Women Don’t Want a Black Man in the White House
I’m disgusted by prejudice against men of all kinds.
Prejudice against women is common sense. They’re no good at anything. Of course it’s okay to be prejudiced against them. It’s okay to be prejudiced against throwing your money into the sewer for the same reason.
Men are better than women.
Hillary Clinton has no chance in hell of becoming the next president of the United States. The only reason she’s running is because women don’t want a black man in the White House.
Women are legendary for their racism.
I asked seven women with young children if they would rather have a white girl or a black man watch their child. None of them responded. Why would a woman not respond to that question unless she had a virulent case racism?
Women didn’t end segregation. Men did. The same goes for slavery and apartheid.
Nelson Mandela? He was a man.
There’s no good reason for Hillary Clinton to be running for president. Victoria Claflin Woodhull already proved that women can’t become president and shouldn’t be in charge of shit when she ran for the White House in 1872. She suffered a massive failure.
What other lesson could Hillary be trying to shove down our throats?
Things haven’t changed much for women in the last 125 years. They can still own property but not afford it, they still marvel endlessly about their cycles, and they still can’t become president no matter how many women have sucked their husband’s dick.
It takes a young man about two months to get tired of shaving his face for the first time. Every time a woman has her period, from 15 to 50, it’s like she’s discovered the continent of Femerica for the first time: the land of the free lunches and the home of endless complaining.
A woman not wanting a black man to babysit her child is like a man not wanting some Latinos to wash his car. That’s racist. People of all colors can wash my car. I don’t care who does it as long as the job gets done.
A man of any color — especially a half-color, has just a good a shot at being president as any other man. We’re all men. We’ve all been punched in the mouth for something, we’ve all had to be more careful while walking around little kids who might accidentally knock us in the nuts, and we’ve all had to negotiate with and tolerate the most annoying, fraudulent, and self-sabotaging creatures on Earth for something we want.
Women.
Unlike women, a black man can be president just as well as a white man. Shit, have you ever had an argument with a black woman? Get through one of those with your nuts and you’re qualified to talk the Gaza Strip into renaming itself Christopia.
24 was a massive success with a black president while Geena Davis’ show didn’t even complete a single season. What does that tell you?
It tells me that the only reason Hillary Clinton is running for president is to ruin a black man’s chances of doing the same. It’s like a young boy eating all the sugar in the house when his mother is trying to bake some dessert. Nice work, you prick. Now no one gets to eat cupcakes.
If you’re drunk and swinging a hammer around your head like a maniac, the reason you’re doing that is to break a bunch of shit. It doesn’t matter what you think your reasons are. If you have a vagina and you’re running for president, the reason you’re doing that is to ruin something.
The real question is what.
Related Articles:
July 17th, 2007 at 5:11 pm - IP Man-Hash: a13ba81333017
I was going to blog on an aspect of this (and still may). But I think this headline from a strangely slick ‘unofficial’ Hillary site says it all:
Hmmm… could there be some subtle subtext there?
And that’s not a one-off. The site uses language like that fairly consistently in a way that I think no man in Hillary’s position would use.
I’d link Dick’s post on ‘All Women are racists’, but it would result in this post being held up for moderation.
I don’t think Obama’s the one, because his Chicago voting history shows him to be economically virtually a Marxist. But there are a lot of positive things in his candidacy, starting with him being a man, that I just don’t see in Hillary’s.
Amen.
-wolfe
July 17th, 2007 at 8:14 pm - IP Man-Hash: 799f5d4830d97
I don’t care who is in the white house as long as he is qualified.
Obama seems articulate and astute. He would probably get my vote over Hilary. Hilary should’ve taken that seven figure “Penthouse Magazine” offer they made her awhile back.
It’s not as though I’d like to see her naked (I probably would). Comedian Ron White (Tater Salad) had a “bit” where he said “once you’ve seen one woman naked, you want to see them all”.
I couldn’t agree with him more, so you see, it wouldn’t be so bad to see her naked in suggestive positions, or sliding down a brass pole, it’s our God given right!
Sorry, I got off track. If a black man was in the White house, he like any man would exude class, descretion and restraint in that position, he might even impress us and play “Swanee River” on a banjo or even crack a few off color jokes.
