Sterilizing for Mother Earth
The reason it takes women two hours to go shoe shopping is because they anthropomorphise consumable goods. That’s what women are after all: consumable goods. It’s no surprise that they project their self-worth onto anything that can be purchased and used.
Women assign souls to inanimate objects. When they go shoe shopping, they have to look at each and every pair because if they miss one, a woman thinks she’s hurting its feelings. That’s why women are such cunts most of time. After a long day of running four errands before 3 PM, a woman has already exhausted her daily supply of caring. Fuck you if you wanted anything by the time you see her. You should have been on the rack with a price tag like the rest of her “babies”.
“Mother Nature” is full of consumable goods. Women think “Mother Earth” has feelings.
At least that’s what I’m going with until anyone can think of a better reason why a woman would abort a fetus in order to protect “Mother Earth” from the carbon emissions of her spawn.
Ten years ago, Toni Vernelli aborted a fetus because she didn’t want to be responsible for the resources the child would consume during it’s life. Ten years later, Toni has gotten herself sterilized in the name of ecological conservation. She will be the first of many.
Before you get too concerned, know that Toni is no beauty queen. Future generations of men aren’t missing out on any super models or the second coming of Heidi Klum. The only thing Toni Vernelli has to pass on is the nose of a prize fighter and the brain of a lemming.
And that’s exactly why she’s MenAreBetterThanWomen.com’s Honorary Man of the Month for November. Congratulations, Toni. You may not be biologically useful anymore, but at least no children will follow in your footsteps.
As a man, I am in full support of women like Toni. A petition could have offset the carbon emissions of one child. Planting a tree instead of posing for a newspaper photo about how great you are could have offset the carbon emissions of one child. Calling in a fake bomb threat on Al Gore’s private jet to keep him from flying to another presentation on global warming could have offset the carbon emissions of one child. Any woman who is stupid enough not to realize any of that, but still somehow driven to sterilize herself for whatever reason, is doing the rest of us a favor.
“Mother Nature” is not a human being. “Mother Nature” is not impressed by pointless gestures.
If it’s true that serial killers are raised by single and psychotic women — and that is true — imagine the serial killer that would have brewed in the womb of a woman who would undergo a permanent and disabling reproductive surgery because she can’t get the image of a crying Indian out of her head.
Think Caligula with a Super Soaker of GHB.
Remember the cereal commercials that asked the question, “How many bowls of Raisin Bran would it take to equal one bowl of Total?” Here’s a question I bet no one asked Toni before she had her tubes chucked in the trash:
How many hours of work would it take to offset the pollution this kid is going to make?
No matter who she is, a woman’s answer to that question will never be, “let’s ask the kid.”
More than I want to spend.
The next time a woman asks you why men are so obsessed with sex, tell her that it’s because women would rather have their uterus removed than convince the neighbors to recycle.
Toni (and all women like her) have done the next best thing to going back in time and killing Charles Manson. She’s aborted him pre-emptively. Then, she’s thrown her broken cloning machine into the sewer.
If only women who called their dogs their “baby” would follow suit.
How many carbon emissions did it take to sell these newspapers?
Related Articles:
Pages: « 11 10 9 [8] 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All
Why would you guys want to limit her or other women? Hell half the fun is bashing them. A new girl shows up and all you hear about is how she’s taking over. What about some of the new guys who are trying to speak for all of us, and take over this site?
No Clair I am not taking up for you.
I really hope Dick sees the light on this one
Try competent. It’s much better English.
@ Clair
Don’t worry, grrrl, you’ll still be able to post……you just won’t be able to spam as you’ll have a ppd limit on your IP address if Dick implements this.
You must have a pretty sad excuse for a life, if thats what your excited about. Bitching and moaning about a couple of strangers on the internet….to another couple of strangers. Thats just odd. Plus if you read what I was saying, that is a pretty bad business move. I wouldn’t do it if I were trying to sell the book.
Not only for the reason I previously stated, but by women bashing together on here, against women, it strengthens your beliefs. Which is a great marketing strategy.
Like I said, I wouldn’t do it. But if he chooses to block me, I wont cry.
Come back tomorrow ladies.
