Women Traded Cooking and Cleaning for Blowjobs
Ever wonder why the only place you can get a home cooked, fresh baked apple pie these days is at Marie Calendar’s or at your grandmother’s house?
It’s because during a movement called “Women’s Liberation”, women traded cooking and cleaning for blowjobs
Does anyone also remember when men worldwide exchanged being the sole breadwinner of the house for listening to their woman’s endless screed of woman problems?
No, no one does. That’s because it never happened.
Men don’t operate like that. All of us work on one principle: always going up and always going faster — and better whenever possible, which to a man is all the time. That means we don’t get to trade shit we don’t want to do for things like are easier, like how today’s modern, “liberated” women traded cooking and cleaning for blowjobs.
How typical of the laziness of the female species. When men are requested to do something in addition to what they’re already doing, they just say, “Well I guess I better do that then.” Then they fucking do it.
Women, however, ration their time out in bits and pieces like it was worth half a damn in the first place. The whole thing is amateur and childish, really. Imagine if men worked that way. When we men invented farming and agriculture, we would have just stopped hunting all together and became a veganous species of some kind.
Would you like from fries with your Big Mac? No, because there’s no such thing as a Big Mac in a world without meat. And that’s exactly what we would have if women ran the show. No meat, just a bunch of aimless dreams and junior high grab-ass horseshit.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 29 [28] 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 … 1 » Show All
JY said:
“face it, women completely dominate men for free. men are driven by the desire for sex. they cant stop thinking about it. one of the articles here is: women hate sex. well, that’s certainly not true for guys. men cant stop thinking about it and will jump through ridiculous hoops just to get laid. men are logical about everything except women. women however, suffer no such weakness when it comes to the opposite sex. they know how to utterly destroy a guy - just offer to spread their legs. the smart ones get married and then they dont even need to spread.”
* We depend on them, and they used to depend on us, until a bunch of morons decided they shouldn’t. Now we have moved from a situation of moderate inequality in the favor of men to a situation of gross inequality in the favor of women. Such is progress. Since such a situation on the long term is intolerable, it can only drive us apart, which is exactly what is happening.
“american women are spoiled self entitled whores? perhaps, but who was it that empowered them to act in such a manner? that’s right, men. men who bent over backwards to please them in hopes of getting some.”
* More precisely, it was the upper class men. They use women to oppress us. They used to have the church to keep us in our place, but since most men do not go to church anymore, feminism comes in real handy.
“i find it funny when in a comment a man will talk about how males have accomplished this or that and then ask what have women done that is so great. YOU didnt accomplish any of that. a few elite men did”
* Untrue. These elite men would be nowhere without the skills, endurance and courage of common men. Also: where are the elite women to match the elite men? — When we talk about crime, all men are lumped together in one big class, we all have to share in the disgrace, but when it comes to achievements we’re seen as individuals who cannot share in the glory. Make up your mind.
“now, i’ll stop playing devil’s advocate for now and just say this: women are human beings at the end of the day. they aren’t perfect and have flaws, but that holds true for men too. women are good for more than just sex. if men stopped thinking of women as just sex objects, then maybe they’d stop getting owned by them day in and day out.”
* But that’s what they are to us, don’t be silly: sex objects and mothers of our children. That are the two things that make them unique to us. Everything else men can do themselves and better.
http://salmonofdoubt.110mb.com/bigot.txt
I killed feminism to the benefit of chauvinism. Oops; how ironic.
Celebrate.
Why do manholes have orgasms?
So they know when to stop fucking.
Why do manholes have trouble getting orgasms?
A1: Who cares?
A2: Why are you still here, fuckface?
I am quiet lucky :D Thank you.
I’m personally all for social equality of the sexes, and many here are as well (some are not). But what pisses me off is that many (maybe most) women have a sense of entitlement, that they deserve special treatment b/c they are women and, as they see it, give “the gift of life”; this social construct of women’s superiority is spread by the somewhat misandrous media . Women enforce entitlement on men by withholding companionship and sex if you disagree with them, this allows them to get away with just about anything.
My view is that there is a spectrum of behavior among a population of women, that on average rates for individual women from, if you will, gracious to virago-like. I think what has happened because of the opportunities (advantages) that feminism has opened in western culture is that the spectrum has shifted to more virago like behavior, making western women less appealing.
So maybe your one of the guys that has a gracious girlfriend. Your one of the lucky few.
Less people buy the “Men are better then women” shit then the love stuff. I know what I’m talking about when I say all you dickheads need to walk into the 21st century and accept everyone is equal insteed of sitting at home looking at porn all day wishing you made better choices in your life.
