Women Would Vote for Hitler
A woman voting on anything other than American Idol or her personal favorite type of chocolate is like watching a small child run full speed into a wall. Clearly the fundamentals are understood. The child runs, it’s going somewhere and there’s no doubt about that. The child can run. But very quickly one comes to the understanding that somewhere, somehow, the process has been perverted. Then comes the wall. Then comes the crying.
Women would vote for Hitler. Not because a woman could be talked into buying a catsup Popsicle while she was wearing white gloves, but because women are all fascists.
Don’t believe me? Let’s leave the constant threat of castration out of it for the moment. That makes it a slam dunk in my book, but that’s fine. Women are just “joking” whenever they play fascism card #1.
How about oppressive dictatorship by force or threat of violence?
Anyone who’s married will tell you a lot of things. The first of which will be, “Don’t get fucking married for any reason you dumb shit.” But a likely secondary is that marriage is not a democracy. What is it then?
Marriage is a fascist dictatorship of oppression — and so is any relationship with a woman. Work, professional, “professional”; they’re all the same. If you don’t like the flavor of the Kool-Aid and you want to add some mix, prepare to have a wailing siren of bullshit go off in your ear. That’s assault and that’s oppression. That’s enforcing your opinion through the threat of violence. If you press the issue, prepare to receive the threat of withheld friendship — or even sex whether it’s applicable or not! There was another man who pulled the same kind of shit. Yep, Hitler.
The biggest women/fascism link is a woman’s reliance on violence. Women will be the first to hit during any kind of dispute. It’s not even a percentage. It’s as much of a guarantee as it is that the sun will rise tomorrow. And as men we can all understand that the sun rises because it’s actually a star that our planet rotates around, therefore it is guaranteed to rise. We are able to remove ourselves from our personal point of view and understand that the sun isn’t rising at all. It’s actually us who are spinning around the sun. Women don’t even fucking know that.
Every morning when a woman wakes up at the crack of 10:30 she’s thrilled to shit to see that the sun’s in the sky again and her fake orange tan will look just as radiant as it did yesterday. That’s one of the biggest reasons why women shouldn’t vote. They don’t know fucking anything about anything. They know nothing.
But that’s not why women would vote for Hitler if given the chance. Say what you want about the merits of an individual ethos of governments as you will. You’re all men and therefore deserve the right to express opinion unmitigated by slander or censure. What I’m saying is that by an intrinsic party affiliation — fascist — all women would check the box marked ‘Kill Or Savagely Beat Anyone Who Doesn’t Agree With Me’. That fact has always held women back more than any mythical glass ceiling.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 107 … 105 104 103 102 101 [100] 99 98 97 96 95 … 1 » Show All
You can can sigh all you want. You should really respond to the challenges of your first rant, before you come in lay more of that stuff on us.
Well now you’re going to ruin my fun and I’ll have to leave. I’m a card carrying female.
But I’m just so amazed by this site. I haven’t done anything wrong to anyone. I mind my own business and I read and I collect records and watch old movies and I have lots of male friends and sometimes boyfriends who I have done nothing mean to nor have I allowed them to do so to me. This will be my last time on the site but now you guys be honest. Why should I be despised? What have I done wrong? Why are you so angry? I get along really well with men and none of the stuff you guys are describing is familiar to me at all.
Nonsense, we live in a society that tries to impose a view of reality upon us that we don’t agree with. It’s perfectly legitimate to satirize that.
We’re not complaining, we’re having a laugh.
Sigh! Actually I assumed everyone knew this stuff but I’ll go back to basics. The feminist movement was, as you say, a movement started up by wealthy white women and it was quite out of touch with the problems of poorer women but black feminists in the 70s voiced their views on this and the movement didn’t quite split but something close. Today this is a very common argument and many women from the less wealthy camp are actually Marxist-feminists for these reasons. Those women would probably say to you that men and women in the power elite are indeed to blame for legislation which discriminates against poor and marginalised women. But they would identify patriarchy and capitalism as the structures that lead to these forms of unecessary human suffering.
You guys seem to think the world is full of man-hating feminists. I’ve never met one and from where I’m standing the world is full of very docile women who have crushingly low self esteem. I suppose that’s thanks to the fact that the kind of men who go on this site sometimes have daughters. I realise the irony of me being on the site and saying that but I can’t stop reading this stuff! It’s fascinating!
