Are Women Smarter Than Horses?
There’s one thing that women are better than men at. I hate to admit it, but it’s true. Women are much better than men at being dumb. But for some reason this fact is hard to prove.
Every day — or thousands of times a day — women go back to abusive spouses or hit Reply To All on an office email even though the buttons are clearly fucking labeled and that is obviously not the right one to press. We men can all agree that those are equally and hugely dumb things to do. However, in this modern and woman-age of double-think and double-speak and no accountability and all other manners of female bullshit, the evidence of the kind I’ve just described is not “evidence” per se. It doesn’t get the job done. And as men, that’s what we’re worried about at all times. Getting the job done.
What we would need in order to say for certain that women are better than men at being dumb is some kind of broad study that says very explicitly:
MEN ARE SMARTER THAN WOMEN
And says so with statistics. We’re men after all. When we prove something we do it with facts and numbers of concrete, not opinions and whining like a meandering teenage girl. Unfortunately, it’s not every day that facts and numbers like these come along.
Today is that day.
Doctors Paul Irwin and Richard Lynn — both men and both British also so you know they don’t fuck about when it comes to talking about shit and knowing their shit before they open their mouths — that’s how British men behave. All men of different backgrounds and nationalities are great and better than all women, but they each have strong suits and unique abilities, like the A Team, or the Smurfs. These two Britons have just published some findings about the Quotient of Intelligence that women all over Earth will find way fucking surprising and men will not.
Here’s what they found.
MEN ARE SMARTER THAN WOMEN
But not because they’re bad drivers or because they get pregnant at the drop of a dime without a job or because they can’t keep a car maintained to save their lives or because not one woman ever has successfully completed a simple fucking crossword puzzle without the help of a man; this time the proof is in the stats.
It’s obviously because our brains are bigger.
Seriously, with stats like that is it any wonder that the Chinese have such a huge problem with too many female babies? That country obviously needs the help of a smart populace of men and everyone should do their part. Just like recycling — which, as a man, I am against. There’s nothing more manly than wasting things, especially resources.
Read more about women being dumb.
Related Articles:
September 19th, 2007 at 2:02 pm - IP Man-Hash: 45a19a6365772
I thought womyn were the ones who have a natural coating of fat. Even the ones who binge up good food can’t remove that persistent layer. It still exists, regardless of what a shallow pop-culture’s representation of it is. Yes, a woman at peak physical condition could conceivably swim across the Atlantic while a male at said peak could not. Does that change the fact that women who are athletic - let alone women who actually perform muscle-building exercises or any other type = constitute perhaps 1% of the young female population at the very most? I know of - indirectly - one teenage female athlete. I say athlete because she participates in an actual sport requiring discipline, character, and motivation. Cheer leading, dancing, or ice skating are not sports. You are not an athlete if you jog for the sensation of your bloated tits slapping against your chest*.
And, of course, in any respect, it’s a give-and-take trait. However, as with all things, the disadvantages of this female trait far outnumber the advantages**, and it achieves its greatest potential only in deviant cases.
*You’d think our PC, pro-decency anti-sexist society would expect one to reserve such behavior for the bathroom, if anywhere. But, alas, it is encouraged and empowering.
**As always with the entire package. Cutting 5mpg from a truck will hardly improve performance in any aspect. Adding a babymaker to the human body will require some functions be reserved for its -hopefully- eventual usage.
September 19th, 2007 at 2:05 pm - IP Man-Hash: 45a19a6365772
Actually, on the Atlantic part, a man would require a bit more strength and endurance in addition to a more effective wet-suit. Or dry-suit.
Come to think of it, men frequently do swim large distances. Well, I rest said example as-is, due to the surprising difficulty of finding any additional utility of a female aspect save childbirth. And I feel many of the womyn have beaten that horse to a pulp already, so I hardly encourage an extension on the many perceived utilizations of the womb’s reproductive capabilities.
“People will fuck.”
And babies will be made.
September 19th, 2007 at 2:15 pm - IP Man-Hash: c41fe27e96c6a
Why Christina their is a difference between looking like them and being built like them. Now walk into your bathroom. Your Jenny Craig treatment starts there.
September 19th, 2007 at 5:02 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0e6a85c252aa8
If you think women are so stupid, then why is it when we try to leave you home with the kids we come home to the house being a mess, food all over, and a bunch of sugar coated food in the cupboards? Last time I checked, it wasn’ t that hard to raise kids, and a lot of women do it everyday. And for some reason, men can’t, and won’t because they’re just too damn lazy. So whos stupid now, you self centered, tyrant bastards?
September 19th, 2007 at 5:28 pm - IP Man-Hash: 2e9b52f9da52f
Charisma and personality oozes from your many pores.
September 19th, 2007 at 6:15 pm - IP Man-Hash: b24fa70c8e643
Straight from the HORSES mouth! Remember to quote this harpy to all the others when they bitch about their hard life at home raising the kids and using all those Manventions to make life even easier.
