Women Don’t Want a Black Man in the White House
I’m disgusted by prejudice against men of all kinds.
Prejudice against women is common sense. They’re no good at anything. Of course it’s okay to be prejudiced against them. It’s okay to be prejudiced against throwing your money into the sewer for the same reason.
Men are better than women.
Hillary Clinton has no chance in hell of becoming the next president of the United States. The only reason she’s running is because women don’t want a black man in the White House.
Women are legendary for their racism.
I asked seven women with young children if they would rather have a white girl or a black man watch their child. None of them responded. Why would a woman not respond to that question unless she had a virulent case racism?
Women didn’t end segregation. Men did. The same goes for slavery and apartheid.
Nelson Mandela? He was a man.
There’s no good reason for Hillary Clinton to be running for president. Victoria Claflin Woodhull already proved that women can’t become president and shouldn’t be in charge of shit when she ran for the White House in 1872. She suffered a massive failure.
What other lesson could Hillary be trying to shove down our throats?
Things haven’t changed much for women in the last 125 years. They can still own property but not afford it, they still marvel endlessly about their cycles, and they still can’t become president no matter how many women have sucked their husband’s dick.
It takes a young man about two months to get tired of shaving his face for the first time. Every time a woman has her period, from 15 to 50, it’s like she’s discovered the continent of Femerica for the first time: the land of the free lunches and the home of endless complaining.
A woman not wanting a black man to babysit her child is like a man not wanting some Latinos to wash his car. That’s racist. People of all colors can wash my car. I don’t care who does it as long as the job gets done.
A man of any color — especially a half-color, has just a good a shot at being president as any other man. We’re all men. We’ve all been punched in the mouth for something, we’ve all had to be more careful while walking around little kids who might accidentally knock us in the nuts, and we’ve all had to negotiate with and tolerate the most annoying, fraudulent, and self-sabotaging creatures on Earth for something we want.
Women.
Unlike women, a black man can be president just as well as a white man. Shit, have you ever had an argument with a black woman? Get through one of those with your nuts and you’re qualified to talk the Gaza Strip into renaming itself Christopia.
24 was a massive success with a black president while Geena Davis’ show didn’t even complete a single season. What does that tell you?
It tells me that the only reason Hillary Clinton is running for president is to ruin a black man’s chances of doing the same. It’s like a young boy eating all the sugar in the house when his mother is trying to bake some dessert. Nice work, you prick. Now no one gets to eat cupcakes.
If you’re drunk and swinging a hammer around your head like a maniac, the reason you’re doing that is to break a bunch of shit. It doesn’t matter what you think your reasons are. If you have a vagina and you’re running for president, the reason you’re doing that is to ruin something.
The real question is what.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 [1] Show All
“The point is that ALL women have skelitons in their closet and it would only be a matter of time before we found it out.”
What male candidate doesn’t have skeletons in his closet as well? They always manage to dig up something: past drug use, affairs, racist comments, draft-dodging, bribes, etc. ANY candidate, male or female, will have something in their past one could attack, and of course it’s always found out and attacked.
“Since the perception is that women are only good for one thing (barley), seeing a woman in a pin-striped pant suit wearing 5 inch spike heels with her fingures gently gripping a microphone delicately licking her lips addressing the nation would only give me a boner and I sure would not remember what the hell she said afterward (unless she was talking dirty to me).”
That isn’t the perception most men have of women. Most men can respect an intelligent woman and value her for more than her looks. Those who can’t see a woman for who she is as a person because they’re distracted by her boobs are incredibly shallow and immature.
I don’t care who is in the white house as long as he is qualified.
Obama seems articulate and astute. He would probably get my vote over Hilary. Hilary should’ve taken that seven figure “Penthouse Magazine” offer they made her awhile back.
It’s not as though I’d like to see her naked (I probably would). Comedian Ron White (Tater Salad) had a “bit” where he said “once you’ve seen one woman naked, you want to see them all”.
I couldn’t agree with him more, so you see, it wouldn’t be so bad to see her naked in suggestive positions, or sliding down a brass pole, it’s our God given right!
Sorry, I got off track. If a black man was in the White house, he like any man would exude class, descretion and restraint in that position, he might even impress us and play “Swanee River” on a banjo or even crack a few off color jokes.
A woman in that position would be fucking dangerous! If she was “PMS’ing, keep her away from the launch codes and launch button.
Nobody takes women seriously either. The perception is that they would not be tough enough for detante or other negotiations.
Could you imagine a woman getting the highest post in the country because of the equal rights amendment? Holy-Shit Batman!
Could you imagine her even trying the same diplomacy that Ronald Regan had with the Soviets?
It would be laughable at best.
Many years ago there was a good movie about a woman that was going to be president or vice president or some shit like that and Sam Elliot was in it.
Someone was trying to discredit her by showing a porno movie she made in her wild & crazy colledge days.
Sam had this great line “nobody would take her seriously with a mouth full of cock”.
And that’s the point. Women are cocksuckers. We know it, they know it and what about it?
The point is that ALL women have skelitons in their closet and it would only be a matter of time before we found it out.
Since the perception is that women are only good for one thing (barley), seeing a woman in a pin-striped pant suit wearing 5 inch spike heels with her fingures gently gripping a microphone delicately licking her lips addressing the nation would only give me a boner and I sure would not remember what the hell she said afterward (unless she was talking dirty to me).
Jack Nicholson in the movie “A Few Good Men” had a good line too when he was telling Demi Moore that there was nothing finer than getting a blow job in the morning from a female superior officer.
What I’m trying to say is that women are still viewed as sex objects. Maybe it should stay that way. Pandoras box was opened a long time ago and good luck trying to close it.
Can we trun back the hands of time some 30 or 40 years and chase women around the water cooler and flirt with them without any repurcussions or labels of political incorrectness or sexual harassment?
After all, it all boils down to enjoying life, playing grab-ass with a woman, partying, riding your Harley and having a male in office with the “Huevos” (to you brits, that’s the same thing as “bullocks”) to keep the freedom going here in the good old U.S. of A.
If that means O’Bama, so be it. Hilary may not have her priorities in order.
Besides, that’s kind of a cool St. Patricks Day name “O’Bama, O’Masterson, O’Banzai.
Let’s all knock back some Boddingtons!!
-Banzai
I was going to blog on an aspect of this (and still may). But I think this headline from a strangely slick ‘unofficial’ Hillary site says it all:
Hmmm… could there be some subtle subtext there?
And that’s not a one-off. The site uses language like that fairly consistently in a way that I think no man in Hillary’s position would use.
I’d link Dick’s post on ‘All Women are racists’, but it would result in this post being held up for moderation.
I don’t think Obama’s the one, because his Chicago voting history shows him to be economically virtually a Marxist. But there are a lot of positive things in his candidacy, starting with him being a man, that I just don’t see in Hillary’s.
Amen.
-wolfe