@ Bagel
Hey, Let’s make a deal. Lets open all cards, be frank and honst. First thing I want to know if you are a man or a woman?
I mean, I was totally not at my computer for a while! Genius.
I give up now. So many questions have been asked and with one exception they are too simple minded to even begin answering. The dominance of men in society is so blatantly true that I’m not even going to get into that because I don’t believe that any of you truly think that they are more priveleged. Everyone here throws around accusations of stupidity yet it is definitely the most laughably ignorant site I’ve ever seen.
I’ll try to put this simply. If you were confident in your own worth as a human being and you had some positive experiences with women as a result of their attraction to you, you would not be on here inventing statistics and saying ‘chicks are, like, totally not smart and I, like, am.’ It just wouldn’t happen.
Can none of you see the transparent psychology of all this? Saying that women only want guys with money for example actually means- ‘women reject me because I am an unpleasant and fundamentally unlovable person but I’d rather think it’s the money’ (the ego can’t handle that kind of bashing so it must shape the world to reflect itself in a more flattering way). Ok?
You might get some tragic girl with Daddy issues who probably had something awful happen to her as a child to suck your balls but that’s a very empty person’s lot and I have enough faith in human beings to believe that you’re not actually happy with that.
Yep And a “person” called bagel has vanished,
It was enough just to ask a question
Guys, I mean if you are talking to a cunt it seems all you have to do here is to ask a question and they won’t respond because they go totally blank. If you insult them they can come back with an insult, but ansevering a question seems too much of a challange.
bagel was impying to be an expert on relationships with women, probably being one, but that’s not even important. Our society gives to women a licence to be experts on realtionships. Guess what, women know shit about it. Im always astonished how little they know about relationships. No wander women have loved me so much, because I know exactly how it works and they never do.
I mean this bagel person is totaly wrong, cos women only know how to destroy a relatioship. If I did not know that and if I did not know what to do and when, many times my realtionship with a women would be over very quickly. But I am a very passionate and patient fellow and I study my realtionship with women with a passion.
I understand some of you have problems with relationships with women very well and let me tell you this; never let a woman lead your relationship, she is gonna scream, cry, go nuts and whatever she does it’s just a big booo. Deep inside she knows that she doesn’t have a clue and that you are the man.
Man, your so right. I mean really. It’s so true. Women are just so weak and stupid almost all the time. I mean they are great things to fuck but other than that, what’s the point. Well thanks for making this site. It’s so true.
Oh by the way on the topic of your assumption and who you are adressing ; So it happens that I happen to be an expert on relationships with women. Im confident that if there were world’s championships in expertise on relationships with women I would be the champion of the world. Just to illustrate, my gf just send me 3 messages and one email just today telling me among many other things that when she returns from her business trip to USA she is gonna lick my dick, balls, ass and toes and also she has a gift for me.
Also keep in mind the Chris - another poster here is a champion at picking up women,
So, are you sure you want to scare us, that we wont “find” a gf???
You have to be pretty far gone to compare modern western women to Jews. Western women, the most pampered and privileged creatures on the planet, who get virtually everything they demand even if it’s completely unreasonable, who can kill or mutilate their husbands in their sleep and walk away unpunished, who can have a man thrown in jail on their say-so. Just like the Jews, eh?
And there is this: does not feminism try to blame MEN for all women’s ills? Hasn’t it been blaming MEN since its inception? Why does it never blame the Power Elite for ordinary women’s lack of childcare facilities, ‘opportunities’ and so on? Why does it always blame men as a class, when working/middle class men have no real say in those issues? Also, why does feminism pretend that women are a united class despite enormous disparities between say, wealthy elite white women and black ghetto women? Why cannot feminism be viewed as self-delusional according to the same criteria you apply to this site?
Answers please, if you have any.
Well, I myself am a male separatist: I have as little to do with Anglo-American women as is humanly possible, in any context.
But this is not a political site, as such. Also, I seriously doubt that large numbers of males withdrawing their consent from society and refusing to marry/breed as their forefathers did is being greeted with too many hurrahs from Bohemian Grove - after all, where are the next generation of exploited workers to come from, without such participation? Immigration, you will probably say: but that is fraught with far more problems than trying to bring men back ‘onside’. The issue of the ‘Marriage Strike’ and increasing male reluctance to engage with their traditional responsibilities IS becoming a topic of mainstream, even elite, discourse. Also, you say people laugh at this website - that’s the idea: it is a funny website. It uses humour and hyperbole in a post-modern context to make some very pertinent points. Humour, as Nietzsche said, can be a potent weapon.
