Indeed, only ONE thing on earth is better than my outstanding and highly personalized (I.E., “Specialized Specific Man-Spankage Spectacular Spunk Starter”), and that is a Bacon Double Meat Cheeseburger……….hence, NOT A FUCKING WOMAN.

I take that back, what I really meant to say is that there are THREE things better than a “typical” woman, other than the cheeseburger and porn obviously, the other one is a Deaf Mute Russian Whore…….and they run like $4210 an hour……outside a manly budget, but within my realm of dreaming that impossible fucking dream. (I hear they go for $5K an hour if they can cook and clean……….)

True, she qualifies as a woman so can’t REALLY make the list, but then again, since all women are whores, it only depends on the local/regional pricing, I would say that yes my friends, the reason Super-L337-Pr0n is so popular is that is so EASILY replaces the douchebaggery that is:

Females who speak, and who are NOT Deaf Mute.

Circular logic. Most women are stupid, and since most women are stupid, most women do not efficiently sell that pussy, hence why a good whore is like shitting a 15lb. Gold Nugget……….not gonna happen soon or often (well, maybe ONE time before it kills you).

Example:
Dude, let’s go to that bar, get drunk, buy a lot of shots for that fat chick in the corner. Act like we are interested in her, and maybe one of us will bang her, then regret it later.
(This is an example of “Stupid Woman Syndrome”, and selling the Vaggy cheaply. AKA- “Marriage”)

Example:
Bitch, I am paying you $250 hour. I want a 14.5 minute long BJ followed by a 3.75 minute Handjob. No, I want baby lotion, not that shit out of the magazine. When you are done with that, we will fuck however I want, I may or may not donkey punch you, and then you will leave. No, I don’t give a fuck what your name is, get out, our time is up. Yes, thank you for stopping by, shut the fuck up more often and I would probably hire you on more often. Pick up the towels and make the fucking bed on your way out, I am going to take a nap now……..

THE FUCKING END.
(Not really. Moral of the story: Whores are cheaper, and you get more work out of them, therefore, efficiency. Why would you hire a quadrapalegic retard female to do the job at 1/762nd the pace and quality? STUPID!)

Chris said:

When a man has reached a point where can afford to say “I COULD BUT I WON’T” . . . he is successful, powerful and IN CHARGE of himself.

Agreed, but have an oustanding porn collection while you wait (!) Thanks again; cheers.

AND @NOMANHOLE . . . PS! yes these discussions have been very enjoyable over morning coffee. I have enjoyed this back and forth tremendously.

:) Cheers!

Commander Scott said:
In my own personal experience, women are only attracted to two kinds of men:

(1) the man who has a fairly substantial bank account with the large number of worldly possessions

(2) the man with an extensive criminal record that places heavy emphasis on violent, psychopathic behaviour.

If you want success with women, you must either be financially well off or, if that fails, a remorseless, brutal thug or gangster.

That’s just WRONG. Women are not remotely “attracted” to THE MEN who have money. They are attracted to THE MONEY.

Just because she is “attracted” to his MONEY (and substantial bank account) doesn’t mean she is remotely attracted to — HIM. Many women marry men they DESPISE so they wear fur coats, drive a Mercedes, and spend summers in the Hamptons. They are whores . . . as we all know.

But! That doesn’t translate to “success with women”.
That guy is not a “winner”. He’s not even close.

SUCCESS WITH WOMEN IS EXACTLY THE SAME AS SUCCESS WITH ANYTHING ELSE —->> “I COULD BUT I WON’T”.

When a man has reached a point where can afford to say “I COULD BUT I WON’T” . . . he is successful, powerful and IN CHARGE of himself.

“I COULD BUT I WON’T” is the ultimate statement and attitude for a man to have. It comes out in EVERYTHING he says and does, and women can SENSE this kind of man a MILE AWAY.

“No thanks sweety, not interested.” = “I could but I won’t”.

(it’s effect is even MORE evident on extremely attractive women,
because they almost NEVER HEAR IT)

Women can ALSO sense a man who believes that MONEY IS REQUIRED TO MAKE A WOMAN FEEL ATTRACTION FOR HIM. Women (and men who are successful with women) know that’s horseshit. Why don’t YOU??

A man can have ALL THE MONEY HE THINKS HE NEEDS and still never enjoy REAL success with women. Ask any man with loads of money! Yeah he gets whores, dates and even women who don’t like him will marry him! Now pull those women aside and ask them if the put three fingers in their pussy and masturbate to the thought of him.

Fuck no.

Let OTHER men pursue women with their money, and their fancy watches, and their cars . . . . I have those things too . . . but women will NOTICE them. I don’t need to flaunt them. Because none of it WORKS at generating true female attraction.

And when a woman says “Wow I love your car” . . .
I just say “Thanks but . . . it’s just a car. Have a great day.”

“I COULD BUT I WON’T”.

•••

“Violent brutal thugs” are only attractive to women (fro sex and mating only - not love and providing) because they FORCE MALE STRENGTH on everyone. They make sure no one EVER regards them as “WEAK”.

