’s like a child grappling with probate.
Also, when a check is written and put in an envelope, affixed with a stamp of postage, and set on the edge of the counter only to disappear — no that isn’t the bill fairy whisking your monies away to the gas company, it’s a woman “cleaning” shit up and throwing a handful of tacks on the road that is your life.
Soap.
That body wash shit doesn’t work. I know because one time I used it to wash my dog as an experiment. Guess what it smelled like when I was done. A fucking dog.
There’s a whole psychology behind this cleaning business, but it’s as simple as women neurotically clean their homes because they’re lives are exactly the opposite. That’s it. You can sum up all of womankind like a box full of fortune cookies.
Related Articles:
Pages: [2] 1 » Show All
Whatever
yeah, he’s an idiot.
Idiots? Turn gay? Wow, thanks for proving everything that Dick has set out to accomplish. You do your gender credit. Bravo.
just become gay & be with your non-woman-having gay boyfriends.
It’s been my experience that in the last 30 years, women have developed this mindset that they aren’t servants to men. Well, maybe, maybe not, but as a result, when they live with a man, the tend not to do housework because they perceive that as servitude, even when they don’t work and the man brings in all the income.
This isn’t all the time, but from what I’ve seen, it’s the preponderance (and I’m not speaking only from my own former domestic situation, although it’s pretty representative) . I can only conclude that modern women under 50 tend to be fucking lazy bitches. Not to mention parasitic, controlling whores.
In my humble opinion, a man shouldn’t even HAVE a woman living with him. There’s absolutely no benefit. Men generally don’t need the money, the woman almost always start wanting to get pregnant, the sex becomes boring and tapers off to 1/5 of what it used to be, and the don’t do chores. Where’s the benefit in that? What’s left, her pleasant company and conversation? In all likelihood, the biggest reason for her moving in was probably the convenient sex, and after that dries up, there’s nothing left except for her bitching. Men, you have more self-respect than that.
“Since women don’t pay any bills they don’t know how the fuck they work. ”
What? I pay all my own bills, thanks. I also don’t nag my boyfriend to clean, nor do I hold it above him when I do. You guys are idiots.
All the truth. Men who get married to modern ticks are young morons surging with lust or closet homosexuals looking for a social cover to climb the corporate/political ladder.
I use dishsoap for “body wash” and shampoo. That is what you call cleanliness.
That’s what you call Manliness, friend.
It’s been my experience that in the last 30 years, women have developed this mindset that they aren’t servants to men. Well, maybe, maybe not, but as a result, when they live with a man, the tend not to do housework because they perceive that as servitude, even when they don’t work and the man brings in all the income.
This isn’t all the time, but from what I’ve seen, it’s the preponderance (and I’m not speaking only from my own former domestic situation, although it’s pretty representative) . I can only conclude that modern women under 50 tend to be fucking lazy bitches. Not to mention parasitic, controlling whores.
In my humble opinion, a man shouldn’t even HAVE a woman living with him. There’s absolutely no benefit. Men generally don’t need the money, the woman almost always start wanting to get pregnant, the sex becomes boring and tapers off to 1/5 of what it used to be, and the don’t do chores. Where’s the benefit in that? What’s left, her pleasant company and conversation? In all likelihood, the biggest reason for her moving in was probably the convenient sex, and after that dries up, there’s nothing left except for her bitching. Men, you have more self-respect than that.
I couldn’t care less if a woman cant clean house. With only two exceptions! 1) as long as the sheets were changed since the last one. 2) she should not bitch about me and at me because of housecleaning shit. Being older than 4, i know how to clean up my own mess. As a result, that shouldnt be a problem if anyone varies from the program just a little. If you are hearing about the seat left up and your poop stain, which you then clean, and she is still bitching after that…this anomalie is otherwise called PSYCHO BITCH. RUN!!!! DO. NOT. HESITATE. JUST> RUN!!!!!
Women are like female these days, lazy filthy scums. You work all week, then they expect you will come home and clean too. What a bunch of useless whores !
I still have a giggle at the following story I read a few years ago, I must find it again…
Apparently one of the feminazy (I forget it’s name) had a daughter. She was determined that the daughter would not be given the option of being a girl, that is, she denied her little girl any dolls or anything that would distinguish her apart from a boy.
She thought that she as a mother was an exemplary example of feminasty right up until she found that the little girl had made a doll out of the rags that she had found around the house.
Feminasty mother found it in her bed one morning.
Feminazy mother decided there and then that male and female are different and tossed the feminazy doctrine and went on to become a writer for men’s rights.
Some women wake up to the lies and deceit. Most do not want to.
Equality is a myth.
No, everyone has not been lied to exactly, but as with most things said by feminazis, it was and still is being misconstrued. Indeed men and women may be equal(as far as the value of life is concerned). However men and women are not the same nor are we ment to be, our differences are “supposed” to be what attracts us to one another. yet the average feminazi see the differences as a cause to justify their overwhelming if completely illogical inferiority complex. Just my humble opinion.
But according to the feminazy ……..everyone is equal………….
Has everyone been lied to ………?
really.
Yes, I did indeed hear about that fracas, Wolfe. There is so much that we could say on that topic that I do not even know where to start.
