All Women Are Whores
I have received well over a thousand supportive emails from women over the last 48 hours. Unsurprisingly to me, the topic they’re the most encouraging about is my comment on whores and all women being them.
All women are whores.
Keep in mind that I consider female anger to be the weather vane of truth and wisdom. When a woman finally has a heart attack after reading something I’ve written, I’m going to start calling myself Buddha.
King Buddha.
That’s why no women are allowed to read this.
Women know themselves almost as well as I know them. They know they’re prone to emotion and anger, and they know they’re all whores. That’s why they get so goddamn upset when I say it. To a woman, calling attention to her innate prostitution is more true than anything else I could possibly say.
But that’s only because women understand math and science about as far as a dog can shit.
Women crave money because they don’t have things like purple hearts, fist fights, and prom queens. They have nothing to validate their self-worth except how much a man will pay for access to their vagina. That’s why they spend money like it’s poison. The albatross of a 100 dollar bill is nothing but shame to a woman. It is a constant reminder of her nature.
All women are whores.
And that’s human nature. Men exchange our body parts for money as well, except our “vagina” is our man-brain, and when we’re done letting the world use it, cancer is cured, slavery is abolished, or something awesome like the `77 Chevelle is invented. Also, once a man lets someone inside his valuable body part, they don’t start thinking of their ex-girlfriend or how to get inside for less money next time.
You can’t cure small pox with a vagina.
All girlfriends are whores. That’s why there’s a Valentine’s Day. All wives are whores. That’s why car leases expire in 16 months instead of 12. It takes 16 months for SUV Roofies to wear off.
All business women are whores.
If I get a free steak at Morton’s because I told them I was Tom Selleck — which would be easy to do because I also have a manmazing mustache, I would go to jail for fraud. Every woman who’s ever gotten a promotion in any business, got there because of fraud. Her miniskirt wrote a check for sex that the Vagina Bank had no intention of cashing.
Or maybe she did cash it. My point is, all women are whores, and the last thing men want is a whore who doesn’t know how to do her job.
When men sell body parts, we’re called engineers or NFL linebackers. When women do it, they’re called prostitutes. It’s as simple as an anniversary bouquet or a “free lunch”. There’s no such thing as a “free lunch”, there’s only prostitution you buy in installments.
Women are like pre-paid cell phones you can use with your dick.
I have no problem with whores. In fact, I love them. Prostitution and monkey-rape is why we’re all here today — but men are why vaccines and plasma TVs are here. If it were possible to respect a woman, I might even respect one who knew what she was and embraced it, instead of drowning her shame in designer handbags and abusive boyfriends.
I’m not going to stop using a perfectly accurate term just because it’s upsetting to women. Holding your tongue because it upsets women is a slippery slope that ends in your penis getting cut off. Besides, the only real reason women hate being called “whores” is the same reason they hate beer: they’re fucking stupid.
Indiana Jones was a box-office smash because all men are clever, resilient, and bad-ass mavericks. Jaws was a success because all men could fuck up a shark with their bear hands. Pretty Woman was a success because all women are whores. Imagine a movie that featured you kicking Hitler’s balls so hard, you traveled back in time and fucked Heidi Klum the day before her 18th birthday. That’s basically the film Pretty Woman: every woman’s ultimate fantasy.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 32 … 21 20 19 18 17 [16] 15 14 13 12 11 … 1 » Show All
There are exactly four reasons to watch Charmed, and they all belong to Alyssa Milano and Rose McGowan.
As near as I can tell, the moment they got rid of the original third sister (the actress’ name escapes me), the costumers correctly decided that they needed something to draw male viewers. So they started dressing Milano and McGowan exclusively in low-cut, skin-tight, slinky outfits and forbade them underwear.
Hell, in one episode, they even stuck Milano in a mermaid costume with only pasties covering her tits. Google “Alyssa Milano mermaid” and you tell me if that isn’t worth gawking at. I’d've given major portions of my anatomy to be one of the grips who had to haul her around in that costume the week they shot that episode.
