Every Woman is a Cheating Whore
Oh yes, that’s right. That’s what I said. And I said it because it’s true. All women are cheaters.
I don’t mean this to be a provocateur or to prance around in the realm of the hypothetical like some kind of dandy. I mean, flat out, that every woman in the world is a cheater, has cheated, and is probably cheating at this very moment.
Getting a woman to cheat on her husband or significant other is not like getting a woman to go to the gym — by heaping shitloads of gifts and attention on her like a spoilt child and then ultimately getting no burn for your earn. Getting a woman to cheat is like getting a duck to eat bread crumbs or a rat to eat rubbish. All you have to do is toss it in front of their face.
It’s not a hard conclusion to draw, so let’s just look at the facts. Getting attention from men is a woman’s lifeblood. That’s why women worship men in the form of menial tasks that they’re not very good at — because men control our attention like the gods of old controlled the sun and the crypt. We giveth and we can taketh away.
Good attention, bad attention, the worst kind of attention; it doesn’t matter. To a woman, being in a Girls Gone Wild video is just as laudable as serving in a highly respected public office. They stack up eyeballs like empty pie plates at a NOW convention.
So let’s compare: a woman’s lust for attention versus a man’s desire to consume or waste things — something very manly indeed. Take throwing a sandwich in the street for example. Do you know what’s better than throwing a sandwich in the street? That’s right, throwing two sandwiches in the street. Now what if that sandwich cost twice as much as the first? What if you had to wait in line again to get it? I would probably still do it and I’m betting that most men would. But what if dealing with two sandwiches cost you your dignity, your job, and your soul?
Women, of course, have none of those things — or at least don’t have 2 out of 3. That’s why when we change ’sandwiches’ to ‘men’ and ‘throwing them in the street’ to ‘getting any kind of attention from them’, we can easily draw the conclusion that women would do anything, and would stop at the destruction of nothing, for more of it.
Not even guilt will stop women from being the cheating harlots that they are. That’s because women think that cheating requires some kind of expressed willingness or premeditation on their part to actually count. I shit you not, that is exactly what they say. To a woman true cheating requires a planning and malice on par with a bank robbery. If the only evidence of infidelity you can produce is that she got drunk and put herself in a compromising position, you’re up argument creek without a chance in hell.
Can you believe that? It means if a woman can somehow convince a co-worker to force himself on her, or to “rape” her, that doesn’t count as cheating. It’s just another horrible thing that’s happened to poor defenseless her in this dog eat dog, man-world of rape happy abusers. That’s obviously a bunch of bullshit, but stand back because it gets worse.
Women also don’t count miring themselves in twisted, Dynasty-styled emotional affairs as cheating. For instance, a woman may hang around with as many as five or six of her ex-boyfriends without batting an eye. She may accept niceties from male co-workers or university staff members without ever questioning the motive of a free backrub. That’s a perfectly reasonable thing to be handing out, isn’t it? A free backrub? They’re like porno pamphlets in Vegas. Sometimes I can’t even get to work without getting two or three.
Bullshit.
Like any virus, women are not content with ruining their own lives. Ultimately, they seek out the lives of decent, honest men and tempt and corrupt them until they appear to be cheaters as well when nothing could be further from the truth. Cheating is like getting pregnant. It’s 100% a woman’s fault 100% of the time.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 217 … 25 24 23 22 21 [20] 19 18 17 16 15 … 1 » Show All
Exactly, Dick. No doubt Fem’s head is spinning trying to comprehend the notion that we’re both ambivalent about what the other one happens to think while she’s in near-hysterics trying to figure out how to make us like her …
“I’m sure if I could just find the right username, they’d like me!!”
We’re also men and not women because in a million years I couldn’t see that as a personal attack.
If you felt otherwise, you’d be a lunatic.
-Dick
To sum it all up, Female you take things way to personally.
Strength and Honor
Honestly, Female, the only one around here who cares what Dick thinks that much is you.
See, I happen to agree with this site on my own. I think Dick makes some really brilliant points sometimes, and then other times not so much. I don’t honestly give a rat’s ass what Dick thinks about my agreements or disagreements with him. Don’t care. Doesn’t matter. My opinions are mine, his opinions are his, and if they happen to cross over sometimes, so much the better.