I’ve heard of it; it’s also more of a self-help book than a serious work on psychology which I assume is more what Half Soul is looking for.
The number to escape being cowed or brainwashed by said dogma is vanishingly small in the media elites, chattering classes, the academy, and other “good and great” trendsetters of Respectable Opinion in most of the West. Just look at the Summers controversy at Harvard where their president spoke of life choices and, reportedly, “innate differences” possibly explaining why there were far fewer women than men in the hard sciences and engineering. He was excoriated, vilified by a rampaging mob of lunatics bearing torches, pouring through the gates. (Many of them were of course already inside the gates.)
(http://www.slate.com/id/2112570/).
Hence, the value (and rarity) of sites such as this.
You’ll have to rely on Mr. Masterson for this one. I’ve never actually read any psychology books.* The only book I’ve been interested in reading that is in the fringe of that field is Dr. Laura’s ‘The Proper Care and Feeding of Husbands’. From what I’ve heard, it has good, common sense insight into what is important to men in a marriage, as well as how to behave as a woman and a lady instead of a nagging harpy. It’s written for women, obviously, so it isn’t likely to interest Half-soul.
Actually – I’ve only heard about that book through other women. Have any of the men here heard of it and if so, what were your thoughts on it?
*(Anyone with even moderate intelligence that hasn’t been thoroughly brainwashed by feminist dogma should know that there are innate differences between the male and female brains as well as male and female behavior and capabilities.)
Half-Soul. I was happy to be of help. Your English is certainly better than any non-English human language I speak!
To add to the mini “language lesson”, it’s also worth noting the verb choices Arielle used, not just “notice” vs. “see”.
If I say “men do not notice”, I imply (suggest) that men CHOOSE not to notice. (This is what she did, if I recall).
If I say “men can not notice”, I imply that men are INCAPABLE of noticing.
Confusingly, if I say “men may not notice”, I imply either that they are NOT PERMITTED to notice or that they PERHAPS will CHOOSE not to notice.
Yes, English is a complex and peculiar language!
As for suggestions of a good book that’s cutting edge and actually useful on male psychology, I’m not really sure for several reasons.
One of the problems is that any research into population genetics and gender biases [and how they impact the brain] is generally viewed as highly politically incorrect. In part this is because much past research in this field has been incredibly stupid and even evil, leading to the sterilization of populations viewed as “defective”. (Margaret Sanger, a woman — no surprise there — lead racist efforts in North America to attempt to prevent whole populations from reproducing.)
This has lead to much of the work in this area being fluffy nonsense (e.g., Deborah Blum’s book, Sex on the Brain: The Biological Differences Between Men and Women. Her book is not garbage, but it is anecdotal and not remotely scientifically rigorous. It also contains many false views of the “superiority” of women.
Possibly a better work — certainly more scientific, but still, somewhat anecdotal and biased towards his speciality (the study of autism) would be Professor Simon Baron-Cohen’s [Cambridge] The Essential Difference: The Truth about the Male and Female Brain. It is worth noting that every male reviewer on Amazon.com gave Prof Baron-Cohen’s work 5 stars, and every female 1. Despite this, his work too says many kind things about women that are perhaps exaggerations.
Some have recommended Steven Rhoads’ Taking Sex Differences Seriously. I don’t know as I’ve not read it.
Dick (and even Arielle) may well know far more about the psychological aspects of gender differences than I and be better equipped to suggest something to your taste and needs. My studies in gender psychology are broad, but not deep.
Hopefully the above was of some help. Nice to meet you as well, Half Soul.
-wolfe.
Female,
Why should l pay for something that l dont really want anyway? l do just fine with the standard of cleaning that meets my needs, which is only slightly above average, say at 55%. A woman comes into my life starts cleaning at say 99.99999 anal retentive percent and all of a sudden l am ‘deriving a benefit’ that l must equalise or pay for. Sheesh, female, you think us guys cant see thru your self absorbed campaigns. l am gonna play your silly head game just to illustrate the absudity of your logic… my girl dont do her fair share of the sex work in our relationship. Therefore she should stop whinning about how l want it 3 diffrerent ways, 3 times a day, and pay for escorts.
Or a less absurd example… one of those feral wind screen washers starts cleaning my windscreen at the traffic lights. l say nothing, afterall lm just on my merry way. Then he demands payment for a service he assumed and in fact imposed upon me.
Again, you conveniently glossed over the crux of the matter which is that this whole cleaning is a power trip for women in relationships. Its about your ego. You are endevouring to set the standard, ergo make the rules. Sweet heart, let go of your massive yet fragile ego and relax into life. Its just nowhere as complicated as many women try to make it.
l just thought of another example Female. You are getting all this free analysis and therapy on this site. Yes, l know you dont need it, cant see it, dont care but l am going to UNILATERALLY decide that eventhough you deny it you derive benefit. You dont reciprocate except with duplicitous and tokenistic attempts at ’sweeping the floor’ therefore YOU OWE ME. Why? Because that is what my self absorbed ego demands. In short… because l SAY so.
There, as a female, you should be able to relate to that gamey waffle.
No need to apologize, Half-soul. Glad Wolfe was able to clarify things for you.