Seriously, where do social rejects like you sexist gits get off telling me, a normal decently adjusted man of the 21st century what I am? You seriosly need to go see a physc or something. Anyone who is stupid enough to listen to the messed up contridactory rambelings of this Dick guy needs to.
Feel free to throw as many of your “Your not a REAL man” insults at me as you want, the fact is your not real men for not being able to accept equality among sexes. Probly stemming for poor upbringing, bad memories of excessivly violent women or simmilar issues from your past. Hell if you realy want you can get your favorite waste of space Dick to come and take a shot at me. I can jsut throw back the fact that I’m happy to be with the woman I love, and that I repect alot of women in the world and my life that have made me a better person.
Vocal minority, correction. Unprepared folks often make the mistake of giving the vocal minority what they want, however absurd, just to get on with their lives. Unfortunately, enforced industry quotas are not enough. So we put a few more black males in prison. But that’s not enough. So we relax the definition of statutory rape.
You get the idea. Eventually, though, we all get together and shut them up the right way - with the naughty box.
‘[Successful, happy man] who is missing out on true love.’
The first ingredient for a manhole movie. Predictably, manhole movies are not very wise investments and are hence becoming farther and fewer in number. Thank God the 90s are over, that was a disaster if you ever saw one - put manholes in charge of our economy and what do you get? A recession.
Even Bill Clinton couldn’t stop that - I mean, an effective presidency against an entire vocal majority?
And, in a beautiful expression of manhole logic, manholes freak out when their failed social experiment they call ‘monogamy’ predictably enough - fails.
Like you, Tom. You’re a failure. You have to compensate by acting like a snooty fuckface, but we all know you have no idea what you’re talking about. Nobody is buying into your shit. You’re just too stupid and emotional - even if you were intelligent enough to make a valid point, your manhole social skills insure your audience will rally against it just to spite you.
So now a manhole with no life and no future has appointed herself my life coach.
Well, that’s why they’re called manholes and not firemen, police men, or plumbers. Their bodies are made for fucking, not working! And have a fuckbox actually give you advice about spirituality?
Well, that’s why they’re called fuckboxes and not priests or leaders. They’re made to be fucked and then forgotten.
Odviously this guy didn’t have a prom date.
Wait wait. Your assuming that Dick gives good advice. Wow, you realy should see a physc or something. And I don’t that a sexist has good authority to give advice on good parenting. I hope to god that you don’t have a little girl some day.
Why defend her honor?
Its a thing we call love. Apperntly, you have never fallen in love before. Your missing out man, your missing out.
I didn’t even go to a prom, I went to the school formal with a bunch of friends.
Of all the statistics I’ve heard or seen, men are proven to be the ones who do the most cheating, so if women are cheating 62% of the time, men must be the biggest EPIC FAIL ever.
Ahaha. He’s not begging for sex. You fool. And also, gaming more important? Seriously, gaming is awesome and all, but you’re not actually meant to admit that you prefer gaming to sex.
Also, not everything has been invented by man. Kevlar, the locomotive chimney, medical syringes, windshield wipers, circular saws, fire escapes, engine mufflers, the electric hot water heater, life rafts and various other exciting things have all been invented by women. Men would still be driving blind in the rain if it wasn’t for women.
Also, I’m going to comment on your username. Deathslayer is lame. You have a real first name, use it.
Ah yes, here’s some lovely Australian women one can marry:
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/editorial/outlook/5769819.html
This time, girl power has gone too far
Empowerment never intended to be of the fight club variety
By ANNE MCGRAW REEVES
The Patriot News
May 10, 2008, 2:25PM
Recent home horror movies showing girls savagely beating other girls raise serious questions over whether “girl power” has warped too far.
Our generation desperately wanted girls to embrace the idea that they could accomplish the same things as their male classmates. We hoped they would see past antiquated gender barriers to push through the glass ceiling.
What we didn’t want was for them to push each other’s heads through a wall in the process.
After years of urging our young women to value and nurture their femininity, we’ve watched in shock as they picked up a male coping technique we didn’t expect: beating each other to a pulp.
Female warfare has typically relied on the subtle and the secretive. As soon as we learned to speak, we girls realized that it was safer to denigrate a playmate with our words than with our hands.
A note passed in class, a late-night phone call, a catty remark - we females have wielded gossip and innuendo as weapons.
But the absence of physical violence didn’t make it any less devastating than a testosterone-fueled smackdown. Often, it was worse.
Given that tendency, it seems a good thing for our girls to be learning to confront each other directly and openly, rather than tearing each other down with hateful words.
So why then are these Internet videos of girl fights so disturbing?