I don’t see this wench complaining about her TAMPON that a Man invented. If it wasn’t for THIS Man, she’d be leaving a disgusting blood drip trail everywhere. The words “thank you sir” would seem more appropriate.
Here’s the facts to back it up. Unlike anonymous’s scrambled “woman logic”, the data is both verifiable and useful.
-”In 1929, the modern tampon (with applicator) was first invented and patented by Doctor Earle Haas. Dr Haas filed for his first tampon patent on November 19, 1931. . He later trademarked Tampax as the brandname for his tampon product”.
-”Mansman tells you what you need to know”.
September 21st, 2007 at 7:46 am - IP Man-Hash: 947c796c93784
MansMan, huh? Are you gay, because that’s what that name seems to imply. Either that, or your not getting any, because you seem to hate women a lot. And what does the invention of the tampon have to do with this? And why do you know when the tampon was invented, and by who? Does that sort of thing interest you, pervert?
September 21st, 2007 at 8:45 am - IP Man-Hash: a13ba81333017
How original.
Men also invented contractions, which women promptly stole and started making use of. Pity you won’t.
-wolfe
September 21st, 2007 at 10:51 am - IP Man-Hash: 9b7a2b3eaa486
“Holly” what kinda name is that?
Are some common plant that’s cheap and nailed to a door once a year for Christmas?
Do you have red poisonous berries that kill small children when consumed?
September 22nd, 2007 at 1:46 am - IP Man-Hash: b24fa70c8e643
Why does Holly post under the names Christina, Pamela Pan, Holly and anonoymous? (so far). Is there an identity crisis going on? Did all four personalities miss the “no women allowed” sign?
In the mean time, lets take a look at their post and see if anything even makes sense…or if it’s just angry womanspeak as usual.
Nothing rational here so far. It does seem like Holly and her friends look down on, scorn or hate Gay people though…is this the case, Holly?
I’m detecting a hate theme here, but let’s give “Holly 1,2,3 and 4″ the benefit of the doubt and pretend they’re trying to actually make a valid point. Seeing as I do get plenty, it just leaves the allegation of “hating women”. For that part, I’ll invite “Holly 1″ to QUOTE ME something I have said which evidentially proves the assertion that I “hate” women. For “Holly 1’s” benefit, that means she’ll need to have TANGIBLE reasoning which validates the allegation. Bullshit innuendo or inferences won’t count naturally, but watch her try it as a first, lazy ass option; her clumsy intellect will surely amuse me. So it’s over to you, “Holly, Christina, et al”…
Oh…you missed the point. I must have been going too fast for you. Here it is in slow motion…….the point…..being…..made…..was….. “that the words ‘thank you sir’ would seem more appropriate”
(as it related to a Man having made wo-mans lives easier by inventing the pussy plug, or Tampon)…..; Didn’t you READ the post, or did you just not comprehend it?
Are the Fascists back in charge? I didn’t realise there were rules on what people are allowed to know, and not know. Sorry honey. I’ll try to be dumber, but I can’t promise it’ll work. Maybe you could try for me?
She finally belches out one last meaningless ad-hominem, not realising how irrational she has become, and so quickly.
-It’s basically THE type of female we are forced to tolerate in the Western World at the present time. Not very pretty, is it?
Imagine being married to it!
There’s no hate here…just what Holly brought in.
October 18th, 2007 at 5:01 pm - IP Man-Hash: 84e1322849682
Wow.. guys these chicks just dont get it do they , oh i know why its cause there dumb they cant help it , ladies go back to the kitchen.
October 18th, 2007 at 6:47 pm - IP Man-Hash: b3d9604b143dd
“sera” clearly demonstrates that she does not agree with a lot of the ideas put forth by countless men on this page. Of course, maybe she should have read the article. Even though it is just one article that has good points, and research to go with it, it is still one article, which is more than you, or anyone complaining about how men are wrong, have provided. When you, or someone else, provides a well conducted experiment stating that men, are in fact, not smarter than women, then I will give you a pat on the back and most likely tell you, “Good job, you have successfully achieved what no other women has yet, manage to argue a point without pissing and moaning about how men are wife beaters. You must not be a women or you were raised in a household that had a lot of men in it.”
As for males beating women. Do you think that other men, that hear that, congratulate the one guy. Let me tell you the answer. Some men do, most do not. That wife beater is more of the laughing stock among men because he cannot manage to logically deal with a situation. If you notice, this “man” sounds more like a women. Dealing with situations unreasonably, jumping to irrational behaviors on a whim. Yes, I believe that this does not sound like a very manly man. Furthermore, I do not support in any way the abuse of power over a women. People like that are usually losers and have no real life.
