Women Would Vote for Hitler

A woman voting on anything other than American Idol or her personal favorite type of chocolate is like watching a small child run full speed into a wall. Clearly the fundamentals are understood. The child runs, it’s going somewhere and there’s no doubt about that. The child can run. But very quickly one comes to the understanding that somewhere, somehow, the process has been perverted. Then comes the wall. Then comes the crying.

Women would vote for Hitler. Not because a woman could be talked into buying a catsup Popsicle while she was wearing white gloves, but because women are all fascists.

Don’t believe me? Let’s leave the constant threat of castration out of it for the moment. That makes it a slam dunk in my book, but that’s fine. Women are just “joking” whenever they play fascism card #1.

How about oppressive dictatorship by force or threat of violence?

Anyone who’s married will tell you a lot of things. The first of which will be, “Don’t get fucking married for any reason you dumb shit.” But a likely secondary is that marriage is not a democracy. What is it then?

Marriage is a fascist dictatorship of oppression — and so is any relationship with a woman. Work, professional, “professional”; they’re all the same. If you don’t like the flavor of the Kool-Aid and you want to add some mix, prepare to have a wailing siren of bullshit go off in your ear. That’s assault and that’s oppression. That’s enforcing your opinion through the threat of violence. If you press the issue, prepare to receive the threat of withheld friendship — or even sex whether it’s applicable or not! There was another man who pulled the same kind of shit. Yep, Hitler.

The biggest women/fascism link is a woman’s reliance on violence. Women will be the first to hit during any kind of dispute. It’s not even a percentage. It’s as much of a guarantee as it is that the sun will rise tomorrow. And as men we can all understand that the sun rises because it’s actually a star that our planet rotates around, therefore it is guaranteed to rise. We are able to remove ourselves from our personal point of view and understand that the sun isn’t rising at all. It’s actually us who are spinning around the sun. Women don’t even fucking know that.

Every morning when a woman wakes up at the crack of 10:30 she’s thrilled to shit to see that the sun’s in the sky again and her fake orange tan will look just as radiant as it did yesterday. That’s one of the biggest reasons why women shouldn’t vote. They don’t know fucking anything about anything. They know nothing.

But that’s not why women would vote for Hitler if given the chance. Say what you want about the merits of an individual ethos of governments as you will. You’re all men and therefore deserve the right to express opinion unmitigated by slander or censure. What I’m saying is that by an intrinsic party affiliation — fascist — all women would check the box marked ‘Kill Or Savagely Beat Anyone Who Doesn’t Agree With Me’. That fact has always held women back more than any mythical glass ceiling.

Related Articles:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

2085 Comments in 2073 threads.»

Pages: « 10416 15 14 13 12 [11] 10 9 8 7 61 » Show All

Comment by gwallan
2006-08-25 23:50:24

wolfe said:

@gwallan. Your trophy, alas, is virtual, but carries no less honour were it extant in the real world.

The weird thing is, if anything, Blair was more enthusiastic about Iraq than Bush. Not saying that doesn’t make him a Bush puppet (though I think he’s not… I think there’s something altogether stranger and more complex at work there). I found Anthony Seldon’s biography of Blair very revealing in that respect.

The other (amusing) thing is that Blair was generally viewed by most on the American center/right as being a total suckup to Bill Clinton. Go figure.

Certainly post-Suez, it seems very difficult for a British PM to appear as anything in between ‘frosty’ and ’suckup’ to the Americans.

I think Thatcher actually managed it; indeed, she seemed to be wearing the pants when it came to persuading Bush ‘41 on Iraq in ‘91. Remember the infamous ‘backbone transplant’ line. Other than that? Can’t think of Cons. or Lab. who have recently.

-wolfe

We Aussies have seen too much of John Howard’s arse licking I suspect and automatically assume that Blair is doing the same thing.
It was during one of the shrub’s visits to Aus that Mark Latham delivered what is perhaps the most descriptive line I’ve ever heard. He referred to the government MPs standing around waiting to meet Bush as a “conga line of suckholes”. Their fawning sycophancy was utterly sickening.

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-08-25 12:24:19

@gwallan. Your trophy, alas, is virtual, but carries no less honour were it extant in the real world.

The weird thing is, if anything, Blair was more enthusiastic about Iraq than Bush. Not saying that doesn’t make him a Bush puppet (though I think he’s not… I think there’s something altogether stranger and more complex at work there). I found Anthony Seldon’s biography of Blair very revealing in that respect.

The other (amusing) thing is that Blair was generally viewed by most on the American center/right as being a total suckup to Bill Clinton. Go figure.

