Marie Curie Deserves a Nobel Prize in Full of Shit
You know, I’m seriously sick of all this Marie Curie nonsense.
Men, let me tell you one thing that I know as 100% fact. Marie Curie was not some fucking super scientist that saved all women from the brink of total historical irrelevance. Women can’t be scientists; plain and simple. It’s not in their blood.
What she actually was — just like every other successful woman in history — was an opinionated, bray-hard, nag ninny with a penchant for stealing the work of her diligent husband.
Marie Curie was the Courtney Love of the 1920’s.
Watch me as I compile a man-erific list of evidence against this pseudo-chemist broad-fraud and her tall tales of females in science. The very idea of which is as laughable as a farting machine.
First of all, Madam Marie Curie didn’t win any fuck all Nobel Prize. She won a third of a Nobel Prize. And to do so she had to support herself on not only her husband, but some other dude as well. How typical of a woman to allow her business relationships to become inappropriately mingled with her personal life. If Marie Curie deserves any kind of Nobel Prize, it’s one for Cock Teasing — which shouldn’t be rewarded. That’s why there’s no Nobel Prize for it.
Marie Curie was the first woman to be allegedly awarded the Nobel Prize.
Here’s a lesson that I’ve learned while reading books of history. I’m a man so I enjoy history. I find it a comfortable fit with my manly ethos; like a worn jacket or old pair of sneaking shoes. Unlike women of course, who loathe history as much as they hate being told they’re just as obnoxious as their mothers. And they all are.
Throughout my years of didactic historical research, I’ve realized that any time a woman is the first to do something it’s always complete token bullshit. And I mean industrial-grade, economy-sized bullshit. The kind of tangled nonsense horseshit you get when you cross a woman and an opinion, or a mule and a spinning wheel. Just like Sandra Day O’Connor, Susan B. Anthony, Edith Wharton, Rebecca Felton, Lucy Stone, Madeline Albright, and Sally Ride; Marie Curie is nothing more than a lip-serviced “Runner Up” in the history of MAN.
What my point is, is that instead of hijacking her husbands work on radiation and spouting an infeasible, overly-idealistic and immature philosophical dogma about scientific progress while doing so, Marie Curie should have been going for her Nobel Prize in Not Dying of Radiation Poisoning like a twat. What the fuck do women know about scientific progress anyway? How about absolutely nothing.
Marie Curie was also widely known as a racist — and she was also Polish so you know she was dumb as shit.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 4 3 [2] 1 » Show All
Tax payers money put to good use….
Now, if you had said:
No, I am not in therapy. My parents were not negative towards me the way yours were.
You’d be right. As written, it was ambiguous.
Sad when you have to explain a joke to such a “literate” young lady…
Alen, learn to read: “No I am not in therapy”
Personly I come on here to irritate the hell outa Dick, and also because the internet is for everyone, if I wana be here, I’l be here.
“Has it occurred to you that no one cares what you think either Dick? Really.”
If no one cares, than why do they come to a site he maintains and pays for? Pays for with money that comes as a result of his hardwork I might add…
Final interesting tidbit: HIStory…
Then why ARE you in therapy?! ;o)
Has it occurred to you that no one cares what you think either Dick? Really.
P.S. No I am not in therapy because my parents were not negative towards me the way yours were.
Again. Horty. You’ve got to take that Show and Tell, This is My Life bullshit elsewhere. Just like everywhere else, no one here cares what you’re going to do — ever.
-Dick
I don’t have a psychologist, I’m going to become one, but I never said that I had one.
Why does it not surprise me that both of you two crazy broads have psychologists by the ages of 16 and 17?
-Dick
Well as an American, you wouldn’t get a psychologist for free now would you?
Therapy bills?
-Dick
Oh no Dick, we wouldn’t want to be positive towards children. That would save too much money in later life on therapy bills.
My god man, I bet your parents never complimented you once as a child. Which may explain why you turned out the way you did, so dam negative.
Won two Nobel Prizes jointly!? Is this like how everyone wins for graduating the fifth grade just for showing up.
Congratulations kids, you’re all winners! And if women ran the world, that’s exactly how you’d be rewarded for the rest of your life.
What a bunch of bullshit.
-Dick
Maybe the ‘truth’ you’re looking for doesn’t exist, because in actual fact she was a brilliant scientist who deservedly won 2 nobel prizes, jointly or otherwise.
Jimbo,
I couldn’t agree with your sentiments any more than I do.
I think the men here should know that I actually found it difficult to find any information on how much malfeasance has been perpetrated on the account of Marie Curie. The truth is being buried out there in the history books. And that doesn’t fit well with my man sensibilities.
-Dick
Ladies, ladies, ladies. Calm down. Remember; you’re not even supposed to be on this site, let alone commenting about it. Be more like Marie Curie and sit on the sidelines while the men do all the commenting. And while you’re at it, get me a cup of coffee.
*hypocrisy
…guess it was too complicated for you as well.
“Marie Curie was also widely known as a racist — and she was also Polish so you know she was dumb as shit.”
Erm, hypocricy, or is that word a little complex for you boys.
Just how many famous science awards ARE named after women anyway?
Thanks for clearing that up, Dick. Actually, since chemistry is a lesser subject than physics, you may decide to factor that in as well.
Oh, and Elliott? Thanks for your insightful followup, you boring little puddle of piss.
hey,
fuck you brewer. you can cough on my cock