Women: Homewreckers From Birth
It’s a commonly accepted fact that women ruin most marriages. At the moment, the worldwide divorce rate is somewhere around 50%. If it isn’t, I don’t care. The point is, in addition to being loud-mouthed and lazy, today’s modern woman doesn’t know how to compensate for her shortcomings in marriage by shelling out any respect. Women also have opinions these days instead of chores. That’s stupid.
What about when divorce isn’t a woman’s fault? It’s unlikely, but since I’m a man, I’ll be the first to admit when women are not to blame.
Science, unclouded by my male compassion, disagrees, and points the blame at daughters. The Little Women.
Gordon Dahl and Enrico Moretti have compiled a scientific paper that includes the following man-ass blowing statistics:
Parents of girls are 5% more likely to divorce.
Parents of three girls are 10% more likely to divorce.
Single mothers of girls are completely fucked.
Apparently, women are poison to relationships no matter what their age! Whether they’re making ten cents on the dollar neglecting their children at some stupid Barbie Dream Job, or just being ten and playing with their Barbie Dream House, women ruin marriages. There’s no arguing with statistics. The figures are black and white.
When I first found out about this study, I was appalled. Little girls are even smaller and more helpless than women. They know even less and need more assurance and assistance than their larger and more opinionated counter-parts. Maybe, I decided, that’s why they’re such a strain on marriage.
Little girls cost way more to raise than little boys.
Men (and therefore boys) have something called imanginations. It means they can turn a cardboard box into a spaceship or a racecar or an outhouse at a construction site. Little boys don’t need constant fucking babysitting and they don’t need a bunch of expensive clothing and shiny bullshit. Fuck the nickel and dime shit, today’s modern little girl needs to have her wedding and college financed! That’s the dollar double dip that broke the marriage camel’s back!
Little boys wig the fuck out at divorces.
As a woman, would you want your bedroom furniture burned or your teenage son to be banned from public school transportation? No way. There aren’t enough hours in the week for a woman to deal with something like that. That’s called, ‘boys incentivize a happy marriage’.
No one wants a daughter.
It sounds harsh and that’s why women are banned from reading all of this, but while everyone loves their daughters, no one ever wanted one. Cindy Crawford loves her mole and Owen Wilson probably loves his fucked up nose, but at some point both were catastrophes. What’s a daughter going to do? Get married to a billionaire? That’s some big fucking achievement. A son might start IBM or join the Marines. There’s no telling what kind of excitement lay ahead.
In conclusion, just like keeping a full-sized woman, having a baby girl involves a lot of charity. If you find yourself in the predicament of having one and you also want to maintain your marriage, take a lesson from China: have a boy instead.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 8 7 6 5 4 3 [2] 1 » Show All
So she is as fully mature as she will ever be now.
I am glad I have no split tails for I was lucky and got two of the smart ones. Boys are great when they aren’t raised alone by cunts.
I was not surprised to find the level of fraud.
I did believe his work was highly suspect when I first encountered it courtesy of a colleague because most letters I’ve read from the colonial and pre-colonial period don’t remotely bear out his thesis of a (relatively) unarmed America. But I’m certainly no expert on the period.
Was there any particular reason for raising him?
-wolfe
Wolfe, Michael A. Bellesiles?
- the beloved - sweet harmony
I have both, a little girl and a little boy. They both drive me fucking nuts at times and at other times they both bring me joy. The difference my son, at age 9, already has a firm grasp of relality. My daughter, fucked. She believes that this life is going to provide her with the biggest house, a custom 200K+ Hummer, the best clothes, and on and on. She has no idea of how it is going to happen but she knows fucking well that daddy will not be providing it. I have started to see the changes in her over the last years from a “kid” to a girl. Eventually I suppose she will turn into a stupid cunt, just like all women, and really like the ones on this site, WHO SHOULD FUCK OFF, IT IS FOR MEN ONLY DUMB FUCKS!
Hmmm… perhaps this is the proper id. If so, the above post is me.
-wolfe
Yes. Men and women are different.
This is an assertion I’ve not seen much evidence of here.
? Why the odd speculation.
This would be potentially hypocritical, but hardly illogical. But again, you’re introducing assertions without facts in evidence to back them up, and I don’t think most men here are in fact saying this.
About paternity, yes. If men had the power to substitute another woman’s egg and have a woman bring up a baby that wasn’t genetically her own without ever realizing it, women might feel the same way about it. If men had the power to deny women the ability to reproduce — while thinking they’d reproduced, then, yes, it might be something women would get a tad insecure about.
I wonder why that might be.
I think if you read what a great many men here are saying, you will note promiscuity and endless cheap sex is not what they desire. I would agree promiscuity benefits men who desire that more than it does women who don’t.
But removing negative societal consequences from female promiscuity benefits all women. It is not clear that it benefits any men. Or society.
Again, I think you are making assertions based upon the sketchiest of evidence. Certainly not based on what I’ve been reading on this site of late.
-wolfe
Unfortunately, without a father in the home, a young women will, most likely, turn into a slut. And dumb mothers get rid of little girl’s fathers about 1/2 the time. So, to have a daughter means there is a 50% chance of her becoming a slut.
Heh. It seems to be one rule for men and another one for women. There seems to be a problem with logistics of this theory some of you gentlemen have.