*D3C*
And wouldn’t it be fantastic to cut them both off right about now. Thats what could happen. We could then go on to discuss why Benita is such a mangina and why Clair will never get an above minimum wage job. Can’t wait.
*D3C*
Except for the whoring her ass off. She’s right there, showing u the error of your ways. You just aren’t competant enough to understand
…My god, you’re psychic
:P Im reading now. Personally, I think banning and limiting people to however many posts per day (if any) is a baaaaaaad business move. This site is here to promote the book, right? What good will it do if someone loses interest in the site and thus wont tell anyone about? They wont end up telling anyone about it. Which means what? One potential customer lost. Since I come here regularly, I have told many people about this site. It amuses me, and now amuses them. One of my mates is in love with the site, and seriously contemplating buying the book.
I think it would be a bad business move on Dicks behalf to do that. But hey, if he does, I’m not complaining.
Yeah, you’re dead right. It’s around 9-11pm in Oz now (depending where you are I guess) so she’s probably out whoring her ass off. She’ll be along with Benita soon, I bet.
She wouldn’t be reading this. If she were, she would be whinging and posting useless shit about rape and racism already.
*D3C*
Poor Clair must be having nightmares if she’s reading this. I mean, wtf is she gonna do with all that spare time if she can only have 5ppd ?? Lmaoooooooooooo
This shit is called problem solving and we are doing it on our man-ears. Too easy.
*D3C*
I just realized that moderation would actually be a good idea. We should not require prerequisite sign-up or have a daily limit for non-spammers, but if a girl is boring and unlikeable, we do not ban her.
We limit her IP address to one post a day. She has that one post to convince us that what she has to say is worth more than one post a day.
While I understand this could be solved by posting elsewhere, that location would then be logged, and the next one…
I’d be willing to listen to her shrilling tirades with the knowledge that she was being passed around the trailer park. Hey, if making a point involves exchanging sexual favors for the use of a computer, I suppose it’s just girl logic going on there.
I have yet to discover why I am jealous of girly-girls and their shallow, materialistic lifestyle, but then I’m sure the bitches have all the answers stuffed up their ass.
@MV
I have sent an email to Dick via the site. I don’t thhink it would be right to publish it here but I have kept a copy if you have some way for me to forward it to you.
Just posted:
Dick, it would be cool and good to implement a modding system of sorts in the main site itself. You can make a couple of regulars mods with the power to limit posts a woman can make. I am perfectly fine with objections or protests made against this site but I, along with many other men, hate to circumvent through all that female drivel daily.
It is also a huge waste of your bandwidth.
My recommendations(Mods):
1. Dazedandconfused
2. RobC (If he is willing to regulate it)
3. BrokenJohnny (I am not sure if he visits the main site regularly though)
Yeah.
Yeah, I am gonna put in a suggestion at the forums. If you wish, you can also submit an email to Dick. Some forms of control would be good; I like reading this site. There are tons of manly shit being posted but I hate to circumvent through all that gay ass female drivel.
@ MV
Agreed. I am perfectly willing to listen to a female’s point of view as long as it isn’t squealed into my face along with insults and abuse. That is the kind of Modding that’s required on here and rather than ban, just impose ppd limits. That alone puts us above the feminazi sites.
Point taken, Doubt Fish, but it isn’t the point. I should be able to have a manly debate ANYWHERE on the site without being hounded by Harpies, whether it be here or in the forums. This is a site by men for men and I disagree that I should have to go into the “Manly” corner for a decent conversation or debate. The WHOLE SITE should be one big “Manly Corner.” The bitches on here are allowed here at Dick’s grace and should be controlled, not allowed to run wild.
I just think it would be good to have some form of control on this site. I like to read the comments made by the men but the constant “you’re gay” screeches just get me down.
A couple of mods could do some respectful moderation - Of course, it wont be like a femi-nazi run place whereby any objection whatsoever would be moded. It would just be the typical “FUCKKK YOU GAYYYZ” shit that we get almost everyday.
Just post anything of importance in the forums.
Let the girls humiliate themselves here. Any great topics which have been pushed off should return to their rightful place for analysis and discussion.