Why women hate sex.
Out of all the problems that have ever or will ever exist on the Earth, there is only one that men haven’t and will never be able to solve — not because they can’t, because that’s ridiculous, but because the problem is unsolvable by design. Women hate sex.
That’s it, there you have it. The end-all, be-all of cluster fucks. But why?
Do women hate sex — and they do — because of some kind of woman-guilt from an outdated puritan societal dogma? Or perhaps a stigma of guilt or a fear of abandonment? No. None of these things are it. Women hate sex simply because they are lousy at it.
This can be proved in a quick stroll down the checkout aisle at your local market of groceries — a place thick to the rafters with women. Take a look at some of their magazines and you will no doubt see a running theme: ‘Ten Ways to not suck in bed’, ‘Six Things to do to Your Man that aren’t Lay There Like a Futon’, and ‘Honestly who gives half a fuck about socks being on or off? Jesus Christ that’s pathetic’.
Also, much in the same way that a wall probably doesn’t like or doesn’t care about playing tennis with you, it’s definitely not your fault. Don’t let your sympathetic male compassion get the better of you. You could be dancing around like a maniac and pulling stunts out of your figurative ass like Johnny Magic the Wicked Awesome — maybe some whirl-arounds and in your face spikes from across the court — it’s really up to you as the man — but no matter what, the wall will remain unfazed. It just sits there doing nothing like a lump on a log probably thinking that it wants a new expensive coat of paint.
This same theory can be applied to many other things as well. For example: that women hate problems.
In Chinese, the symbol for crisis is the same as opportunity. I haven’t looked that up, but I heard it from a man so it’s probably true because us men have something called integrity. This means that in a time of crisis, we men are at our show stopping best. Take a flat tire on a moonless night for instance. While a man is out changing nuts and bolts and doing all manner of screwing on the side of the road, will a woman so much as think to grab a flashlight and help? No.
That’s because women hate holding flashlights, because they are complete rubbish at it. Force a woman to hold a flashlight when it matters and you’re likely to catch her aiming it into the sky for absolutely no goddamn reason. You’re better off just duct taping it to a mailbox and catapulting it into space.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 278 … 272 271 270 269 268 [267] 266 265 264 263 262 … 1 » Show All
Has anyone ever noticed that whenever a man tries to assert his independence, a woman will always try to bring him down by making derogatory remarks about his sexuality? Has anyone ever noticed that whenever a woman wants to hurt a man emotionally or mentally, she always focuses on his adequacy, his penis size, or his sexual orientation? Historically, women have always tried to destroy men through the tactic of psychological emasculation because they subconsciously realize that men are superior to women; all women realize their supreme impotence in the shadow of a male superiority that is based on the need to continually remake the world and the universe around it within the image of the world-conquering Phallus. However, we must realize that because the overwhelming majority of women lack imagination and creativity, both essentially masculine traits, the attempt to psychologically emasculate the male is always expressed using the same phraseaology repeated over and over again ad nauseam. Some of the most frequent insults common to the standard, yet limited, female repertoire include either “you’re gay”, “you have a small penis”, “you’re still a virgin” or “no woman in her right mind will ever go out with you”.
It seems that women always insult a man’s sexuality because they possess nothing else that is worthwhile to offer. We must acknoweldge that because women are both intellectually and biologically inferior to men, they have absolutely nothing to contribute to human civilization and culture. In perfect harmony with this observation, it must be said that a woman is only as valuable as what price she can obtain for her vagina within the heterosexual marketplace of socio-economic transactions. In other words, without her vagina, a woman is nothing; instead of being an essentially worthless social parasite that sponges off male wealth and power, she becomes a useless plaything that must be discarded on the ash heap of history. After all, when was the last time a woman ever mocked a man’s understanding of mechanical engineering or nuclear physics? In this world, women are highly prized for the only thing they exercise any degree of monopoly over: namely, sex. The only thing of value that any woman possesses is right between her legs and even that is horribly overrated.
WITHOUT THE VAGINA AND A STRONG MALE LIBIDO TO GIVE IT POWER, THE WOMAN IS NOTHING BUT AN EVIL, COLD, SELFISH BIGOT OUT TO DESTROY MALE WORTH AND KINDNESS.