You want to be able to sleep around, because this gives you power or some reason to be proud of yourself. However, in order to do this you need women who will sleep with you - yet you look down on and criticize women who do this, even though the women is necessary for the casual sex you wish to have.
If more women were more sexually conservative the reality would be that men wouldn’t have as many opportunities to have casual sex as they do, which I believe a majority of men enjoy and take full advantage of. (And I don’t mean in an exploitative way either)
This contrary attitude of enjoying women having sex with you but looking down on her for doing so leads me to the conclusion that men are highly insecure. It is as if men want a woman to be sluttish in the bedroom but only with him, the idea of her already having sex with another bloke is a turn-off.
I am not an apologist for promiscuous women. I think the nature of promiscuity today actually benefits men not women, because men have access to easy sex. It is actually women, I think, that draw the short straw.
The truth is as you have stated, a majority of men would find it hard to respect a woman who sleeps around, even though he wouldn’t mind shagging her himself, he wouldn’t take her for his girlfriend for fear of her running off with another man.
Men benefit and from all appearences enjoy casual sex but women are not respected but seen (at least from the male perspective) as sluts and whores - I think the quicker women learn this male attitude the happier she would be.
Sorry i meant Anyway*
Any guys there is a petition online to help destroy feminism. THAT SITE IS http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/downwithfeminismnow
If you are saying that the men of the town will feel that have a special pass to take the piss out of the father because they had sex with his daughter, then what they are really thinking is that the father must be an idiot for raising a daughter that allowed them to have sex with her. I guess they know better than anyone else how dumb someone would have to be to have sex with them.
SotS,
Another take on this is “reverse cuckoldry”: the woman goes out clubbing etc and presents herself as an “independent” woman who wants casual sex.. ie the typical slutty feminist type who dresses and acts like she wants to get fucked. Then when she has sex with some alpha type guy, she wakes up the next day and turns back into the “good girl”, then goes back to her beta daddy and cries about what the “bad man” did to her. Then daddy gets the matriarchal government to punish the young man - either sexual harassment accusations, false rape accusations, statutory rape accusation, or if she gets preggers, she’ll force the man into child support slavery for 21 years, most times without allowing him to even see his child (some women make a nice career out of this - fat fuckin welfare queen feminists).
Anyway you slice it, all men - betas, alphas, family men, players, blacks, whites, purples, whatever - eventually lose under matriarchy.
“Iow, men who fuck and run win. Men who are fathers of the fucked/chucked daughters lose. Usually the slut daughters don’t really care if the bastard’s father runs if they can cuckold their own fathers/brothers into raising her and her bastard. So, in the end, it is mainly the men of her family who lose.”
And the fathers and brothers who refuse to care for bastards are the survivors, the one’s who can see through the bullshit and have “what it takes”.
Let the whores and their bastards starve.
…excuse me. You’re a woman. And you’re talking about morality? Where are your fucking morals when men get their kids taken away but still have to care for them. Where are your fucking morals when a man gets charged for rape and she consented to it in the first place. Where are they when a man gets nothing but the woman gets everything in a failed marriage which is 50 percent her fault
Morality? You women have as much of that as you have dicks. None.
From a genetic and evolutionary perspective, a man who spreads his genes and doesn’t expend any male parental investment (mpi), ie. time, money, committment - towards raising the offspring - is a winner. He gets to spread his genes without cost.
The woman/whore who gets fucked and chucked is a loser as well as the men of her family who will be forced to raise the bastard in shame. Her genes and the family’s genes (in the bastard) are reduced in quality due to not receiving any mpi from the bastard’s father - essentially they have given away her female parental investment (her body, pregnancy, nursing, raising of the kid) for free.
Iow, men who fuck and run win. Men who are fathers of the fucked/chucked daughters lose. Usually the slut daughters don’t really care if the bastard’s father runs if they can cuckold their own fathers/brothers into raising her and her bastard. So, in the end, it is mainly the men of her family who lose.
Yes that’s right, western men, you and I are the cucky wucky losers who can just bend over and take it up the butt with a smile.
Thanks for the lesson in morality, Sandra Dee.
Shut the fuck up and fuck off my site.
-Dick
A son who “fucks whores” is nothing to be proud of, he’s showing the same lack of morality that a female slut is. Maybe being able to sleep around makes him powerful, but it also makes him immoral. Also, not all daughters are sluts, they could easily grow up to be something a father would be proud of. And I’d argue that parents have control over their daughters just as they do their sons; it’s the parents responsibility to teach their children how to behave regardless of the child’s gender.
When a man has a daughter, in our matriarchal world especially, he essentially aquires a vagina he has no control over. He instantly becomes a fuckee instead of a fucker.. a bottom instead of a top. So when the slut lets herself get fucked by the neighborhood, the father essentially has to feel and bear the shame in the eyes of his peers - which she herself is clueless about and bears no cost emotionally, socially etc - the men of the family will bear all of this humilation alone.
If a man has a son, he aquires another penis. When his son fucks whores, the father can only gain pride and power in the eyes of other men - he essentially becomes a bigger/stronger fucker - instead of a fuckee.. a top instead of a bottom… a winner instead of a loser.
Thus, having a son gives a man much greater odds of becoming a winner - having a daughter much greater odds of becoming a loser.
-BMU
Right you are, Dutch269.
-Dick
So your Mom has come to the realization that girls are stupid? That is the only way to understand girls. How typical of a woman to argue against the facts.