Weddings are Golden Toilets…Flush
Is it any surprise to no one that a woman’s second favorite past-time: having a wedding, is a huge waste of time and money?
It sure is.
Or it sure isn’t. I’m not really sure how to answer that question, so I’ll just say it. Weddings are a complete waste of time and money and are the stupidest thing that a new couple can do.
Let me give a hypothetical situation that may or may not have happened six thousand, five hundred times a day every day this year — in America alone.
Johnny Everyman (twenty-five years old with a degree in Business and Economics and a summer job selling kitchen knives) is going to enter into a bond of legal matrimony with Jill Princess-Complex (twenty-two with a degree in Art History and who has never had a job that earned more than minimum wage in her life). Sound familiar? You bet it does.
Is this new couple going to:
A) Put a down payment on a house with their savings and token gifts from family members and friends.
B) Elope for like a hundred bucks to beautiful and romantic Downtown Courthouse.
C) Have an extravaganzic gala that will drain their bank accounts, stock their kitchen with glitzy, over-priced wares from Eddie Bauer, and leave every moment in their relationship from that point on to lurk in the shadows of lost potential.
That’s why men think weddings are stupid. Because we’re better than women at starting a family and laying the foundations for a healthy relationship with a significant other. Call us all softies for it if you want, but it’s completely true.
Here’s fact that may surprise you in a fun way. Even on women’s home turf: weddings, men can run circles around them. For instance — you might want to step back for this one — how many women do you think know the 6 C’s of diamonds, the main ingredient to any engagement ring? As a man, I can just rattle them right off the top of my head and for all you know I’m not even married.
Cut
Clarity
Color
Certification
Carat
And of course the sixth C is the one wearing it.
The bottom line is that calling a comb “Indestructible” doesn’t make it so. It’s still just a plastic piece of shit that isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on.
Next time you’re going to get married men, just think about it like this: Don’t.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 18 … 15 14 13 12 11 [10] 9 8 7 6 5 … 1 » Show All
For ME it is:
Honest to god TRULY intelligent woman that puts out on my demand for LESS money than if I got married.
So, financially, a whore is a better buying choice than marriage or dating.
She knows what you want, knows you don’t give a fuck what she wants, gives it up with no more fight than a stack of 20’s (or, Quid, Pounds Sterling, Rubles, etc.)
She is GOOD at what she does, because unlike these other shrews, she makes sure she is good for more business from more men. God forbid I date a woman who is better at sex than I am………….
True free trade at work, and consumerism at the most basic level.
And that doesn’t even count the fact that she does NOT want to get pregnant, control you, and could give a shit less if you stink after work, since she doesn’t even know you at all.
No kissing? That’s fine. I can dig it. No oral? Only a GF or wife says that shit. Around the world? You bet baby, Oh, and could you kind of hurry, Scientific American is coming on, and they are talking about how women’s brain sizes are smaller. What was that? Oh yeah, you said nothing because as a “Lady of the evening”, you could give a shit less……….
A True Professional in a world of amatuers………Long Live the WHORE!
Why the stigmatism of a “whore”? Can you imagine a world of completely non-confused women saying “Half up front” and getting the job done with utmost efficiency and NO bullshit?
Anarchy would ensue. The world would probably tilt completely off axis and the sun rise in the west. Cows would dry up, chickens would stop laying, and babies would start crying the world over.
What exactly is the definition of a whore SGM?
-Strength and Honor-
Actually, they are pains in the cock. Literally, since the FIRST thing they do is go into “siege” mode and hold out hoping a hubbies dick will shrivel up from non-use.
Factual? You bet your ass, there is a whole world full of men, whores, and extra-marital sex.
I can’t condone it (fuck it, she don’t give up the pussy, I kick her out, after all, not a fucking person ALIVE can’t figure out that marriage for a man means PUSSY ON DEMAND. Only a shitty female would hold off to get something MORE out of it ((Known as “upping the ante”))
The problem with many getting married is men are too brave for their own good. Young men think this one is sweet or wouldn’t do the same as other women. These young men don’t understand that women change constantly.. And usually for the worst. Many young men are just blind to the facts. They must be warned.
Most Women are just a pain in the ass.
It’s your new email. Same thing happened to me when I switched email addys. It’s a reasonably sensible system: let’s people post without having accounts, but still provides a fairly unique way — combining IP Man-Hash+ (private?)email+name to identify posters.
-wolfe
Ah well they should all burn in hell in that case. But I’m sure as men, the married ones have good reasons all the same. Not all of them (Poor bastards) but some. The ones who can actually make marriage work are rare, very rare. They are Gods!!
A male who fucks hippie chicks and is against masculinity? Smoke a little hash too?
The 60’s are over. You don’t have to act like a failure anymore to get sex.
well said: feminists should fight patriarchy everywhere in every movement system, political ideology and government… so then, the masculine elements of consistent and arrogant expansion will have no exscuse, and then stupid fucking fearmongers/warmongers wont have any excuses to “retaliate” - i.e the US in all its colonial beatuy. sorry US citizens on this site, but your country is devastatingly FUCKED UP>
personally, i am ALL FOR maintaining aggressive defensive militray when masculine prowess like in china exists. so i dotn beleive in erradicating “the others
unless we do it here first.
peace (ya right)
@all, my post count seems to have been reset, probably because i added in my new email and/or because i just registered on the forums. it’s me though, not a copycat.