Women can easily attack the mail sexuality/penis size/ or libido because men’s sensitivity to this subject let them.
The most memeorable ” time a woman ever mocked a man’s understanding of mechanical engineering or nuclear physics ” had to be Marie Curie.
“they have absolutely nothing to contribute to human civilization and culture” That would be a quote feminists would die for to unload the whole ‘you can’t even have civilization without females’ arguement.
If a woman’s vagina is overrated, then why has been historically such a prized possession. “You can’t blame whore’s for their pimps opinions”. Ever heard that quote? From your vocabulary, one would assume that you were an intelligent man, but your arguement has no stability, so even the stupidest feminist could call you wrong since it doesn’t sound like you know what you’re talking about.
I don’t know, he seems pretty right to me…
After decades of feminist social engineering, the women of the West have all but abandoned traditional feminine roles and have become, through extensive political indoctrination, extremely masculinized. The modern woman of today has a penis and a scrotum between her legs and high levels of androgens circulating in her veins; as a matter of fact, there are no “women” currently living within the territory of the Western Hemisphere. All the women we see around us on a daily basis are essentially psycho-sexual hermaphrodites with abnormally high levels of testosterone and erect clitorises that function as penises; in reality, the western woman has all but ceased to exist. The contemporary climate of modern Western culture has actually encouraged the growth and development of female behaviour that is both psychosexually dysfunctional and actually detrimental to the stability of those individuals living within it.
When are we going to stop coddling women with welfare benefits and affirmative action/ employment equity programs that deliberately obscure the fact that women cannot succeed in modern industrialized society because they do not possess the same level of innate aptitude as men do? If women continue on the same path that they are on today, doubtless encouraged by both feminist and Marxist radicals, the feminization of the male will be complete and the patriarchal basis of all modern Western civilization will be undermined, even annihilated off the surface of the Earth. We will soon become a nation of androgynes ripe for conquest at the hands of a more sophisticated, vibrant, male-dominated culture.
KEEP THE WOMAN IN THE KITCHEN WHERE SHE BELONGS. WOMEN SHOULD NOT BE SCIENTIFICALLY CLASSIFIED AS MEMBERS OF THE HUMAN RACE BECAUSE THEY ARE BIOLOGICALLY INFERIOR TO MEN AND ARE OF SUBNORMAL INTELLIGENCE. WOMEN ARE ESSENTIALLY A SUB-SPECIES OF LOWER HOMINID IN A TRANSITIONAL STAGE OF EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENT AND DO NOT HAVE THE PSYCHOLOGICAL ABILITY TO INTERNALIZE THE SAME MORAL/ ETHICAL CONTROLS THAT MEN HAVE. BECAUSE OF THE MORAL/ ETHICAL DEFICIENCY INTRINSIC TO FEMALE NATURE, ALL WOMEN SHOULD BE STRICTLY POLICED AND GOVERNED WITH AN IRON FIST.
SAVE CIVILIZATION! STOP FEMINISM! KEEP THE WOMAN IN THE HOME WHERE SHE BELONGS!
OHH NOO, REALLY!!!? we all must round up these TERRIBLE disobedient women, spank them like children and lock them up inside BEFORE THEY TAKE OVER THE WORLD!!!!
EVERYONE PANIC, THE EVIL WOMEN ARE REALLY TAKING OVER THE UNIVERSE, EVEN THOUGH WE KNOW THEY ARE INFERIOR AND WEAK AND NOT AS SMART AS US MEN!!!
HOLY SHIT WHAT ARE WE GONNA DO!?
Yeah yeahh, you seem pretty afraid of these “inferior, subnormal intelligence, sub species” taking over the entire WORLD.
IF you really believed they are so stupid and weak, you would not be so hysterical about your little idea of them taking over.
You’re just such too much of a crazed, brainwashed, hysterical mess to make any sense.
Commander Scott, I think you need some professional help.
Keep talking like that to the wrong people and one day you might end up picking your teeth up off the ground with your broken fingers. I’d watch my mouth if I were you, you sexless, frigid cunt.