I’m sure a mean-girl videotape of one clique targeting another would be just as cringe-worthy.
But even hardened law enforcement authorities say it’s tough for them to watch the girls beating up each other.
Experts seem torn on the reasons for the increase in girl-on-girl violence.
Some say it comes from the breakdown of socio-gender stereotypes: Treat girls like boys, and they will act like them. Others opine that it’s the proliferation of Web sites such as YouTube and MySpace that fuels the violent behavior - then makes it seem more pervasive than it might be.
Other experts say that toughening up girls to make them more aggressive in sports sometimes carries over into other situations.
I wouldn’t begin to guess why more girls seem to be brawling to settle their disputes.
But one thing I do feel sure about is we can’t make excuses for their bad behavior and resist efforts to punish them. Just because it’s a girl fight doesn’t mean we should treat it as a lesser crime.
But that is exactly what seems to be happening.
During media interviews, the mother of one of the girls arrested in the prolonged beating of a Florida teen hinted that the victim deserved some of the blame for embarrassing the other girls on the Internet.
“I just don’t see why she would do that, if she didn’t have the nerve to back it up,” the mother told reporters.
Maybe we feel bad for working too much, maybe we’ve stretched our blanket of self-entitlement to cover our kids - but whatever the reason, we too often let our kids get away with murder.
It seems many of us can’t take the blame for doing anything wrong, and neither should our kids: There’s no way my little angel would ever do anything wrong. It’s got to be the other kid’s fault.
I would never want a return to corporal punishment in schools, and I don’t advocate it at home.
But we need to employ a little more tough love.
We need to get more involved with our children before they get into trouble. And when they do, we need to be the parent, not the buddy.
We also need to remind our girls that they can be tough, yet compassionate; strong, yet empathetic; successful, yet kind. They don’t need their fists to prove their power.
Becoming empowered doesn’t mean overpowering another.
Deathslayer
xhttp://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story…70-7583,00.html
Dangerous sex as state enters bedroom
Janet Albrechtsen | April 30, 2008
IF you are a man, sex got a whole lot more dangerous. Consider this scenario.
A woman meets a man in a bar or at a party. She likes the man. He likes the woman. She may not normally be a sex on the first night kind of girl. But they have a number of drinks. Fuelled by alcohol, they put aside their inhibitions.
The woman goes home with the man. She says yes to sex. In the morning, the man makes it clear it was a one-night stand. The woman is deeply offended and regrets her drunken decision.
She claims rape.
Under new rape laws introduced in NSW this year, that man is likely to be convicted as a rapist. He is likely to go to prison.
Rape reform in NSW means that post-coital regrets can now be refashioned into rape claims that send innocent men to prison. That’s why Gold Coast Titans footballer Anthony Laffranchi is a fortunate man. He walked free from a rape charge last week after the prosecution failed to establish lack of consent. He and his then Wests Tigers NRL teammates met a woman at the Sapphire Club in Kings Cross in September 2006 and continued to party at a teammate’s apartment. The footballer said he had consensual sex.
The woman, who was “significantly affected” by alcohol, claimed she was raped.
Had Laffranchi met the woman after January this year, he would probably be a convicted rapist facing a long stint in prison.
Let us be clear. Rape is wrong. It is a crime that calls for imprisonment. It can destroy a victim’s life.
But let us be clear about something else.
Wrongful claims of rape are made. And they can destroy a man’s life. No one knows whether a rape occurred that night when Laffranchi had sex with the woman. But under the old laws of rape, the defendant’s actual state of mind was critical. If the accused had an honest belief that sex was consensual, the rape charge failed. And when the evidence became a simple contest between “he said, she said”, a reasonable doubt would lead to an acquittal. Criminal law says that is as it should be; we are talking about a serious crime and imprisonment.
Not anymore.
Now the rules have changed.
Now, in a contest between he said it was consensual and she said it was rape, a jury may be forced to convict the man of rape without any further corroborating evidence.
The new laws say that if a woman is “substantially affected” by alcohol, she may lack the capacity to consent to sex even if she says “yes” to sex. More disturbing, even if a man honestly believes consent was given, his state of mind is now irrelevant. Now, the man is effectively deemed to have knowledge of lack of consent if there are no reasonable grounds for believing consent was given.
And it gets worse.
When asked to determine whether the man had no reasonable grounds for believing the woman gave consent, the jury must ignore the fact that the man was drunk.
In other words, the fact that the woman who says “yes” to sex is drunk is highly relevant: it may vitiate her consent. But the man’s intoxication must be ignored when working out whether he had “reasonable grounds” for believing consent was given. It is a curious law that says alcohol only affects the cognitive abilities of women.
