Every Woman is a Cheating Whore
Oh yes, that’s right. That’s what I said. And I said it because it’s true. All women are cheaters.
I don’t mean this to be a provocateur or to prance around in the realm of the hypothetical like some kind of dandy. I mean, flat out, that every woman in the world is a cheater, has cheated, and is probably cheating at this very moment.
Getting a woman to cheat on her husband or significant other is not like getting a woman to go to the gym — by heaping shitloads of gifts and attention on her like a spoilt child and then ultimately getting no burn for your earn. Getting a woman to cheat is like getting a duck to eat bread crumbs or a rat to eat rubbish. All you have to do is toss it in front of their face.
It’s not a hard conclusion to draw, so let’s just look at the facts. Getting attention from men is a woman’s lifeblood. That’s why women worship men in the form of menial tasks that they’re not very good at — because men control our attention like the gods of old controlled the sun and the crypt. We giveth and we can taketh away.
Good attention, bad attention, the worst kind of attention; it doesn’t matter. To a woman, being in a Girls Gone Wild video is just as laudable as serving in a highly respected public office. They stack up eyeballs like empty pie plates at a NOW convention.
So let’s compare: a woman’s lust for attention versus a man’s desire to consume or waste things — something very manly indeed. Take throwing a sandwich in the street for example. Do you know what’s better than throwing a sandwich in the street? That’s right, throwing two sandwiches in the street. Now what if that sandwich cost twice as much as the first? What if you had to wait in line again to get it? I would probably still do it and I’m betting that most men would. But what if dealing with two sandwiches cost you your dignity, your job, and your soul?
Women, of course, have none of those things — or at least don’t have 2 out of 3. That’s why when we change ’sandwiches’ to ‘men’ and ‘throwing them in the street’ to ‘getting any kind of attention from them’, we can easily draw the conclusion that women would do anything, and would stop at the destruction of nothing, for more of it.
Not even guilt will stop women from being the cheating harlots that they are. That’s because women think that cheating requires some kind of expressed willingness or premeditation on their part to actually count. I shit you not, that is exactly what they say. To a woman true cheating requires a planning and malice on par with a bank robbery. If the only evidence of infidelity you can produce is that she got drunk and put herself in a compromising position, you’re up argument creek without a chance in hell.
Can you believe that? It means if a woman can somehow convince a co-worker to force himself on her, or to “rape” her, that doesn’t count as cheating. It’s just another horrible thing that’s happened to poor defenseless her in this dog eat dog, man-world of rape happy abusers. That’s obviously a bunch of bullshit, but stand back because it gets worse.
Women also don’t count miring themselves in twisted, Dynasty-styled emotional affairs as cheating. For instance, a woman may hang around with as many as five or six of her ex-boyfriends without batting an eye. She may accept niceties from male co-workers or university staff members without ever questioning the motive of a free backrub. That’s a perfectly reasonable thing to be handing out, isn’t it? A free backrub? They’re like porno pamphlets in Vegas. Sometimes I can’t even get to work without getting two or three.
Bullshit.
Like any virus, women are not content with ruining their own lives. Ultimately, they seek out the lives of decent, honest men and tempt and corrupt them until they appear to be cheaters as well when nothing could be further from the truth. Cheating is like getting pregnant. It’s 100% a woman’s fault 100% of the time.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 215 … 19 18 17 16 15 [14] 13 12 11 10 9 … 1 » Show All
–No, you are laughable, your logic is flawed, and your view is biased, come back when you actually have sometime worthwhile to say.—
Man Law 1 in its usual wall of text. Sorry Veronica, after the first few lines your lack of paragraphs and bizarre lurches between topics became a little too much like listening to a valley girl on meth.
Check your keyboard; over at the extreme lower right corner there should be a key marked “enter”, or possibly “return”. It lets you insert new lines between “paragraphs” that each delineate a separate thought or idea. Hope that was of help.
As for your contents, yes, people of both sexes like attention. Guys will indeed look at fat and ugly women, but their thoughts may not be very favorable until last call. Bonding over shopping is a sad and pathetic thing involving consumption rather than production. I would refrain from contending ideas are being “stupidly argued” were I you.
