Every Woman is a Cheating Whore
Oh yes, that’s right. That’s what I said. And I said it because it’s true. All women are cheaters.
I don’t mean this to be a provocateur or to prance around in the realm of the hypothetical like some kind of dandy. I mean, flat out, that every woman in the world is a cheater, has cheated, and is probably cheating at this very moment.
Getting a woman to cheat on her husband or significant other is not like getting a woman to go to the gym — by heaping shitloads of gifts and attention on her like a spoilt child and then ultimately getting no burn for your earn. Getting a woman to cheat is like getting a duck to eat bread crumbs or a rat to eat rubbish. All you have to do is toss it in front of their face.
It’s not a hard conclusion to draw, so let’s just look at the facts. Getting attention from men is a woman’s lifeblood. That’s why women worship men in the form of menial tasks that they’re not very good at — because men control our attention like the gods of old controlled the sun and the crypt. We giveth and we can taketh away.
Good attention, bad attention, the worst kind of attention; it doesn’t matter. To a woman, being in a Girls Gone Wild video is just as laudable as serving in a highly respected public office. They stack up eyeballs like empty pie plates at a NOW convention.
So let’s compare: a woman’s lust for attention versus a man’s desire to consume or waste things — something very manly indeed. Take throwing a sandwich in the street for example. Do you know what’s better than throwing a sandwich in the street? That’s right, throwing two sandwiches in the street. Now what if that sandwich cost twice as much as the first? What if you had to wait in line again to get it? I would probably still do it and I’m betting that most men would. But what if dealing with two sandwiches cost you your dignity, your job, and your soul?
Women, of course, have none of those things — or at least don’t have 2 out of 3. That’s why when we change ’sandwiches’ to ‘men’ and ‘throwing them in the street’ to ‘getting any kind of attention from them’, we can easily draw the conclusion that women would do anything, and would stop at the destruction of nothing, for more of it.
Not even guilt will stop women from being the cheating harlots that they are. That’s because women think that cheating requires some kind of expressed willingness or premeditation on their part to actually count. I shit you not, that is exactly what they say. To a woman true cheating requires a planning and malice on par with a bank robbery. If the only evidence of infidelity you can produce is that she got drunk and put herself in a compromising position, you’re up argument creek without a chance in hell.
Can you believe that? It means if a woman can somehow convince a co-worker to force himself on her, or to “rape” her, that doesn’t count as cheating. It’s just another horrible thing that’s happened to poor defenseless her in this dog eat dog, man-world of rape happy abusers. That’s obviously a bunch of bullshit, but stand back because it gets worse.
Women also don’t count miring themselves in twisted, Dynasty-styled emotional affairs as cheating. For instance, a woman may hang around with as many as five or six of her ex-boyfriends without batting an eye. She may accept niceties from male co-workers or university staff members without ever questioning the motive of a free backrub. That’s a perfectly reasonable thing to be handing out, isn’t it? A free backrub? They’re like porno pamphlets in Vegas. Sometimes I can’t even get to work without getting two or three.
Bullshit.
Like any virus, women are not content with ruining their own lives. Ultimately, they seek out the lives of decent, honest men and tempt and corrupt them until they appear to be cheaters as well when nothing could be further from the truth. Cheating is like getting pregnant. It’s 100% a woman’s fault 100% of the time.
Related Articles:
April 30th, 2008 at 11:34 am - IP Man-Hash: 5e3b0a85c96af
Live from Mandalay Bay on payperview…..
April 30th, 2008 at 4:19 pm - IP Man-Hash: 15262bcd8e29c
And as I’ve told you time again I don’t sweat or bleed for harlot societies.. I destroy them.
The time has come to clean house en masse.
April 30th, 2008 at 5:23 pm - IP Man-Hash: 3e8d1e2b2a4c4
I sincerely hope you end up being unintentionally killed the next time Osama bin Laden decides to target that feminist-dominated totalitarian shit-hole you call the United States. You also deserve to be brutally raped and crucified by your husband (or your boyfriend).
CORRECTION: you don’t deserve to be raped by a human penis; instead, you deserve to be brutally raped and torn from limb to limb by a trained, sexually aroused mastiff, you frigid Yankee fuck-face cunt.