And then there was the episode where they had Milano give a lap-dance …
Furthermore, in any given episode you’ll see them wandering around with their headlights on for a good fifteen minutes. Knowing something about movie-making, I really chuckle at that.
I mean, think of it: for continuity, the girls would actually have to make sure their nipples were hard before the cameras rolled. Can you imagine Milano or McGowen standing on the set before a shot pinching their nipples to make sure that they matched the rest of the shots for that scene?
Or how about when the director had to yell “Cut!” and then come and tell McGowan, “I’m sorry, honey, but we’re not seeing your nipples clearly. Would you go rub some ice cubes on them or something? And make it quick — time is money.”
I’m always amazed that the show even pretended to be something other than a Milano/McGowan T&A fest. I’m sure the costume department had no such illusions.
Again, Google “Alyssa Milano mermaid” and then come back. :)
I know many girls that are about my weight, just a lil over. They’re not over weight either.
I doubt I’ll be mortified at how I look now, perhaps giggle. But I don’t wanna look like those 40 year old women that wear their pants up to high, with their shirt tucked in, whist wearing a straw hat. At least not now, maybe in a couple of years that’ll be attractive to me, not now. I’ll dress how I wanna dress, you know why? Coz it means NOTHING. All it is, is different styled and coloured cloth that protects my body from the harsh enviorment, so I’ll make it fun and pick what cloth I want today. It maybe different from the cloth I pick tomorrow but I deal with that tomorrow.
You might not be on the same planet we are. Good luck finding to many women who weigh 110 pounds. Your point is well taken. That’s why 15 years from now your going to be mortified at the way you dressed.
You’re superficial aren’t you? Extra 30 pounds that most women carry? What exactly is this weight limit? Coz I think I’d be very unhealthy if I was a mere 80 pounds.Any, thats what an extra 13 Kilo….so what??
The fashion thing, just translates to women like to experiment. Have fun and be different.
And you can tell the 60’s, I’ll give back my hipsters when I’m ready.
Men are so used to no days being devoted to their causes how the hell was I supposed to know? The 60s called and they do want huggers back. The extra 30 pounds of lard most women carry dont make them look to appealing. If you read anything Dick has posted you would know women look ridiculous fashion wise later on. That is compared to men.
It’s movember, dumbass. Its a campaign where men are sponsored to grow mustaches to bring awareness to and fund research for male depression and Prostate Cancer.
Well, last time I checked bellbottoms haven’t been around for a good 5 -7 years and you got a problem with hip huggers? They’re comfy, try them…..or don’t. Second thought, don’t. Please don’t. Anyway, what you want women wearing their pants up their armpits again?
It is November dumbass. If deciding what’s in and what’s out means bellbottoms and hiphuggers your generation sucks.
no. You see, I am the youth of today which means I decide what in and out, and I say mustaches are out. Yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk.
Right. This era.
Mustaches should be reserved for movember. And old men, that grew up in the era where mustaches were cool.
It’s the moustache Dick. :D
Man it’s like a magnet to women.
I didn’t say you would want to. I said you don’t look like you could hold your own in a fight, and I come to this conclusion after comparing you to the men around me. Gee get with it dicko.
Why would I want to fight the men around you?
-Dick
Dick’s not hot. The mustache is kinda weird, all it does is remind me of the old west. Facial hair can be hot, maybe 2 day old stubble, that can look hot - but not mustaches.
He doesn’t look like he could hold his own in a fight either. At least compared to the men around me.
You stupid, ignorant fucking asshole!!! Had you READ this entire website, instead of simply coming here and throwing up your naive and immature opinions all over us, you would know that Dick’s Mother is an angel and a very graceful woman!!!
Why are YOU so fucking concerned about Dick’s mustache? Are you bald? Or does male, facial hair male you hot????? It’s okay to adamit it……
BUT NOT HERE YOU FUCKING FAG!!!! You seem SO angry, why is that? I’ll tell you, it’s because you think Dick is hot, and his picture made it wiggle.
Just go away, OH WAIT!!!!! SHUT THE FUCK UP AND GET ME A BEER!!!!!! You pussy motherfuck*r!!!!!!!