I’d also like to comment on your statement regarding the creator of this page. You assume that “Dick”, spelled with a capital letter because he is a person, is a women beater and has no qualifications to comment on his theory of why women return after being beaten. Since, we are getting into who qualified to do what and who is not, lets take a look at what you’re qualified for. One, you are commenting on a web page that is over run with men who want to get a good laugh and care nothing about what you say. Two, your points are not even about the topic of the situation at hand. to refresh your memory it is the bold statement “Men are Smarter than Women.” Because you are not arguing against the point, you have no real argument. Just saying,
does not improve your position. Being purposely ignorant would not be a smart thing to do if you want to make a strong case against someone. Actually, it sounds like a pretty STUPID thing to do. Also, it seems as though you come to this site a lot to just read comments and argue against them. I myself, have only visited this site once this being the first time. My friend wanted me to read something he found funny, but you seem to like to waste your time going off of this statement, “i never really read the articles, that would be more of a time waster than dicks life.” So again, using your own words to make an argument. If you think that because “Dick”, who most likely does this on his spare time for fun, wastes his time, you should really look at the person who is really wasting their time. To make this simpler it is you. You see the difference is he is enjoying himself doing a hobby he enjoys, you are just complaining.
Now I’m sure you’re having lots of fun outwitting dumb people a.k.a. majority of people who leave comments, but you have come across someone, myself, who also loves to counter peoples arguments. You see the difference between me and you is not just our gender, it is also our level of intellect. You being someone sophisticated seeing that you are able to write a load of crap that attempts to counter points with other points like world hunger. What are you doing for world hunger if you are on this site? I don’t see you making a website for “west memphis three.” The most likely answer for all of this is you may help world hunger but you will never fix it. The earth has too many people on it and competition for food and shelter makes it almost impossible for everyone to live. Once you reach carrying capacity thats it, either people die or they live because they were that much better than the people that died. Also, you probably can’t make a web page for your “googled” issue about “west memphis three”, so when you want to tell people what to do maybe you should think, “Do I have
That is it for me. I could continue on about a proper way to argue, but I think you get my message. I also know that if you ever read this, you will most likely attempt to argue against me, so I thought I’d help you out with some facts about me. I am only 17, so my opinion does not really have very much weight to persuade a lot of people even though many will most likely agree with me. I am not arguing about if men are smarter than women even though I told you that you were in fact acting very dumb by not reading about what you are arguing against. I personally find women to be overly emotional which could be the reason that their IQ, according to the test, is lower seeing that emotions affect the decisions we make. I also find that women like to twist words so that they can better manipulate other people for their personal gain. You state that you are not like most women, but I believe that you argue like one. That is to say, men do not argue with facts yet the whole article has them, you would know that if you read it. Also, I believe that you are somewhat hypocritical because you boldly state we do not argue with fact when you just argued without using one quote. What do you think everyone is just going to believe what you say is true. Here is what you said,
Don’t you look stupid now. You just got caught contradicting yourself which now weakens your entire argument. Also, you should probably learn to spell correctly and learn to use CAPITALS and PUNCTUATION so that you appear to at least seem intelligent. Last thing, and this is for the record, I read the article, and I find it funny and enjoyable to read, but I do not hate women just you “sera”.
October 18th, 2007 at 6:53 pm - IP Man-Hash: b3d9604b143dd
Also even though “sera” had written her argument a long while ago, it still go without saying that this applies to most women that write arguments. If you have an issue with me or my post, you can just submit your name where is says “sera” at the bottom. If your smart you might catch on.
October 18th, 2007 at 11:14 pm - IP Man-Hash: 6d3bb32787b07
Agreed. The majority of women act and argue as you have stated. Well said.
November 3rd, 2007 at 8:07 pm - IP Man-Hash: 47e070fd87755
I wonder why is it that women can say that they hate men without anyone accusing them of lesbianism, but men who say they hate women are instantly deemed gay. I wonder why there is this double-standard?
P Coderch
December 14th, 2007 at 7:09 am - IP Man-Hash: 1d5f6f1b50faa
CANNIBAL CORPSE
December 14th, 2007 at 7:18 am - IP Man-Hash: 1d5f6f1b50faa
HOLLY SMELLS
HOLLY SMELLS
December 14th, 2007 at 8:12 am - IP Man-Hash: 8e86de744d7eb
Women have no conscience or shame.
Ever trid to shame one? They would probbly agree that they like eating pussy better than men or you will be screamed at about the guilt trip.
December 20th, 2007 at 3:44 pm - IP Man-Hash: e24370fe2bb3c
Not all women are dumb. There are dumb women, just as there are dumb men.
But you cannot say that every single woman on Earth is an idiot.
That is not proven by anything other than your moronic ideas.
Most women are just as smart as most men. Every race, gender, ethnicity has a few bad seeds, but that doesn’t mean that every person is like that.
By the way Dick, the size of your brain does not affect your IQ, if it did then the geniuses in the world head’s would explode. A little common sense.
March 3rd, 2008 at 4:29 am - IP Man-Hash: 6d75b4c0c735a
Stop using the word american women for feminist women.cause most of the women aroung the globe have become femininst due to westernization.
There are worst kind of feminist women u will encounter like here in India.