See, I care about what my friends think of me. Dick isn’t my friend: he’s just some guy whose Web site I like. There’s a difference — a big one.
See, men have their own opinions separate from what anyone else thinks, and what anyone thinks of them. That’s why we’re men. Women believe their opinions have to match their friends’ or that they need approval for their opinions from someone else. That’s why they’re women.
I’m me, Dick’s Dick, wolfe’s wolfe, Big Al is Big Al … and you’re you. The only one of us who cares what the others think about them or their opinions is you.
The Cow said: “Many women who post here make lucid, rational and valid points and not one, NOT ONE of you ever says, “yeah, you could be right you know.â€? You are simply too interested in preserving this site, your ’status’ on it and lying prostrate at the feet of the oh so “magnificantâ€? Dick.
Who by the way, is completely full of it. Hundreds of emails to you Dick? That’ll be the day.
Regardless of what you tell yourselves, all of you are incredibly rude and disrespectful towards women. Arrogant….moo moo moo moo.”
I believe that many woman have been told that their points of view were valid and well thought out. You were just too busy chewing cud to notice.
Grump is quite often right in herdebates, but with me as a husbadn what do you expect. :-)
Some do; when they do, that’s what I say. Look at most of the discussion between between Enya and me. Or Arielle. Or Grump. Or even a few things you’ve said.
Dick is neither magnificant nor magnificent, though I applaud what he’s done simply because it’s worthy of applause. No one is interested in ’status’ on an internet website. Well, maybe you are; that I don’t know. Dick’s covered the rest of this para.
Not so.
Since I don’t attack every single female that posts here (Never attacked Arielle or Grump for example, only attacked Enya when she was using 3-4 different ID’s), I think that stands for itself. I’m not the only one who operates that way either.
You do have some strange imagery today.
I’d care more about your opinion if you first said the same thing (just reverse gender) at feministing.com.
That’s why we don’t teach that here.
Have a nice day,
-wolfe
Proastă. ProsternaÅ£ie. Prostată. It seems to me an alliteration missing the word “prostate”. Perhaps it got lost along the way. Or maybe it’s just another subtle hint. Surprised you know the difference.
You’ve got that prostrate at the feet of Dick part backwards, cow.
-Dick
stare decisis. stare decisă? decided state. wow.
Maybe that guy who fucked her after her apartment was robbed told her. You have to feel sorry for the guy.
-Dick
I knew what “vacca” means. “vacă” is romanian for cow, after all. foeda stumped me for a bit.
The man who told her the phrase should have given an example of its use. I bet HE’LL cop an earful the next time they talk.
I think she might have been clumsily inferring that it has previously been decided that this site allows men to act like asses towards women.
By whom, I’m not sure. Probably the suicide dolphins. Or one of the voices in her head.
If she wants to quote Latin she should at least make it relevant.
Vacca foeda.
-Big Al
Please. Enough! Take a look at yourselves. Constant nitpicking, whinges, attacks on female posters. Get over yourselves.
Many women who post here make lucid, rational and valid points and not one, NOT ONE of you ever says, “yeah, you could be right you know.” You are simply too interested in preserving this site, your ’status’ on it and lying prostrate at the feet of the oh so “magnificant” Dick.
Who by the way, is completely full of it. Hundreds of emails to you Dick? That’ll be the day.
Regardless of what you tell yourselves, all of you are incredibly rude and disrespectful towards women. Arrogant.
If you really were simply against feminism, you wouldn’t attack every single female that posts here, you would instead, siphon out your abuse. But of course you don’t do that. Dick certainly is the master, holding onto the leashes of all his pit-bulls.
This site is nothing to be proud of. All of your behaviour here is offensive and pathetic, and the older male posters should be wary of what they say to the younger ones. Teaching intolerance towards women is a very nasty poison.
Well said, Sonyad.
I know I’m going to regret this, but do you even have a clue of what stare decisis means? It’s not remotely applicable in this context, even if you’re trying to be clever.
‘Get thee to a phrontistery’ before you overwhelm us with your pedomorphic logomania.
-wolfe
How is writing stuff for the eyes of other men via an online forum be tantamount to “acting like asses towards women”?