-wolfe
Hahahaha this page’s pretty funny and stupid. Whoever wrote must really be a loner and have like no dates at all, plus he was probably rejected by all girls in highscool which is the reason he hates us so much to try and actually manipulate people by completely overgeneralizing. Can’t deny that some points were good. By “good” i mean real like the magazine example, I buy tons. That is so true but the reason is incorrect. I mean, come on, do you really think magazines print out stuff because they really care about the lifes of their readers?. (people they do not even know) Of course not, they print subjects that are hot and that will get people to buy them to read and pass the time while you are at the bathroom or whatever. Women love attention from men. I do not know if every single women does, but most sure do and I do. I must admit I flirt with alot of guys, but hey, its fun, okay, and it is not like I’m hurting anybody’s feeling because I bet most guys are desperate for women attention also, actually more desperate than women. (men tend to be more oversexed) Oh yeah men, I hate to break it to you, but you are not the primary reason why most women care about their appereance, despite the way society interprets it . I mean a guys will look at you if you are wearing a rag, are fat, but have big boobs and a huge ass. So basically many, of course not all, men are very easy to get. So why would we bother so much about dressing up? well if you were a girl you wouldknow. First if you dress nicely other girls will comment about your clothes and it is a great way to make new friends. Second, and I bet this is hard for all you boys, it is a way for us to bond because society raised us that way. Many of us love to go shopping, picking clothes for each other, go to the spa together, work out at the gym and check out all the really hot guys who do work out. So you see that is the real reason why most women care about their appeareance. Oh yeah I would also like to comment on the Girls Fone Wild Video vs. the respectable public office. It is not the same. I mean at least the others were relying on credible sources although the idea was really bad interpreted. This idea was very stupidly argued. It was written by a man who very probably has no relationship with any women and he claims to know what all women desire. This is simply just laughable.
Yeah, like that’s even mildly offensive.
More proof for the following…
Women are un-original
Women have no imagination
Women think about sex every 6 seconds
Women have nothing to offer except cheap sex and it’s the only weapon they have ever had.
If you were a girl you would also use “u” instead of “you”.
Oh wait a minute. What do we have here. Another woman.
-Dick
Dude.. i would cheat on you too.. if i were a chick dating u..
Christian, you don’t have to read my posts if they offend you. I have nothing futher to say to you. So, don’t bother.
Em, I think you should at least make a donation to Dick as you seem to be abusing this site with your rants as well as taken up valuable bandwidth.
Wolfe,
I think are for the most part you have made good observations of female behaviour - of course I know many exceptions, and even know of some men who act like that! But generally speaking what you say is true. Even so, I still question this extreme kind of writing for its effectiveness (i know it is a little off subject but I hope you might see what I am saying here…)
I can see your point of view, and your comment about the pendulum is an interesting one as I have been thinking along those lines too.
It seems to me that society delights in the extremes, the pendulum is at the moment swung towards the radical feminists ideas of how the world is. Rather than have ‘oppression’ of women by men (as it was - these are not my words) we now have women acting in ways to oppress men. I suspect what might happen in the next 20 years is a swing in the opposite direction whereby women are ‘oppressed’ again. (I cannot think of a better word for oppressed right now - if you can pick a fault in that word I would be grateful, it makes me uneasy to use it..)..
…now what do I say to this swinging pendulum? Stop! I am sick and tired of living in extremes, I say the intelligent way is to find the balance, the win-win situation. It is too easy to sit on either extreme and start gender wars. The hardest thing to do is to really look at the issues and find the balance between the two extremes so that everyone wins.
Now I think there is a good point in this concept of “shocking” people out of their complacency, if that is what is happening here then I am all for it.
Yet most people (men and women) do not possess the ability to really see themselves as they are (people like Arielle are few and far between). Most would not like to admit that they are wrong. So an article like this will only create further barriers of people defending their point rather than listening to what is being said. This is a shame because if you are to create a shock value, surely the people who think they are never wrong are the people that are most badly in need of shocking? I just sometimes find the extreme approach lacking in this respect.
It all boils down to Dick’s objectives when writing these articles - I can only have a guess at them by what I read in his comments and his articles. We might both be over-analysing when Dick himself might say he is just letting off steam?
Anyway, I am hungry so I better make some lunch. Been good exchanging ideas with you!
Em
Em: I’ve little time so here’s a fast response. Your comment deserves an intelligent response.
Can you honestly say that in general (not talking about you, but IN GENERAL)
- women seem to seek attention more than men;
- women tend to seek more indirect methods of manipulating situations and people (I know, redundant; too much of a hurry to reword)
- women tend to mire themselves in considerably more complex emotional situations than men do;
If you say no to all those, then I’d like to live where you do (or have you committed; I don’t know which).
Realistically these things are true.
A perceptive woman (yes, even this website admits they exist!) named Arielle (you can google her posts on this site, or search for them) noted that Dick speaks in extreme fashion about things; that this is of value because it forces even intelligent women like her to say “Hey… do I do *any* of that?”
[Grossly paraphrasing her, but I think I've captured the crude essence].
That’s my view of what Dick says.
Is it as bad to say “All women are cheating wh*res” as to say as “Men are rapists” — ? That’s a legitimate comment. My only answer is to say that the pendulum has swung so far in the favor of feminism that the former may qualify as legitimate mental virtual ’shock therapy’ [not in the electroshock sense, literally as 'shock']; the latter doesn’t remotely in the western world.
Note: my views are mine, not Dick’s not anyone elses.