April 30th, 2008 at 5:55 pm - IP Man-Hash: 3e8d1e2b2a4c4
Dear Muzalon:
You’re both a gentleman and a scholar, my friend. I respect you for both your cosmopolitanism and your learning.
I am intrigued by your constant allusions to the puritanical basis of much contemporary Western European culture and civilization, with especial reference to the Protestant Anglo-Saxon strain of Western-derived social organization in particular. Richard Posner, a law professor at the University of Chicago, has written a fascinating book called “Sex and Reason”. Perhaps you have read it? The central thesis of the book gravitates around the subject of how the modern conceptualization of human sexuality can be fully integrated within both a jurisprudential and economic framework. However, Posner also manages to meticulously explore why many of the societies of the ancient past, such as Greece and Rome, as well as many existing Third World and Catholic Mediterranean societies, that happen to be very “machista” in both social atmosphere and tone, tend to be much more liberal towards human sexual expression than either their corresponding Western European complement in general or their Anglo-Saxon equivalent in particular. Mr Posner’s understanding of the rigid nature of the prevailing Calvinist morality that undergirds the fundamental structure of the contemporary social institutions of the Anglo-Saxon world rests on a distinction he draws between companionate and noncompanionate marriage. He defines companionate marriage as being a genuine partnership between husband and wife supposedly based on mutual love and respect, with both spouses expected to participate equally in the daily operation of the household economy. It is chiefly distinguished from noncompanionate marriage by the fact that male-female relations are no longer exclusively organized around the male need for sexual release or the assurance of paternity and patrilineal inheritance. In his book, Posner writes:
Companionate marriage fosters puritanical attitudes generally, so we should not be surprised by the puritanical strain in the Anglo-American sexual culture. A husband’s adultery becomes for the first time offensive , because it undermines love and trust and reduces the amount of time that he spends with his wife, which are elements of companionate but not of noncompanionate marriage. The patronizing of prostitutes by married men is a form of adultery, and so also becomes offensive. Moreover, as a male-female relationship signally lacking in love and trust – a relationship characterized, indeed, by the impersonality of the spot market – prostitution is incongruous in a society that has turned its back on the businesslike model of noncompanionate marriage. But because prostitution is a substitute for forms of extramarital sex that are more threatening to companionate marriage, and thus is a complement to as well as a substitute for such marriage, the effect of a social commitment to companionate marriage is not to condemn outright but to problematize what in a society of noncompanionate marriage would be an unproblematic institution. (158)
Posner generally attributes the puritanical undercurrents of modern Anglo-Saxon culture to the rise of companionate marriage during the sixteenth century. This is brought about through the advent of a nascent Western capitalism and the English version of the Lutheran Reformation. It stands in sharp bas-relief to the more traditional noncompanionate forms of marriage which had previously dominated all of the societies of classical antiquity and other non-Western cultures before the advent of European exploration and colonization. As an interesting sidebar, it seems that wherever the shadow of the Pax Britannia fell, so fell the rigidly puritanical values it brought with it. Consistent with this, many previous scholars and ethnographers once argued that the culture of the Indian sub-continent was positively licentious. As a matter of fact, pre-Mughal Indian culture was characterized by having a highly sexualized body of erotic literature (such as the Kama Sutra) and many of its most sacred temple complexes were decorated in a rich pornographic imagery. After the eighteenth century introduction of the British Raj, the East India Company, and the legions of evangelizing Christian missionaries who came trailing behind from the rear, the Indians became even more fanatically puritanical than the traditionally more socially rigid Englishman.
Maybe we should also be looking at the notion of the Protestant Work Ethic developed by German sociologist Max Weber. It is evident that much of the socially conservative, morally puritanical underpinnings of Anglo-American civilization (the United States, Canada, Great Britain, Australia, and New Zealand) come from the rigid Calvinist morality preached by the first English pilgrims settling the New World. The reformer John Calvin, the theological idol of the first Puritans, did stress the value of hard work and the full completion of those religious tasks mandated by God as a means of determining who ultimately numbered amongst “the predestined Elect.” Additionally, the only way any of the believers could be certain of his salvation was on the basis of how much wealth he had accumulated throughout an entire lifetime, eventually culminating in the “time is money” mantra of modern Western capitalism (secularized Calvinist morality). Thus, those who were either financially impoverished or deviated from the average code of conduct prescribed by Calvin and personally exemplified by many a Puritan believer, came to be regarded as social outcastes condemned to an eternity of hellfire and suffering.