Caution guys. These kind of statements are overtly misogynistic. The theme here is antifeminism, not antiwoman.
That said, yes, there is something about the process of masculinisation which occurs in feminists which renders them incapable of basic human faculties. It almost appears as if they are disqualifying themselves from the criteria which define them as human. I have no personal qualms on treating them in like manner.
The woman, as orginally designed and intended, is obedient and submissive, a good mother, loyal, warm-hearted, kind and giving, who understands her place and what it means to be a good woman. There are many historical archetypes of this behaviour (even as recent as 50 years ago) which functioned well, and contributed to an orderly functional society.
Feminists of course would attribute this to the direct oppression of women by men, and to social conditioning. However, this is not consistent with the testimonial evidence, which demonstrated that women in such societal roles enjoyed an excellent quality of life relative to modern females, and were considerably more protected and respected. It’s also consistent with what scientific evidence we have regarding gender-specific neurobiology, which suggests that the traditional gender roles and archetypes are hardwired and bound to our cerebral cortex via a differentiation process beginning in the first trimester of pregnancy.
Modern women in certain westernised societies have defiled their fundamental nature, poisoned their intrinsically culpable minds with deceptive and illusory feminist doctrines, and have thus become socially engineered against their intrinsic biological tendencies. In many ways, they have disqualified themselves from the biologic and spiritual criteria which define them as “women”.
Condemnation and criticism of feminism can not be dismissed as the hatred of women. If anything it is behaviour derived from the appreciation of true women as intended by fundamental design, in that it stands for the protection of traditional feminine virtues.
so you’re saying that if a woman is strong it no longer qualifies them as a woman?! i would like to point out that i am indeed a strong, hardworking woman. and yes, last time i checked i am still a woman. i am “by-nature” a woman because i fit all of the qualities. (i am not exactly submissive, but when necessary i am)…but i am those above listed qualities and then some. i am also hardworking, smart, go-getting woman. i think that makes me a better person no?
actually scratch that, i do not need you approval to be the kind of woman i intend to be. there is no convincing you ll so i dont know why i even bother.
“i am also hardworking, smart, go-getting woman. i think that makes me a better person no?”
No, by your own definition of these terms, that makes you psychometrically masculine.
I’d contend that your definition of “hardworking” “smart”, “strong”, “by-nature” and “female qualities” are relativistic, distorted, masculinised versions rather than traditional feminine ones. They are not relevant to absolute feminine characteristics and traits.
You are effectively demonstrating male secondary sexual attributes, and masculine cerebral architecture behaviour. To psychologically-balanced heterosexual males who see women as something more than sexual playtoys, these qualities are about as femininely alluring as having a hairy barrel chest.
so now im a man?! wow i like having sex with guys, cooking, and just being a woman. but on top of those “feminie” qualities i am also the ones listed above….and also, to point out, this is how woman are being taught to grow up. in grammar school, we start by everyone is equal. if this is “a man’s world” and the world is teaching us to do this…then i think it is your act you need to get together.
Just because you demonstrate some feminine qualities does not make you psychometrically female. Indeed, biologically, I would bet money that you are indeed feminine. The key point is that these inherent traits have been suppressed, denied and otherwise distorted by feminist social conditioning. You are selectively demonstrating characteristics, which, at the level of our physiological design, are manifestations of masculine-pattern behaviour.
Modern women feel a severe, deep dissonance between what the world is compelling them to be, and what their intuition and biological nature compels them to be. I personally believe that this is responsible for the abysmal rate of psychological illness in contemporary young women, in rates of depression, schizophrenia, social isolation, anxiety disorder, deliberate self harm, and other forms of self mutilation and self “punishment” such as the various eating disorders.
One you “get” the notion that I am actually on *your* side by opposing feminism, and by understanding that feminism is, at its most fundamental roots, an anti-woman ideology, you may begin to understand my motives more clearly.
Until then, I will always be an aggressor, misogynist, woman abuser etc in your eyes.
John your argument is flawed. There is no scientific research that conclusively proves gender specific neurobiology. If you know of any actual research please post for a read.