A woman in that position would be fucking dangerous! If she was “PMS’ing, keep her away from the launch codes and launch button.
Nobody takes women seriously either. The perception is that they would not be tough enough for detante or other negotiations.
Could you imagine a woman getting the highest post in the country because of the equal rights amendment? Holy-Shit Batman!
Could you imagine her even trying the same diplomacy that Ronald Regan had with the Soviets?
It would be laughable at best.
Many years ago there was a good movie about a woman that was going to be president or vice president or some shit like that and Sam Elliot was in it.
Someone was trying to discredit her by showing a porno movie she made in her wild & crazy colledge days.
Sam had this great line “nobody would take her seriously with a mouth full of cock”.
And that’s the point. Women are cocksuckers. We know it, they know it and what about it?
The point is that ALL women have skelitons in their closet and it would only be a matter of time before we found it out.
Since the perception is that women are only good for one thing (barley), seeing a woman in a pin-striped pant suit wearing 5 inch spike heels with her fingures gently gripping a microphone delicately licking her lips addressing the nation would only give me a boner and I sure would not remember what the hell she said afterward (unless she was talking dirty to me).
Jack Nicholson in the movie “A Few Good Men” had a good line too when he was telling Demi Moore that there was nothing finer than getting a blow job in the morning from a female superior officer.
What I’m trying to say is that women are still viewed as sex objects. Maybe it should stay that way. Pandoras box was opened a long time ago and good luck trying to close it.
Can we trun back the hands of time some 30 or 40 years and chase women around the water cooler and flirt with them without any repurcussions or labels of political incorrectness or sexual harassment?
After all, it all boils down to enjoying life, playing grab-ass with a woman, partying, riding your Harley and having a male in office with the “Huevos” (to you brits, that’s the same thing as “bullocks”) to keep the freedom going here in the good old U.S. of A.
If that means O’Bama, so be it. Hilary may not have her priorities in order.
Besides, that’s kind of a cool St. Patricks Day name “O’Bama, O’Masterson, O’Banzai.
Let’s all knock back some Boddingtons!!
-Banzai
July 17th, 2007 at 9:50 pm - IP Man-Hash: 3c8b05bf321cc
“The point is that ALL women have skelitons in their closet and it would only be a matter of time before we found it out.”
What male candidate doesn’t have skeletons in his closet as well? They always manage to dig up something: past drug use, affairs, racist comments, draft-dodging, bribes, etc. ANY candidate, male or female, will have something in their past one could attack, and of course it’s always found out and attacked.
“Since the perception is that women are only good for one thing (barley), seeing a woman in a pin-striped pant suit wearing 5 inch spike heels with her fingures gently gripping a microphone delicately licking her lips addressing the nation would only give me a boner and I sure would not remember what the hell she said afterward (unless she was talking dirty to me).”
That isn’t the perception most men have of women. Most men can respect an intelligent woman and value her for more than her looks. Those who can’t see a woman for who she is as a person because they’re distracted by her boobs are incredibly shallow and immature.
July 17th, 2007 at 10:45 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0a97b5a1ff681
“Most men can respect an intelligent woman and value her for more than her looks.” That is bad grammar or you’re trying to be funny.
The words ‘intelligent’ and ‘women’ should never be used together in the same sentence.
July 18th, 2007 at 2:42 am - IP Man-Hash: a13ba81333017
O’wolfe agrees, except it’d have to be Guinness or Smithwicks. Boddingtons, horror of horrors, is an English beer. Good for drinking 364.25 days a year, but not on St. Pats!
True, but there are so many things to distract. Pins, rear, face, eyes…
@Alex and others: I don’t see a beautiful woman becoming a top leader in most countries very easily. And it’s not because of the men, who, true, will tend to deprecate her intelligence if she’s very attractive, it’s the (other) women that will stop her. A woman who is too attractive will inspire jealousy in too many women. No, not all women, but enough to make it very difficult for her to be elected. Fortunately for her, Hillary has no such problems.