May 1st, 2008 at 8:30 am - IP Man-Hash: 83a63482c144a
I sincerely hope you find Jesus. I wish NOTHING but good things in life for you Commander.
May 1st, 2008 at 8:54 am - IP Man-Hash: 666508dec08b7
You’re a better person than me. I hope he gets an ingrown toenail.
May 1st, 2008 at 9:05 am - IP Man-Hash: 8aaa53a9a008d
Nothing but good things in life…except an ingrown toenail, that no matter what you do it just keeps growing back. Or maybe he already has that problem and that’s what makes him so dang hateful.
May 1st, 2008 at 10:02 am - IP Man-Hash: 0c86228e3e6a5
Big surprise.. female wants powerful male with potential to bow to a false messiah who escalates women and socially and sexually degenerate males that belong in the belly of hungry lions.
May 1st, 2008 at 10:24 am - IP Man-Hash: 72ac873c7863e
Oh sots, you got that all wrong and backwards.
I don’t wish death, violence or anything hateful towards anyone…I honestly don’t.
I have done nothing but wish you well in life and think you have potential to be a great man and have something good deep down in you…sorry, but you can be mean to me all you want, but you are not MY enemy.
May 1st, 2008 at 11:46 am - IP Man-Hash: e9cf47d59ffbf
You dream.
Lacuna Coil - Devoted
May 1st, 2008 at 12:01 pm - IP Man-Hash: e17be3afdf469
Yes, sots, I dream of a day you could be happy again.
May 1st, 2008 at 12:25 pm - IP Man-Hash: 3e8d1e2b2a4c4
Leave SOTS alone, you cold, sexually frigid Yankee cunt; a single hair from SOTS’ body is worth more than your entire meaningless existence.
I too have a dream, Keb; I dream of a day when your boyfriend finally has enough courage and inner strength to take a searing hot iron and put both of your eyes out, permanently blinding you for the rest of your life. Hopefully, your weeping and gnashing of teeth will further infuriate your boyfriend. In a desperate attempt to forever silence your frigid voice, your boyfriend will mercifully sever your head from your shoulders with a traditionally hand-crafted Samurai sword.
All American, Canadian, Australian, British, and New Zealander women are sick cunts who should be rounded up into concentration camps and physically exterminated by means of firing squads, gas chambers, and lethal injections.
May 1st, 2008 at 12:50 pm - IP Man-Hash: b9acdedb38018
Wow….
May 1st, 2008 at 12:56 pm - IP Man-Hash: e9f290952c13e
Dream of free energy and global peace while you’re at it.. because those are the odds of finding a woman who doesn’t deserve a lead injection.
May 1st, 2008 at 1:04 pm - IP Man-Hash: e57a16d7fd409
@Commander- My husband would never do such things to me. In fact, I would give my very life for him.
My dream for you, is to live well, be well and find happiness to replace the hate in your heart.
May 1st, 2008 at 1:10 pm - IP Man-Hash: 666508dec08b7
Leave her alone you loon. Go back to fantasizing about doberman pinschers and cheeseburgers.
May 1st, 2008 at 1:14 pm - IP Man-Hash: a5f3a30b88dc6
@Commander- fuck off, you trite, uncreative fuck-tard. Your fucking repetitive with the insults, and they’re dumb. Fucking autistic austalopethicus-resembling, mouth-ball-gag-wearing fuck-tard.
May 1st, 2008 at 2:02 pm - IP Man-Hash: e57a16d7fd409
Awwww….Lynn, you took a liking to my word…loon.
@NMH- YOU are so creative.
May 2nd, 2008 at 5:34 am - IP Man-Hash: e04656c755969
You Dick are not only a dick by name, but by nature too! You are an absolute scumbag and you deserve to die a slow and painful death! You make me sick!
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:49 am - IP Man-Hash: 5c6a220a53ee4
He can’t help himself…….that toe is killin him.