Women are biologically hardwired to be attracted to STRONG MALES who are NEVER WEAK under any circumstances. I said that before and I will say it again.

–>> WOMEN ARE NEVER ATTRACTED TO WEAKNESS.
–>> WOMEN ARE NEVER ATTRACTED TO WEAKNESS.
–>> WOMEN ARE NEVER ATTRACTED TO WEAKNESS.

. . . for all of the reasons I have been talking about in this entire thread. Go back to the several paragraphs I wrote on every woman’s obsession with RAPE. That’s why women lift their skirts for men who DO NOT SHOW MALE WEAKNESS - EVER.

Women are designed to TEST men for weakness CONSTANTLY.
On a dialy basis - many times a day - women will test you for weakness.

Romance, wining and dining, gestures of chilvarly and being NICE to women you don’t even know NEVER gets a man laid. Women only want you to believe that it will . . . . because she is TESTING YOU FOR WEAKNESS.

If you fall for that shit, you are not getting any pussy tonight.
SERIOUSLY - RE READ WHAT I WROTE ABOVE!
AND WHAT “STUDIOLINE” WROTE.

Commander Scott said:

no manhole said:

@Chris, Studioline- thank you for your thoughts.

@Commander Scott- get a life.

Get the fuck off the site, you frigid lesbian bitch. Stop masquerading as a man and take your cunt and go elsewhere.

You should post your essays somewhere in the forums, for easy access. They are good to read in the morning with coffee.

no manhole said:

@Chris, Studioline- thank you for your thoughts.

@Commander Scott- get a life.

Get the fuck off the site, you frigid lesbian bitch. Stop masquerading as a man and take your cunt and go elsewhere.

Chris said:

Muzalon said:

studioline said:

Chris, I read that you play the piano.

What woman is interested in that? All Anglo-American women are interested in is a criminal record, especially the lower classes.

LMFAO!!!

Yeah but you’re overlooking one important thing. I didn’t spend years of my life to become a virtuoso on the piano (and other things) —>> FOR WOMEN. I did it for a sense of accomplishment for myself . . . something very few women know anything ABOUT.

ESPECIALLY the “lower classes”.

You’re not kidding, dude. Lower class women are subhuman donkey cunts who deserve only death.

@Chris, Studioline- thank you for your thoughts.

@Commander Scott- get a life.

Hey am reading your book fabulous !! Great angle… $$$

Muzalon said:

studioline said:

Mine too,

Chris, I read that you play the piano. I play piano too. I also compose piano music. It reminds Chopin. If you would like I can send you my tune in piano sheet format, so you could broden you repertoire, by a piece that no women heard before. Its my music but I dont mind even if you say to a woman that you composed it ;) Interested?

What woman is interested in that? All Anglo-American women are interested in is a criminal record, especially the lower classes.

Never mention that one has any familiarity with the piano compositions, or the accompanying sheet music, of Frédéric Chopin; because the vast majority of women are of both low intelligence and creativity, many will find any sign of high intelligence in the male to be extremely physically repulsive and very intimidating.

Of course, you are right Muzalon. In my own personal experience, women are only attracted to two kinds of men: (1) the man who has a fairly substantial bank account with the large number of worldly possessions and (2) the man with an extensive criminal record that places heavy emphasis on violent, psychopathic behaviour. The message is as clear as an azure sky on a summers’ day; if you want success with women, you must either be financially well off or, if that fails, a remorseless, brutal thug or gangster. In this, there is no middle ground, no compromise; it is either one or the other or even a mixture of both.

In my experience

studioline said:
First YOU fuck a woman then YOU decide what she is good for.

I WAS JUST GONNA SAY THAT TOO!
(+ another man point for you.)

@NOMANHOLE….

It isn’t until the END of a relationship that you can know whether or or not it was (or IS) a short-term, or long-term relationship.

You must approach EVERY relationhip and interaction with a woman as a SHORT TERM RELATIONSHIP. Because you can NEVER identify a long term relationship looking forward.

That’s a HUGE - MASSIVE - mistake that WOMEN make.

Women will actually go into a first date —>> LOOKING FOR A LONG TERM RELATIONSHIP BEFORE THEY HAVE EVEN MET THE MAN!

Never make that mistake.

I don’t - EVER - want to have a long-term relationship with ANY woman unless SHE has made an effort to show me that she would be enjoyable to be in a long-term relationship with. That takes TIME and it will be entirely up to HER.

You will notice that MANY women are not even willing to make that effort. They expect YOU to make all the effort, while they sit there with their arms folded saying “I want a long-term relationship”.

This is something you can openly say to a woman’s face!

Its important to not even CONSIDER a woman for a ” long term relationship” until SHE has shown you that she is WHAT YOU WANT in a long term relationship.

If it doesn’t end up being a relationship . . . it’s NOT A LOSS.

You must never wake up one morning and find yourself in a relationship ACCIDENTALLY and think “oh I fucked her last night, I guess this is a long term relationship now.”

Never go out with a woman thinking its gonna be (or GOTTA be) a long term relationship . . . because MEN don’t often GET ANYTHING OUT of long term relationships. They very often fail. Increase your odds of successful interactions with women by FORGETTING about long term relationships right at the beginning.