There is no “conclusive” scientific research period. But there is scientific evidence. If you wish to find evidence of gender specific neurobiology, why don’t you do a journal search yourself? Let me kick you in the right direction:
Green, R., Sexual Identity and Sexual Orientation. Hormones, Brain and Behavior. Vol. 4. 2002: Elsevier Science (USA). 463-485.
Hines M, Sexual Differentiation of Human Brain and Behavior. Hormones, Brain and Behavior. Vol. 4. 2002: Elsevier Science (USA). 425-461.
Swaab DF. Sexual differentiation of the brain and behavior.
Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007 21(3):431-44.
Pardridge WM, Gorski RA, Lippe BM, Green R. Androgens and sexual behavior. Ann Intern Med. 1982 96(4):488-501
Friedman RC, Downey JI. Sexual differentiation of behavior: the foundation of a developmental model of psychosexuality.
Using the “related articles” feature via pubmed can be useful.
I apologise for the crude formatting on those references, but I’m a pressed for time ;)
Hey John, No need to dig materials. Let’s better sum it up in one sentence.
FEMALE HAS A BRAIN OF A CHILD.
… and she works very hard in order to keep it that way.
You just keep on thinking that. The smartest people I have ever met in my life were female.
So… does that mean you guys fuck each other. Is this a gay chat room?
ok, i know most men in this “forum” wil be quite upset with a women coming in and speaking her mind. but i just have to say a few things. no, i do not hate you for thinking men are better than women, i just disagree. god (or scientifically, evolution) has put us on this earth for one reason. this is to live together and reproduce in a happy manner. i have noticed some men talking about “teenage girls are he worst” and such…this is shocking to me because who will be taking care of you in your old age? that’s right. the younger teenage girls. men do not work to care for others. i am not saying that all men dont, but rarely do you see a loving, male nurse or doctor. without women in this world, i feel it would be full of hate and testosterone. women bring love to the table. i know that you men are saying that love doesnt matter, but it feels good and im sure that if any of you have ever actually been in love you would agree with me. i understand that because i am a women, i am limited. i hope to change this someday for myself…i want to become wealthy on my own merit, and no i do not want to “marry up”…i hope that just because of my name, the men will not skip over my post. i am trying not to be personal here, but i do however feel that there has been a personal attack on all women here and i am just stating my opinions.
Only men are capable of expressing true love; women are filled with hatred. Without men, the world would be filled with estrogen, selfishness, an impenetrable darkness, and coldness towards others.
“Only men are capable of expressing true love; women are filled with hatred. Without men, the world would be filled with estrogen, selfishness, an impenetrable darkness, and coldness towards others.”
“Women are the coldest, uncaring and malicious beings to ever infest the universe.”
“Teenage girls are HORRIBLE - even women should admit this fact to retain a shred of credibility.”
The very point is that these individuals you’ve met in life have rejected traditionally feminine criteria, and can no longer be strictly defined as women. There is nothing intrinsically wrong with the female nature, as long as they function as per their biological nature, understand their place and are obedient.
The problem of course is that an increasing proportion of women (but not by any means, all women) are increasingly masculinised, and are adopting thinking patterns and lifestyles typical of homosexual men. They are psychosexual aberrations, but for the moment current societal trends mean that we cannot address them as walking psychopathologies. It is essential that good men steer clear of these damaged individuals as potential partners or friends.
As long as you remain carefully selective of your company, you’ll have less risk of significant problems.
Women are the coldest, uncaring and malicious beings to ever infest the universe.
This repugnant disaster of evolution that blends an organic primate evil with rudamentary sentience must be culled.
I would rather be looked after by a ravening pack of Utahraptors than Anglo-American teenage girls…
Who are without doubt the most selfish, self-absorbed, obnoxious, stupid, vindictive monsters ever to grace the chordate Phylum. And that includes sharks…
Teenage girls are HORRIBLE - even women should admit this fact to retain a shred of credibility.
lol. Who told you that? The media?