These new rape laws degrade women. They treat them as helpless victims, stripping them of the power to make decisions about sex after consuming alcohol. Down a few too many Bacardi Breezers, and the law says you are no longer responsible for your actions. Is this really the message we want to send to young women?
And for men, it’s even more serious. As the President of the NSW Bar Association, Anna Katzmann SC, has pointed out, these new laws mean that the intoxicated man will be treated just like “the true rapist, the aggressor who inflicts himself on his victim, knowing they do not consent”. There is no gradation of penalties.
Why is this happening? Lawyers point to the perfect storm. The intoxicated man is trapped between a strident but misguided feminist agenda and the law and order lobby driven by perceptions that rape conviction rates are too low.
In reality, the low conviction rates reflect nothing more than the reasonable doubt that arises when, absent other evidence about an alleged crime in private, a woman claims rape and a man claims sex was consensual.
Stephen Odgers, a senior Sydney silk who chairs the Criminal Law Committee of the Bar Association, told The Australian that, while we all want a civilised world where people treat each other with mutual respect in all walks of life, including sexual interactions, the new rape laws are a “very blunt and brutal instrument” to educate and civilise us about sexual relations. He fears that the new rape laws, in effect, can be used to criminalise those who merely treat others with disrespect after a night of sex. “And people will end up going to jail for long periods as a result.” That is why his committee, made up of almost equal numbers of prosecutors and defence lawyers opposed the reforms.
So how does a man navigate the consent nightmare?
Bring a witness into the bedroom?
Perhaps bring along a lawyer to guide him through every stage of consensual sex from foreplay to orgasm to ensure that the final, breathless and drunken “yes, yes, yes” is genuine consent? Similar rape reforms in South Australia led independent MP Ann Bressington to suggest earlier this month that perhaps
“parliament could devise a sex contract which men could carry around in their pocket, next to their condoms”.
Bressington is concerned that otherwise sensible rape reform has gone too far, leaving “very little room for a decent defence of a man who has been falsely accused”.
False accusations are helped along, says Heather MacDonald in the winter edition of City Journal, by feminist victimology and rape industrialists intent on redefining drunken sex where a bloke wants to get inside a girl’s knickers in terms of the classic case of domination rape by power-hungry men.
If you are a man, you are entitled to be frightened by the new order.
While society is still committed to a 1960s model of sexual liberation, encouraging men and women to explore their sexual desires, the state is also entering the bedroom trying to educate us about appropriate sexual conduct. Unfortunately, we may discover that civility cannot be legislated by criminal sanction without innocent men going to prison.
Australia also has a lower divorce rate then America, so it will fail less then half the time.
*
Australia is also one of the feminist controlled countries in the world.
It’s so pathetic there, men AREN’T getting married there- they are going to Thailand to get women.
That’s not the worst part for men in Australia:
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,23644674-2,00.html
Young Aussies ‘losing’ male role models
By Stephen Lunn
May 05, 2008 06:00am
THE social development of many young Australians may be stunted because potential male role models will not engage with them for fear of being wrongly accused of child abuse.
Men are worried about putting themselves in positions where such an allegation may be levelled against them, either within families and more broadly at school or in social settings such as team sports, warns Australian Institute of Family Studies director Alan Hayes.
This may add to the problems of the current generation of children, who are more anxious and have more developmental problems and mental health issues than previously, he says.
In a paper presented to the Australian Family Law conference, Professor Hayes notes that while the significance of harm caused by child abuse should not be underestimated, the public focus on shocking instances has wider ramifications, particularly on the raising of boys.
“Within families, concern over child sexual abuse has … altered the nature of relationships and the behaviour of fathers and male members of extended families particularly,” he writes in the paper, to be published this week in the AIFS Family Matters series.
“There is a sense in which families have also been touched by what, at times, can be an overly fearful focus on child abuse.
“Beyond the family, the changes have been even more marked, with increasing anxiety surrounding children’s interaction with their teachers, clergy and coaches, among others.
“The fear of accusations of sexual abuse may be one driver … for the decline in the proportion of males entering teaching.”
Professor Hayes says the reported levels of child abuse in 2006-07 — 309,517 notifications and 58,567 substantiated cases involving 32,585 children — underestimates the prevalence of the problem. He says Aboriginal children are among those most at risk.
But this, he says, represents 0.7per cent of the child population aged 0-16. “While there can be no room for complacency about a situation such as this in a nation with the advancement and wealth we possess, the unanticipated negative effects on the rest of the population also cannot be ignored.”
