There’s Nothing to Wrong Except Wrong Itself
I hear this question all the time; never directed at myself, but while hearing shrill she-devils screech and harp on their man-friends while standing in line for the cinema or the man-theater or a meat restaurant.
“Were you checking out that girl?”
I carry around a special stash of Man Points for the first man to answer it correctly. I haven’t given them out yet, so if you see me hanging about the correct answer is:
“Yes.”
Honesty is not the best policy. Lying is always the best policy. It’s fun and it gains you Man Points by the boatload. I was at the pub the other week and the lady-bartender was wondering if I should have another seven and seven. As an aside, can I comment for a moment on how men are better than women at being bartenders? Always go to the female bartender. They’re a curse on a money making bar who pour drinks like the liquor is free. A bartender’s job is getting women as drunk as possible, not men.
I said yes just like I answer most questions women ask. See, women don’t ask anything unless they want you to say no — and that’s only because they want you to agree with their ‘no’. Women don’t give a shit about what you think or what you want, it’s all them, them, them. Anything that ends in a question mark is their way of telling you you fucked up somehow. You think they would be the experts at spotting fuck ups, but they’re not. They’re just the experts at fucking up.
I gave myself 65 Man Points for lying.
The reason you should simply say “Yes, I was,” when some daft princess asks if you’ve been checking out another woman is because you were and it doesn’t fucking matter. It’s not your responsibility to explain the complex workings of the man-mind to a woman. All the reasons you were checking her out for are beyond her limited comprehension.
1. Men notice everything. We notice everything and we need details. We need details to occupy the cogs of our massive brains so they keep spinning. Man brains are like boats and motorcycles. If you let them sit they need an expensive tune-up.
2. Men are wary of all creatures that come within our personal space. Our personal space includes (but is not limited to) our field of vision.
3. Halter tops are fascinating. How do they stay up like that?
If you’re going to explain to a woman the motivations men subconsciously consider before everything they do, why not start with the free market system which no woman anywhere understands? Why not explain democracy to a woman — who all have the attention span of a fucking child. Teach her why she has her precious right to vote. That ought to be a treat!
Why not just sit down and teach the poor girl why the men in her office want to help her move so badly?
There’s no fucking point.
Women will take whatever they’re given with a smile. They need to know when they’re supposed to get upset. That’s why a simple, “Yes,” works so well. There’s no mumbling or nonsense. You didn’t do anything wrong anyway so there’s nothing to get upset about.
This brings me to a point about why women consider it their job to raise children. Children give obvious clues when they’re supposed to be punished. A child might throw food on the floor or defecate on the wall. At that point a woman knows to punish the child. The same works in relationships. If you act like you didn’t do anything wrong, you didn’t.
Two hundred Man Points.
Related Articles:
September 28th, 2006 at 1:24 pm - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
woops… that should read “over 90% — nearly 95%”.
-w
September 28th, 2006 at 3:53 pm - IP Man-Hash: 620db7e22a363
Now, that truly must by a thorn in the side of feminism.
- Oldone
September 28th, 2006 at 4:20 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7f0331adb6577
Woman are useless at everything. Why doesnt the goverment do anything about these clear stats?
September 28th, 2006 at 6:13 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4555637db20cf
Oldone, women are a thorn in the side of feminism.
September 28th, 2006 at 8:41 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9113ee5a6c662
Because the government doesn’t care Aaron. Thats why. As long as they have little worker drones and votes, the elitist shitbags could give a rats ass about families. Follow the money and votes and you will find the anwser.
-Strength and Honor-
September 29th, 2006 at 2:30 am - IP Man-Hash: 7f0331adb6577
so we are doomed
September 29th, 2006 at 3:39 am - IP Man-Hash: eadd56da2c7c9
Wrong attitude, Aaron. Think Chesty Puller. Think “All right, they’re on our left, they’re on our right, they’re in front of us, they’re behind us…they can’t get away this time.”
-Big Al
September 29th, 2006 at 4:46 am - IP Man-Hash: 7f0331adb6577
Wrong attitude, Aaron. Think Chesty Puller. Think “All right, they’re on our left, they’re on our right, they’re in front of us, they’re behind us…they can’t get away this time.”
-Big Al
that is the voice of reason, well said
September 29th, 2006 at 5:36 am - IP Man-Hash: 54f297af1830d
Likewise I’d really like to know the source.
I should point out that the “factor” for the “other” group should be 1.5:1 rather than the 1:1.3 in the table.
I did search unsuccessfully for relevant data. Most refs I found were for articles about poor lil mums stuck in prison away from their kids and how unfair that was.
I did however end up at fathermag.com which gave the following little titbits
And perhaps most scary of all
Of course not much info on how these numbers were calculated.
Not surprised this stuff is hard to find. Feminists have been very successful at shutting down anything that doesn’t shine a light out of womens’ collective arsehole.
September 29th, 2006 at 8:18 am - IP Man-Hash: 06ed5ff70ac4b
I think we give feminuts way too much credit for things.
They really aren’t that smart.
September 29th, 2006 at 9:42 am - IP Man-Hash: c17d989f3617f
But very manipulative. And experts at the bait and switch games women have always played. Their infiltration of the media, publishing and education systems has given them great power where public opinion is concerned. It also enables them to stifle any attempt at rational debate which would spell disaster for them.
September 29th, 2006 at 10:41 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
@gwallan I agree. I’d add (in many countries) well-funded NGO’s.
I’d also ask: Why has socialism so surrendered to feminism? Certainly in the 19th century and early 20th century this didn’t seem an obvious alliance (other than, debatably, socialists like upheaval and conservatives don’t … but that’s a gross oversimplification unfair to both camps).
-wolfe
September 29th, 2006 at 12:15 pm - IP Man-Hash: 20de71915fc29
I found it in a long-gone ebook I stumbled on and saved it.
September 29th, 2006 at 12:19 pm - IP Man-Hash: 20de71915fc29
By the way, please share the link with everyone you know.
September 29th, 2006 at 12:44 pm - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
I think Dick should do a post on Chesty Puller. That’s like 240 man points, right there, just saying his name.
-wolfe
September 29th, 2006 at 5:33 pm - IP Man-Hash: eadd56da2c7c9
It takes a special kind of person to look back at the last hundred years and think that what the world needs is more socialism. And feminists are special.
Capital suggestion, wolfe.
-Big Al
September 29th, 2006 at 5:53 pm - IP Man-Hash: 261f688076ac6
There isn’t a more perfect alliance than feminism and socialism.
Are you forgetting Eve, the original rebel without a cause?
September 29th, 2006 at 6:23 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
What, that little story with the McIntosh and the affable serpent?
Big Al, almost noon already in Ozzy land, I gather?
September 29th, 2006 at 10:19 pm - IP Man-Hash: eadd56da2c7c9
UCT + 10 here, sony. I think you’re UCT +2. Substantially correct, but I posted some hours ago and things are a little blurry right now.
This could well be due to the effects of Wolf Blass’s chardonnay and James Boags’ beer.
Both are excellent. However, my monitor is looking slightly blurry right now.
-Big Al
October 1st, 2006 at 5:31 am - IP Man-Hash: 6d589b37beaa5
i think the very reason why feminists exist in the first place is because of gays like you who haven’t been taught respect by your oh-so-manly dad’s before. congratulations.