“i want to become wealthy on my own merit”
The motivation to go out alone and succeed by your own selfish criteria is a direct index of feminist indoctrination. Following this mindset will destroy you as a viable functional human being and woman, and dehumanise you to the degree that you will become dysfunctional, psychologically and psychosexually impaired, isolated, bitter and hate-filled.
You are not a man. You serve a different biologically- and spiritually-determined role, for which every facet of your design is specialised. You will benefit (a) yourself (b) family and (c) society much more by marrying, supporting and pleasing your husband, and raising your children up to be something more than a clutter of disobedient brats.
I’m not ruling out some nominal vocation to help pay the bills. This is the way things have turned out as a matter of practicality and necessity in modern life. But never forget your primary role.
CORRECTED VERSION
Ok, I know most men in this forum will be quite upset with a woman coming in and speaking her mind, but i just have to say a few things. No, I do not hate you for thinking men are better than women, i just disagree. God (or scientifically, evolution) has put us on this earth for one reason. This is to live together and reproduce in a happy manner. I have noticed some men talking about “teenage girls are the worst” and such, this is shocking to me because who will be taking care of you in your old age? That’s right. The younger teenage girls. Men do not work to care for others. I am not saying that all men don’t, but rarely do you see a loving, male nurse or doctor without women in this world; i feel it would be full of hate and testosterone. Women bring love to the table. I know that you men are saying that love doesn’t matter, but it feels good and i’m sure that if any of you have ever actually been in love you would agree with me. I understand that because i am a women, i am limited. I hope to change this someday for myself, i want to become wealthy on my own merit, and no i do not want to “marry up”…I hope that just because of my name, the men will not skip over my post. I am trying not to be personal here, but i do however feel that there has been a personal attack on all women here and i am just stating my opinions.
27 errors of basic spelling and punctuation. I’ve corrected these errors for you free of charge. It will now be easier for all the men to read your asinine post now.
No need to thank me. I’ve paid myself, in man-pride.
Why is it then..that US women have little or no personal drive? they all look to marry “UP” so as to have money, luxuries etc. If said women divorce, they end up welfare recipients in some or most cases? I knew a western society german gal who I dated, was 35 years old and NEVER had a job in her life? she had work training that is common with the german system but, she told me; why should I work if I can make so much on welfare? Western minded and raised gals think along these lines. think about this sometime or even test your gal on this; tell her you want to go to Europe. when she gets all excited, then spring and say that you’ll share the costs. See how quickly the excitement will leave her freeloading ass. If the man is paying; by all means. If you’re foolish to pay, she’ll probably break up with your ass AFTER the trip by sayign some shit like things won’t work out.
try that sometime. Women have to personal drive. they expect someone to carry their ass financially through life and NOT pay or do a fucking thing for it. not even have sex with you.
Hey Chris is this you??
Man or woman… we’re humans, we have to co-exist with each other or you get what’s happening to baby girls in China or women in Pakistan - useless suffering and pain that could be avoided.
Man or woman, what needs to be done is getting rid of the ego - the one thing that makes us so selfish and gives the illusion of superiority. We cannot advance if we don’t learn to respect the life that surrounds us may it be a woman, a child, an elder, a small animal or a plant.
Once we become aware that the material world dominates us over real values - what matters most - the big corporations and money world will collapse bringing a better Humankind.
China is the future.. it is your pathetic world that will burn.
A healthy disgust of the female, a Godless laize-fair capitalism, and the absolute drive to accumulate and burn any energy available without remorse.
Son of the suns…How can you fucking say something like that about the tragedy in China. Innocent baby girl are being killed for being female. Whoever says this website is not anti-women is so fucking wrong.
Notice you don’t mention MEN in your little charity list, there, bro - feminist slip? Of course, Anglo-Americans only respect women, as we all know… everyone else can go hang - until you want their taxes, right?
Finally. A rational person
Hiring a household full of servants, such as a maid, a babysitter, and a cook, is much cheaper and more economical in the long run than having a modern, western-educated woman about the house.