He says the problem is most acute for the nearly 30 per cent of children growing up in single-parent households or households with a step-parent. “For both boys and girls, especially those growing up in sole-parent families, the lack of male role models is of concern.”
Professor Hayes says other factors are making the current generation of children’s lives more challenging, including the fact that more children are being born into disadvantaged homes.
Guess what we are doing tonight :P? Yea thats right.
*
You begging for sex.
Guess what your not doing? Yea the same thing :P
*
You’re right. She’s begging me…she forgets gaming is more important than her. I’ll take care of her after my gaming is done.
You don’t want STD’s? Good netiher do I, use a condom. Realy they help.
*
They DO help…about 95%
And how are you going to stop women from posting on the board.
*
I’m not. I expect children to never read the rules and obey them. It amuses me to see how easy it is to watch them whip out the repeated insults, emotional logic and shaming tactics as well as personal attacks and not once disprove that men are better than women.
Wait your not, your going to winge about it.
*
No, that would be you whining so hard about defending your female consort. That’s your choice, not mine.
Good work bro. Love your arguement Im defending her simply because I want sex.
*
Then why else would you defend her honor on the internet?
Thats just sad man. More to life then sex.
*
True. Thing is, the only need for women is sex. Everything else has been invented by a MAN.
Personaly I’m looking foward to getting married and being a father.
*
Why didn’t you do that before you banged the chick? You probably missed the part where Dick says NOT to get into a legal contract with a woman. However, if you think you can escape the fate so many men fall into, then enjoy your freedom…
And yea, your username makes you sound like a 14 yearold playing WoW.
*
Again, you really can’t talk about usernames.
Oh yeah, let’s not forget your succubus:
Don’t attack my boyfriend just because he’s got a girl,
*
Personally I’d rather have a lady as a female consort, but as long as you are above the age of consent…
and you’re all sad lonely fuckers
*
Predictable shaming tactic…she FEELS that the ONLY men who post here are alone, just as she hopes they are. The only thing she has going for her is a simp playing Capt. Sav-A-Hoe. It just makes them even more pathetic.
who’ve either been left by their wives
*
Thanks…I was gonna mention how 62% of women cheat in a marriage and 85% of divorces are initiated by women…so, tell us why we should marry whores…
or haven’t had a date since before that time you got rejected at prom in 1985.
*
The prom? Sorry, sugar tits but you might wanna try a better tactic that the prom. The prom is simply a chance for girls to dress up and start their lifetime whoring as they usually do. Judging by the amount of sex the average woman denies having, the prom is basically a call out to be a call girl for the night.
Deathslayer
She is fun when she is fiestey :P Guess what we are doing tonight :P? Yea thats right. Guess what your not doing? Yea the same thing :P
Oh Please? Weak? Me?
I am not weak at all. I just get tired of having to argue pointless arguments such as ‘men are better than women’. It would be ok if the website gave decent points as to why they are for this statement, but I find that most of them as piss-poor attempts at telling everyone that women hate sex but are indeed whores.
Trading cooking and cleaning for blowjobs? Seriously, guys on this site, get a life. Get a fucking clue as well. You clearly don’t know women and never will. Don’t attack my boyfriend just because he’s got a girl, and you’re all sad lonely fuckers who’ve either been left by their wives or haven’t had a date since before that time you got rejected at prom in 1985.
Just saying really, because someone had to.
User name isnt ment to be cool. I assume your name is Matt, and that is why your user is Matt. My name is Tom and I’m a girl called Kat’s boyfriend. :O SHOCK! Australia also has a lower divorce rate then America, so it will fail less then half the time. And Dr. Phil is on daytime TV, and day time TV here sucks, why watch it?
“Tom, Kats boyfriend” Is not really that much cooler of an alias. Noone gives a fancy shit your with that slut. Any female that posts on here wants more attention. Nice plan too! Get married, have kids. you left out the part where that plan fails misserably half the time! Take your P-whipped ass off this website and go watch some Dr. phil Mcgraw.
Right, focus on bracing for conflation. Offering advice like you matter will just make things worse - you can’t fool hell.
ROAR THE MIGHTY DEATHLSLAY ATTACKS WITH HIS INFOMATION OF STD’S OF BDING COMMON AND HOW MANLY HIS USERNAME IS.
You don’t want STD’s? Good netiher do I, use a condom. Realy they help.
And how are you going to stop women from posting on the board. Wait your not, your going to winge about it. Good work bro. Love your arguement Im defending her simply because I want sex. Thats just sad man. More to life then sex. Personaly I’m looking foward to getting married and being a father.
And yea, your username makes you sound like a 14 yearold playing WoW.