There’s No Such Thing As a Free Lunch
Since I began the Honorary Man of the Month program (in which an ordinary woman can honorarily have the prestige usually saved for men for a fleeting moment), I have never thought that Carmen Electra would not be among the herd.
This month she has done a man-deed by outing prostitutes worldwide while participating in a charity auction. The auctioned prize: a date with Carmen Electra. The price: high enough so that Miss December “actually felt obligated to, like, sleep with the guy.”
Brava Madam. By the way, when I said prostitutes earlier, I was talking about all women. Every single woman on Earth is a prostitute. Most are just lousy at it.
Before we get carried away, let me say first that Carmen declined the man’s charitable donation, which was probably going to orphans or some kind of diseased persons. Even though no stipulation of sex was implied or requested, she simply didn’t feel comfortable with it — probably much in the same way that the child who could have purchased a working kidney or new eyelids with the man’s money feels uncomfortable with his plagues.
Women are like that in everything that they do. They can be winning important awards like the Honorary Man of the Month with one hand, while they’re stripping organs from needy children with the other. It’s the same kind of shit magicians do except women do it for personal gain. Women are morality magicians. They make principles disappear.
While she has displayed a typically appalling woman-selfishness, Carmen Electra has also expressed the perfectly opposite and very manly opinion that all women are prostitutes. They are. And that’s why she’s the Honorary Man of the Month.
Prostitution is a part of a woman’s nature. It’s something they can never escape, and that’s why they respond so well to being propositioned as such.
“Would you like to go to dinner?”
“I’d love it.”
Yea. That’s because you’re a prostitute.
Unlike men, women are lazy as shit. Women are so lazy that if they designed houses, there would no longer be stairs. Houses would have only slides, and women would give absolutely no fuck about how to get back upstairs because with women it’s all a race to the bottom anyway. Or they would make some hack joke about a man finally asking for directions.
Women ask for directions at the first sign of trouble because they’re lazy too. How many gloriously mantastic things have ever been done because someone got to the right place at the right time? Fucking none. You just show up right where you thought you would be at exactly the right time and then a bunch of predictable shit happen.
That’s horseshit. Men don’t ask for directions because we don’t ruin great things that might be just over the horizon or around some uncharted corner for the sole purpose of clinging onto a pathetic timetable that represents how much control we delude ourselves into thinking we have over our lives.
Also, the women who eat a free meal and then skip out on the requisite sex aren’t thieves or empowered, they’re just lousy whores. Once payment takes place, you’re guilty. Don’t believe me? Go ask a fucking cop.
Related Articles:
July 10th, 2007 at 6:29 pm - IP Man-Hash: ea146503678a7
What is love?
July 10th, 2007 at 7:56 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9a305b0d72d4d
what is an assclown?
September 20th, 2007 at 9:15 pm - IP Man-Hash: b24fa70c8e643
Women want all the “rights”, but no responsibility (like for the bill).
When people are watching, they give the usual haughty lip service of “I can pay my own way THANK YOU”, but when the opportunity comes to AVOID it, that’s exactly what they DO.
Watch out for this giveaway behaviour in your observations of women from now on. You’ll see it occur very regularly, in various subtle and not so subtle forms.
The best advice is this: When you are dealing with pathalogical deception, what they DO is a much more reliable indicator of intention that what they SAY. Pathological deception is most commonly observed in women when they have an agenda, or want something.
Women will deny they do this. Some of them will even get really angry and pissed off that their behaviour has been laid bare.
Just smile…and keep watching what they DO.
January 17th, 2008 at 9:49 am - IP Man-Hash: 3a5a75c0b8f33
To a woman free lunch is a swap for pussy
Hey just put it on my pussy-express card
January 17th, 2008 at 9:58 am - IP Man-Hash: 38395ab842ea1
You know girls that will fuck you for buying them lunch? No wonder you idiots hate women so much…maybe you should try looking outside of the trailor park next time.
January 17th, 2008 at 10:21 am - IP Man-Hash: 4b8494f25ae28
So are you just here to try and make those mean old facts go away? I mean, so far you little girly-girls have proven each and every one of Dick’s essays correct beyond doubt.
January 17th, 2008 at 11:05 am - IP Man-Hash: df8a37f402a4d
Jenn is another dopey woman trying to act as a psychic..
Women have no clue about anything.
Just say something it don’t matter, we all know you dumb as dirt.
January 17th, 2008 at 11:11 am - IP Man-Hash: 38395ab842ea1
That’s a shame…I bet women all over the world are really crushed at the loss of you winners as prospects in the dating world. In my opinion you guys are doing a favor to women by spending all day on the internets and not dating. People like you should do your best to just avoid having to make any kind of human contact. I knew a kid like you guys in high school…he smelled like tomato soup and I’m willing to bet he’s still a virgin. Brilliant plan you’ve all come up with here.