Women have the power to end all internecine conflict forever, nonetheless they choose not to give for free what they monopolize in superabundance, namely the vulva and the uterus. Because the overwhelming majority of women happen to be both frigid and grasping, such a solution would neither be feasible nor practical. Thus, with the invention of the artificial womb, a plastic tank filled with amniotic fluid and attached to a number of suction tubes that help deliver nutirents to the foetus, man has once and for all bypassed the selfish, callous nature of womankind to liberate the human male from dependence on female reproductive capacity for the sole function of gene proliferation. When the sex-droid is finally invented, possibly in conjunction with a mind-altering substance that inhibits male libido without diminishing the outward manifestation of the secondary sex characteristics, the use of the human female as a receptacle for seminal fluid will also one day become an anachronism.
I think I will pen a thoughtful sci fi story about this very issue. How, with sex in bountiful supply due to elimination of the human female, war and conflict is entirely eliminated. It shall be called, ‘The Perfect Dance’.
Why is it that women always find it necessary to use ad hominem attack and self-justifying rationalizations to viciously neutralize the position of an opponent? Is it because women, being largely unable to reason logically or think clearly, need to hide this mental deficiency by deliberately obfuscating the issue at hand and focusing on a debater’s personal character? Is it not much easier to disparage an opponent’s point of view than to offer truly constructive criticism or judicious praise? If certain women wish to be taken seriously, they should start addressing the substance of the argument at hand instead of dancing around it. The problem remains that this is certainly not the case in real life; the average woman does not possess the same powers of concentration as the average man does and is therefore not able to focus on the finer details of any system based on a highly wrought logical analysis.
Normal women do not have sexual fantasies, neither do they possess much of a sex drive; interest in issues of human sexuality is not only abnormal behaviour for women, but strongly indicative of female psychopathology. Only women with high levels of testosterone or central nervous systems that are sexually differentiated along masculine lines fantasize in the same way that men do. Many women who enjoy indulging in sexual fantasies are also psychologically disturbed or suffer from serious emotional problems.
A woman should keep her mouth shut and her legs spread wide open.
They’re always evil. They’re shallow, they lie, they are self absorbed, they are stupid, they are naive, they are ignorant, incessant, whores that can’t be trusted and never have a cohesive thought as to what in fucks name they want out of life.
Girls are the most vile creature to walk the face of this Earth.
Never let your guard down
Well said, friend. And teenaged girls are the biggest fuckers of all.
What kind of people have you met? My girl friends and I hate those kinds of people as much as the next. That is why we women are not like that.
Because one lion in a million is friendly to humans, would you climb in a cage with a random lion?
Josh,
Very true.
Women are selfish, materialistic, hypocrite, and naive. That’s why they have a violent personality. That’s why they are shy. That’s why you see them changing. And that’s why they put make-ups–to hide their inside. And that’s why many men are deceived, because they look only at the make-up.
My advise is to never trust a woman, even if she’s your mother or sister. That’s why I advise all men never to get married to a woman. You give them importance when you date or marry them. It is us who give them importance when we accept their bad traits.
dickhead-
congratulations on proving yet again that you’re completely fucking stupid.
i feel sorry for your mother (if you even have one), you seem to have been raised by rabid wolves. first off, if it weren’t for women you wouldn’t even be here you fuck.
secondly, your inane attitude towards women says A LOT. you probably have a micro sized dick and have no clue what do with it.
have you even ever been with a women? if so, you probably think she hates sex because you have no idea what you’re doing with your dick. all men have sex so they can get off, none of them give a shit about getting a girl off. besides, if you had a clue, which you don’t, or if you cared about getting her off, you’d make an attempt to find her gspot. it gives me ultimate joy having a girl get off so quick and begging for it over and over. girls love sex, just as much as men do. what girls don’t like are bastards like you that hit and quit it. it makes them feel like trash. because that’s how you and most men treat women– like they’re just some sex toy for you to play with.
by the way you ignorant piece of shit, here’s some trivia for you– the suicide rate in this country is 20% higher in men than in women. if men had to birth children, the entire human population would become extinct.
congrats on making the world a better place. people like you are waste of air. next time, take your glasses off so everyone can see you you fucking coward.
You retarded cocksucker… far more women attempt suicide, but fail - they can’t even get that right. Men are better than women at everything - even killing ourselves!