You don’t want to begin communicating to a woman - by any stretch of the immagination - that you are interested in PROVIDING for her. The idea that you need money, charm and good looks to enjoy successful interactions with women IS A LIE.

YOU ARE THE ONE WHO GETS TO DECIDE WHAT ROLE YOU WANT A WOMAN TO PLAY IN YOUR LIFE. —>> SHE DOES NOT.

no manhole said:

Thanks for the responses, gentlemen, and I’m thinking it over–lot’s of food for thought. But I think one distinction needs to be made: there are A.) women you can have sex with only, short term, and B.) women to have a long term relationship/love/sex with. Chris, I have respect for what you are saying, but I think a lot of it applies to women for picking them up for v. short term relationships. Here, the goals are to build attraction and excitement about you, and yes they will forget about your money and status. For LTR THEN YOU REALLY NEED money and status if you want that 1%–looks and charm can make up for some degree.

My last LTR girl (8 yrs) was pretty dull in the sack but compared to the rest of the overweight/psychotic women at her age level she was in retrospect an outstanding catch. That is HOW BAD it is for LTR’s. Sorry, hoppin’ in the sack doesn’t cut for me; I want the whole shibang (love/companionship/great sex), and it’s become ridiculuous what a man needs to be to get the 1% top-tier, because the are so few in number. Fuck women, probabaly time to move out of the country.

NMH

I even did not read you post to the end I dont have to Know exactly whow you feel. And Ill say it again - this is just a pattern of your thoughts. First you fuck a woman then you decide what she is good for. If you fuck a woman within 15 min of meeting her don’t expect she is your gf already you need to finish with all seduction process first. The only thing which change is different sequence of steps.

I think what has happened is that modern female entitlement/feminism has forced men to develop PUA-like artifices to get immediate gratification (sex), but our basic needs for love and companionship are not being met. Then women get pissed off b/c they think they are being used for sex, and let themselves go to hell, minimizing the dateable girl pool further. So in the end everybody is miserable and fucked. Total and complete destruction from not an invading army but within, sort of an internal rot.

@M

also imagine like after fucking her confessing that you are a criminal but really you compose music. This are just tools.

Muzalon said:

studioline said:

Chris, I read that you play the piano.

What woman is interested in that? All Anglo-American women are interested in is a criminal record, especially the lower classes.

LMFAO!!!

Yeah but you’re overlooking one important thing. I didn’t spend years of my life to become a virtuoso on the piano (and other things) —>> FOR WOMEN. I did it for a sense of accomplishment for myself . . . something very few women know anything ABOUT.

ESPECIALLY the “lower classes”.

Muzalon said:

studioline said:

Mine too,

Chris, I read that you play the piano. I play piano too. I also compose piano music. It reminds Chopin. If you would like I can send you my tune in piano sheet format, so you could broden you repertoire, by a piece that no women heard before. Its my music but I dont mind even if you say to a woman that you composed it ;) Interested?

What woman is interested in that? All Anglo-American women are interested in is a criminal record, especially the lower classes.

True too, You got the point there lol, but Chris knows how to use it and when to use it plus this tune really works and will work especially with a statment that you wrote it. I never say in the begining to women that I compose music, acting like a criminal works much better.

Thanks for the responses, gentlemen, and I’m thinking it over–lot’s of food for thought. But I think one distinction needs to be made: there are A.) women you can have sex with only, short term, and B.) women to have a long term relationship/love/sex with. Chris, I have respect for what you are saying, but I think a lot of it applies to women for picking them up for v. short term relationships. Here, the goals are to build attraction and excitement about you, and yes they will forget about your money and status. For LTR THEN YOU REALLY NEED money and status if you want that 1%–looks and charm can make up for some degree.

My last LTR girl (8 yrs) was pretty dull in the sack but compared to the rest of the overweight/psychotic women at her age level she was in retrospect an outstanding catch. That is HOW BAD it is for LTR’s. Sorry, hoppin’ in the sack doesn’t cut for me; I want the whole shibang (love/companionship/great sex), and it’s become ridiculuous what a man needs to be to get the 1% top-tier, because the are so few in number. Fuck women, probabaly time to move out of the country.

studioline said:

Mine too,

Chris, I read that you play the piano. I play piano too. I also compose piano music. It reminds Chopin. If you would like I can send you my tune in piano sheet format, so you could broden you repertoire, by a piece that no women heard before. Its my music but I dont mind even if you say to a woman that you composed it ;) Interested?

What woman is interested in that? All Anglo-American women are interested in is a criminal record, especially the lower classes.

Mine too,

Chris, I read that you play the piano. I play piano too. I also compose piano music. It reminds Chopin. If you would like I can send you my tune in piano sheet format, so you could broden you repertoire, by a piece that no women heard before. Its my music but I dont mind even if you say to a woman that you composed it ;) Interested?

studioline said:
Chris, I realy apprecate you being here. Your advices are pure gold. How can I thank you for that?

:) No need. The conversation has been MY pleasure.