Are you saying we men should forget about women and never have anything to do with them or talk about them?
Work is the morality of slaves and this modern world has no need for slavery
Here’s an article that refutes the idea that the working classes voted Hitler into power
According to this article the NSDAP attracted voters from all social backgrounds:
If there is little dispute about the politics of Germany’s so-called old Mittelstand, there is rather more about the political identity of the new Mittelstand (white-collar workers). It was once thought that this group (roughly 20 per cent of the German labour force) shared the status anxieties of its older counterpart and their Nazi politics; but there is only limited evidence to support this contention and the voting behaviour of white-collar workers was tar from uniform, with civil servants more likely to register higher levels of support for Hitler than their counterparts within the private sector. There were divisions even within that sector, as sales assistants and supervisory, rather than technical staff were more likely to vote Nazi, while white-collar workers from manual backgrounds and those who lived in the working-class districts of large cities often gave their votes to the SPD.
The National Socialists also won the backing of significant numbers of Protestants from both the upper middle class and the manual working class. There is considerable evidence, for example, of Nazi voting on the part of Protestants living in some of the wealthiest districts of Hamburg and Berlin. This, together with the voting returns from upper-class holiday resorts and even cruise liners, indicates that sections of the upper middle class also voted for Hitler at the height of the economic and political crisis of 1932; such support had been withheld earlier, and party membership among this group still remained a rarity.
Considerable attention has been devoted to the appeal of Nazism to many in the professions such as doctors and engineers, as well as civil servants, leading some to claim that anti-modernism provides the key to Hitler’s triumph. A vast literature has also been devoted to the relationship between the Nazis and big business. It is fairly clear that big business was less likely to support the NSDAP than small business; that the party allegiances of individual industrialists varied; and that Fritz Thyssen’s membership of and donations to the Nazi Party were a typical of the business community as a whole. The Nazi Party was largely self-financing, and industrial money was most likely to find its way into the coffers of the DNVP and DVP, though some concerns (such as Flick) did spread their donations over virtually all bourgeois parties, including the NSDAP, as a kind of political insurance. Of course, industry was not hostile to welfare taxation and the power of the unions, which it saw as the essence of Weimar; and by 1932 many industrialists wanted to be rid of the Republic. Most, however, would have preferred a solution that excluded the Nazis.
More contentious has been the relationship between workers and the Nazi Party. Recent research has revised the impression of working-class immunity to Nazism: around 55 per cent of SA stormtroopers came from working-class backgrounds and the Nazis made substantial gains from working-class communities in parts of Saxony, especially around Chemnitz. Around 40 per cent of members of the Party seem to have been of working-class origins; similarly 40 per cent of the Nazi vote came from workers and one worker in every four voted for Hitler in July 1932.
I don’t think working class men have much political consciousness at all. It’s not until they end up in divorce and family court that they start to realize something’s wrong. And all they typically do is lose their temper or get drunk.
If working class men knew what was going on they wouldn’t be voting for their worst enemies.
I theorize female-entitlement is a problem that hurts educated men in the middle class (like me) more than men in any other class. The reason is we would like to mate with an educated woman in the middle class, and to some degree we were all brainwashed by feminism desiminated by the media and NOW into thinking that these kind of women would be attracted to us and fall in love with us. Well, feminism has produced educated women but instinct compels them to date beyond the middle class because they are only drawn to men “better” than them. If a man is lucky enough to have an equal marry him, entitlement could take hold and lead to her divorcing him and his financial and mental destruction. In the later case, the divorce laws and the female need for emotional attachment for sex have set up a situation for her to be easily made unhappy if the make is not performing to her expectations and to take off. Hence, what middle class educated men are left with are women at the bottom of the barallel, if any.
This condescending snob approach is at least better than the usual ‘you are gay and can’t get laid’ drivel. But it’s still a shaming tactic. Problem with that is, bagel dear, we don’t have any shame.
Didn’t take long for Bagel to drag Hitler into it, did it? Godwin’s law strikes again.
Godwin’s Law is often cited in online discussions as a caution against the use of inflammatory rhetoric or exaggerated comparisons, and is often conflated with fallacious arguments of the reductio ad Hitlerum form.