A person commits suicide because they lack the desire for survival. If a person fails at performing a suicide, that doesn’t mean they’re stupid, that means they have strong will and the want to survive prevailed over the desire to give up like a coward.
Correction: “they” instead of “the”.
The Samurai and Kamikaze pilots made a lifestyle of committing suicide, but they sure weren’t cowards. ‘Life at any price’ is the biggest cowardice of all.
I don’t believe Dick is referring to the Japanese culture, though, hence the mention of that society’s mindset is pointless.
Correction: Muzalon. Not Dick.
You make a lot of corrections…
Measure twice, cut once.
im just curious…if woman hate sex so much than why do you call them whores? if we hate sex so much than why would you say that we sell our bodies for sex. women like sex. you generalize to an outrageous extent. i am sure that some women do not like sex but how can you possibly say that all women don’t. that is a ridiculous statement. and i for one enjoy a challenge. sex is fun and i like to improve on it as much as possible. i am not bad in bed…as a matter of fact i have been with plenty of sorry men with no skills. i wouldnt mind being with a man who knows what women want because for god sakes i know what a man wants in bed.
ohh and as for “in a time of crisis, we men are at our show stopping best.”…yeah i am just going to say one thing…Hurricane Katrina… what man was at their “show stopping best?” oh thats right. our president George W. Bush….bullshit.
Because they want sex with money, whether directly or indirectly paying them.
If some men had no skills, as you said, it is because the woman does not express to them what pleases her. This is an additional proof that women are shy of sex.
I do not say women hate sex; I say she is hyper-shy of sex.
Micho
I MADE ALL BITCHES SO MEN CAN RECEIVE PLEASURE FROM FUCKING THEM AT A WHIM. I HOPE I HAVE PLEASED THE MALE SPECIES. MAY BITCHES SLOB YOUR KNOB WELL, AND TAKE YOUR CREAMPIES WITH ENTHUSIASM, FOR I HAVE CREATED BITCHES FOR YOUR SOLE PLEASURE. IT IS ALSO IN MY JUDGEMENT THAT IF A WHORE VIOLATES MY 10 COMMANDMENTS THAT WHORE SHALL BE SLAPPED BEYOND KINGDOM COME AND INTO THE DEPTHS OF HELL:
10. IF AN UNHOLY SKANK TOUCH THY MANS POSSESSIONS, THOU HAS PERMISSION TO SLAP THAT WHORE WITH THE MIGHT OF A HUNDRED IKE TURNERS
9. THOU SHALL IMPREGNATE AS MANY WHORES AS HE SEEMS FIT
8. THOU HAS NO OBLIGATION OR DUTY TO CARE FOR A WHORE
7. IN SACRED LEARNING INSTITUTIONS A MAN SHALL NEVER LET A WHORE BENEFIT FROM THE KNOWLEDGE HE POSSESSES
6. THOU SHALL NEVER BE SEEN IN PUBLIC TAKING ORDERS FROM A FILTHY CARPET LICKING LESBIAN
5. IF THY WHORES FRIEND IS BETTER LOOKING THEN THYS OWN WHORE, IT IS THY MANLY DUTY TO IMPREGNATE THY WHORE AND HER FRIEND AND WATCH THEM FIGHT
4. NEVER MONETARILY REWARD THY WHORE, TREAT THEM AS SLAVE AND THY BEING MASTER
3. BE MINDFUL OF THY WHORES WEIGHT, AND IF IT INCREASES LIKE THE WAVES OF ATLANTIS…MAN THE HARPOONS!
2. ALWAYS REMIND THESE SLUTS WHO IS SUPERIOR TO THEM…FARM ANIMALS, INSECTS, VEGETATION, AND PRETTY MUCH EVERYTHING ELSE I HAVE MADE
1. IMPREGNATE AS MANY WHORES AS YOU CAN WITH YOUR CELESTIAL SEEDS OF GODLINESS BEFORE PASSING ON AND SHOW NO INTENT TO STAY WITH ONE WHORE FOR LONGER THAN A ONE NIGHT STAND
NOW MY CHILDREN (MALES ONLY) GO FORTH AND SPREAD THE WORD OF THE LORD, AND LIVE BY THESE COMMANDMENTS!!!