You’re like a girl butting in the boy’s treehouse. Nobody asked you here so you could tickle your sense of indignation with men.
Must we stand your constant negative yapping? Can’t you just post sensibly like everyone else instead of making some attempt at bashing some or all the male members of this site with every reply?
What is it with women that they feel obliged to BUTT IN everywhere they’re not wanted and where they’d probably not want to be anyways, if not for the off limits disclaimer?
This being a site for men, by men, with men you were naturally not banned, despite being here against the terms of use and obviously to stirr up a stink, untill you really let all hell break loose. And even now, you post freely here whenever you wish to.
Can’t you at least value the freedom of speech that is granted here everyone, even to those that really should be elsewhere, and keep your part of the discussions in the restraints of civility?
How would you feel if someone burst into the ladies restroom in a restaurant while you were poudering your nose just so he could be a part of your yapping fest on men( how good they shagged you last night), lost pounds(gained), shopping spree(currently flat broke) and all that?
Naturally, having no empathic abilities, you’ll have missed my point.
YAP YAP YAP YAP YAP YAP
That’s an interesting take oldone. The alternate view (Stare decisis) is that this site simply allows men to act like asses towards women.
Luka:Actually, I believe your concerns over this site to be largely unfounded. Compare if you will, the number of men who may misconstrue this site, to say, the number of boys and men being broken mentally by a media who, for the most part, find men and fathers in particular, useless. Where men are portrayed as husbands who either can’t stand their wives or are so incompetent; they need there wives to swoop in and save them from such daunting tasks as doing the dishes, such as “Everybody Loves Raymond.� You are concerned for one site on the internet compared to a media smorgasbord of accusations in which the greatest crime is being a masculine man. Tell me, when did strength, valor, courage, honor, morality and wisdom become deplorable qualities in a man? No, I find this site to be of value and if this site does anything, it allows men to be men. There can be nothing wrong with that.
Oldone
women don’t understand cause and effect.
But it is fun watching them try.
Example: “Free Tibet” and “War is wrong”
hmm. Exactly how do you suppose Tibet gets free?
I’m actually not trying to help Carmen. I know that is impossible and pointless. Like wrestling with a pig. You get frustrated and the pig might enjoy it thinking it is attention.
To formulate and cement ideas they need to be discussed. Any failure in my logic will quickly be pointed out by the very capable men on this site. That is my audience. Women in general have the logical capabilities of children.
I find it amusing that Biff is trying to talk sense into Carmen. Dude, women don’t understand cause and effect. They lack simple and basic logic and reasoning skills, and act/speak strictly off of emotion without any regard for consequences.
They will easily bitch about ‘oppressive’ market driven economies, but then join all types of activist groups to protest against conditions in communist and islamic countries.
They argue for the sake of flapping their lips, thus their motto:
“I am woman, hear my BITCHING“
Some observations on Carmen’s … comments.
So Government would abdicate their role in actual citizen welfare or governing? What is it with women and the obsession with government as the be all answer to every ill?
In my view governments exist to serve with the consent of the governed. Not the other way around. Anything else is voluntary slavery which is despicable.
Yes, the nuclear family ideal would work well if there was still linkages from it to other extended family networks, however, in individualist, market driven cultures, what tends to happen is that the nuclear becomes isolated and alienated.
And why would those linkages be broken assuming they are vital? One can go to any local church and find a fairly active extended family network if that is desired. The biggest complaint of most Grandparents is: a) too much time with grandkids or b) too little? Your precious linkages are what you make of them. If isolated and alienated is where you find yourself maybe you should brush up on your people skills.
As far as the dreaded individualist, market driven culture is concerned; you certainly don’t have to be part of the rat race. You can step right off the treadmill any time you like. Find a little patch of land and grow everything you need. Raise some free range chickens and have a milk cow living in your house. A house that you build from scratch. I personally think subsistance living sucks but you may take right to it.
Or if you want anti-market lite there is always the kibbutz model. I hear they may be hiring. Of course the work there is fairly demanding. The Amish would probably welcome some new blood. You may need some productive skills before you apply though.
Don’t bitch about oppressive market driven economies until you’ve examined the options.