Certainly post-Suez, it seems very difficult for a British PM to appear as anything in between ‘frosty’ and ’suckup’ to the Americans.

I think Thatcher actually managed it; indeed, she seemed to be wearing the pants when it came to persuading Bush ‘41 on Iraq in ‘91. Remember the infamous ‘backbone transplant’ line. Other than that? Can’t think of Cons. or Lab. who have recently.

-wolfe

 
Comment by gwallan
2006-08-25 04:14:18

wolfe said:

Darn. If I hadn’t already picked a ‘funniest line of the week’ — gwallan’s “I felt like a heel”, sony’s would be it.

-wolfe

So where’s my trophy?

Personally I reckon sony’s the winner even though my leftie leanings don’t allow any positives re Maggie T.
On the other hand Tony IS the number one ticket holder in Bush’s Bitches.

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-08-22 15:59:48

Much obliged. Though perhaps we should take better care not to offend British sensitivities. After all, we mustn’t forget missis Tony is George’s wife now.

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-08-16 12:49:26

Darn. If I hadn’t already picked a ‘funniest line of the week’ — gwallan’s “I felt like a heel”, sony’s would be it.

-wolfe

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-08-16 04:20:53

Tony Blair’s a man? Wow. Guess you learn new stuff all your life.

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-08-15 21:53:35

Welcome to the site Mr. Dilly. Stay around, check out the forums and register there. You’ll find lots to occupy you in the archives and in active, intelligent discussions.

As for “dead before Female Led”, I’ll say this. Margaret Thatcher was more of a man than Tony Blair.

‘Nuff said.

-wolfe

 
Comment by Mr.Dilly
2006-08-15 14:16:42

The scary thought is the day a woman runs for president.
All the feminists will surely amount behind whoever the woman is.
Imagine if a national disaster happends on the woman’s “Red Tide” week..
Need I say anymore?

Dead before Female Led.

 
Comment by Alex Martin
2006-08-13 19:10:03

Women would vote for Hitler because they might think his mustache is cute.

Or they might see him as a bad boy who needs taming.

Or they might like the fact that he kills jews because women like a man in power.

Women will do go for any guy depending on what her period says.

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-08-10 19:08:15

Naomi, reading what you write is painful to my eyes and brain. I shall quote what I said in some other thread you’d posted in:

Naomi. Please use paragraphs. Please spell check. “steriotypes? ? What you say is not unreasonable, (though it’s hard to decypher it through the wall of text).

Respect yourself as being worthy of the time you spend posting, and respect those to whom you post. (Otherwise, if you’re posting trash to people you think are idiots, you can’t think much of the value of your own time now, can you?)

Welcome to a site that will not be very friendly to you, and I hope the universe will unfold as it should for you.

Please, please, write cogently. For your own sake if no one elses.
-wolfe

 
Comment by Naomi
2006-08-09 11:31:13

Why can’t we all just get along. I posted a comment on the pay pump and go blog i believe, Or maybe it was the bralless feminit site one. As I said before, I have not gone to the site because I find myself neither a feminist or siding with the men. I think the pinnacle of being a human being is when you find someone where none of those things matter. Where you can both draw each others attention to eachothers “fuck ups” That maybe didn’t come out quite right. Yes most women are attention whores, Yes most women act like a dictatorship in relationships, as men have their faults as well. The key is to be who you are and try and realize that steriotypes exist, they will never go away, and to try and live with them. If being a woman you know that you aren’t the way that men describe then why worry about it? If you must be an attention whore, then atleast strive for respectful attention, and glory :-)

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-08-05 10:36:01

Welcome to the site, winter1.

The Fountainhead: By Ayn Rand? Great philosophy, mediocre writing. We discussed her elsewhere on this site, you can google.

Get a new keyboard when you can. A working one shouldn’t be more then #5 at the right second-hand shop; forego a couple of beers.

Respect for men is largely a generation off I suspect.

Enjoy the site. Stick around and have some fun.
-wolfe

 
Comment by winter1
2006-08-04 16:40:29

wow,

what us this site guys…. I just kind of found it. You know I got a first class honors degree and still my wife beats me all the time (verbally. ALso my keyboard is broken so some letters don’t come out right, like close brackets, sorry about that. Can we win the battle, I love the book called the fountainhead now thats what it is all about. My wife thinks I am insane with my music, I love to make music but she thinks its cra, maybe it is but I think its great and so do all the other men (well those with a brain who like anything outside of he charts, maybe men can be taken seriously oneday. I am not saying by any stretch women are uselss cos they aren’t. I just wish we men could be resected a little more.

w

 
Comment by The Machine
2006-08-04 01:45:41

Stimulation said:

And that also brings another point up. The more women learn and read. The harder it will be for a guy to have the last word. Knowledge is power, and being able to out think, out talk, reason over someone i.e. a woman, then the easier marriage you will have. So really the only thing I can say is to fucking just pick up a book and be smarter than them. Take a class at your local college on psychology or something.