Dakota Smith: (Sorry MANSVOICE) First, fuck that!!!!! You admitted to watching charmed? I’ve never seen it, and never will!!! Unless you can give a seriously valid point why you did? Which I doubt! And unmuting the volume on a “rare impulse” is not woking for me. Your man card has been suspended/revoked until further notice!!! That’s not fucking cool at all!! Ball up would ya? You paid WAY too much fucking attention to that episode???? Sorry, but a real MAN would have NEVER done that. PERIOD!!!!! I’m a little worried!! What’s going on with you bro?
THIS post IS about ALL women being whores!!! And 99.9% of them are!!! Do we still need to argue that point? Haven’t we proven it over and over again?????
Dick: I ask again, can’t you set up a seperate blog for just the bitches? Just for them to whine and complain?
That way you will leave the MEN to get down to and solve our SERIOUS MAN business!!!
Don’t get me wrong, I love a good debate, however, I am sick of arguing my MANLY point’s with stupid bitches that just don’t get it. They should have ONE page to go to, and if any man WANTS to go there, then he can.
But if he chooses not to, then he/we shouldn’t have to deal with all of this pussified, feminist, I am woman hear me roar bullshit!!!!
OH.. BY THE WAY.. DO YOU HAPPEN TO HAVE A MOTHER? JUST WONDERING WHAT DOES SHE THINK OF HER OH SO NAUSEATING, IGNORANT AND PATHETIC SON?
1) YOU ARE SO RIGHT WHEN YOU SAY THAT VACCINES AND PLASMA ARE HERE BECAUSE OF MEN… THINK ABOUT IT: WITHOUT MEN THERE WILL BE LESS INFECTIOUS DISEASES, AND SINCE YOU WOULDN´T BE DOING STUPID THINGS WE WOULDN´T NEED TO WATCH THEM OVER AND OVER AGAIN.
2) YOUR *MANMAZING MUSTACHE* THAT MAKES YOU LOOK LOKE TOM SELLECK… OK PLAIN PATHETIC… BUT IF THAT´S YOUR FANTAZY OK…
3) KEEP THINKING LIKE THAT! PLEASE! THAT IS JUST GOING TO MAKE YOU LESS APPEALING FOR US *OH THE MUSTACHE* AND YOU WILL NEVER REPRODUCE…
The wage gap theory again? The patriarchy “glass ceiling” again?
Assumption:The research has proven,on multiple occasions, that the average income for a women is significantly lower than that of a man’s.
This may be true. But there are reasons for this, such as:
1. The type of occupation chosen by the employee
2. The level of education of the employee
3. The firm that the employee works for.
4. Willingness to work well (and overtime)
The US Bureau of the Census states in its Feb 1995 statistical brief “Two Different Worlds: Men and Women From 9 to 5″ that:
Although the Equal Pay Act of 1963 outlaws differential pay for men and women in the same occupation and in the same firm, this study shows that a large component of gender pay differences result from men and women working in different firms. Moreover, the reasons for which men and women work in different firms (pastry shops vs. gun shops) may bear no relationship to discrimination, and thus, there may be no discriminatory component to this aspect of pay differentials between men and women.
Assumption 2:The average woman, with a Master’s degree, will earn the same amout as a man with no high school diploma.
It has nothing to do with education, experience or child care. Those are factors considered when looking into the research, this is after all factors such as those have been weighed with adjustments made accordingly.
Please take a look at this table here (compiled using Census Bureau data) to better understand the reasons for the differences in gender pay.
PLUS, do note that it is expected that on the principles of economics, demand and supply, what is in demand will be more well received(ie well paid) therefore engineering which is traditionally and usually male dominated usually pays better than say teaching which is usually female dominated.
Wimbledon Scandal: Women paid equal as men.
Note: Women play best out of 3 sets while men play best out of 5 sets.