SotS, I registered, but awaiting “confirmation” before I can log in. I will post back later when I receive it.
Necro, I’m sure your father is a good man. My point above is directed more at men who are currently choosing to get married in spite of all they know and see in today’s feminist world. My point is they should know better, and stand up to the system instead of enabling it.
If you knew my father, you would see my point. But I concede. Marriage indeed could work if it was redesigned. IE: The woman DOESN’T get all the benefits in court. But my father was a great man who was indeed, a man, in all respects of the word and I can’t say I thought he was cuckolded.
BMU, register your name on the Forums so I can send a private message.
Necroswordsman,
I agree with your sentiment, one of solidarity, which is why I stand up for fathers, brothers and sons who have a desire to stand up for themselves and stand with us against matriarchy.
Those men who continue to reward the feminist oppressor are part of the problem, not part of the solution.
They need to get a backbone, grow up and realize the western woman has no value for the good man, and will only use and abuse him. After all, she has constructed an intricate system to assist her in doing so.
Marriage and family has been co-opted by the oppressor and must be destroyed so that it may be rebuilt on our terms.
BMU please don’t bash fathers and husbands too. My dad was the perfect example of a father surviving the female world. Marriage is a cherished thing, its just the women which mess it up. If we start to turn on each other, then they have won.
Any western man who gets married is a submissive cuckold dummy who deserves to get fucked in the ass by his no-cooking/cleaning, cold as ice, strap-on feminazi wife.. and later by the matriarchal divorce courts run by her friends.
indeed since feminist is taking alot harder action and trying to take the lead, marriage is indeed a shithole for men, no wonder men prefer to just live with women now then marry them, atleast that way they stay out of alot of shit they would have to go through marriage and then a divorce, and as for kids, if she go fucks up someone else and brings in a kid , you can easily do a DNA test and show who’s the real father of the child.
@gwallan and Female, I want to communicate one key point. When I employed the word ‘used’, I meant more than just ‘benefited from’. I meant generating benefits such as propaganda gains. I also meant that this was something of a deliberate plan, in my view.
In that sense “The Corporate world used feminism” simply isn’t correct in the same way.
Both of your comments have merit, even coupled with that clarification. My response (where I fear I shall repeat some of the above).
That’s why I didn’t say that; instead I said Communism used feminism. I not only meant that they had used women, but that they had successfully deployed feminism as a propaganda weapon. Many (stupid) western feminists believed this evidenced equality between the sexes.
I can’t. Women are quite a bit weaker than men, the East German woman’s shot put team notwithstanding. This means that either the women must be ‘carried’ by the men, or they will have to work much, much harder than the men in order to achieve the same output. Either way, it doesn’t do much for equality.
Realistically, the West is a mixed economy. Even the US, land of the free and home of the brave, has very substantial government influence.
Your objection has some merit though. Where, however, did the prime movers of feminism come from? They came from the intelligentsia (Oh, the irony, of me using a piece of near neo-Marxist terminological analysis when I think Marxism is crap).
The academies and intellectuals who were also, overwhelmingly, Marxist.
Very few right-wing feminists; most socialist.
I do agree though, that the nadir of feminist thought certainly seems to have been plumbed in the (more) capitalist West. And that is an interesting point. Gwallan’s thesis below could conceivably have something to do with this, though I remain skeptical.
Not really. I will only note that Hitler’s regime didn’t mobilize most women for war (until very late on) the same way the West did; yet, simultaneously, they treated a goodly number of young ‘Aryan’ women as little better than breeding/sex slaves. A very schizophrenic view of women. Leaving aside, of course, their death camps, in which millions of women perished. Cherish women, enslave them, or murder them. Lucky I guess if you were a hausfrau who fell into the first category.
What you say is quite right; however, I have two comments.
First, the Corporate world initially resisted feminism. They didn’t like it one bit, culturally. After all, the only thing dumber than a conservative is a socialist. (/ducks). You’re entirely correct that they benefited once it was going; however, it’s still a bit of a mixed bag.
I shall have to review our discussion. I find your arguments somewhat persuasive, but only partially so. Certainly jobs for which women could compete definitely lowered pay. No question. The thing is, there are still a great many jobs that women do not seem inclined or willing to take up. (Plumber, electrician, sewer-line worker, roofer, truck driver…) Some of these are very well compensated (have you hired a plumber recently?); some much less so.
I seem to recall agreeing that basic assembly line work, much administrative work, and retail would all be areas with depressed wages due to female entry into the labor force.
The case could certainly be argued, then, that feminism succeeded the most in the West because, as always, everything comes down to economics. Those benefiting from a freer market in areas of labor enjoyed the fruits of feminism despite it’s oh so bitter seeds.
Good points, both of you.
-wolfe
Arguably the corporate state has used feminism very well also. Remember our little discussion about the lower cost of labour parallelling increased numbers of female workers. They also have no problem with women having more spending power as it’s easier for them to get money out of women.
WHOA He’s a loon alright.
Who likes to throw 4 year old spoiled brat temper tantrums.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Zhirinovsky