The woman loves sex more than the man. But the woman is much more shy of sex. The woman loves long time sex with few men, while the man loves short time sex with different women.
The main reason behind that is reproduction. The basic drive for sex is reproduction. You might say, “Hey, but I don’t think of having children when I think of sex.” I know, but this is not the core reason that DRIVES YOU for sex. This is just what you feel, not WHAT DROVE you to feel so.
The woman can have on average 1 baby per year, and for this reason she demands one man to satisfy her need. The man can have thousands of children per year, and so he demands much more.
This is one of the reasons that make me laugh at the feminists. Pity these women when they talk about equality. They know nothing about the sexual differences. Where is that equality when we are different in everything?
Women want sex more than men, but not with multiple men. If women were equal to men, then why don’t they ask for sex themselves? Why do they always want to link sex with other benefits for them, such as paying their bills or commitment? This proves that they are different.
We all know that the woman is 10 times happier in sex than the man. If she needs as many men as the man needs women, then why don’t they ask for sex themselves instead of waiting for the man to initiate that, and then they want the man to spend on them to have sex. This all shows that the woman cannot go for sex with different men as the man can.
MenAreBetterThanWomen
Micho
If women love sex more than men, than why are so many women brutally raped and sexually harassed by the hundreds of thousands each year?
I can not believe you just compared forced sex to willing sex.
And I thought bob was dense.
*Commander,
You didn’t get what i said. I said they love sex but with fewer men, while men love sex with more women. For instance, the woman may love to have sex with 1-4 men per year. However, the man have no problem if everyday has sex with one or two women. This is not the case for women.
In addition, women are shy of sex, because they know that their bodies are submissive to the man. They are even shy of nudism (even if without sex) for this same reason.
So, to sum it up, yes women are reluctant of sex for two reasons: (1) they demand sex with less men, and (2) they are shy of it.
When I say they love sex with 1-4 men per year, this does not mean they love to have sex only 1-4 times per year. They love to have sex a lot, but with few men.
And in addition, the woman is so much shy of sex in an unbelievable way. This is what makes her appear hating sex. Do you know that the woman gets pleased on average 10 times more than the man does in sex? This shows that she loves sex a lot, but since she does not go for sex herself but rather wait for the man to ask her, this also shows how much she is shy of sex.
You just want to hear women say the opposite. hahaha
you are all fucking tossers,
You should kill yourself you low life, asshole.
(THIS IS COMING FROM A WOMAN named “Natalie Finn”)
“We…are…shocked!
Former Bachelor Matt Grant and the recipient of his most important rose, actress Shayne Lamas, have broken off their engagement after publicly pretending that they were meant to be for two whole months, People reports.
“We tried hard to make it work but we realized that we were both heading in different directions,” the duo said in a statement. “We truly care about each other and will remain close friends.”
Just so long as they don’t have to spend any time with each other, apparently.
The pair had been plagued by reports of trouble in paradise ever since Grant chose Lamas over Chelsea Wanstrath on the season finale of The Bachelor’s 12th season, but each continued to deny that the fact that they were no longer living together or that they were never seen in the same place meant that they weren’t still planning to tie the knot.
“This stuff makes us stronger,” Grant, 27, said last month.
No word yet on whether Lamas, 22, returned the 2.85-carat sparkler her British beau used to seal the deal in May.
Anyway, that makes 10 out of 11 Bachelors (not including the not-ready-for-a-relationship Brad Womack) who have opted out of the matches they made during their stints on the ABC series.”
•••••
OK I am back now…..
AND THERE YOU HAVE IT. 10 OUT OF 11 MEN WHO HAVE THEiR FREE PICK OF 25 GORGEOUS WOMEN WHO COMPETE FOR HIS ATTENTION AND AFFECTION . . .
—>>> WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH THOSE CUNTS.
Wow.
What does that communicate American women?
That they are ALL DEFINITELY DOING SOMETHING —>>> WRONG.
Menarebetterthanwomen.
oh, you hate men, which makes you an asshole by your own standard, bye.