I’m rambling now I think, oh well. Back to counter-strike xD

It doesn’t really matter my friend. Women will always have the last word. Anything the man says is the beginning of a NEW arguement !

 
Comment by The Machine
2006-08-04 01:41:49

Stonecoldjohnnyk said:

Okay, first let me say that I’ve never seen this site before today and it’s kinda depressing… I wish I’d discovered it LONG before I got married! If my hooke… Umm, I mean: wife, were to see this (and she will since she’s ALWAYS snooping on the ‘net to make sure I’m not on a dating site or something) she’d be CERTAIN to threaten me with violence. I liked what you said about women being the first ones to hit during any dispute because I’ve never seen anything more accurate! Here’s the deal: Women KNOW they can get away with hitting a guy. A woman can hit a guy and it’s called “self-defense” but if a guy hits a woman it’s called “abuse” or “battery”. What a load of crap!!!! No one can tell me that a woman can’t infilict major damage either, especially with them damn claws they spend SO much time on!!! I’ve got a permanent scar from a woman raking her claws down my forearm. Anyway… I’m glad I finally discovered this site and will frequent it as much as I possibly can.

More true words have not been written ! But I have an alternative strategy ! When you are overcome with the feelings of “hit ! hit ! hit !” the irrational provoker RATHER substitute those feelings with “smash ! break ! destroy !” and apply these feelings to her possesions ! Having already mentally prepared yourself for the locations and individual “weaknesses” of each item and how those “weaknesses” can best be exploited !

I guarantee this will have BETTER results regarding how it affects her, although you will have to apply the discipline of delayed gratification.

 
Comment by diamatik
2006-07-29 09:47:18

This nonsense really pisses me off.

All these queefs coming on this great website with all their crappy use of caps, horrible punctuation, shitty grammar, their HAHAHA’s, LOL’s and other shit is rather annoying.

This site is by men, for men. We men come here to have intelligent discssion, but this is often interrupted by outbursts from the lesser gender and manginas.

I wouldn’t mind if what those idiots were saying said had sense to it, but reading their posts is like being bukakked with stupidity.

 
Comment by Pete
2006-07-28 11:23:36

Pixie said:

Iambetterthanyou said:

I originally posted here because you all seemed like that sort of people I like to make fun of. After seeing how incredibly seriously you all take yourselves I have only one thing left to say: Thank you for making me laugh. Now I will GET OF THIS SITE before I turn into one of you.

HAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAA yeah they make me laugh too

haaha . they also made me laugh. oohman some pleople could be so stupid.

 
Comment by Stimulation
2006-07-21 17:25:53

And that also brings another point up. The more women learn and read. The harder it will be for a guy to have the last word. Knowledge is power, and being able to out think, out talk, reason over someone i.e. a woman, then the easier marriage you will have. So really the only thing I can say is to fucking just pick up a book and be smarter than them. Take a class at your local college on psychology or something.

I’m rambling now I think, oh well. Back to counter-strike xD

 
Comment by Stimulation
2006-07-21 17:22:42

Can’t say I dissagree with your point that women are very violent in a situation like a fight or an argument. Women always have their nails out and are ready to attack. But being able to handle these situations can be the difference between a good marriage and a bad one?.. :O

It is no surprise that women are more emotional and that’s because (I believe) they use their left brain more often. The left brain being the more artistic side and more emotional side. While the right side, the one most men use, is more analytical i.e. mathematics. I could of mixed up the two

So why try to make them out to be Nazis when they are just women being what they are, emotional - almost unstable at times in heated arguments or fights. Every man knows they are moody, so my opinion is that you are trying to over analyze that something that is apart of them to the point where you want to make them into a very bad person just because of what they are. If your a good of enough man, you will be able to calm her down and even work out problems. Being a good talker and a good listener can go a long way to having a good relationship with women. That’s the end point, you can’t live without women and you can’t live with them. =/

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2006-07-20 05:06:54

Stonecoldjohnnyk said:

Anyway… I’m glad I finally discovered this site and will frequent it as much as I possibly can.

Welcome to the site, Stonecoldjohnnyk. Sorry to hear about your marriage.

-Dick

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis