Every Woman is a Cheating Whore
Oh yes, that’s right. That’s what I said. And I said it because it’s true. All women are cheaters.
I don’t mean this to be a provocateur or to prance around in the realm of the hypothetical like some kind of dandy. I mean, flat out, that every woman in the world is a cheater, has cheated, and is probably cheating at this very moment.
Getting a woman to cheat on her husband or significant other is not like getting a woman to go to the gym — by heaping shitloads of gifts and attention on her like a spoilt child and then ultimately getting no burn for your earn. Getting a woman to cheat is like getting a duck to eat bread crumbs or a rat to eat rubbish. All you have to do is toss it in front of their face.
It’s not a hard conclusion to draw, so let’s just look at the facts. Getting attention from men is a woman’s lifeblood. That’s why women worship men in the form of menial tasks that they’re not very good at — because men control our attention like the gods of old controlled the sun and the crypt. We giveth and we can taketh away.
Good attention, bad attention, the worst kind of attention; it doesn’t matter. To a woman, being in a Girls Gone Wild video is just as laudable as serving in a highly respected public office. They stack up eyeballs like empty pie plates at a NOW convention.
So let’s compare: a woman’s lust for attention versus a man’s desire to consume or waste things — something very manly indeed. Take throwing a sandwich in the street for example. Do you know what’s better than throwing a sandwich in the street? That’s right, throwing two sandwiches in the street. Now what if that sandwich cost twice as much as the first? What if you had to wait in line again to get it? I would probably still do it and I’m betting that most men would. But what if dealing with two sandwiches cost you your dignity, your job, and your soul?
Women, of course, have none of those things — or at least don’t have 2 out of 3. That’s why when we change ’sandwiches’ to ‘men’ and ‘throwing them in the street’ to ‘getting any kind of attention from them’, we can easily draw the conclusion that women would do anything, and would stop at the destruction of nothing, for more of it.
Not even guilt will stop women from being the cheating harlots that they are. That’s because women think that cheating requires some kind of expressed willingness or premeditation on their part to actually count. I shit you not, that is exactly what they say. To a woman true cheating requires a planning and malice on par with a bank robbery. If the only evidence of infidelity you can produce is that she got drunk and put herself in a compromising position, you’re up argument creek without a chance in hell.
Can you believe that? It means if a woman can somehow convince a co-worker to force himself on her, or to “rape” her, that doesn’t count as cheating. It’s just another horrible thing that’s happened to poor defenseless her in this dog eat dog, man-world of rape happy abusers. That’s obviously a bunch of bullshit, but stand back because it gets worse.
Women also don’t count miring themselves in twisted, Dynasty-styled emotional affairs as cheating. For instance, a woman may hang around with as many as five or six of her ex-boyfriends without batting an eye. She may accept niceties from male co-workers or university staff members without ever questioning the motive of a free backrub. That’s a perfectly reasonable thing to be handing out, isn’t it? A free backrub? They’re like porno pamphlets in Vegas. Sometimes I can’t even get to work without getting two or three.
Bullshit.
Like any virus, women are not content with ruining their own lives. Ultimately, they seek out the lives of decent, honest men and tempt and corrupt them until they appear to be cheaters as well when nothing could be further from the truth. Cheating is like getting pregnant. It’s 100% a woman’s fault 100% of the time.
Related Articles:

















Pages: « 220 … 29 28 27 26 25 [24] 23 22 21 20 19 … 1 » Show All
I don’t drink numb nuts!!!!!
Rhoderick, please see the FAMQ.
-Dick
Is this page a huge joke I failed to get or something? Women are pretty much like men, ie all completely different. Only thing I don get is all the stuff about nice guys and that. Most guys are pretty decent anyway, and the rest are nice to available women anyway. Anway, if someone cheats on you, man or woman, should you really be surprised, its pretty damn arrogant to assume they wouldnt.
That’s ok. With my manly powers of future sight I foresaw that and compensated with an extra ‘r’ 2nd post back. Can you spot it?
And what is it that missed your “r”?
I suppose that was just a coincidence.
-Dick
astro, are you a helpless play thing of your silliness (I’m being polite)?
Can you really out there with the little green men, and women, your speeches are? really.
adreneline is what fueled you typing fingers.
An adrenal response? It’s text on a screen, muffin. What the fuck are you talking about?
-Dick
Astromuffin’ here’s got her lardboard confused with her starboard.
are ya mad dick?
mean mad?
fightin mad?
an adrenal response from, you guessed it - the limbic system.
are you a helpless play thing of your lower brain?
poor dick.
Jesus Christ, astromuffy, fuck off my site!
Did you already drive all the men in your life away with your endless ravings.
-Dick
There might be some truth to that stinging observation.
It implies that I think the people reading these posts have a child-like mentality.