If you look at women who are elected in their own right, such as Sirimavo Bandaraneike, Golda Meir and Margaret Thatcher, well, they aren’t going to collect that $15 community chest card in Monopoly anytime soon.
This YouTube video conducted by Ali G with perhaps my favorite living Republican, Newt Gingrich, is on point to Dick’s topic.
Female exceptionalism may be rare, but that doesn’t mean exceptional women don’t exist. Quite the contrary. I can certainly conceive of a situation where a woman could be the best candidate for President, as I believe Thatcher was for Prime Minister of Great Britain.
It is, however, rare. And it is not the case in 2008. Unless we’re left with a choice between Hillary and, say, Dennis Kucinich. I believe the highlight of Mayor Kucinich’s time in office was when the river caught on fire. Good job, Dennis.
-wolfe
July 18th, 2007 at 10:58 pm - IP Man-Hash: 067217242bf78
Whahahahahaha!!!!!
July 18th, 2007 at 11:35 pm - IP Man-Hash: 19968a06a2a3c
Sitename for it is ‘anus.com.’ I’m not clicking that, anyone who is brave enough will need to tell me if my worst fears surface. Alex, Female, it’s nothing you haven’t seen before, go right ahead.
Oh God please just answer in a simple yes-no format.
July 19th, 2007 at 12:27 am - IP Man-Hash: 71df2d9b039c5
If this country let a woman become president, she would get pissed one day and paint the whitehouse pink
July 19th, 2007 at 4:32 am - IP Man-Hash: a13ba81333017
@doubt ‘view-source’ is your friend. If you’re using a manly browser that is. e.g. view-source:http://badwebsiteplace.com
Works with Firefox. No idea about internet exploder. Probably not.
Looking at the advertised site in question, it seems to be something called the American Nihilist Underground Society, who are into ecoterror, eugenics, naturalism. It’s probably a campaign site for Hillary Clinton.
Am I going to go beyond the source code to look at it? No dice.
-wolfe
July 19th, 2007 at 5:34 am - IP Man-Hash: 19968a06a2a3c
Much appreciated! Ah, the buried archives of html coding, an escape from deathly featuritis.
July 19th, 2007 at 6:35 am - IP Man-Hash: ff4893678328d
Well said Dick.
Obama for President. Here at Singapore, I can tell you we support Obama 100%. Why? Because he is a MAN.
July 19th, 2007 at 7:22 am - IP Man-Hash: 356b2e2244d02
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again:
Presidents are not elected by ballot, they are selected by bloodline.
Hilary is blood related to the wealthy Mellon family and strongly connected to the Rockefellers via her husband. She is a blatent illuminati stooge; a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and Bilderberg group. Her election wil prove to be the final nail in the coffin for the US.
Hillary is also known to practice Shamanism witchcraft. (Fritz Springmeier, The Illuminati Bloodlines).
July 19th, 2007 at 9:52 am - IP Man-Hash: a8014d2ff3afb
I read about the Illuminati from the famous Da Vinci Code or was it the other novel by that author? Regardless, what you say holds some truth though I am unsure whether or not I can believe the witchcraft bit. Hehe
July 19th, 2007 at 11:07 am - IP Man-Hash: a13ba81333017
@mansvoice I would not regard Dan Brown as a reliable source on anything historical. His books are fiction, and not terribly well-researched (historically speaking) fiction at that.
The Illuminati were mentioned in his book Angels and Demons (yes same author as DVC). While they did indeed exist though they did not survive in any meaningful form beyond the 1780’s.
Yes, true, it’s possible that there is some vast secret society controlling everything (or trying to). It’s simply very, very unlikely. CFR and the Bilderberg group do exist though, as do a number of other organizations and societies.
It does make for good conspiracy theories though, if one’s mind is of that bent. And, to be sure, one can’t prove a negative.
-wolfe
July 19th, 2007 at 3:15 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5fd634f6ed1ed
Stuff the books, I was studying the illuminati before Angels and Demons.
Wolfe, I put it to you:
If there is no organisation controlling George Bush or America from the sidelines, then America is fucked if it’s all him. Look at Iraq. Maybe it’s not the illuminati, but isn’t it very likely that George Bush is not really in control and that maybe his board of governors or something is pulling the strings.