Source: http://randomratio.blogspot.com/2006…rve-equal.html
This is not about equal rights or entertainers. At present women can get far more money for less work pro rata by claiming equality. Equality is about equal pay for equal work or value and it is in fact unfair and a distortion of the argument to claim that whilst still insisting on doing less. As a lawyer I would suggest that the argument that they should by right get the same money for doing only three fifths of the work would not stand up under any equality legislation or principles
Dont kid yourself. You are no-where in the same league as Dakota. All the women on this site added together cannot match up to his man-brain.
You are an extraordinary aberration, then. Here’s just one small example of the social reinforcement for men paying for women:
I happened to be watching Charmed the other day (with the volume muted, for the Alyssa Milano and Rose McGowan T&A fest). In one scene, Rose McGowan’s character is out to lunch with some guy. Everything’s going fine, and even with the volume down and staring at McGowan’s hard nipples, I can tell that the scene is being played that she’s getting smitten with the guy.
On a rare impulse, I unmuted the volume and listened to McGowan gibber about her feelings for a while. Then the lunch is over and it comes time to pay the check.
The guy asks what the tab is. McGowan tells him. He coughs up half, and McGowan’s face instantly goes to bitch-mode. The guy takes off, and McGowan calls Holly Marie Combs to tell her that McGowan just had lunch with “a cad.”
Now, while TV isn’t reality, the fact that the writers could dream up this scene without thinking that it made McGowan’s character look like the shallow little whore that she was, and that two of the female show’s stars are also producers with content control didn’t bat an eyelash either says volumes about what women expect from men. I’d go so far as to say that none of the female viewers thought McGowan’s character was a shallow bitch.
Women as a group expect men to pay for them. It’s nice that you’re among the statistically insignificant few that don’t, but the fact is that you’re statistically insignificant.
Trust me: if you want a relationship to end immediately, just offer to split the cost of a date. You’ll never hear from the woman again.
I know. It takes multiple dates and lots of money for them to believe that you’ve paid enough.
I’ve never had a woman buy me a diamond stud earring. I, on the other hand, have bought diamond earrings for women. You cannot compare what little money a woman may condescend to shell out over the course of relationship to that which a man is expected to shell out or be deemed “a cad.”
I apparently wasn’t clear. I don’t think women want sex. Women in general don’t like sex. The only one I’ve met who really did was bi-polar and hypersexuality was a symptom of her disorder.
Women want money. They want cash and/or expensive gifts. That’s fine, a hooker wants cash, too. The difference is that a hooker expects to give you sex in return while the average woman only expects to get money or expensive gifts.
I used to. Then I wised up. If I have money to spend on them, women want to spend time with me. If I don’t, I might as well not exist.
That’s utter nonsense.
My last family law attorney — a woman — told me point blank, and I quote:
“Dakota, you’re an able-bodied white man holding down a job. You’re going to get screwed. That’s just the way the law is set up. You’re going to lose your possessions, your kids, and keep paying for the rest of your life. Don’t be disappointed when that happens: it’s just the way the laws are set up. You’re not doing anything wrong, that’s what always happens to men because that’s how the law works. If you were a minority or somehow disabled, you’d do better, but as it is, you’re going to lose everything.
“You have a choice: you can pay lots of money to fight for you and still lose, or you can pay me less money and lose. Either way, you’re going to lose because that’s how the law works.”
The law is structured to specifically screw men in divorce. The woman always makes out like a bandit, which is in part why divorce rates are so high. If you can behave like an abusive bitch and still get money even after the man shows you to the curb, what impetus would you have to be civil?
Also nonsense.
In my particular case, my ex earns $30K more annually than I do, yet I still go home with less than half of what I earn.
No, the fact is that since the women’s voting block has become important, women have induced the law to be structured entirely in their favor. It totally victimizes the man, typically at the real expense of any children produced in the marriage.
Marriage/divorce is a profitable business for women to get into. No wonder men no longer want to get married. I certainly advise young men not to do it, since there’s at least a 50% chance that he’ll wind up with a bitch, show her to the curb, and still pay for her existence for the rest of his life. If he doesn’t show her to the curb, his existence will be miserable.
Better to never make the mistake in the first place.