It’s possible that all of this negativity and hatred directed at women is very childish.
It’s likely that all of this anger and comtempt comes from the less evolved part of the brain - the limbic system, or mamillian brain.
It’s likely that the some of the male psyches in this forum, deal with these contentious feelings with language - provided by the left hemisphere of our more evloved human brain.
The result is that these beastly feelings are given a name.
Whore, cheat, quitter, stupid, ugly, fat, lazy, shit, etc.
That’s about the only help the intellect can offer in these cases.
If you name it, (in this case, you name the woman for what she appears to be) then you have power over it.
The power to name it over and over and over again - the power to take pleasure and satisfaction in hate.
In a sense, the intellect is dragged down to a beastly level.
The rewards of this are sufficent enough to disincline the intellect to seek other ways of addressing the problem.
I do not ask maliciously. It is because of the language you choose, some of the points you make. They might be due to habitual writing with children in mind.
Do you write children’s books, by any chance?
They do it for the glory.
Glorious amounts of money for a glorious lifestyle.
A glorious house, glorious car, glorious off shore relocation after the heist.
They do it for attention.
And they get it.
Some of the attention they don’t want, of course, like the attention of the penal system.
I guess that’s the black lining behind the dazzeling, silvery cloud nine.
Who but a woman could possibly suggest men rob banks for attention.
Cute tho.
I’m thinking that these comments allude to my latest post being non-sequitor to the premise that all women are cheating whores.
I guess not all women are cheating whores.
And we don’t all trade cooking and cleaning for blowjobs - although there were times, I thought this the latter vocation would be a lot more fun than the former.
But, I think it’s fair to say that we’re all attention whores.
Men and women.
Some of us whore with dignity, and some of us don’t.
Speaking for the harpie segment of the population - I definitely agree that this is one of the more disgraceful ways to get our need for attention met.
Of course, men have their own, unsavory attention seeking ploys.
Gambling.
Womanizing.
Risky behavior.
All of it is for attention/recognition.
The womanizer, to be admired by men and desired by women.
The gambler, for the big win, and the wonder and awe from others that attend the win.
Risky behavior - who dosn’t love a successful bank heist?
Who dosn’t love the best race-car driver?
The highest mountain climber…
So that’s all I’m sayin really.
We all be hoes.
My thoughts exactly, sonyad.
-Dick
huh?
I know of many situations where couples both work, full time oustide the home, yet one of them shoulders most of the responsibility for household management, and child rearing.
Sometimes it’s the man, and sometimes, it’s the woman.
Either way, it’s an unfair division of labor.
And back in the days, when women were protected from the vote, and protected from utilizing legal autonomy, protected from economic independence, and protected from the privledges of social status (save the vicarious status she enjoyed if her husband was a high status male), they were also protected for any recognition they might enjoy as a result of women’s work.
They were pretty much expected to do it - and do it to a high gloss finish.
They were expected to shut up, yet make a flawless performance invisable and seamless.
They were expected to content themselves with the rewards of a paycheque, a roof over their heads, with luxuries and entertainment dispensed at the sole discretion of the head of the household.
This is how the attention whore is born.
Men crave the same recognition and rewards for their contribution as women do.
They crave it in world outside the home.
The successful ones get it.
The less successful ones take a back seat to the ‘winners, and find their consolation in other ways.
Some with a successful hobby that gets them respect, like marshal arts, or home improvement.
Some at the casino - betting the farm on the favorable attentions of lady luck.
Women tend to become harpies if they feel unappreciated by me.
Or shopoholics.
Or chocoholics.
There was a whole big debate going on in the seventies about the actual economic value of a woman’s contribution to the household.
It was heated indeed, as many men felt that there was absolutely no economic value to a woman’s work.
I may be back later with more musings.
As a stay at home wife, I calculated my actual financial contribution to our marriage - and I did not figure in sweat equity, like the day to day operations of a well organized household.
I spearhead rock solid investment strategies that required minimum upfront expense, for maximal returns.
When I did the math on that, my actual finacial contribution to the marriage equalled $50,000 per year, over a period of six years.
And I still couldn’t get no love and respect.
Meanwhile - he’s a star - a brilliant scientist with breakthrough technologies that actually surpassed the well recognised standard for the same product before his ingenuity - causing the standard to be revised to the new bar he set.
Come to think of it, he collegues certainly didn’t give him the recognition and respect he deserved as a result of his dedication and ingenuity.
The same dedication and ingenuity that turned this company away from collapse, the same dedication that established this company is THE leader in this field in a few short years…
I guess that lack of well earned recognition (not even his pay reflected his achievement) came home with him as a heavy burden - which gave him trouble recognising my worth, as he had trouble seeing his own worth.
Oh yes, this terrible misunderstanding between the sexes is tragic indeed.