Also…is there a reason you say girly-girl in every post? Is it supposed to be condescending? I am a girl and I guess you could say I’m kind of girly…I’m not sure what effect you’re going for there manly man
January 17th, 2008 at 11:13 am - IP Man-Hash: 38395ab842ea1
And Billy…you don’t make any fucking sense. I’m impressed with your grammar. That’s all.
January 17th, 2008 at 12:07 pm - IP Man-Hash: a5769efe846a1
Jenn, you can live in denial and think only trogs inhabit this board but I know for a fact that I pull more ass than oprah going upstairs.
I’m pretty much every single woman my age’s dream (I’m in my mid 40’s.) I have a nice house, a boat (big one too), many toys, president of a multi-million dollar firm. I’m laid back, fit, have all my hair where it should be and none where it shouldn’t.
I would probably intimidate you in real life.
Fact is, our system is out of control pandering to women’s fickle nature. It is why we have a nanny state and it is a big reason for out of control government.
Women as peers is like the Santa Claus fairytale. Everyone knows it isn’t true but nobody wants to spill the beans and ruin the fun.
Your bitter rantings here only show that you have finally figured out men are cluing in thanks to the internet and your shaming language is comparable to using a bow in a modern battle.
January 17th, 2008 at 12:44 pm - IP Man-Hash: 38395ab842ea1
I have yet to meet a man that intimidates me detached. I grew up in Georgetown, wealth does nothing for me. I’ve met plenty of multi-millionaires that have the personality of a rock. A man that I can have fun and laughs with is what I look for…I’d rather live in a trailer with a man I’m actually happy with than in a mansion with someone boring. Think it’s bullshit all you want but frankly I think it’s pretty sad that some of you really believe that all women want is money.
January 17th, 2008 at 12:58 pm - IP Man-Hash: 720a12647a390
We believe it because it is a sad truth. Although the average woman’s wish-list in regard to her “ideal man” is indeed more complex than that. It’s actually an abomination of contradictions. The only two things that stand out for not being contradicted by other factors on the wish-list are “wealthy” and “good looking”. In that order of preference.
January 17th, 2008 at 1:12 pm - IP Man-Hash: 38395ab842ea1
Physical attraction is an important thing in any romantic relationship Zardoz and I’ve been attracted to many men that aren’t what is typically viewed as “good looking.” Good looking is all relative to the person doing the looking, don’t you think? You are absolutely right that I would want someone that I’m attracted to but in many cases you can meet a man that IS classically handsome and as soon as you learn his personality he gets uglier and uglier and it works the other way around as well.
January 17th, 2008 at 3:25 pm - IP Man-Hash: 720a12647a390
Odd that a woman would associate “physical attraction” with “romantic relationship”. Hmm, or is it..
Physical attraction is important to a sexual relationship, romance is governed by gestures of expression. Being physically attractive has very little or nothing whatsoever to do with being romantic. Being physically attracted to a person should by this reasoning have very little or nothing to do with being romantically inclined toward a person. The fact they seem to entwine so heavily in peoples minds suggests to me that there may well be some bullshit involved somewhere. Let’s look for it.
Humans seek spousal partners for a few simple reasons. To procreate, have intimate[non-sexual definition] companionship, and to increase their viability through partnership amid societal competition. In short form, this basically means we pair off with someone we desire to fuck, converse, and nest with. It would seem that sex is important, mutual compatibility is important, and capacity to maintain for the family a sustainable life in society is important. Sexual attraction certainly governs the first. Similar interests, language ability, and compatible attitudes would govern the second. Complimentary differences to make a greater whole and commitment to hard work should govern the third. This being the case, where does romance fit into the equation?
Well, there really is only one place for romance. Courtship. That being the prelude to establishing either a (no strings) sexual relationship, or combining two social singulars into a spousal couple unit. Romance is the expression of desire through thought and deed, for either short term casual sex or long term involvement. The romance level is increased or decreased depending on which type of relationship, and depth of desire. The intensity factor involved for long term relationships is so exponentially greater I’ll concentrate on that as the “classical” sense and easily recognisable form of “true romance” courtship. Let’s look at what it traditionally (and still relevantly to this day and age) entails.
While there are many forms of expression (such as flowers, gifts, poetry, various deeds and gestures intending to prove commitment, etc. which vary from person to person and couple to couple) it predominately involves a man showering a woman with attention to declare his interest, and a woman declaring her interest by accepting it. Emotional proteins run into overtime production during this period, to such an enormous extent that people frequently describe the sensation as “floating on air” and numerous other well known phrases. Its reason for seeming drug like is the fact that it is a drug affect stimulated by the brains chemical reactor in response to external stimuli rather than the contents of a corner-purchased dime-bag.