I hope I don’t come across as a conspiracy theorist because I like facts. KKK are real. Illuminati are/were real.
Finally, although Dan Brown writes fiction and says so in his book, you have to admit he wrote it so well that you could believe it. I mean he did give alot of proof with symbolism and all.
July 19th, 2007 at 9:20 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5707889809bd7
The breifcase that holdthe launch codes that goes everywhere with the president is called the “football” - clearly it was named this because NO women should ever be given a football.
July 20th, 2007 at 2:51 am - IP Man-Hash: a13ba81333017
Well, Bush certainly is influenced by Cheney. And Cheney is part and parcel of an organization called Project for a New American Century, which is basically classic Kennedy-era pre-Vietnam (”pay any price [for freedom]“) Cold War liberalism:
(The Republicans, by contrast, tended to be isolationist and wary of foreign entanglements. How times change)
That said, no, I don’t think PNAC, or any organization ‘controls’ George Bush.
It comes down to Occam’s Razor (you can google it). Basically, the simplest explanation generally prevails.
Looking around us in daily life, which is more probable? A complex conspiracy controlling things? Or simply stubbornness culminating in bad management.
My brother-in-law can be a bit of a jerk sometimes. I can easily see him getting into a perilous situation. But that doesn’t mean I think a conspiracy controls him.
No, I honestly think that’s a less likely explanation. The sad reality is that humans bumble, misread one another, and do stupid things. In the case of Bush, I think it’s a degree of hubris and stubbornness rather than stupidity or malice.
You do, but not as a crazed one. Certainly there have been odd conspiracies. The weird (some purported, some real) Kennedy family links to strange mafia figures, and all sorts of odd goings-on in the late 50’s and early 60’s, for example.
Heh. I’m not a huge fan of Brown’s, and we could debate his literary style. That said, I’ll give you a better example (for me). I don’t like the political beliefs of Oliver Stone at all, and I think he’s a bit of a jerk, but watching some of his (conspiracy theory) movies, you could almost believe them. (e.g. JFK). James Ellroy, who writes a grand set of novels about the end of innocence in America (American Tabloid, The Cold Six Thousand) is similar — and I like him.
For you, it seems simpler to believe that there is something controlling Bush. For me it seems vastly more complex, and prone constantly to being discovered and unraveled.
I suggest perhaps we move this discussion to Politik if we wish to continue it, so that we may all continue discussing the [lack of] merits of a female candidate for President such as Hillary.
-wolfe
July 20th, 2007 at 4:07 am - IP Man-Hash: 356b2e2244d02
In the US House of Repesentatives, you find two bronze instances of the “Fasci” hanging on the wall.
The Fasci is the universal symbol of fascism, taken from the Roman empire. Bundles of rods representing individualism are bound together by ribbons and ruled from above by an axe-head, representing centralised control.
We are dealing here with dictatorships masquerading as democracies. There is no denying this.
As wolfe said, the partriot act was drafted well before the events of 9/11. Does this not tell you that the Bush administration has been planning to strip away our civil rights from the beginning?
I wonder how many here are aware of the annual Cremation of Care Ritual that takes place at Bohemian Grove, where human effigies are burned in ritual fashion before a 40 foot stone owl, by influential businessmen and major world leaders?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZD3WT3Vqa8
I wouldn’t let these guys walk my dog, never mind run my country, would you?
Even more worrying is the fact that over 600 FEMA concentration camps exist in the US, all fully operational and ready to receive prisoners.
Then there’s the global warming scam. Never mind that the whole solar system is heating up due to increased solar activity. If we just focus on Earth then taxes can be raised to ridiculous levels and we can drive each other up the wall with talk of “carbon footprints” and other bollocks.
I could go on forever, unfortunately I’m supposed to be working right now..
July 20th, 2007 at 4:36 am - IP Man-Hash: c406e944e31e4
You must watch it to the very end. The street directory view is…words fail me.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oc8VQrWqkos&NR=1
July 20th, 2007 at 5:24 am - IP Man-Hash: 356b2e2244d02
Ahhh yes, the Satanic Washington street layout…..
More on that here:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4854686992345665111