Best,
-wolfe
On what basis do you make these claims?
It is impossible to know how all men think. Men are a rich tapestry of thought and philosophy. Their boundaries of thought are limitless.
-Dick
Well that was a very eloquent as a response, Dick. What about this question: Can you really know how ALL men think?
Because women are slightly more complicated than goldfish. The difference? Women have to sit down to take a shit.
-Dick
Thank you for taking my ideas into account wolfe. Personally, I do not see considerable truth in what Dick writes. Some points he makes are worthy of note, but most really isn’t more than blind finger-pointing.
His title “Every Woman is a Cheating Whore” might attract attention, but it does little to really make someone think. The conclusion is already made, so there is little room for thinking.
Dick is stating his opinions as a fact, which does not make his claims valid or even worth looking into, it makes him seem dishonest at best.
If you found an article similar to this on a feminist website claiming that EVERY man is a rapist, wouldn’t you find the logic a bit strange? I know I would, because it is simply not true. Most men I know never even think of doing such a thing to a woman. Now I don’t see Dick’s logic as being any less absurd than that of the premise that EVERY man is a rapist.
For example, how can Dick really know what ALL women think? Does he really know the thoughts and actions of every single living woman out there? If so, how does he know this? Does he talk to them? Does he ask them what they are thinking? Has he really researched his claims? Does he have some ability to mind-read? What has he read? What has he seen? What has made him think this about women?
You said yourself that Dick’s mother is not a whore, well isn’t she a woman? And isn’t Dick’s article arguing how EVERY woman is a cheating whore? If he proved his article correct, he would have to include his mother, and mine and yours… so, you see that he is painting a very large portion of the human race with the same brush, he makes no exceptions.
Of course you are entitled to your opinion, but his black and white thinking doesn’t wash with me.
Thanks
Emm
See, I don’t think this kind of thinking helps anyone. What you are doing is no better than the feminists.
To begin with, to imply that I am somehow connected to 40 years of male oppression by the female gender by the mere fact that I am a woman, is no better than me telling you that you are a potential rapist because you are a man. Both arguments are crass and pointless, because we both know that neither are true.
I do not speak for “my sex” any more than you can speak for yours. I never chose to be born as a woman, biology dictated that for me. Everything else, such as behaviour and attitude is influenced by society, individual differences, and personal experiences. Rather than see me as an enemy because I am a woman, why not address me as a fellow human being?
I cannot blame you for feeling intense anger towards feminism, but you are not alone in this feeling, because I feel that way too - especially towards the radical feminist ideas that men are all rapists and so on and so forth. I don’t like the idea that our young men are being fed the idea that they are piece of shit, any more than you do. Nor do I like the idea of our young women being fed this crap about being the victims of male oppression either.
It is obvious that neither message helps. So we have to bring about a shift in attitudes, but to do that we need both genders, male and female to achieve it. Men putting down women/women putting down men only reinforces the very ideas that you which you want to change.
If men really are better than women then why not rise above the catty calls of the feminists, the pointing of the fingers and name calling and do something to change the ideas of society, give your fellow man guidance, tell them they are not crap, speak out to the women, let us know where we are going wrong, and give us guidance for improvement - in this way you can help to bring about change. :-)
Cheers
Em
Em, your point is reasonable and cogent. I concur that not ALL women are cheating whores. My mother for example. Perhaps yours (I’ll leave that judgement to you). Certainly Dick’s.
That said, there is considerable truth in what Dick writes, and the shock value has merit in making one think. It’s not simply “spilling bile”
Regards,
-wolfe
Gee Em, finally reached this important milestone after denegrating and humiliating males at every level possible for the last 40 years and reaping all those benefits of all those wonderful initiatives demanded for your sex by the lying feminists. But now saying “there may be something wrong”? Brilliant deduction.
It is always amazing how on the odd occassion, women actually think outside their own selfish circle only to see the wall they have created around themselves.
The backlash has only just begun.
This is an interesting website, the article has attracted a lot of criticisms from women that find it offensive and some are defending it.
I don’t see why anyone would find it offensive - this article is not offensive because it contains nothing of any substance to offend. There is not one decent argument that even proves that ALL women are cheating whores - this is just one person spilling bile. So what? You are offended because you choose to be.
I would say, on the other hand, that this website is not going to help understanding between the sexes. The idea that men are better than women or even that women are better than men is a crass way of thinking, to say the least.
Women do have their faults as do men, and even as a woman I would be one of the first to say it is important to highlight them. I do think that men deserve a lot more respect than they have been given recently, by both women and society in general. I can understand how these men can feel resentful of this - but spilling bile does not help.
What IS this gun thing of Fem’s lately?
I know Freud said that sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, but she just will not shut up about the goddamned things.
It’s as bad a case of hunting rifle envy as I’ve ever seen.
-Big Al