Now we get to the interesting part. Since courtship makes a woman feel as though she is a princess and the centre of all creation, why would she want that feeling to stop once the courtship ends? This is exactly why many women complain that their marriage failed because the romance “died” after the honeymoon period (during which the initial stages of sexual attention kept that mood protein factory churning out its product like mini-Columbia). One day she wakes up and realises she hasn’t been showered with poems, or flowers, or gifts outside her birthday, Christmas, anniversary etc. and all that’s left is the hard work of upholding one end of the marital partnership, a man who still wants sex all the time, exhaustion from the days social labours carving into what hours are left for social conversation, and wet towels on the bathroom floor.
Why is this such an issue? Often the man doesn’t even realise there’s anything wrong. He’s working harder than he ever has in life, motivated by the prospect of having a wife and maybe children to give the best possible opportunities to, and expects (whether she works in a job or the home) his wife is content to do her utmost same for the mutual benefit gained and increased viability. Well, the truth is, in a healthy relationship, this isn’t an issue at all. The trouble comes into it when the woman’s desire and yearning for that “romance” of courtship attention turns her off conjoining in sexual intercourse on a regular basis, talking time becomes argument time, and the family unit’s nest becomes metaphorically akin to Poland during WW2 or Berlin thereafter.
Women whom seek “romantic relationships” are basically saying they don’t want commitment unless it involves an ongoing shower of attention and feelings of floating on air. However, thanks to Walt Disney productions that end “happily ever after” the white dress wedding day, most don’t even realise this expectation within themselves.
Is it little wonder then that a common phrase for fallaciously fanciful things is “romancing”?
[Another wall of text brought to by Zardoz.]
January 17th, 2008 at 3:27 pm - IP Man-Hash: eeb32e3dc6874
Of course you’ve been attracted to men who weren’t viewed as good looking. Ugly can be overlooked. Like when it comes down to $$$$$$$$.
January 17th, 2008 at 3:30 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0a379370a5fd8
Zardoz has his Man-Shit together.
Damn, I need to work on lengethening my already lengthy Man-Posts if I keep seeing this type of stuff. (Not really, repeating my Man-Rightness like a broken ABBA record and a Dyslexic Parrot only serves to make the slower ones ((women)) get headaches, though Cut&Paste is Man-Tastic)
Remember MEN: Women = Money
Man Wisdom: Money = Women
Men want Sex with a side of Relationship. Women want Relationships with a side of Sex.
Obviously, men are superiour in efficency, and finance through Man-Logic when anything Relationship is involved. I pay for food for my dog, I pay for my women. Economics at the Pinnacle of “Free Trade”.
January 18th, 2008 at 8:21 am - IP Man-Hash: 38395ab842ea1
Zardoz…you think it’s strange to relate physical attraction to a romantic relationship? Don’t you think that sex is a HUGE part of any working relationship? To desire to have sex with someone (at least initially) you need to be physically attracted to them. And if you don’t connect sexually with someone…that’s a problem. I once dated a man that I really, genuinely liked…but our sex was terrible, we just didn’t connect on that level and you may not think that’s important but I certainly do. It’s not that he or I was bad in bed it just wasn’t happening for us. I’m sure that sounds stupid to you but personally I place a decent amount of emphasis on sex in a relationship. If you can’t have good sex or at least ANY sex…neither of you will be happy and it will end in divorce. I have plenty of good male friends who are married (quite recently too!) and the sex has stopped. How can you be with someone without it? Sex is more important that romance in my opinion.
January 18th, 2008 at 8:31 am - IP Man-Hash: 1ac5c1024cd8f
Do you really believe what you have just wrote? Are you that asinine?
Chauvinism is not about feeling sorry for yourself - It is about elitism. About elites. About being the best. Men are the best. Women are no-where near our fucking leagues and I use that lightly. I don’t know nor do I care how you choose to read what I have just said. Call me a snob, elitist, ass, blah, whatever, the facts are that men are better than women. Myself? I haven’t met a woman in real life whom I can truly respect.
January 18th, 2008 at 8:35 am - IP Man-Hash: 720a12647a390
@Jenn: I suggest you reread my above post. I declared sex to be one of the three main reasons people seek out a long term relationship, and the sole reason for a short term relationship. To suggest then that I do not see sex as being important to a relationship is absurd. What I dispute is the term “romantic relationship” which in essence describes nothing more than the courtship period directly preceding a relationship of either kind.
I can only agree with your statement Sex is more important that romance in my opinion. as that is very much what I have already iterated. Why then, I must ask you, do so many women cease expressing sexual interest shortly after the honeymoon period?
May 12th, 2008 at 1:13 am - IP Man-Hash: 3a0c42991e18d
You’re mom is a big fat lazy whore dyke who can’t get enough of my cock. Tell your mom to lose weight and get off my dick.